No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vineyards At Fowler

1306 East Sumner Avenue, Fowler, CA 93625 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 49 certified beds · (559) 834-2542 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
119 S 6th St · (559) 834-1614 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3020 San Antonio Dr · (559) 344-6945 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
220 E Merced St · (559) 834-3854 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%9.8%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.2%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.0%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.882.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.841.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
36.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.2%CMS range 33.2–75.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
59.6%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 44.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2021-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven of 13 sampled residents (Residents 10, 11, 13, 25, 32, 33, and 36) received diabetic (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired) management care in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 10 did not have a baseline (starting point) hemoglobin A1C (HBA1c- test tells you your average level of blood sugar over the past two to three months; the target A1c level for people with diabetes is usually less than 7% [percent]. The higher the hemoglobin A1c, the higher the risk of having complications related to diabetes) obtained upon admission to the skilled nursing facility (SNF), licensed nurses (LNs) did not notify the physician when Resident 10 exhibited consistent elevated blood sugars, and the interdisciplinary team (IDT-approach involves team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were reported immediately (but not later than 2 hours if serious bodily injury is involved, or within 24 hours if no serious bodily injury) to the local ombudsman (neutral, independent public official or office tasked with defending the public's interests and investigating complaints), state survey agency (SA- a state-level government department that inspects health care facilities) and local law enforcement for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and Infection Preventionist (IP- professionals who make sure healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should to prevent infections) that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 showed her a nude video of CNA 2, and the facility did not report the allegation to the required government agencies. This failure had the potential risk for delayed protective interventions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager was qualified to perform the duties of a dietary supervisor when the facility was unable to provide documentation the Dietary Supervisor (DS) completed a state-approved program in dietetic service supervision. Regulatory requires individuals in this role to meet one of seven recognized qualification pathways. The DS Food Handler Card, high school transcripts, and Regional Occupational Program (ROP-hands on training and career preparation in various fields including culinary arts, health care, automotive and technology) course documentation were insufficient to meet the regulatory requirements under HCS (Health and Safety Code- state laws and regulations governing public health, healthcare facilities, and safety standards, including requirements related to dietary services and staff qualifications)1265.4.This failure had the potential to result in 40 of 41 residents at risk of receiving nutritionally inappropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the food preparation sink was equipped with a required air gap to prevent contamination, when the food preparation sink was observed without an air gap, creating the potential for backflow and contamination of food and food-contact surfaces.This failure had the potential to affect 40 of 41 residents who received meals prepared in the facility. During an observation on 9/30/25 at 8:16a.m. in the kitchen, the one-compartment sink located next to Fridge 2 was observed with beans soaking. During an interview on 1/6/26 at 12:51p.m. with Kitchen Staff (KS) 1, KS 1 stated the small, one-compartment sink was used as the food preparation sink. KS 1 indicated the two-compartment sink was used only as a backup if the dishwasher was not functioning. KS 1 stated she was unsure what an air gap was but stated the piping to the sink had not been altered. During an interview on 1/7/26 at 3:08p.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated an air gap was intended to prevent contamination of food if the sink were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure garbage was stored and disposed of in a manner that prevented unsanitary conditions when 3 of 3 outdoor dumpsters were observed with lids open and one dumpster was overflowing.This failure had the potential to attract pests, create offensive odors and negatively impact food safety and the overall sanitary environment of the facility. During an observation on 1/6/26 at 12:44 p.m. the facility's dumpsters located behind the building were observed with all three lids in the open position. One dumpster contained overflowing boxes, which prevented the lid from closing securely. During an interview on 1/6/26 at 12:51 p.m. with Kitchen Staff (KS) 1, KS1 stated the lids of the dumpsters were required to remain closed at all times to prevent pests. During an interview on 1/7/26 at 3:08p.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated the dumpsters were required to remain closed at all times and the surrounding area should be kept clear to prevent unwanted pests. The DS stated the facility's location next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice and the facility's policies and procedures were followed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 46) when Resident 46's psychotropic medication (psychoactive drugs that alter brain chemistry to treat mental illness) brexpiprazole (used to treat Alzheimer's disease- disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) ordered on 12/7/25, was not available for administration and was documented in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR- a digital system that replaces paper charts to streamline and secure the process of giving medications to patients) as administered on 12/10/25, 12/18/25, 12/19/25, 1/5/26 and 1/6/26. The EMAR for the medication was documented as refused on 12/8/25, 12/12/25 and 12/13/25 when the medication was not available for administration on those datesThis failure resulted in Resident 46…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 6Number of residents cited: 2Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent when the facility's medication error rate was 9.68 percent. There were 31 opportunities for errors and three medication errors occurred for three of six sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 46) when:1.Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)1 did not follow Resident 46's physician's order of multivitamins when she administered multivitamin with minerals to Resident 46 on 1/7/26. This failure had the potential for Resident 46 to develop adverse reaction to medication that was not prescribed to her which could result in serious health condition.2.LVN 1 did not follow Resident 5's physician's order of senna-docusate (used to prevent/treat constipation) when she administered senna and a routine inhaler (a small handheld medical device that delivers medicine as a mist or spray directly to the lungs for treating respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and disposal of medications and biologicals in accordance with facility policy and procedures when:1.Two expired medications were found in one of one medication rooms. This failure had the potential for residents to receive medication that no longer had the desired efficacy with the potential to slow healing, and or relieve pain and discomfort.2. Station 1's medication cart, contained Resident 21's lactulose (used to treat constipation) medication with label different from the medication's physician order in the Electronic Medication Administration Order (Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR- an electronic daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident), dated 1/2026.This failure placed Resident 21 at risk of not receiving the physician's prescribed dose which could lead to serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological function needs) accurately reflected resident's health and function for one of four sampled residents (Resident 21) when Resident 21's use of lorazepam (medication uses for anxiety) was inaccurately coded in the MDS assessment dated [DATE].This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21's care needs not being met and the potential risk for adverse medication reactions not be monitored. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record [AR- a document with personal identification and medical information], dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated Resident 21 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety (feeling of worry, fear or unease, often triggered by stress, that helps cope with challenges by creating focus and energy), depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest, and changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 2Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to ensure residents with mental disorder or intellectual disorder or intellectual disabilities are not appropriately placed in a nursing home) were completed and the state mental health authority or stated intellectual disability authority was notified promptly after a significant change of condition for two of four sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 46).This failure had a potential risk for Resident 21 and Resident 46 not to have received the appropriate services related to their mental health needs. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record [AR- a document containing resident profile information], dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated Resident 21 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest, and changes in sleep,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nurse staffing data was posted in a visible location for residents, families, and visitors. This failure did not allow the residents and their families to access important information about the facility staffing levels, which could affect their ability to make informed decisions about safety and quality of care provided. During a concurrent observation and record review on 1-8-26 at 12:30 p.m., with the facility's administrator (ADM), outside of the business office, the nurse staffing data was not displayed. The ADM stated that the nurse staffing data belongs in the empty clear folder that is taped to the outside of the window. The business office is to place the nurse staffing data for the day inside the clear plastic folder so that it is visible for residents and visitors to see as they first enter the facility. The ADM stated there was no reason for the nurse staffing not to be posted.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, dated 12/18/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 6Number of residents cited: 2 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured appropriate administration of medications to meet residents needs for two of six sampled residents (Resident 46 and Resident 5) when Resident 46's psychotropic (medications that alter brain chemistry to affect mood, thoughts, and behavior) medication brexpiprazole (used to treat Alzheimer's Disease-a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and Resident 5's inhaler (a small, handheld medical device that delivers medicine as a mist or spray directly to the lungs for treating respiratory conditions like asthma) medication fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (used for treatment of breathing problems in patients with asthma) were not available to administer on 1/7/25.These failures resulted in Resident 46 and Resident 5 not receiving their routine medications, which could have led to serious health conditions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were accommodated for one of four sampled residents (Resident 16) when Resident 16's standing physician order for strawberry shake was not served to Resident 16 during lunch on 9/30/25. This failure had the potential risk to result in Resident 16 not meeting nutritional needs, which could lead to unplanned weight loss. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/30/25 at 12:20 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 16 was sitting in her wheelchair with her lunch tray positioned in front of her. Resident 16's lunch tray did not include a strawberry health shake. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, was observed seated next to Resident 16 and assisting with lunch. CNA 1 stated Resident 16 needed assistance with meals to ensure adequate intake and prevent weight loss. CNA 1 reviewed Resident 16's meal ticket and stated, There should be a milk shake with her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 2Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided for two of four sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 16) when:1.During a meal observation in the dining room on 9/30/25, Rehabilitative Nursing Assistant (RNA) used plastic straws instead of spoon for Resident 14's liquids.This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to aspirate while drinking fluids.2.Resident 16 was not provided sippy cup on her meal tray during lunch on 9/30/25. This failure had the potential to limit Resident 16's ability to drink independently and safely. 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/25 at 12:12 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 14 was observed seated in a geriatric chair (large, padded, reclining room with wheels, designed for individuals with limited mobility, offering comfort and support for relaxing, dining or medical procedures) assisted by RNA with his meals. Resident 14's drinks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of seven residents (Resident 1) when two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA 2, CNA 3) spoke loudly and disrespectfully to Resident 1 and accused her of taking her roommate's remote control and adjusting the television to face Resident 1.This failure placed Resident 1 at potential risk for emotional distress, depression, mental instability, and decline in overall health. During an interview on 11/25/25 at 9:38 a.m., Resident 1 reported two CNAs (CNA 2, CNA 3) accused her of turning her roommate's TV and taking the remote control. Resident 1 stated the CNAs spoke loudly and angrily, calling her a liar, which she found unprofessional and hurtful. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 11/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents' rights and ensure they were free from misappropriation of property, medications were administered as prescribed, and controlled drugs were properly accounted for and discarded according to facility's policy and procedure for two of three sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6) when License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 diverted controlled medications (drugs regulated by law for potential abuse, addiction, or dependence) prescribed for Resident 5 and Resident 6 for personal use and failed to properly document, discard discontinued medications according to facility's policies and procedures. These failures resulted in Resident 5 and Resident 6 not receiving their prescribed medications as ordered which placed them at risk for inadequate pain management and anxiety. During an interview on 11/25/25 at 12:09 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN), the RN stated controlled substances were stored in the controlled substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate controlled substance records, documentation and reconciliation in accordance with facility's policies and procedures for two of three sampled residents (Resident 5, 6) when the license nurses (LNs) failed to accurately document and account Resident 5 and Resident 6 controlled substance on the Controlled Drug Records and Medication Administration Record to accurately reflect the controlled substance disposition or resident administration.These failures resulted in the facility's delayed detection of controlled substances diversion for Residents 5 and 6, and placed residents at potential risk for medication errors, untreated pain, and overdose, compromising residents' safety and quality of care. During an interview on 11/25/25 at 12:09 p.m. with the Registered Nurse (RN), The RN stated when controlled substances were delivered, the licensed nurse (LN) checked the medications against the pharmacy manifest to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications administration for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 5, and 6) when license nurses (LN) assessed Resident 1, Resident 5, and Resident 6's pain levels as mild to moderate and administered pain medications prescribed for severe pain, not in accordance with the physician's order. These failures had the potential to place Resident 1, Resident 5, and Resident 6 at risk for over-medication, respiratory distress, impaired cognition, falls, and inadequate pain control. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 11/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which includes type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2-- a condition where the body has trouble controlling blood sugar levels, causing blood sugar to become high)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the residents responsible party (RP- an individual who has the authority to act on behalf of the patient)/family/emergency contact of a change in condition for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 6) when Resident 1 experienced seizures (abnormal electrical activity in the brain) and Resident 6 reported chest pain and were transferred to acute care hospital. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 6's RP/family/emergency contact being unaware of the acute health conditions, hospital transfers, and treatment decisions, which could negatively impact continuity of care and right to have their representatives involved in care decisions. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/22/25 at 1:41 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the DON office, Resident 1's Situation Background Assessment Recommendation Form (SBAR-a tool used to improve the clarity and efficiency of information exchange) form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 left the faciity on 2/17/25 without facility staff's knowledge and did not return. This failure resulted for Resident 1 at a higher risk of harm such as dangerous weather exposure, getting hit by a car or being assaulted. Finding: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident medical and personal information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include . Non displaced intertrochanteric( area between the two trochanters (thigh bone) of the femur) fracture (complete of partial break in a bone) of left femur(bone of the thigh) Alcoholic cirrhosis (a chronic liver disease characterized by the formation of scar tissue) .Bipolar Disease (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses have the competencies necessary to meet the needs and safety of the residents for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 3 and LVN 4 failed to notify the facility Administrator (ADM), Director of Nursing (DON) and the authorities when Resident 1 left the facility and did not return. This failure resulted in delayed in emergency response and placed Resident 1 at increased risk for harm such as dangerous weather exposure, getting hit by a car or being assaulted. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident medical and personal information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include . Non displaced intertrochanteric( area between the two trochanters (thigh bone) of the femur) ( fracture (complete of partial break in a bone) of left femur(bone of the thigh) Alcoholic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment was updated and reviewed annually. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, implemented 06/2024, revealed, 10. The facility assessment will be reviewed and updated as necessary and at least annually. A Facility Assessment Tool, revealed the sections for Date(s) of assessment or update and Date(s) assessment reviewed with QAA [Quality Assurance Assessment]/QAPI [Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement] committee, were dated 08/31/2023. During an interview on 09/17/2024, the Administrator stated the facility assessment had not been reviewed prior to 08/31/2023. The Administrator stated they planned to review the facility assessment the last week of 09/2024. During an interview on 09/20/2024 at 2:21 PM, the Administrator stated the facility assessment was done on 09/10/2024, but it had not been reviewed or revised. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program. Specifically, the facility failed to establish and implement a surveillance plan to identify, track, and monitor infections. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, implemented 10/2022, revealed, Policy: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. The section titled Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, included, 3. Surveillance: a. A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to support a resident's choice to be out of bed by not providing the necessary specialized wheelchair needed for the resident to be out of bed for 1 (Resident #26) of 16 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rights, with a copyright date of 2024, revealed, 5. Self-determination. The resident has the right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to: a. The resident has the right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part. b. The resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #26 on 12/05/2023. According to the admission Record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided for 1 (Resident #4) of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #4's fingernails were not properly trimmed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Nail Care implemented 10/2022, revealed, 4. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #4 on 10/04/2002. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of quadriplegia, contracture of muscle at multiple sites, generalized muscle weakness, pain in an unspecified limb, and wrist drop. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/25/2024, revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #4 had upper and lower extremity impairments on both sides. The MDS indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a physician's order for the use of supplemental oxygen for 1 (Resident #98) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, implemented 10/2022, revealed, Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. The policy further indicated, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #98 on 04/14/2023 and readmitted the resident on 09/16/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute pulmonary edema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty daily for eight consecutive hours. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Nursing Services-Registered Nurse (RN), implemented 10/2022, revealed, 1. The facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week. A facility nursing schedule for September 2024, indicated there were no RNs scheduled to work on 09/05/2024. However, RN #5's Employee Time Cards, dated 09/05/2024, revealed she worked 1.40 hours that day. A facility nursing schedule for September 2024, indicated there were no RNs scheduled to work on 09/08/2024. However, a Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-in Sheet, dated 09/08/20024, revealed RN #7 worked nonconsecutively for 7 hours that day. During an interview on 09/20/2024 at 1:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was out sick from 09/01/2024 through 09/05/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (pro re nata, as-needed) psychotropic medication had a 14-day stop date for 1 (Resident #12) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, implemented 10/2022, indicated, 9. PRN orders for all psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (i.e. [id est, that is] 14 days). a. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she shall document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. An admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted Resident #12 on 07/06/2023 and readmitted the resident on 08/08/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnoses of schizoaffective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe hospital discharge medication orders for 1 (Resident #12) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Transcribing Physician Orders and Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders, implemented 10/2022, revealed, 2. For consulting physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax [facsimile], the nurse in a timely manner will: c. Follow facility procedures for verbal or telephone orders including: noting the order, submitting to pharmacy, and transcribing to medication or treatment administration record. An admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted Resident #12 on 07/06/2023 and readmitted the resident on 08/08/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/12/2024, revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) had a correctly completed Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a comprehensive, standardized assessment tool) when a review indicated six (6) incorrect entries. These six (6) errors indicated a pattern of incorrect assessment results, resulting in Resident 1's MDS that was not reflective of her status at the time of the assessment, and had the potential for Resident 1 to have unmet care needs that did not address her status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated at Question A2300 as having an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE], which indicated a look back period of 7 days (unless another time period is indicated). For Resident 1's MDS assessment, the 7-day time period was [DATE] through [DATE]. The MDS contained six (6) errors at the following questions: Question C1310C Question E900 Question I2300 Question J1800…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a new onset of confusion, hallucinations (seeing and/or hearing things that are not real) and was yelling. This failure resulted for Resident 1's new onset of altered level of consciousness needs such as monitoring and safety to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/17/24, at 4:08 PM, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool), dated 3/26/24, the MDS indicated at Section C500, Brief Interview for Mental Status, a score of eight out of 15, which indicated Resident 1's cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) was moderately impaired. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was assessed with a new onset of confusion and hallucination (seeing and/or hearing things that are not real) and a physician's order for urine culture and sensitivity test (lab test to check for bacteria and germs in the urine) was not done to determine if an infection was present and the cause of the confusion. This failure resulted for Resident 1's urinary tract infection (UTI-a condition in which bacteria invades and grow in the urinary tract) to go untreated which led to Resident 1's new onset of confusion and hallucination. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 4/17/24, at 4:08 PM, the AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 3/19/24, at 10:52 PM, the PN indicated Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a history of psychological problems and previous attempts to leave the facility on 4/11/24, received the necessary supervision from staff during another attempt to leave the facility on 5/12/24. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being unattended while in the parking area of the facility, who then quickly left the facility without supervision and was found 20 minutes later wandering on a nearby street. This failure had the potential for injury to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 5/29/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included psychosis (refers to a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality, a person's thoughts and perceptions are disrupted and they may have difficulty recognizing what is real and what is not), and Strange and Inexplicable Behavior. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 3/18/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 48 sampled residents (Resident 1) received Trauma Informed Care Evaluation (a process that acknowledge the need to understand patients ' life experiences to deliver effective care and treatment) performed when the Social Services Director (SSD) did not complete a Trauma Informed Care Evaluation for Resident 1. This failure had the potential for the facility ' s inability to identify triggers which could result in Resident 1 ' s re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms by way of thoughts, memories, or feelings related to past experienced). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 4/17/24, at 4:08 PM, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes, dated 3/21/24, at 1:50 PM, the Progress Notes indicated a care conference meeting was held with Resident 1 ' s Family Member (FM 1). During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 48 sampled residents (Resident 1) had a Social Services Evaluation completed. This failure had the potential for unmet care needs for Resident 1, who was recently admitted to the facility, including care for mood and behaviors, adjustment to the new environment, mental health history, support systems, and behavioral interventions. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 4/17/24, at 4:08 PM, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/24/24, at 10 AM with the Social Services Director (SSD), Resident 1 ' s clinical record was reviewed. The SSD stated Resident 1 did not have a Social Services Evaluation. The SSD stated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and the Social Services Evaluation should have been done. The SSD stated she was responsible to complete Resident 1 ' s Social Services Evaluation. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make information available for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 23, 25 and 29) when residents were unaware of how to file a grievance or complaint. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 23, 25 and 29 to have their concerns or grievances unaddressed. Findings: During an interview on 5/12/21, at 10:20 a.m., with Resident 23, Resident 23 stated the Director of Social Services (DSS) was the grievance official. Resident 23 stated, I do not know how to file a grievance . During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an evaluation used to identify resident care needs), dated 3/29/21, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 23 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an evaluation of attention, orientation and memory recall) score of 15 (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment). During an interview on 5/12/21, at 10:30 a.m., with Resident 29, Resident 29 stated, I don't know how to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) assessment accurately reflected the resident's current status for three of three sampled residents (Residents 5, 13, and 39) when: 1. Resident 5's MDS assessment of hearing and cognition were not coded accurately; 2. Resident 13's dialysis (use of machine to remove wastes from the body and keep body in balance) status was not coded (a system of signals used to represent letters or numbers in transmitting messages) accurately in Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) of the MDS assessment; and 3. Resident 39's MDS assessment for identification information was not coded accurately to indicate the accurate discharge status. These failures had the potential of the facility to not provide the necessary care and services to meet the residents' individualized needs. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 11, and 23) when the facility did not support residents in their choice of activities. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1, 11, and 23 being bored and verbalizing the facility did not have activities to do daily. Findings: During an interview on 5/11/21, at 2:58 p.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, CNA 4 stated the Activities Director (AD) was on leave. CNA 4 stated she was the Activities Assistant (AA). CNA 4 stated the AD was to come back after her leave but had not returned. CNA 4 stated she had been working in the facility since June 2019. CNA 4 stated she started doing activities in June 2020. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/11/21, at 3:21 p.m., with CNA 4, in the hallway, a calendar dated May 2021 was reviewed. CNA 4 stated she would follow the calendar as scheduled. CNA 4 stated on 5/11/21 at 1 p.m. Aroma Therapy was scheduled. CNA 4 stated she did not do the Aroma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served met the daily nutritional needs for 21 of 37 residents (Residents 1, 3, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, 31, 33, 34, 187, 189 and 190) when residents on regular and large portion diets were served more than the required portion size of the main dish [meatballs]. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1, 3, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, 31, 33, 34, 187, 189 and 190 to receive more than the recommended daily calorie intake based on residents nutritional dietary needs. Findings: During a review of facility document titled, Order Listing Report, dated 5/11/21, the order listing report indicated, .Status: Current, Order Category: Diet, Order Status: Current. Resident Name: Resident 31, Order Summary: Controlled Carbohydrate diet Regular texture .Resident 13, Renal Diet, Regular Texture .Resident 29, Regular Large Portion diet Regular texture .Resident 3, Regular diet Regular texture .Resident 16, Regular diet Regular texture .Resident 20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide suitable, nourishing snacks for four of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 11, 23, and 29) when facility staff did not provide a variety of snacks for residents in the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1, 11, 23, and 29 verbalizing and requesting different types of snacks from staff and staff did not notify the Dietary Service Manager (DSM). Findings: During an interview on 5/12/21, at 10:20 a.m., with Resident 23, Resident 23 stated the facility staff did not pass out evening snacks. During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an evaluation used to identify resident care needs), dated 3/29/21, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 23 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an evaluation of attention, orientation and memory recall) score of 15 (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment). During an interview on 5/12/21, at 10:30 a.m., with Resident 29, Resident 29 stated the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when the Dietary [NAME] (DC) did not document the temperatures of the food served on 5/10/21 and 5/11/21. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (caused by consuming contaminated foods or beverages) in 37 of 39 residents who consumed food prepared the kitchen. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, Spring Cycle Menus, dated 5/10/21, the spring cycle menus indicated, . Temp [blank] Grape juice .Temp [blank] breakfast meat . Temp [blank] Broccoli salad .Temp [blank] egg salad sandwich . During a review of the fancily document titled, Spring Cycle Menus, dated 5/11/21, the spring cycle menus indicated, .Temp [blank] Apple Juice .Temp [blank] Toasted Oats .Temp [blank] Ham and Egg Scrambles .Temp [blank] Bran Muffin .Temp [blank] Milk . During a review of the facility's document titled, Order Listing Report, dated 5/11/21, the order listing indicated, .Status: Current, Order Category: Diet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment when: 1. One of one bathroom (Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]) had baseboards there were peeled, the walls had even paint, and tiles were missing and broken near the shower tub; 2. One of one bathroom (Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]) had a soap dispenser that was not functional; and 3. One of 35 Residents (Resident 34) had a gap between the window and the window seal. These failures created an environment that was not homelike and had the potential to result in a decreased quality of life for residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/11/21, at 10 a.m., in Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard by the wall in the shower area was peeled off. The walls had uneven paint. There were missing tiles pieces and broken tile pieces by the shower tub. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/11/21, at 4:49 p.m., in Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER], with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline (starting point) care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 188), when Resident 188 did not have a care plan for hospice (care focuses on terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) care within 48 hours of admission. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 188's hospice needs to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 188's admission Record (AR-document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) dated 5/6/21, the AR indicated, .admission Date 05/01/2021 .Diagnosis Information .OTHER SEQUELAE (condition which is the consequence of a previous disease or injury) OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION (blockage in the brain) . During a review of Resident 188's Order Summary Report undated, the Order Summary Report indicated, .Admit to [name of company] Hospice for Dx (diagnosis): End stage Sequelae of cerebral vascular . order date: 5/2/202 . During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 187), when Resident 187's did not have a care plan to address his hard of hearing and Resident 187's care plan for activities of daily living (ADL- routine activities people do every day without assistance. There are six basic ADLs: eating, bathing, getting dressed, toileting, mobility, and continence) was incomplete. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 187's hard of hearing and ADL care needs to go unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/10/21, at 8:35 a.m., with Resident 187, Resident 187 was observed leaned forward to try to hear what was said. Res 187 stated he did not hear well from both ears. Resident 187 stated he had a hearing aid prior to admission to the facility on 4/29/21. Resident 187 stated he did not use his hearing aid because it make loud noises and it made him unable to hear what people said. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/12/21, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented for two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 20) when: 1. Resident 7 was provided a house supplement (beverage containing protein and other performance substances as ingredients mixed with milk or water for the purposes of improved nutrition) for weight loss and did not have a physician's order for a house supplement; and 2. Resident 20 suffered a fall on 2/12/21 and the licensed nurse on duty did not complete an assessment of Resident 20. Resident 20 had an x-ray (type of radiation called electromagnetic waves, creates pictures of the inside of your body, the images show the parts of the body in different shades of black and white to checking for broken bones) completed on 2/17/21 which indicated a fracture of the long middle finger. These failures resulted in Resident 7 and Resident 20 not receiving professional care and presented with delayed treatment and care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure a resident's abilities of daily living did not diminish for two of twelve sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 29) when: 1. Resident 5 requested a grooming services for a haircut from staff and there was not staff available to provide him with a haircut; and 2. Resident 29's Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA-helps residents gain/improve strength and mobility) exercises and ambulation were not provided per the physician's order. These failures resulted in Resident 5 expressing and verbalizing not liking his long hair on multiple occasions and had the potential for Resident 29 to decline in her ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL-skills required to manage one's basic physical needs including personal hygiene or grooming, dressing, toileting , transferring or ambulating, and eating), strength, and mobility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/10/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a safe environment with an effective infection prevention and control program for the prevention of Corona Virus (COVID-19- a contagious serious respiratory infection transmitted from person to person) transmission when one of one sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 4) did not follow the use of a fit tested (a fit test determines if a tight-fitting respirator can be worn without having any leaks) N95 respirator (protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) when caring residents identified as PUI (person under investigation- someone on observation for symptoms of COVID-19 [a serious respiratory illness caused by a virus which is the cause of a current worldwide pandemic [prevalent over a whole country or the world]) COVID-19. This practice potentially placed the residents and staff at risk for the spread and transmission of COVID-19, complications from COVID -19 and death. Findings: During a concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the survey period from 9/30/25 through 1/9/26, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom accommodated no more than four residents (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This failure had the potential to adversely affect care provided to residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 14.During an observation on 9/30/25 through 1/9/26, in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 14, the two resident bedrooms had more than four residents. Each room met the required needs of the residents, as well as the square footage. Closet and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There were sufficient room for nursing care to be provided to the residents. Wheelchair and toilet facilities were accessible. The health and safety of residents would not be adversely affected by the continuance of this waiver. Room Number Number of Beds Square footage4 8 735.19 14 8 732.52 Recommend waiver continue in effect.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during the survey period of 9/30/25 to 1/9/2026, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms (Rooms 1, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 16). This failure had the potential for residents not to have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/25, at 12:47 P.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), an environmental tour was conducted. The MS measured six rooms and stated the rooms did not meet the minimum square footage of 80 square feet per resident. These rooms were as follows: Room Number: Square Feet: Number of Residents room [ROOM NUMBER] 145.96 2 bedsroom [ROOM NUMBER] 312.0 4 bedsroom [ROOM NUMBER] 159.17 2 bedsroom [ROOM NUMBER] 147.17 2 bedsroom [ROOM NUMBER] 147.25 2 bedsroom [ROOM NUMBER] 300.9 4 beds During the observations made on 9/30/25 to 1/9/26, the residents had reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 16 residents' rooms accommodated no more than four residents per room. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rooms, implemented 10/2022, revealed, Resident bedrooms will not accommodate more than four residents. A Client Accommodations Analysis, dated 09/19/2024, revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER] had a floor area of 963.9 square (sq) feet (ft) with an approved capacity of eight residents. Further review revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a floor area of 733.22 sq ft with an approved capacity of eight resident. An observation on 09/20/2024 at 10:21 AM, revealed there were seven residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The observation revealed the room size was comfortable, with bedside tables and adequate closet space. The observation revealed there were no concerns with square footage per resident. An observation on 09/20/2024 at 10:23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square (sq) feet (ft) of living space per resident in 6 (Rooms 1, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 16) of 16 multiple occupancy resident rooms. This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rooms, implemented 10/2022, revealed, 2. Resident bedrooms will measure at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. A Client Accommodation Analysis, dated 09/19/2024, revealed the following living space per resident: - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 72.5 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 77.4 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 78.9 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 73.1 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 73.1 sq ft for each resident. - In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the survey period from 5/10/21 through 5/19/21, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom accommodated no more than four residents (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This failure had the potential to adversely effect care provided to residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 14. Findings: During an observation on 4/10/21 through 4/19/21, in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 14, the two resident bedrooms had more than four residents. Each room met the required needs of the residents, as well as the square footage. Closet and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There were sufficient room for nursing care to be provided to the residents. Wheelchair and toilet facilities were accessible. The health and safety of residents would not be adversely affected by the continuance of this waiver. Room Number Number of Beds Square footage 4 8 677.16 14 8 681.49 Recommend waiver continue in effect. ________________________________________________________________ Health Facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during the survey period of 5/10/2021 to 5/19/2021, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 16). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/13/21, at 8:40 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), an environmental tour was conducted. The MS measured six rooms and stated the rooms did not meet the minimum square footage of 80 square feet per resident. These rooms were as follows: Room Number: Square Feet: Number of Residents room [ROOM NUMBER] 150.29 2 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 239.56 3 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 301.32 4 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 160.8 2 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 149.34 2 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 148.03 2 beds room [ROOM NUMBER] 302.4 4 beds During the observations made on 5/10/2021 to 5/19/2021, the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AJC HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SWC CA OPCO 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2021
CHESLEY, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 11/01/2021
HOLGUIN, SIMONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2021
GAMETT, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+29.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 9%Other / private 22%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,585per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$538per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055454. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next