No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Bend Nursing Center

2215 Oakmont Way, West Sacramento, CA 95691 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (916) 371-1890 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 371-1890 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 actual-harm citations$21,879 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $21,879 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2727 W Capitol Ave · (916) 371-2275 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1250 Harbor Blvd · (916) 617-4321 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2328 W Capitol Ave · (916) 375-1724 · Call to confirm hours
Park
904 Sycamore Ave · (916) 617-4770 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.242.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.391.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
23.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 23.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.9%CMS range 19.1–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.2–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge23.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge9.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge23.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.3%CMS range 6.5–15.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.02
RN hours/ resident / day
1.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
43.4%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-12-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents received Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) when Resident 1 was found pulseless and not breathing by a Respiratory Therapist (RT) and Licensed Nurses (LN). This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure a physician's order and Resident 1's request to receive care with the primary goal to prolong life was executed. Findings: A review of LN 1's Healthcare Provider card, dated [DATE], indicated LN 1 successfully completed the requirements for certification in adult CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED, a medical device used to analyze the heart's rhythm and, if necessary, deliver an electrical shock to help the heart re-establish an effective rhythm). This card also indicated an expiration date of [DATE]. A review of LN 2's Basic Life Support Provider document, dated [DATE], indicated LN 2 successfully completed the cognitive and skills evaluations for certification in CPR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-07-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and services were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for two residents (Resident 24 and Resident 30), for a census of 85. This failure resulted in the reopening of two Stage III pressure ulcers (full thickness skin loss extending into the fat layer) for Resident 30 and a Stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) for Resident 24. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of both the arms and the legs) and persistent vegetative state. Review of a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 5/12/21, indicated Resident 30 was totally dependent on and required two or more staff for physical assistance. It also indicated Resident 30 did not have any skin ulcers and was receiving a pressure reducing device for a chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff did not administer a prescribed antibiotic (a medication used to kill or stop the growth of bacteria) medication as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to result in inadequate infection treatment and worsening symptoms for Resident 1.Findings:Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses that included non traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain) and H. pylori gastritis (a stomach infection caused by Helicobacter pylori bacteria).A review of Resident 1's Hospital After Visit Summary (AVS), dated 3/17/26, the AVS indicated that the metronidazole (medication used to treat infections caused by bacteria or parasites) 500 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) every 6 hours was last given on 3/17/26 at 12:12 p.m.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, with a start date of 3/17/26, indicated, Metronidazole Oral Tablet 500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the needs of residents were accommodated for five of nine sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6 and Resident 7) when:Resident 3 and Resident 4 did not have a call light system that accommodated their special needs; and, 2. Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7 did not have their call lights within reach.These failures had the potential to result in residents being unable to ask for needed assistance and not attaining their highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and emotional well-being.Findings:1.During a review of Resident 3's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility November 2023 with multiple diagnosis including contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of left and right hand.During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders and consistent monitoring were followed in accordance with professional standards for Resident 1, when Resident 1's side effects were not consistently monitored and treatments not done as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's health and their ability to achieve their highest practical well-being.Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in May 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included sepsis (extreme response to infection) due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (type of bacteria), urinary tract infection (infection in the urinary system), type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't respond properly to the insulin), cellulitis (skin infection) of left lower limb, pain in right hip, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/5/25, indicated Resident 1 had impaired cognition.A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was free from significant medication error when Resident 1 did not receive prescribed antihypotensive medication (used to increase low blood pressure) in accordance with the physician's order.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing low blood pressure and other unnecessary side effects which could have negatively affected Resident 1's health.Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in May 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included hypotension (low blood pressure, means that the pressure of blood circulating around the body is lower than normal). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/5/25, indicated Resident 1 had impaired cognition. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, with start date 1/31/25, indicated, Midodrine HCl [medication to treat low blood pressure (hypotension)] Oral Tablet 5 MG [milligrams-unit of measurement] (Midodrine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypotension *HOLD for SBP [systolic blood pressure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preparation in accordance with professional standards for food service safety were provided for a census of 86, when:1. A kitchen staff's personal food item was found in refrigerator opened and expired;2. Low temperature dishwasher logs showed documentation of 200 parts per million (ppm - a unit of concentration to measure pollutants in water) for June, July, and August 2025; and 3. Kitchen staff did not know how to calibrate thermometers to determine food time/temperature control during lunch tray line. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a vulnerable population.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/12/25 at 8:30 a.m., in the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM confirmed a seafood item in an opened plastic container found in a cardboard box labeled, Liquid Cage Free Whole Eggs, was unlabeled with expiration date of 8/8/25 in the refrigerator door. The CDM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional standards of care for forty (40) residents in a census of 86, when the licensed nurse (LN) did not have consistent practice in enteral tube (flexible tube inserted into the gastrointestinal tract to deliver liquid nutrition or medications directly to the stomach or small intestine) medication administration, and the facility provided two versions of the policy and procedure addressing the practice with the same revision date and modified text.These failures had the potential to expose the residents on enteral tubes to unsafe medication administration and the adverse side effects of the medications.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/25 commencing at 4:27 p.m., a medication pass was conducted with LN 4. LN 4 prepared and administered seven medications for Resident 3. LN 4 combined and crushed together six medications: aspirin 81 mg (milligram unit of measurement, blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services were provided to meet the communication needs for three of 30 sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 55, and Resident 60), when:1. Resident 12, non-English speaking resident, was not provided with any communication board or devices; and2. Resident 55 and Resident 60, non-verbal dependent residents, were not provided with any visual materials to express their needs. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 12, Resident 55 and Resident 60's inability to participate in daily tasks, make choices, or have their preferences and unmet needs heard. 1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (AR), dated 5/2025, the AR indicated Resident 12 had diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 12's Physician's Order (PO) dated 5/28/25, the PO indicated Resident 12 had no mental capacity to make healthcare decisions. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/25 at 10:35 a.m. inside Resident 12's room with Licensed Nurse 5 (LN 5),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain good grooming, nail care and oral hygiene were provided to five of 30 sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 22, Resident 27, Resident 60 and Resident 77) who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), when:1. Resident 12's toenails were long, untrimmed, curled inward and discolored;2. Resident 22's left big toenail was long, jagged, untrimmed and curled outward; 3. Resident 27 toenails were long, jagged, untrimmed, discolored and curled inward;4. Resident 60's fingernails and toenails were long, jagged and untrimmed, his nostrils had yellowish-colored substance, his upper and lower eyelids and eyebrows had white-colored-crust-dried substance, his teeth were discolored, and his lips were cracked and dry, dry and scaly skin; and, 5. Resident 77's left second finger was discolored, jagged, untrimmed and curled inward, her eyebrows and the crevice of her nose had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free from accidents or hazards for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 61), when Resident 61 had a traumatic fall with injury. This failure resulted in Resident 61's decline in physical and psychosocial well-being.During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in late 2022 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and hypertension (high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/1/25, the MDS indicated Resident was cognitively intact.During a review of Resident 61's Care Plan (CP), revised and updated 6/18/23, the CP indicated Resident 61 was at risk for falls and injury due to bilateral above the knee amputations, paraplegia and muscle wasting and interventions included frequent checks and keeping the environment free of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 25.81% error rate, with eight medication errors out of 31 opportunities observed during a medication pass for two of five residents (Resident 3 and Resident 76).These failures resulted in medications not being administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders and may have affected the residents' clinical conditions.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/25 commencing at 4:27 p.m., a medication pass observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN 4), LN 4 was observed preparing and administering seven medications for Resident 3. LN 4 combined and crushed together six medications: Aspirin 81 mg (milligram unit of measurement, blood thinning medication), docusate sodium 100 mg (a stool softener medication), Magnesium oxide 400mg (a supplement medication), Metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg (a blood pressure medication), Risperidone 1mg (a medication used to treat psychiatric conditions), famotidine 20mg (a medication used to tread high stomach acid). LN 4 stated that Resident 3 had an order that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely for a census of 86, when:1. An open container of glucometer test strips was not labeled with the open date;2. One eye drop medication had no legible open date;3. Keys to the controlled substance cabinets and refrigerator were not secured.These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications or treatments that were unsafe or with reduced potency or accuracy, and increased risk of access to controlled substances by unauthorized individuals.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/25 at 10:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 6) in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER], the medication cart was inspected and found an open box of glucometer test strips that was not labeled with an open date. The directions on the box indicated use within 6 months after first opening. LN 6 confirmed the box should have been labeled with an open date. LN 6 was not able to state how long after opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from acquiring scabies (contagious skin infestation caused by mites), when the facility had three residents who tested positive for scabies (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) and facility wide prophylaxis was not completed per public health recommendations. This failure had the potential for multiple vulnerable residents to acquire scabies and suffer the effects of infestation including infection. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke- disrupted blood flow to the brain causing brain tissue death), ventilator dependence (requires a mechanical ventilator to breathe), tracheostomy (opening in neck to provide airway for breathing), and heart failure (heart does not pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 12/13/24, indicated .Patient was tested for scabies with Positive results .Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the wound care plan was updated and revised timely for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's moisture related skin condition deteriorated to a pressure ulcer stage 4 (pressure injuries extended to muscle, tendon, or bone) to include interventions ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in an inaccurate evaluation of the progress of wound healing for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted in October 2022 and readmitted in January 2023 with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the body), muscle wasting, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and reduced mobility. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] Skin Integrity Review, dated 9/10/24, the review indicated, WEEKLY WOUND EVALUATION: 9/10/24 SITE: Sacrococcyx [tailbone]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility did not obtain instructions for follow up care for Resident 1 who had electrodes placed for an EEG (electroencephalogram- measures electrical activity in the brain) machine and appointment for removal of electrodes was missed. This failure had the potential to have caused the scalp skin injuries after the electrodes were removed at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility initially in June 2013 with multiple diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke-lack of blood flow to the brain), quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and epilepsy (a seizure disorder). A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, active orders as of 10/4/24, indicated order 9/23/24, .medical device (EEG) Pressure injury (on scalp to forehead): - Cleanse with wound cleanser or normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain timely and appropriate pharmaceutical services for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a prescribed medication was unavailable to be administered as ordered by the physician. This failure caused Resident 1 to experience worsening tremors, increased rigidity, loss of balance, confusion, and agitation due to not achieving the therapeutic dose. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses that included parkinsonism (brain condition that cause slowed movements, rigidity (stiffness), and tremors), fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory, and mood issues), muscle wasting, atrophy, and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/4/24, the OSR indicated, Rytary® Oral Capsule Extended Release 23.75-95 MG [mg, unit of measure] (Carbidopa-Levodopa) Give 2 capsules by mouth three times a day related to PARKINSONISM . During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical information when meal tray tickets were thrown into the general kitchen trash. This failure had the potential of compromising resident privacy for 54 residents receiving facility prepared meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 9:36 a.m. near the dish washing sink, with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1), DA 1 was preparing the breakfast meal trays to be washed and, while doing so, threw the resident meal tray tickets into the kitchen's general trash. When asked what is done with the resident meal tray tickets, he pointed to the trash and stated, I throw them in here. A review of the facility's meal tray tickets for 8/20/24 were noted to include the following information: resident name, room number, diet order, food allergies, food preferences, and special dietary needs. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 9:39 a.m. with the District Kitchen Supervisor (DKS), the DKS confirmed that meal tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff had the knowledge and competencies to carry out dietary functions when: 1. A cook was unable to correctly read the temperature in one of the reach in freezers; 2. A Dietary Aide did not know how to check the temperature of a dishwashing machine; 3. A cook did not use a recipe when preparing pureed foods; and, 4. A cook used the wrong scoop size to measure out food quantities. These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness or weight loss for 54 Residents receiving facility prepared food. Findings: 1. During an interview on 8/19/24 at 10:23 a.m. near the kitchen's rear exit, with [NAME] 1 (CK 1), CK 1 was asked to check the temperature of the reach in freezer near the kitchen's rear exit. CK 1 was unable to differentiate between Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement for temperature) and Celsius (C, a unit of measurement for temperature) on the temperature probe used in the reach in freezer. CK 1 was also unable to state what temperature the reach in freezer should be. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe for pureed food for three out 20 residents (Resident 37, Resident 63 and Resident 85) receiving a pureed diet when a kitchen staff member used the wrong scoop size to measure out food quantities. This failure had the potential to place residents receiving a pureed diet at risk for malnutrition and weight loss. Findings: During a review of the facility's [Facility Name Diet Guide Sheet] (DGS), undated, the DGS indicated that residents on the dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) mechanical (food texture modified in a way to help residents swallow easier) and dysphagia puree diets should receive a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) serving of pureed potatoes and a #8 scoop serving of pureed cream style corn. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 12:02 p.m. in the food preparation area of the kitchen, with [NAME] 2 (CK 2) and District Kitchen Supervisor (DKS), CK 2 used a 3/8 scoop to measure the pureed potatoes and a ¼ scoop to measure out the pureed corn which caused residents on a pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to conserve nutritive value and palatability for 20 residents receiving a pureed diet when the pureed bread was prepared without using a recipe. This failure had the potential of leading to poor intake and malnutrition for the 20 residents receiving pureed meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 10:03 a.m. in the food preparation area, with the [NAME] (CK 2), CK 2 was observed pureeing slices of bread in a blender. CK 2 added an unmeasured amount of milk, bread, and water to the blender container then blended the ingredients. CK 2 then poured the pureed bread into a metal food container and started adding an unmeasured amount of food thickener. CK 2 indicated that, when making purees, he makes them without a recipe and goes by feel. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 12:35 p.m. near the kitchen entrance, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS brought two lunch test trays that contained one regular consistency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F812 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 54 residents who received facility prepared foods when: 1. Proper food labeling was not followed for items in the freezers, refrigerator, dry storage, and spice shelf; 2. Expired food items were found in the refrigerator, dry storage, and spice shelf; 3. Personal milk cartons were not stored at appropriate temperatures; 4. Kitchen reach in freezers contained multiple boxes of food items that were exposed and open to the freezer environment; a plastic container of brown sugar was not sealed properly; 5. Frozen foods were not stored at appropriate temperatures; 6. A steam table pan was found stored wet; 7. No air gaps were found in the produce sink; 8. The kitchen can opener had a chipped blade; and 9. A kitchen staff member was not wearing a beard restraint. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness for the 54 residents receiving facility prepared meals. Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection practices were followed when: 1. Respiratory Therapist (RT) did not perform hand hygiene during a breathing treatment for Resident 66; 2. The isolation trash can was not covered for Resident 66; 3. Oxygen tubing used by Resident 139 was not labeled and additional oxygen tubing and nebulizer facemasks were labeled with an expired date; 4. An air fan was found with black residue and lint in Resident 41's room; and 5. Three plastic trash containers were open and had no lid cover during lunch meal in the facility dining room. These failures had the potential to increase the transmission and spread of infection. Findings: 1.Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate), and heart failure. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 8:35 a.m. at Resident 66's bedside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain one out of three reach-in freezers in safe operating condition when the freezer was found running at unsafe temperatures. This failure had the potential to lead to growth of bacteria and food borne illness for all 54 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 8:18 a.m., in the facility kitchen, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the reach in freezer closest to the DS's office (freezer 1) had a temperature reading of 16 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement for temperature). The DM confirmed the temperature reading and stated, It should be colder. The DS stated, I think the freezer [freezer 1] was last serviced in July of this year [2024] but there is no scheduled maintenance .it might be broken. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 10:26 a.m., in the facility kitchen, with the DS, freezer 1 had a temperature reading of 20 F. All ice cream, gelato, and orange sherbet containers being stored in the freezer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, clean and comfortable environment was provided for a census of 89, when: 1. Several missing slats on the window blinds, three fluorescent bulbs not functioning, and three open trash containers without lids were found in the dining room; and 2. Resident 19 had a strong odor and foul-smelling room environment. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 11:42 a.m. in the facility dining room, Resident 12 stated, The place could be much better. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 12:15 p.m. in the dining room, the window blinds next to the table of Resident 12 had four missing slats. Restorative Nursing Aide 3 (RNA 3) verified the missing slats, and stated, It has been a while those blinds had been missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required in-service training, competency skills and techniques were provided for two out of two sampled Contracted Certified Nursing Assistants (CCNA) CCNA 15 and CCNA 16, when the facility was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate the CCNAs received no less than 12 hours of annual in-services. This failure had the potential to significantly compromise the quality of services provided to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/20/24 at 9:40 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD confirmed she could not find the missing documentation to support dementia management training for CCNA 15. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/20/24 at 10:25 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, The facility used contracted staff through a staffing agency, and the contracted nursing staffing agency is expected to provide CCNAs with mandatory training documentation. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 2:25 p.m. with the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and privacy were promoted for two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 19), when: 1. Staff did not knock nor identify himself and entered Resident 52's room; and, 2. Resident 19 was left with a pungent, strong body odor and foul-smelling immediate environment. These failures resulted in negatively impacting Resident 52 and Resident 19's emotional, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 52 was admitted in early of 2024 with diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/25/24, the MDS indicated Resident 52 had no memory impairment and had episodes of feeling down, depressed and hopeless. During a review of Resident 52's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 8/1/24, the NCP indicated, At risk for altered well-being & reduced sense of well-being related to: DX [diagnosis]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for two out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 85), when: 1. Resident 52's emotional issues and environmental concerns were not developed; and, 2. Resident 85 had no care plan developed and implemented for activities. These failures had the potential to result in residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 52 was admitted in early 2024 with diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/25/24, the MDS indicated Resident 52 had no memory impairment and had episodes of feeling down, depressed, and hopeless. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 11:10 a.m. in Resident 52's room, Resident 52 sat on the edge of the bed, awake, alert and verbally responsive. Resident 52 stated, I have been here six months .People here don't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 139), when: 1. Resident 18's nutrition care plan was not updated for an adaptive device; and, 2. Resident 139's pain care plan was not updated for a new pain medication. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 18 and Resident 139's not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in late 2015 with diagnoses which included stroke, diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar levels), left sided hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 18's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 5/20/20, the NCP indicated, Adaptive equipment: Sipper cups and Divided plate for all meals .No changes have been made since the last review. During a review of Resident 18's NCP, dated 8/19/20, the NCP indicated, SELF CARE DEFICIT:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene were provided for two out of 30 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 29), when: 1. Resident 19 was unkempt and the immediate environment had a strong foul-smelling odor; and, 2. Resident 29's fingernails were long and with jagged ends. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 19 was admitted in early 2020 with diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), blindness, and anxiety. During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/19/24, the MDS indicated Resident 19 had moderate memory impairment and did not reject ADL (activities of daily living) assistance. During a review of Resident 19's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 5/9/23, the NCP indicated, ADL SELF CARE DEFICIT: [Resident 19] is at risk for self-care deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet two of 30 sampled residents' (Resident 37 and Resident 85) activity needs when the residents did not receive in-room visits by staff. This failure increased the potential for residents to experience isolation and depression. Findings: Resident 37 admitted to the facility in late 2019 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke, medical condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted), aphasia (language disorder that makes it difficult for people to communicate), and quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects arms and legs). During a review of Resident 37's care plan (CP), initiated 5/10/22, the CP indicated, .Will continue in room visits 3 x week . During a review of Resident 37's, Activities- Quarterly [assessment] ., dated 5/17/24, the assessment indicated, Resident receives 1:1 in room visits with the activity staff .staff will continue to do in room visit. During a review of Resident 37's, CUSTOM IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] CARE CONFERENCE FORM .ACTIVITIES, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt appropriate alternatives, obtain physician's orders, and obtain an informed consent prior to using bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the side of the bed) for 1 of 30 residents (Resident 63). This failure had the potential to result in entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail), injury and/or negative physical outcomes to skin integrity or muscle function. Findings: Resident 63 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including sequelae of cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a blood vessel in the brain bursts), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscles weakening and shrinking), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/5/24, the MDS indicated Resident 63 had memory impairment. During an observation on 8/19/24 at 12:24 p.m. in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate inventory of narcotics (a medication that is used to relieve pain) for two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 76) when six tablets of narcotics were not entered into the residents Medication Administration Record (MAR, document that serves as a legal record of the drugs administered to a resident). This failure had the increased potential for diversion and not being able to accurately monitor the amount or frequency of medications given to residents. Findings: Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses which included cancer of the head and neck. During a review of Resident 66's physician orders (PO) dated 8/1/24-8/31/24, the PO indicated, Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 MG [mg, a unit of measurement] [Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen] Give 1 tablet .every 6 hours as needed for .pain. During a review of Resident 66's CONTROLLED DRUG RECORD [CDR], Individual Patient's Narcotic Record [a form that keeps count of the number of narcotics dispensed to a resident], entries dated from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were accommodated for one of 54 residents receiving facility prepared food (Resident 9) when Resident 9's request not to be served cream of wheat for breakfast was disregarded. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 9's nutritional status. Findings: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a lack of oxygen in the blood), pneumonia (infection of the lungs), and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away of a body part). During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/26/24, the MDS indicated Resident 9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Score (BIMS) of 13 indicating Resident 9 had no cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 9's meal tray ticket for breakfast on 8/20/24, the tray ticket indicated, No cream of wheat Oatmeal please 3 butter packets. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 8:15 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 73) were provided with necessary adaptive equipment for meals as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being and contribute to decreased meal intake. Findings: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in late 2015 with diagnoses which included stroke, diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar levels), left sided hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 18's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 8/19/20, the NCP indicated, SELF CARE DEFICIT: due to: Need assistance IN ADL [activity of daily living]: Resident's ability to perform ADL at highest practicable level will be promoted with interventions. During a review of Resident 18's Clinical Physician Orders (CPO), dated 1/12/24, the CPO indicated, Consistent Carbohydrate (CCD) diet, Dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device to alert nursing staff when a resident is in need) was within reach of one resident (Resident 1) out of a sample of four residents. This failure prevented Resident from communicating his care needs and had the potential to increase his anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted in February 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included, quadriplegia (the inability to use both arms, both legs, and the torso), tracheostomy (a surgical hole in windpipe for breathing), dependent on a ventilator (a machine that helps those who cannot breathe on their own), a voice disorder (inability to use voice to communicate), and an anxiety disorder. An interview on 9/21/23 at 10:23 a.m., CNA 1 stated its important to ensure call lights are in reach of the residents. CNA 1 added if a call light is not in reach the resident could get agitated and feel abandoned. During a concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper garbage disposal, for a census of 85. This deficient practice had the potential of disease spreading among residents and visitors by vermin and pest infestation. Findings: In an observation on 7/27/21 at 9:35 a.m., two outdoor trash dumpsters in the parking lot were overflowing to the point where lids could not be closed. Approximately 15 white plastic garbage bags were also on the ground around the bins. In a concurrent interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), she stated that the bins were regularly collected on Monday, Wednesday and Friday; the contractor did not collect the bins the previous day, Monday. During an interview on 7/28/21 at 12:59 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist, she stated they have had an increase in trash due to more residents on isolation precautions. She further explained she was concerned about infections (from biologic and food waste) coming back into the facility since nurses and staff walking through the parking lot can carry infectious material on their shoes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain food safety when: 1. Freezer 3 had ice build-up on the walls supporting the door; 2. An employee's facial hair was not fully restrained while working in the kitchen; 3. Plastic pans were stacked wet (wet nesting) in the ready to use area; and 4. A leaking pipe was in the walk-in refrigerator which stored food. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness for 44 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 7/27/21 at 8:20 a.m., freezer 3 (a reach-in, chest style freezer) was opened, revealing ice buildup on all four side walls that supported the door. This ice buildup was continuous and up to 1 inch (a unit of measure) in length. This freezer contained diced turkey, sliced turkey, chicken strips, chicken nuggets, and burgers. In an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 7/27/21 at 4:36 p.m., he stated he maintenance of the freezers are conducted monthly but was unable to provide documented evidence of when it was last done. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide safe food storage of food brought for residents from outside sources nor did they have a mechanism to heat food for later use. This failure had the potential to prevent residents from receiving preferred foods for later enjoyment for the 44 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial tour on 7/27/21 at 10:23 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated residents may have food brought in from restaurants for immediate consumption but went on to explain the facility does not reheat or store resident food for later use. In an interview on 7/27/21 at 4:48 p.m., the Wound Care Nurse stated the facility does not have refrigerators on the nursing unit or in the resident's room to store resident food. She went on to explain, Residents may have food brought in, and if it is within their diet, the resident must eat the food right away as the facility does not store or heat up resident foods. A review of a facility policy titled Food for Residents From Outside Sources, dated 2018, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During a dining observation on 7/27/21 between noon and 1:00 p.m., residents were not offered hand washing or sanitizer prior to eating their meal. In reviewing resident trays, sanitizing wipes were not on the meal tray for personal hygiene. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/27/21 at 12:53 p.m., the final tray was passed and again no hand hygiene was observed. CNA 4 started to feed the resident. When asked, she stated she had not washed the resident's hands or offered sanitizing gel prior to the meal. She then looked over the tray for a sanitizing wipe and concurred that there was not one. In an interview with the Infection Preventionist on 7/28/21 at 12:59 p.m., she stated residents should have their hands washed and dried prior to meals, as well as positioned in an appropriate position for eating. If a resident can get up, they should be encouraged to wash their hands with soap and water, for others we can use hand sanitizer. She further explained that keeping hands clean is one of the steps taken to avoid getting sick and spreading germs to others. A review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were implemented for: the use of a low air loss (LAL, pressure reducing) mattress, repositioning every two hours, and elbow and knee splints for one resident (Resident 30) for a census of 85. These failures had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 30's range of motion and reopening and development of pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of both the arms and the legs) and persistent vegetative state. Review of a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 5/12/21, indicated Resident 30 was totally dependent on and required two or more staff for physical assistance. It also indicated Resident 30 did not have any skin ulcers and was receiving a pressure reducing device for a chair and bed; was in a turning/repositioning program; and required the application of nonsurgical dressings. A review of Resident 30's progress note, dated 6/13/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nursing Services [person-centered nursing care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents] were provided as scheduled for one resident (Resident 30), for a census of 85. This failure had the potential for a further reduction in range of motion for Resident 30. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of both the arms and the legs) and persistent vegetative state. Review of a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 5/12/21, indicated Resident 30 was impaired in functional range of motion in both arms and legs. A review of Resident 30's care plan, revised 5/4/21, indicated, Resident is at risk for decline in ROM [Range of Motion] and/or functional mobility . Interventions/Tasks [for staff to implement] .RNA [Restorative Nurse Assistant] to apply bilateral knee extension splints for up to 4 hours or as tolerated [daily] 5 [times] a week…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 48) maintained the resident's desired weight, for a census of 85. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for negative physical and psychosocial effects of undesired weight loss. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 48 was admitted in August of 2019 with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and required tube feedings (formula feedings via a tube directly to the stomach) to maintain nutritional status. In an interview on 7/28/21 at 8:24 a.m., Resident 48 reported weight loss over the past two months which left Resident 48 weak. Resident 48 denied desiring the weight loss and preferred to weigh around 200 pounds (lbs). Resident 48 believed the weight loss was related to staff having forgot to start his tube feeds. A record review indicated Resident 48 weighed 197 lbs upon admission and currently weighed 182 lbs on 7/5/21. In an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 7/29/21 at 2:30 p.m., the RD stated she was not aware of Resident 48's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe enteral feeding (tube feeding, delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach) was performed for two residents (Resident 45 and Resident 74), for a census of 85, when: 1. Resident 45's head of bed was not elevated at least 30 degrees during the tube feeding; and 2. Resident 74's feeding tube formula was not correctly labeled nor the tubing dated. These failures increased the potential to result in aspiration (when liquid enters the airway or lungs) and incorrect labeling. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 45 was admitted in February 2021 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 45's order summary report, dated 7/30/21, indicated, an active physician's order for the head of the bed to be elevated 30 degrees at all times starting on 2/21/21. A review of a Physician/NP (Nurse Practitioner)/ PA (Physician Assistant) progress note, dated 7/26/21 at 11:37 a.m., indicated, .[Resident 45] has a PEG [type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents was provided as scheduled for one resident (Resident 30), for a census of 85. This failure had the potential for Resident 30 to develop contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (partial or complete paralysis of both the arms and the legs) and persistent vegetative state. Review of a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 5/12/21, indicated Resident 30 was impaired in functional range of motion in both arms and legs. A review of Resident 30's care plan, revised 5/4/21, indicated, Resident is at risk for decline in ROM [Range of Motion] and/or functional mobility . Interventions/Tasks [for staff to implement] .RNA [Restorative Nurse Assistant] to apply bilateral knee extension splints for up to 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Emergency kit (E-kit, a limited amount of medications for use in an emergency) was replaced after medication removal within the required timeframe, for a census of 85. This failure decreased the facility's ability to have medications available during an emergency. Findings: An inspection of the medication room in Station 1 was conducted on 7/28/21 starting at 2:42 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The Intravenous (IV, medications to be given through a vein) E-kit had a red seal and the ADON confirmed the E-kit was previously opened. In a concurrent interview and record review on 7/29/21 at 11:40 a.m., the ADON confirmed a medication was taken out from the IV E-kit on 7/24/21 and the E-kit was not replaced within 72 hours. The ADON stated her expectation was for nurses to follow-up with the pharmacy when replacement was not received as scheduled. In a telephone interview on 7/30/21 at 1:38 p.m., the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) stated once the E-kit was opened, the licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound solution (used for cleansing, irrigating, moistening and gentle removal of unhealthy tissue) was properly labeled, for a census of 85. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination and increase the risk of infection. Findings: An inspection of the medication cart #3 was conducted on 7/29/21 starting at 2:44 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1). The LN 1 confirmed the observation of an opened and unlabeled wound solution in the bottom drawer with approximately 100 milliliters (ml, unit of measure) of fluid remaining in a 475 ml bottle. The LN 1 was unaware which resident the solution was used for. In a telephone interview on 7/30/21 at 1:38 p.m., the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) stated if the wound solution was supplied by the pharmacy, it should have a label with the residents' name on the bottle. In an interview on 7/30/21 at 5:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not know for which resident the unlabeled and undated wound solution was used for. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$21,879 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $21,879 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-03 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRAZIER, SUZANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
CALABAZARON, REDENTORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2022
CHINTHAKINDI, RAVIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2024
MAYS, DARLENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/18/2022
THAPA, NISCHALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2024
VAN WAGENEN, SEANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$985K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 5%Other / private 24%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $985K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$620per resident / day
operating cost
$18,863per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$516per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055887. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next