Haven Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, to a resident identified as having moderate risk of elopement (risk that refers to a situation where a resident, has a moderate likelihood or possibility of leaving the premises without authorization or supervision, wandering away from a controlled environment, which can pose safety risks for the individual) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 ' s elopement and wandering care plan did not address the specific monitoring needs and frequency necessary to minimize the risk or prevent Resident 1 leaving a safe area without the facility ' s awareness on March 6, 2024, and had not been found for more than 72 hours. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1's health and safety at risk and for him to likely experience some serious adverse outcome, due to exposure of the (outdoor) elements, missed antipsychotic medications (drugs used to treat symptoms of psychosis (mental disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe oxygen administration in accordance with its policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 was connected to an oxygen concentrator (a machine which delivers oxygen) labeled, broken, on June 2, 2026. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 2's respiratory status, including decreased oxygen saturation (a measurement of how much oxygen the red blood cells are carrying in the blood), shortness of breath (difficulty breathing) and lung injury, placing Resident 2's health and safety at risk.During a review of Resident 2's admission RECORD (contains medical and demographic information), the admission RECORD indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure (a when the muscle of the heart is too weak to pump blood well), hypertension (a condition with high blood pressure), diabetes (a condition with a high sugar in the blood), chronic respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by not documenting resident-reported falls for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure resulted in a medical record that did not reflect Resident 1 reported change of condition.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included subsequent encounter for fracture (the patient is in the healing or recovery phase, receiving routine follow-up care) and Alzheimer's disease (the most common form of dementia, a brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory and thinking skills). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (facility assessment tool), dated March 3, 2026, under Section C, it indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- screening tool to assess resident's cognition) score was 12. (A BIMS score of 8-12 suggests…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when buildup of grime and debris were noted on the floor and walls of kitchen's walk-in refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in accumulation of pathogenic microorganisms (germs or infectious agents that can cause disease) and attraction of insects or rodents, which could place the health and safety of 88 highly vulnerable residents who receives food from the kitchen at risk. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), on March 3, 2025, at 8:44 AM, in the kitchen, the walk-in refrigerator was inspected. There was buildup of grime and debris on the floors and walls, underneath the shelve racks. The DS acknowledged the finding, and stated it is unacceptable. The DS further stated the walk-in refrigerator should be free of grime and debris. During a concurrent interview and record review on March 5, 2025, at 9:09 AM, with the Administrator (Admin), the facility's policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their weight change protocol was implemented for one of two residents (Resident 50) reviewed for nutrition when the Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) recommendations for Resident 50, which included weekly weights monitoring and administration of appetite stimulant (substances that increase hunger and food intake) were not carried out timely. These failures have the potential to place Resident 50 at risk for malnutrition (state of nutritional deficiency or imbalance that occurs when the body does not receive or absorb sufficient nutrients to meet its physiological needs), increasing the risk of further weight loss, frailty, and weakened immune function, muscle wasting, weakness, reduced mobility, and cognitive and psychological decline, potentially leading to confusion, lethargy, and depression. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 50 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and treatment supplies were stored in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Two expired Central Line Trays (a kit containing the necessary supplies for maintaining a central venous catheter [long thin tube inserted into a large vein near the heart]) were found in the intravenous cart (IV cart- mobile cart used to store intravenous supplies) and were available for use. 2. Six different types of expired dressings (pads or materials applied directly to wounds to protect them, promote healing, and absorb fluids), in various quantities were found inside the treatment cart and were available for use. 3. A medication treatment cup filled with an unidentified cream was found underneath Resident 5's bed. These failures had the potential for the medical and treatment supplies to loss sterility and adhesive strength, increasing the likelihood of infection and ineffective wound care, placing 88…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pain Assessment and Management policy was implemented for one of two residents (Resident 214) reviewed for pain, when Resident 214's PRN (pro re nata; as needed) pain medication was not administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to put Resident 214 in unnecessary prolonged pain and discomfort and had the potential for increased suffering, delayed recovery, and reduced mobility, ultimately affecting the resident's overall well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 214's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses for displaced intertrochanter fracture of the left femur (broken left hip), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body has trouble to regulating blood sugar.) During a review of Resident 214's Physician Orders, dated March 1,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate (determined by calculating the percentage of medication errors (observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications; or accepted professional standards and principles) observed during a medication administration observation) were not 5 percent or greater. There were three medication errors identified out of 33 opportunities for errors, affecting one of 8 residents (Resident 214), resulting in an overall medication error rate of 9.09 % when three of Resident 214's were not administered in accordance with prescriber's order and facility policy on March 4, 2025. This failure had the potential to place Resident 214 at risk for dangerously high blood sugar, increasing the risk of serious health complications including infection (when harmful bacteria, viruses or fungi enter the body and start growing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents (Resident 214) reviewed for medication administration was free of significant medication error (observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations); or accepted professional standards and principles, which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety) when three of Resident 214's medications were not administered in accordance with physician's order and facility policy on March 4, 2025. This failure had the potential to place Resident 214 at risk for dangerously high blood sugar, increasing the risk of serious health complications including infection (when harmful bacteria, viruses or fungi enter the body and start growing causing illness, delayed wound healing, and sepsis (severe infection that spreads through the blood and can damage organs or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for all four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During the review of Resident 1's admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included unspecified hyperlipidemia (increase levels of lipids - like cholesterol [waxy substance found in the blood] with high cholesterol increases the chance of heart problem). During interview and observation with Resident 1 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care was provided to prevent a pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed Resident 1's health and safety at risk, when he developed a facility acquired sacrum (lower back/spine) pressure injury and right hip stage IV (full-thickness skin and tissue loss). Findings: During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right upper extremity (deep vein thrombosis, clots), hypertension (high blood pressure), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (sensory and motor nerves are affected). During a concurrent interview and record review, on August…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$37,557 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $37,557 — penalty dated 2024-03-10
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-03 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $795K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA