Socal Post-Acute Care
7931 S. Sorenson Ave., Whittier, CA 90606 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (562) 698-0451 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 4.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.9%CMS range 54.5–73.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.5–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.6–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 56.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.446 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage disposal area was free of clutter by leaving the dumpster surrounded by used cardboard boxes and empty plastic containers. This failure had the potential to attract pests such as rats, cockroaches, flies, and ants, which may spread disease to the residents of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/2026 at 7:42 AM with the Maintenance Director (MD) at the facility's garbage disposal area, the ground was cluttered with garbage. Next to the main dumpster there were both constructed and deconstructed cardboard boxes stacked on top of each other. Directly adjacent to the dumpster were at least ten empty plastic containers stacked on top of each other. The MD stated the area around the dumpster should be clear of trash and the boxes and containers should not be left around the dumpster. The MD stated it is important not to leave trash around the dumpster as it may attract pests, which may lead to infections. It is a pest control risk. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's infection control policy and procedure by failing to: 1.Ensure the two pillows were not place on the handwashing sink and ensure Family Member (FM) for Resident 64 who was on contact precaution (infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infections transmitted through direct or indirect contact) wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) when in contact with the resident. 2. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 4) performed hand hygiene (the act of cleaning your hands to remove germs, dirt, and viruses) when feeding. 3.Ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and 2) performed hand hygiene when entering and exiting the residents' rooms. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination and healthcare-associated infections that could lead to a wide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT - a coordinated group of experts from several different fields who work together) assessed one of six sampled residents (Resident 16) to determine the resident's ability to self-administer medication and keep the medications at the bedside. In addition, Resident 16 had no physician's order to self-administer medications and keep artificial tears ophthalmic solution (eye drops) and Tums tablets (chewable antacid tablets containing calcium carbonate for fast relief of heartburn, sour stomach, acid indigestion, and upset stomach) at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration and overdose of medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record the (AR) indicated that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled Answering the Call Light for one out of one sampled residents (Resident 8) with call light that was not within reach. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of not having their needs meet timely, especially during an emergency or accident. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, down syndrome (a genetic condition leading to intellectual disability and developmental delays), and reduced mobility. During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/25/2025, the H&P indicated that the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 1/2/2026, the MDS indicated that the resident has severely impaired cognition (the ability to process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures regarding the formulation of an Advance Directive (AD a legal document that specify the person's medical treatment preferences and appoint a surrogate decision-maker if you become unable to communicate their wishes) for two out of four sampled residents (Resident 39 and Resident 47). As a result of this deficient practice, the facility had the potential to not honor the residents' wishes and choices in the event that they become incapable of making decisions regarding their care. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking, urinary tract infection (infection of the urinary system), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 47's History and Physical (H&P), date 1/21/2026, the H&P indicated that the resident has the capacity to make needs known but cannot make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to reflect the resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) reflected of the resident's status at the time of the assessment on two of six sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 42) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 22 fall on 1/3/2026 was documented in the MDS and Activities of daily living (ADL's) were accurately assessed and documented in the MDS. 2. Ensure Resident 42 ADL's were accurately assessed and documented in the MDS. These failures had the potential of not identifying Resident 22 and Resident 42's relevant care needs and developing a plan of care that will meet their needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a temporary brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the body), dementia (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 10)'s care plan was updated to reflect the discontinuation of Ativan (a medication used to quickly calm the brain and nervous system). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 10 not to receive the necessary care and behavioral monitoring when Ativan was discontinued. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (face sheet), dated 3/5/2026, the face sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills over time), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), and anxiety disorder (repeated episodes of feelings of intense fear or terror). During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/5/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 10 does not have the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor and evaluate one of six sampled residents (Resident 16) who complained of diarrhea on and off for two months. This deficient practice had the potential to result in weight loss, fluid and electrolytes deficit. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record the (AR) indicated that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), left and right leg above the knee amputation (AKA-surgical removal of the portion of the leg above the knee joint). During a review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H &P) dated 6/16/2025 indicated that resident does have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 2/18/2026, the MDS indicated that Resident 16 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) treatments per physician's orders for one of six sampled residents (Resident 46) by failing to provide range of motion exercises to the affected joints. This deficient practice had the potential to promote the development of contractures (a condition involving shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of the joints) in Resident 46's upper and lower extremities. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), cerebrovascular accident (stroke), and contracture of the left elbow. During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The MDS documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for the infusion of intravenous (IV, directly into the vein) medications for one out of one resident (Resident 39) who was receiving IV medications at the facility when Resident 39's IV medication bag did not contain the appropriate labeling. This deficient practice placed Resident 39 at risk of developing IV-related complications such as infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's AR, the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia (elevated blood cholesterol level), pneumonia (infection of the lungs), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure) During a review of Resident 39's H&P, dated 2/19/2026, the H&P did not indicate if the resident has the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 39's Physician's Progress Note, dated 2/26/2026, indicated that Resident 39 has the capacity to make medical decisions. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters for required monitoring prior to medication administration for one of six sampled residents (Resident 63). During a medication pass, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed preparing and about to administer Resident 63's ordered Doxazosin Mesylate (a medication used to lower blood pressure) via the gastrostomy tube (G tube). The surveyor stopped the administration when LVN 1 did not check Resident 63's blood pressure and heart rate as required by the physician's order. The order directed staff to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110 or if the heart rate (HR) was below 60. This deficient practice had the potential to result Resident 63's risk for adverse outcomes (undesired effect of medication) such as severe hypotension (dangerously low blood pressure where blood flow to vital organs-like the brain, heart, and kidneys are severely reduced) that could cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 10)'s psychotherapeutic drug (medications that affects mood and behavior) Informed Consent Form (a written document ensuring voluntary participation in research or medical procedures, detailing the study's purpose, duration, procedures, risks, and benefits) was completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 10 or the responsible party to receive information such as side effects about the medication Rexulti (an antipsychotic medication used to treat agitation). Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (face sheet), dated 3/5/2026, the face sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills over time), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), and anxiety disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen freezer was maintained at a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) and below, per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in widespread foodborne illnesses with the residents. Findings: During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 8:39 a.m. in the kitchen, the thermometer inside the freezer read 18 F and the digital thermometer on the exterior of the freezer read 22 F. During an observation on 3/3/2026 at 8:13 a.m. in the kitchen, the thermometer inside the freezer read 30 F. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/3/2026 at 8:21 a.m. with the Director of Food Services (DFS), the Cold Storage Temperature Log, dated 3/3/2026 was reviewed. The log indicated the freezer's readings are to be 0 F or lower. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/2026 at 10:22 a.m. with DFS, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated October 2017 was reviewed. The P&P indicated the freezer must keep frozen foods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 33), had their call light within reach. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' ability to request assistance when needed.Findings: During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 9:32 a.m. in Resident 17's room, Resident 17 was lying in bed with a sling on her right arm. The call light was behind the resident, tied to the bottom right side of the bed, not within reach. During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 9:51a.m. in Resident 33's room, Resident 33 was lying in bed in with their head elevated at a 45degree angle. The call light was behind the resident, on the floor not within reach. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/2026 at 12:38 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) title, Answering the Call Light, dated September 2022 was reviewed. The P&P indicated the call light is to be accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing and from the floor. RN 1stated it is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNA) were competent in providing appropriate care and services during resident transfers, to and from the bed, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) who underwent orthopedic surgery (a procedure on the musculoskeletal system [a complex of network of bones, muscles, joints, tendons, and ligaments that work together to provide support, movement, and protection to the body) This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for further injury and delay healing process.A review of Resident 1's general acute care hospital (GACH) records, dated 10/13/24, prior to the admission to the facility, indicated Resident 1 was status post fall with left femur fracture, status post (s/p) surgery on 10/10/24. The record indicated the diagnosis was open femur fracture. A review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/23/2024 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to account for and administer medications as ordered by the physician for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), by failing to: 1. Account for Resident 1 ' s Dilaudid 4 mg tablet bubble pack (also known as a blister pack, a card that packaged doses of medication within small, clear plastic bubbles [or blisters] for easy and safe administration) and the Controlled Medication Count Sheet (CMCS, form used to keep track of how much of a controlled medication was on hand, how much was given to a resident, and how much remained) for the bubble pack. 2. Administer Resident 2 ' s Alprazolam 0.25 mg tablet on 5/4/2025 at 3:30 AM (55 minutes earlier than what was ordered by the physician). 3. Document Resident 2 received Alprazolam 0.25 mg tablet on 5/4/2025 at 3:30 AM in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 4. Implement Resident 2 ' s Care Plan interventions to administer anti-anxiety medications as ordered by the physician.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after experiencing a fall on 4/4/25 and reported having pain on 4/6/25. Resident 1's x-ray (a medical imaging test that creates images of the inside of the body) that was ordered by the physician 4/6/25 at 7:48 AM due to the resident's complaint of pain on the ankle and x-ray was taken on 4/7/25 at 10:59AM. The facility did not follow up to with the Radiology (company that specialize in x-rays) company of the resident's x-ray to obtain the x-ray result. As a result of this deficient practice the X-ray result was not received until 4/9/25 that showed ankle fracture (broken bone) which delayed Resident 1's care and hospitalization after a fall to receive care which could potentially result in long term functional limitation, persistent pain, and limited of range of motion affecting the resident's quality of life negatively. Findings: During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's trash bin was not overflowing. The facility disposed trash in a bin with overflowing trash and the trash was on the ground of the facility's parking lot. These deficient practices had the potential to attract pest and rodents, that could spread infection and create an uncomfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/2025 at 7:56 PM with the Dietary Director (DD), a variety of trash (open boxes, broken containers, wooden pallets, broken decorations and other scattered items) was observed within the view of residents ' windows in the facility ' s parking lot. The DD stated, The trash should be disposed in the trash can, not on the parking lot floor (ground). We don't know if it's hazardous, it can attract animals, bugs. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/2025 at 8:35 PM with the Maintenance Director (MNTD) a variety of trash (open boxes, broken containers, wooden pallets, broken decorations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to put an opening date on an open pack of ground beef in the facility's one of one freezer. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses to 54 residents residing in the facility who receives their daily meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/2025 at 6:25 PM with the Dietary Director (DD) an open pack of ground beef was observed without an opening date. The DD stated, We don't know how long something has been opened if there is no opening date. This pack of ground beef does not have an opening date on it. It might be old and cause a resident to get sick if they eat it. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/12/2025 at 10:28 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods dated 2023, indicated, All food items in the storeroom, refrigerator and freezer need to be labeled and dated. Newly opened food items will need to be closed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 53's Advance Directive Acknowledgment Form (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law [whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State], relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) was completed upon admission to the facility on 1/7/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in misinformation of medical care and treatment and not honoring resident's wishes in cases where the resident and/or responsible party was unable to participate in making healthcare decisions. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following other nontraumatic intracranial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-12 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the blood sugar levels are too high). The facility failed to ensure all appropriate discharge orders from General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 were verified with the attending physician (Physician 1) upon readmission to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 53 not receiving the care and services to continue diabetic management and/or medications for the resident ' s diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, while in the facility from 12/8/2024 to 1/12/2024 (36 days). Cross Referenced to F641, F657, and F692 Findings: During a review of facility's admission Record indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted on [DATE] but readmitted back to the facility from GACH 1 on 12/8/2024, with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) was accurate for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the blood sugar levels are too high) with no physician orders for Diabetes Management. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 53 not to receive appropriate treatment and/or services. Cross Referenced to F635, F657, and F692 Findings: During a review of Resident 53's Facility Physician Progress Notes from GACH 1 dated 12/1/2024 indicated a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus with blood sugar control per protocol. During a review of facility's Facility admission Record indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema (condition caused by excess fluid in the lungs), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease (ESRD- condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) who had an active care plan for a diagnosis diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the blood sugar levels are too high) with no physician orders for Diabetes Management. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 53 not receiving appropriate treatment and/or services for the Diabetes. Cross Referenced to F635, F641, and F692 Findings: During a review of Resident 53's Physician Progress Notes from GACH 1 dated 12/1/2024 indicated a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus with blood sugar control per protocol. During a review of facility's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema (condition caused by excess fluid in the lungs), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease (ESRD- condition in which the kidneys lose the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive approach in regard to resident's diet for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) by failing to ensure an accurate nutritional assessment was completed for Resident 53 ' s diagnosis for diabetes mellitus (DM- a disease in which the blood sugar levels are too high). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 53 to not receive the appropriate diet and nutritional needs that addressed her DM. Cross Referenced to F635, F641, and F657 Findings: During a review of Resident 53's Physician Progress Notes from GACH 1 dated 12/1/2024 indicated a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus with blood sugar control per protocol. During a review of facility's admission Record indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema (condition caused by excess fluid in the lungs), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 15) was receiving the appropriate oxygen flow rate in liters per minute (LPM; measurement of volume delivered, used to measure delivery of oxygen) for chronic respiratory failure (when not enough oxygen passes from your lungs to your blood) as ordered by the attending physician and in accordance with the resident's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 15 not to receive enough oxygen or receive too much oxygen which can lead to oxygen toxicity (a condition that occurs when someone breathes in too much oxygen, damaging the lungs and other organs). Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure and pulmonary embolism (PE; when a blood clot blocks and stops blood flow to an artery in the lung). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician responded to a recommendation made by the consultant pharmacist (CP) regarding laboratory monitoring for one of four residents (Residents 18) sampled for medication regimen review between 1/9/2024 and 1/9/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a negative impact on the resident ' s overall physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of facility's admission Record indicated Resident 18 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on 3/16/2019, with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when there are high levels of sugar in the blood)with unspecified diabetic retinopathy(a complication of diabetes that damages the blood vessels in the eyes), Major depressive disorder(a mood disorder that consist of feelings of sadness, hopelessness and loss interest) During a review of Resident 18 ' s History and Physical Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the spread of transmission of infections to residents, staff members, visitors in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure on infection control by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was aware when to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) in an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) room for one of one sampled resident (Resident 49) who had an EBP. 2. Ensure LVN 1 disposed of soiled PPE in a disposable bin inside of Resident 49 ' s room. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the risk of the spread of infection to the residents, staff, and other visitors in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who has a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Guillain-Barre syndrome (a neurological condition causing muscle weakness or paralysis [the loss of the ability to move some or all of the body]) and was assessed as a high risk for falls by failing to: 1. Increase the residents ' need for supervision, including the development of an individualized care plan indicating the frequency of supervision to be provided to the resident after the first fall at the facility on 10/22/24, as indicated in the facility ' s policy and procedure [P&P] titled Safety and Supervision of Residents. 2. Implement Resident 1 ' s care plan titled Witnessed Fall Care Plan to monitor Resident 1 ' s whereabouts and frequent visual monitoring after sustaining a fall on 10/22/24 [3 days after admission to the facility]. 3. Analyze the risk in identifying the trends of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) do not diminish for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was dependent with staff on personal hygiene, toilet use and ADL. Resident 1 was left wet with urine for a long period of time, not kept clean and dry as indicated in the resident's care plan and the facility's policy and procedures. As a result of this deficient practice Resident 1 was placed at risk for skin breakdown, infection and feeling frustrated that could result in a decline in ability to perform activities of daily living. Findings: During a review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction (an area of necrotic [dead] tissue in the brain resulting from a blockage or narrowing in the arteries supplying blood and oxygen to the brain). During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facilities policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Management, and Reporting Policies by failing to complete in the facility's employment application (reference section) regarding the previous employer(s), and the facility did not contact the employee's previous employer or references for the employee's character or any history of abuse prior hiring five of five randomly selected employees (Registered Nurse 2 [RN 2], Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4), LVN 3, Certified Nurse Assistant 2 [CNA 2], and CNA 1). This deficient practice had the potential to hire employees with history of abuse, and result in abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents which could lead to harm and abuse of residents. Findings: During a concurrent review of the employee file of RN 2 and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/14/2024 at 11:59 am, the DON stated RN 2 was hired on 11/12/2020, but there was no documented evidence in RN 2's employee file that the facility's employment application section was answered for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-14 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS: a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) was accurate for two of three sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 56) for the use of physical restraints (any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body). 1. For Resident 56, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected an accurate assessment of the resident's discharge destination. Resident 56, who was discharged home was coded in the MDS assessment as being discharged to a general acute care hospital (GACH). 2. For Resident 4 the MDS was coded incorrectly for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the palliation of a terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms) services. These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 4 and Resident 56 not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident 34's Face sheet (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) indicated an admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aftercare following joint replacement, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 34's History and Physical assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 34 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 34's Order Summary Report (a physician's order) indicated the following: a. On 2/9/2023, the physician ordered Resident 34 to receive Bupropion (Wellbutrin) Hydrochloride (HCl) Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 150 milligrams (mg-a unit of measure) one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression manifested by self-report of feeling sad. b. On 2/9/2023, the physician ordered Resident 34 to be monitored for depression behavior as evidence by self-report of feeling sad for Wellbutrin use. c. On 12/9/2023, the physician ordered Resident 34 to be monitored for hours of sleep every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of two sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 159 ) who are high risk for developing pressure injuries (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for too long which reduces blood flow to the area and cause the skin to die and develop a sore) by failing to set the Alternating Pressure Mattress (mattress that provides pressure redistribution by filling and un-filling air cells within the mattress so that contact points with the body are reduced) according to the resident's weight as indicated in the manufacturer's recommendation. Resident 4's body weighs 170 pounds (lbs.-a unit of measurement) Resident 159's body weight of 220 pounds. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 4 and Resident 159 to develop worsened or new pressure ulcer or injury (skin injury due to prolonged unrelieved pressure or skin friction) and/or delay the resident's wound to heal. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 7, 108 and 47) receiving oxygen therapy were provided respiratory care and resident safety in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and professional standard of practice by failing to: 1. Ensure proper placement of Resident 7's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula tubing (flexible plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen through nostrils and the tubing is fitted over the patient's ears) was administered continuously and not placed in a storage bag. 2. Ensure Resident 108's nasal cannula was placed properly by placing both nasal prongs in the resident's nostrils; one prong of the nasal cannula was observed in the resident's nostril. In addition, there was no cautionary sign posted on the resident's door indicating oxygen in use in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. 3. Resident 47's nasal cannula tubing (NC-flexible plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen through nostrils and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pulmonary edema (a condition caused by too much fluid in the lungs), essential primary hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high). A review of Resident 11's History and Physical Assessment, dated 12/23/2023, indicated Resident 1 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 11's Order Summary Report dated 1/14/2024, indicated a physical order for the resident to receive Apixaban (a medication known as blood thinner and reduce blood clot formation) oral (by mouth) Tablet 5 milligrams (mg, unit of measure), give one tablet by mouth two times day for A-fib with a start date of 12/19/2023. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 11's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Order Summary Report with Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/14/2024 at 4:29 PM, DON stated she could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and safe food handling based on the facilities policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. The Dietary Supervisor wore hair net while in the kitchen. 2. The opened bag of five dozen corn tortillas found in refrigerator were dated on when it was opened. 3. The Main [NAME] 1 changed gloves while preparing grilled cheese sandwich, opening drawer to grab spatula, and then proceeding to touch grilled cheese sandwich with the same gloves. These deficient practices had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: On 1/12/2024 at 6:14 PM, during the initial observation of the kitchen, Dietary Supervisor (DS) was observed in the kitchen putting away utensil and not wearing a hair net. On 1/12/2024 at 6:18 PM, during a concurrent interview with DS, DS stated she was getting ready to go home and was doing last minute checks for the next day's meals, and she forgot she was not wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the spread and transmission of infections to residents, staff members, visitors in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure on infection control by failing to: 1. Ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 2 wore the N95 respirator mask (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of air particles) that covered the nose and mouth while in the facility during an active Coronavirus (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 virus)) outbreak. 2. Ensure used face shields (a plastic covering the face) by staff were disposed after use. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the number of infected residents and spread the infection to the residents, staff, and other visitors in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/12/2024 at 6:12 PM, RN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and treat one of two sampled residents (Resident 159) with respect, privacy and dignity by failing to ensure Resident 159's foley catheter bag (a small flexible, rubber tube that is placed through your skin into the kidney to drain your urine) was left covered to provide resident privacy. These deficient practices had the potential to cause Resident 159 to feel embarrassed that could lead to a psychosocial (mental and emotional well-being) decline, resident's individuality, self-esteem, and self-worth. Findings: A review of Resident 159's Face Sheet (an admission record) indicated Resident 159 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked). A review of Resident 159's History and Physical dated 1/10/2024 indicated Resident 159 does not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of need for one (1) of 14 sampled resident (Resident 2) who was at risk for fall, by failing to ensure the resident's call light (a device used to call for assistance) was within reach as indicated in Resident 2's Care Plan and the facility's policy and procedure, titled Answering the Call Light. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not to receive or received delayed care to meet the necessary care and services that could result in fall and accident. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 2 on 12/5/2023 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and history of falling. During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/6/2023, the record indicated, Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and made decision. During a review of Resident 2's Care Plan, indicated Resident 2 was risk for falls or injury initiated on 12/6/2023. The care plan interventions indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 159) with suprapubic catheter (a hollow flexible tube that is used to drain urine from the bladder.) had an active physician's order for the indication of placement for suprapubic catheter and the necessary care and treatments while in use. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 159 with a suprapubic catheter to experience UTIs and had the potential to cause actual harm. Findings: A review of Resident 159's Face Sheet (an admission record) indicated Resident 159 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked). A review of Resident 159's History and Physical dated 1/10/2024 indicated Resident 159 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 159's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent unnecessary use of medication by failing to assess for depression (depression, mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that can interfere with daily life) and monitor the side effects (undesired effect of medication) for one (1) of 1 resident (Resident 1) who was receiving Duloxetine (a type of antidepressant medication, used to treat depression and anxiety). As result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 and other residents receiving psychotropic medications (any medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) could develop side effects that are not detected or continues to receive the medications even when the indication for the use of psychotropic medications had been resolve. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated a readmission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included transient cerebral ischemic attack (stroke, occurs when there is a lack of blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances verbalized by a family member (Family 1) by one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) and keep Family 1 appropriately apprised of progress towards resolution. In addition, the facility failed to issue a written grievance decision to Resident 1 and Family 1, in accordance with the facility ' s policy on Grievance/Concern. This deficient practice increased the risk for negative psychosocial impact on Resident 1 ' s quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/02/2023 with diagnoses of urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra), difficulty walking, and muscle weakness . A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical Examination dated 11/16/2023, indicated Resident 1 can make needs known but could not make medical decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and screen tool) dated 11/06/2023,indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-03-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post an accurate nurse staffing information of actual hours worked by Registered Nurses (RN), License Vocational Nurse (LVN) and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) per shift on 2/23/2026 up to 3/3/2026 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Number. This deficient practice of posting inaccurate nurse staffing information misinforms the residents and responsible parties about sufficient staffing ratio per residents to meet their needs which affects their quality of care.Findings: During a review of the facility documents titled Nursing Personnel on Duty, (posting of staffing information) dated 2/23/2026 up to 3/3/2026, the document did not indicate, the number of actual time worked per shift for each category (licensed or non-licensed) and type of nursing staff (RN, LVN , and CNA), instead it had a combined total hours per shift of all nursing staff. During a concurrent interview and record review of the document Nursing Personnel on Duty, on 3/4/2026, at 8:36 AM, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALABAZARON, REDENTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/14/2022 |
| DAHL, SHANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/12/2021 |
| GARZA, VICTORIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| GORMAN, MINDEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/13/2021 |
| MALLARI, MARYLIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/30/2020 |
| SULIT-FERNANDEZ, JOANA MAE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| THAPA, NISCHAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/06/2024 |
| WELSH, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2009 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $602K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055168. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.