Vista Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 13.79% when four medication errors occurred out of 29 opportunities during the medication administration observation for four out of nine residents (Residents 3, 8, 10, and 37). Resident 37 did not receive one medication as scheduled; Resident 8 received insulin with incorrect priming; and Residents 3 and 10 did not receive one medication as prescribed. The failures resulted in the residents not receiving the medications as prescribed and had the potential for complications of their medical conditions (such as high/low blood sugar or blood pressure). Findings: 1. During the medication administration observation on 1/27/25 at 10:02 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse B (LVN B) was observed preparing one medication, doxazosin (a medication to treat high blood pressure) for Resident 37. LVN B stated, I don't have chlorhexidine [an antiseptic mouthwash with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a clean environment, within standards for safety when: 1. Floor drains were not maintained clean; 2. Kitchen tile floors were not clean and were not maintained in good repair; 3. Kitchen wall had an opening in the wall around the drain; 4. Kitchen backsplash, where dishes were cleaned, had food and black substance buildup; 5. A kitchen cleaning schedule was not maintained according to facility policy; 6. Frozen meat did not have date received, date placed in freezer, use by date, and expiration date; 7. Produce and food were not labeled with use by date and were not rotated with FIFO, First in-First out per facility policy; 8. Food in refrigerator had expired. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food leading to food borne illness, for 69 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 1/27/2025, at 9:30 a.m., in the kitchen, a drain cover over the floor drain in the middle of the dish room was not secured with tile,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe proper infection control practices when: 1. A nursing staff failed to perform hand hygiene after touching potentially contaminated surfaces during the medication administration; 2. A nursing staff touched and opened two medication capsules with bare hands; 3. A nursing staff failed to observe the enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as per facility policy and procedures (P&P) for two residents (Residents 37 and 61) during the medication administration; These failures had the potential for Residents 37, 54 and 61 to be placed at risk for infections. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) A on 1/27/25, at 9:29 a.m., RN A was observed preparing two medications, which was put in a small medication cup, for Resident 54. On 1/27/25, at 9:40 a.m., RN A placed the medication cup along with a cup of juice in a medication tray, brought it to Resident 54's bedside, and placed it on the resident's table. Then, with her gloved hands, she moved the resident's wheel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to facility policy and procedures (P&P) when the nursing staff did not check the tube placement and/or residual volume before medication administration for three of three residents (Residents 10, 37, and 61) who were receiving medications via the gastrostomy tube (aka G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition and medications directly to the stomach). The failure had the potential for complications related to enteral feeding such as aspiration (foreign material into the lungs) due to undetected tube displacement, nausea, vomiting, etc. Findings: a. During a medication administration observation on 1/27/25 at 10:02 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) B was observed preparing a medication, doxazosin (medication to treat high blood pressure), for Resident 37. She crushed and diluted the medication with water. On 1/27/25 at 10:08 a.m., at the resident's bedside, LVN B was observed attaching the 60-milliliter (mL, unit of measurement) syringe to the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued and unused controlled medications (medications that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) for three residents (65, 123, and 174) were promptly removed from one of three inspected medication carts. The failure had the potential for medication errors or loss/abuse of controlled medications. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the Station 1 medication cart with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN D) on 1/27/25 at 11:06 a.m., two opened bottles, one 180-milliliters (mL) and one 120-mL, of morphine (a potent narcotic medication for pain) 2 milligrams (mg) per mL for Resident 174 were identified in the locked compartment of the cart. The Controlled Drug Record (CDR or Count Sheet, an inventory sheet documenting the medication, count, date, time, amount given, the amount left, and the signature of the user) for each bottle was wrapped around the bottle with a rubber band. LVN D stated each bottle has zero count left, meaning the count on the CDR had zero (0) amount remaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 47) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). Resident 47 received quetiapine (Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication) for delusion (fixed, false beliefs that conflict with reality) without documented evidence of delusional symptoms, and without demonstration how these symptoms caused harm to the resident/others or caused significant distress to the resident. The failure had the potential for the resident to receive the antipsychotic medication unnecessarily, which had the potential for increased risks associated with psychotropic medication use that include but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, falls, constipation, anxiety, agitation, abnormal involuntary movements, and memory loss. Findings: A review of Resident 47's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (general term that describes a group of symptoms,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meal assistance for one of five sampled residents ' (Resident 1) when staff did not reposition Resident 1 higher in bed and did not assist in setup of meal tray for 30 minutes during dinner. This failure prevented Resident 1 from finishing dinner because Resident 1 was in an uncomfortable position and could not reach or open food items on the meal tray, which had the potential for weight loss and low blood sugar. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fall, fracture of lumbar vertebra (lower back bone), rib fractures, muscle weakness, and diabetes (long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During a record review of Resident 1 ' s physician order set titled, Order Summary Report, dated 10/29/24, the order set indicated Resident 1 had an order for [Carbohydrate control] diet .assist with meal,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 15.63% when five medication errors occurred out of 32 opportunities during the medication administration observation for three of five residents (Residents 11, 20, and 36). Resident 20 received a corticosteroid (aka steroid) oral inhaler without rinsing her mouth with water afterwards; Resident 11 did not receive two medications as scheduled; and Resident 36 did not receive two medications as prescribed. The failures had the potential for the residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of medications, or adverse affects, compromising their health. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 9/11/23 at 8:05 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN ) 2 was observed preparing 8 medications for Resident 20 including an oral inhaler containing a combination of budesonide and formoterol (budesonide belongs to a class of drugs known as corticosteroids. It works by reducing the irritation and swelling of the airways. Formoterol belongs to the class of drugs known as long-acting beta…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the right of privacy for one of 23 sampled residents (Residents 52) when personal care instructions were posted on the walls of the resident's shared room. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 52's sense of self-worth and self-respect due to the public display of personal care information. Findings: During an observation on 9/11/23, at 8:06 a.m., inside Resident 52's shared room, three signs without privacy covers (two signs stated, Please use wipes when cleaning him. Thank you. and one sign stated, Please use the wipes to wipe the Resident instead of the towel. Thank you!), were posted on the walls (by Resident 52's headboard, to the left side of Resident 52's bed, and across the room, taped to the closet of Resident 52). The signs listed were specific personal care instructions for Resident 52. During an interview on 9/12/23, at 11:45 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated because it was the family of Resident 52 who posted the signs in the shared room, DON thought it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an orderly and homelike environment for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 52 and resident 119), when an old, uncovered sign that showed the name of the previous resident (Resident 42) was not removed from the shared room currently occupied by Resident 52 and Resident 119. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 52 and Resident 119's well-being and cause mental confusion in a setting meant to be their home. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23, at 8:06 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), an uncovered typewritten sign (stating, Family will do laundry. followed by a handwritten name of Resident 42) was posted on the closet door visible from both Resident 52 and Resident 119's beds. CNA 2 stated Resident 42's family posted the uncovered sign which was not removed when Resident 42 was sent out to the hospital then later discharged from the facility. CNA 2 stated the old sign should have been removed because it didn't belong to the current residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $635K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA