Double Tree Post Acute Care Center
7400 24th Street, Sacramento, CA 95822 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 122 certified beds · (916) 422-4825 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,842 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 27.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.14 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.2%CMS range 22.6–45.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.8–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.9%CMS range 7.2–17.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly manage a resident's Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2-a disease that results in too much glucose, also called blood sugar in the blood) for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 31) when the Licensed Nurses (LN) did not follow Physician Orders and the standards of care for diabetes. These failures resulted in Resident 31 having dangerously high levels of glucose throughout the day and suffering from unwanted symptoms of hyperglycemia (high sugar level) which could have led to a diabetic coma, a life-threatening medical emergency requiring immediate medical care or death if left untreated. Findings: An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was declared at 7:25 p.m. on 9/30/24 with Facility leadership representatives including the Regional Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) due to Resident 31 having dangerously high glucose levels throughout the day and suffering from symptoms of hyperglycemia while the Licensed Nurses (LNs) failed to administer Resident 31's morning insulin (a medication that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure industry standards for food safety were met for a resident population of 102, when: Kitchen walls had chipped paint and damaged dry walls, food shelves were rusty, vents over food production area were rusty, floor tiles were chipped, and linoleum tiles had dark discoloration and rust stains making it difficult to determine if clean and sanitary;Spices were labeled using inconsistent use by dating system and one spice had expired;Plastic containers and lids were stacked and stored while wet in ready-to-use area; A metal colander was observed with dried food inside the openings and along the base, a plastic scoop had food residue inside its bowl, and a knife case had dust and crumbs all along the top near insertion sites. All were found in the clean ready-to-use area; andSix out of eight fry pans were found with chipped and greasy cooking surfaces and were available for use. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the pureed and alternate foods made for lunch on 1/21/26 were not made by methods that conserved nutritive value, flavor and appearance when recipes were not utilized. This failure had the potential to lead to poor intake, weight loss and malnutrition for the 6 residents eating the chicken entree and 10 residents (Residents 2, 14, 16, 24, 42, 52, 63, 71, 90 & 95) receiving the pureed pot roast and pureed peas.Findings: During a return visit to the kitchen on 1/21/2026 at 9:42 a.m., [NAME] 1 (Ck 1) was preparing the lunch meal. The main meal consisted of pot roast and roasted potatoes which had been prepared and were in the oven. The alternative entree was Lemon Almond Chicken. No recipes were seen on the counter.Ck 1 opened a bag of thawed chicken breasts, counted out 6 pieces and placed them into a high sided pan. Ck 1 proceeded to sprinkle the chicken with an unmeasured amount of dry mustard, lemon/pepper seasoning, salt, chicken bouillon and garlic powder. Ck…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 46) for unnecessary medications, received safe and adequate monitoring of a psychotropic medication (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts or perception), when Resident 46's Lithium (a naturally occurring salt used as a powerful mood stabilizer medication) level had not been ordered or drawn since 12/26/24.This failure had the potential to put Resident 46 at risk for ineffective low Lithium levels and/or levels that were too high which could lead to toxicity (a potentially fatal condition that occurs when too much Lithium builds up in the blood).Findings:A review of Resident 46's admission Record indicated he was admitted in early 2017 with diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought).During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/26 at 12:10 p.m. in the dining hall with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of theft within 24 hours to CDPH (California Department of Public Health) for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 102). This failure delayed the theft allegation investigation by the department and had the potential to compromise Resident 102's safety and psychosocial well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 102's admission Record (AR), dated 1/23/26 (print date), the AR indicated Resident 102 was readmitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses which included intellectual disabilities, substance abuse, and cognitive communication deficit. During a review of Resident 102's nursing note (NN), dated 4/23/25, the NN indicated, Resident came to nursing station at 7:05pm reporting that his money worth $2300 is missing from his fanny pack. Per resident, he took a nap, when he woke up he checked his fanny pack and his money is gone. Reported and referred incident to Social Services. During an interview on 1/22/26 at 12:44 p.m. with Resident 102, Resident 102 stated that months ago…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 74) in a census of 102, received his nasal spray medication properly when Licensed Nurse (LN) did not follow the medication administration instructions. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 74's not getting the full benefits of the nasal spray medication and could worsen the allergy symptoms.Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (AR), dated 1/11/25, the AR indicated Resident 74 was admitted with diagnoses which included nasal allergy symptoms. During a review of the Resident 74's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 6/25/25, the OSR indicated, Fluticasone Propionate [an allergy medication] Allergy Relief Nasal Suspension 50 mcg/ACT (microgram per actuation, unit of measurement/) Fluticasone Propionate (Nasal) 1 spray in both nostrils one time a day for allergy symptoms. During a review of Resident 74's Medication Administration Record (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 113), when:1. The facility did not obtain Resident 113's hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c-a test that indicates the average level of blood sugar [BS] control, a high or low number is a sign of poor blood sugar control) as ordered by the physician;2. The facility did not provide the required diabetic education for Resident 113; and3. The facility did not provide diabetic training, for licensed staff, year 2025 to current date. These failures had the potential to negatively compromise the necessary quality of care and treatment for Resident 113. A review of Resident 113's admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 113 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function). During a review of Resident 113's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 83) when resident 83's call light was not in reach.This failure had the potential to result in injury of Resident 83.Findings:During a review of Resident 83's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 83 was admitted in the fall of 2021 with diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking and moving around), and history of falls.During a review of Resident 83's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated 12/25, the CPR indicated Resident 83 had a fall assessment score of 12, which indicated he was at a high risk for falls, and Resident 83's call light should remain within reach.During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9 a.m. with Resident 83, Resident 83 lay in bed with his call light tucked above his head. Resident 83 stated he was unable to reach his call light.During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:05…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address Resident 46's weight loss of 22 pounds over 6 months. This had the potential of leading to Resident 46's malnutrition, muscle loss and functional decline. Findings:During an observation in the lunch dining room on 1/20/26 at 12:31 p.m., Resident 46 was noted to be slowly feeding himself. Resident 46 was noted to have a tremor (shaking movement in one or more body parts) which increased the time needed for self-feeding.During a subsequent interview with Resident 46 on 1/20/26 at 12:37 p.m., Resident 46 stated he doesn't pay attention to his weight and was unsure if there was a change. Resident 46 stated he has a history of depression and felt that he was being warehoused at the facility. Resident 46 also mentioned being bored with the facility food and felt that he had no choice in what he was served. During an observation on 1/21/26 at 7:57 a.m., Resident 46 was the only resident in the dining room. Resident 46 had finished 90% of the breakfast meal and was still eating. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided for one of twenty-eight sampled residents (Resident 8), when Resident 8's swallow evaluation (test performed to determine if food or liquid is passing safely to the stomach without entering the lungs) was not rescheduled and completed. This failure had the potential to result in delayed restoration of eating and placed Resident 8 at risk for aspiration (choking).Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 8 was admitted in spring of 2025 with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and esophagitis with bleeding (pain and swelling to throat).During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/1/25, the MDS indicated Resident 8 had no memory impairment and received more than fifty one percent (51%) of nutrition enteral feeding [tube feeding] (nutrition provided directly to the stomach via a tube).During a review of Resident 8's Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 119) received his diabetic medications with meals as ordered.This failure could potentially result to Resident 119's blood sugar level to drop in dangerous levels and suffer stomach upset. Findings: During a review of Resident 119's admission Record (AR) dated 1/19/26, the AR indicated, Resident 119 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 119's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 1/19/26, the OSR indicated, Metformin HCl Oral Tablet 1000 MG (Metformin HCl). Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for DM. Give with meals. During a review of Resident 119's Medication Administration Record (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident), dated 1/19/26, the MAR indicated, Metformin HCl Oral Tablet 1000 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for diabetes. diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications of a discharged resident were removed from the nurse's medication cart and mixed with other residents' active medication supplies. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors when the medications were accidentally given by mistake to other residents. During a facility task observation, two medication carts were inspected on [DATE] at 1:21 p.m. Cart #3 was inspected together with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3). Inside med cart #3, the lower medication cart drawer contained oral, liquid, and topical medications of active residents. The same lower drawer also contained one box of lidocaine patch which belonged to a resident who was discharged on [DATE]. During a concurrent observation and interview with LN 3 on [DATE] at 1:21 p.m., LN 3 confirmed the resident's name imprinted on the 1 full box of lidocaine patch was already discharged last [DATE]. LN 3 stated medications of discharged residents should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility Registered Dietitian lacked the skill set to assess a non-English speaking resident (Resident 11) when language interpreter services were not utilized though the resident appeared to have lost 22 pounds during her 3 months at the facility. This failure had the potential of leading to further weight and muscle loss as well as malnutrition for Resident 11.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of the lunch meal on 1/20/26 at 12:36 p.m., Resident 11 was in bed, awake and alert. Resident 11 nodded to answer questions, but after a couple of questions Resident 11 stated she did not speak English and reported her preferred language. During a review of Resident 11's electronic medical record on 1/20/26 at 2:17 p.m. a weight variance note from 1/15/26 was observed. This note included the following weight history:Current wt (weight)=88# (pounds) 1/3/26=84#12/1/25=89#11/1/25=99.5#10/11/25=106# During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/26 at 8:27 a.m. with Resident 11, Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 in the head.This failure resulted in Resident 1 having pain and dizziness and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience physical and/or psychosocial harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) the MDS, dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) BIMS score of 7 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had severe cognition impairment. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record, Resident 2 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts longer than three months),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one (Resident 1) out of a census of 108 when Resident 1 was pushed by a visitor during an altercation.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not free from abuse by a visitor.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis including Alcohol Induced Psychotic Disorder- Unspecified.During a review of Resident's 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 7/9/25 indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition.During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), indicated there was no documented evidence of a person-centered care plan, related to the potential risk of aggression. During a review of SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation - a communication tool used by healthcare workers for changes in residents' conditions) dated 7/1/25, it indicated that Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported timely within 2 hours for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when an allegation of abuse was reported to the department the following day.This failure reduced the potential to ensure resident safety.Findings:A review of a facility document titled, SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation - a communication tool used by healthcare workers for changes in residents' conditions) note dated 7/1/25 indicated, .Writer [Licensed Nurse (LN) 3] was also approached by this Resident [1] and also got in writers face . Resident [1] got agitated, and pushed the visitor. visitor reacted and pushed back [Resident 1] as he was getting in his face as well with yelling and cursing. Primary Care Clinician notified 7/1/25 at 6:30 p.m.A review of Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Follow up dated 7/2/25 at 9:48 a.m. indicated, . On 7/1/25, pm shift, res [1] was verbally aggressive to staff in the hallway. Staff asked him to calm down. Res [1] got close to charge nurses' face about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when facility staff witnessed Resident 1 hit Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 2 not being free from abuse and had the potential for Resident 2 to be injured. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and muscle weakness. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/30/24, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition. Resident 2 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and reduced mobility. A review of the MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 2 had intact cognition. During an interview on 10/24/24, at 11:23 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated on the morning of 10/16/24, she was informed by Janitor (JN) that he witnessed Resident 1 and Resident 2 get into a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to verify, document, seal, and replace an opened E-Kit (emergency kit, a limited supply of medications in the facility to use during an emergency or after-hours) for a census of 116 residents. This failure had the potential to have expired pharmaceutical products, contribute to decreased availability of medications in an emergency or increase the risk of drug diversion. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at approximately 9:15 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 e-kit # 731 was observed to be kept unsealed in the north station medication storage room. LN 3 stated she did not know when the e-kit # 731 was opened and when the e-kit should have been replaced. LN 3 confirmed the opening of the e-kit # 731 was not logged in the e-kit logbook and the contracted facility pharmacy was never contacted for replacement and both pharmacy white labels were not signed by any pharmacists. During an interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for two of 28 sampled residents (Resident 31 and 103). 1. For Resident 31, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not administer Resident's Humulin Insulin medication used to lower blood sugar level, in accordance with the Physician Order. 2. For Resident 31, LN 1 did not administer Resident's glipizide, a medication given 30 minutes before breakfast to lower blood sugar level, 5 mg (milligram, unit of measure) in accordance with the Physician Order. 3. For Resident 103, LN 1 administered lactobacillus, a probiotic to aid in digestion, without clarifying the Physician Order. These failures exposed the residents to possible adverse reactions and health complications. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 9/30/24 at 9:37 a.m., LN 1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident 31's morning medications which did not include Humulin R insulin. During a reconciliation (review of medications observed being administered against the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 28 sampled residents, Resident 31 was free from significant medication errors when: 1. For Resident 31, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not administer Resident's Humulin R Insulin, medication used to lower blood sugar level, in accordance with the Physician Order. 2. For Resident 31, LN 1 did not administer Resident's glipizide, medication to be given 30 minutes before breakfast used to lower blood sugar level, 5 mg (milligram, unit of measure), according to the physician order. These failures resulted in Resident 31's elevated blood sugar levels and subsequent signs and symptoms of high blood sugar (headache, dizziness, thirsty, and not feeling well), and had the potential to result in a diabetic coma (a life-threatening condition that occurs when someone with diabetes experiences dangerously high or low blood sugar levels, leading to unconsciousness). Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 9/30/24 at 9:37 a.m., LN 1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly, when: 1. Three unopened bottles of latanoprost ophthalmic solution, an eye drop medication used to treat an eye condition, 0.005% (percentage, unit of measure), 2.5 ml (milliliter, unit of measure) were not kept in the medication refrigerator per manufacturer's instructions before opening. 2. An opened glucose test strip bottle was found in the medication cart #1 did not have an open date to determine its expiration date. 3. An opened bottle of insulin lispro, medication used to treat high blood sugar levels, 100 unit/ml (unit per milliliter, unit of measure), was found in the medication cart #1 without an open date to determine its expiration date. 4. Two expired 5 ml multidose vials of Tuberculin purified protein derivative testing agents, a solution used in a skin test to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection, were found in the North Station Medication room's refrigerator. 5. One prescription bottle of polyethylene glycol with electrolytes, a laxative used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in freezer in safe operating condition in a census of 115 residents who received facility prepared foods, when the walk-in freezer had ice buildup on the walls, ceiling, and boxes of food. This failure had the potential to cause the freezer to not operate efficiently, which would result in possible contamination of food leading to food borne illnesses and decreased food quality. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 9/30/24, at 8:56 a.m., the walk-in freezer revealed ice buildup on two separate food boxes, on the floor, walls, and ceiling. The DM stated he was aware of the ice buildup in the freezer, and it was caused by the fluctuating temperature from the door opening and closing. During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 10/1/24, at 8:36 a.m., the MS confirmed he was aware of the ice buildup in the freezer. MS stated the ice buildup was probably due to old equipment and insulation issues. MS stated he was not aware that ice buildup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 25 sampled residents' (Resident 100 and Resident 72) planned meal tray tickets (guidance to staff on what to serve for a meal to a resident) were accurate and followed. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 100's and Resident 72's nutritional status and potentially result in unplanned weight lost. Findings: Resident 100 was admitted to the facility January 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size or wasting away of a body part or tissue) and protein-calorie malnutrition. Resident 72 was admitted to the facility February 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included muscle weakness and protein-calorie malnutrition. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/24, at 11:57 a.m., in the Dining Room, Resident 100's supplement drink was observed missing from his meal tray. Resident 100's meal tray ticket indicated, House Supplement. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) acknowledged the supplement drink was missing and stated, Will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of seven sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3 and Resident 4) were free from abuse when: 1. Resident 1 and Resident 2 had an altercation resulting in Resident 2 sustaining a skin tear; and 2. Resident 3 and Resident 4 had an altercation resulting in Resident 3 sustaining a skin tear. These failures had the potential to result in serious physical injury to the residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 3/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/26/24, indicated Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment. A review of a Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Communication form, dated 4/5/24 and written by Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), indicated Resident 1 had been in an altercation with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were followed for 1 of three residents (Resident 3) in a census of 115, when Resident 3's privacy curtain had multiple soiled areas. These failures had the potential to increase the risk for the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in mid-2023 with diagnoses which included enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-difficile, germ that causes diarrhea and swollen colon). During a record review, dated 11/7/23, of Resident 3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of memory) indicated severe memory impairment. During an observation on 11/30/23 at 12 p.m., the signage on the bedroom door for Resident 3 indicated contact precautions for C-difficile. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 12:15 p.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, I wanted a room change because, there is poop [feces] on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was provided for a census of 109, when roaches, ants and flies were found in multiple locations throughout the building. This failure resulted in the presence of pests inside the facility and had the potential to result in the transmission and spread of infection. Findings: During a review of the facility's (Name of Company .PEST MANAGEMENT) Service Summary Report (SSR) dated 4/28/23, the SSR indicated, Services & Findings: Inspected interior rooms 600, 608 and 609 checked monitors for roaches. Minor Turkestan roaches seen at this time. During a review of a facility provided receipt titled, Name of Company .PEST MANAGEMENT, dated 6/10/(23), the receipt indicated, Treated interior of breakroom .Added monitor to rooms 309, 211, 507 for Turkistan (sic) Roaches. During a review of a facility provided receipt titled, Name of Company .PEST MANAGEMENT, dated 7/10/(23), the receipt indicated, Plesed (sic) insect monitor in rooms 610, 511, 403 and main station for Turkestan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment was provided for six of 35 sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 55, Resident 64, Resident 511, Resident 512, Resident 517), when: 1. Broken window blinds were found in Resident 10's room; 2. Flies were observed in Resident 55's room; 3. Walls in Resident 64's room had multiple holes and cracks; 4. A used bandage covered with ants was found in Resident 511's room; 5. Two used urinals in the closet drawers, broken window blinds, and over-bed light cord consisted of two garbage bags tied together were found in Resident 512's room; and 6. Several cockroaches were found in the light fixture and on the floor in Resident 517's room. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not maintaining their mental, physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included chronic pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for three out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 72, Resident 76, and Resident 78), when no person-centered communication care plans with interventions were in place to address the residents' needs. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 72 was admitted to the facility in late 2019 with multiple diagnoses which included anxiety and depression. During a review of Resident 72's Nursing Care Plans (NCPs), there was no care plan developed or implemented for hearing difficulty found. During a review of Resident 72's Order Summary Reports (OSR) dated 4/20/23, the OSR indicated, [Resident 72] has the capacity to make healthcare decisions .Refer to hearing and ear consult. During a review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 6/21/23, the Section B of the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for three residents (Resident 89, Resident 86, and Resident 74) of 35 sampled residents when: 1. Antidiabetic-medication (medicine to control blood sugar) was not ordered and delivered on time resulting in a missed dose for Resident 89, and 2. Controlled medication (medications with a likelihood for physical and mental dependence) drug records had discrepancies for Resident 86 and Resident 74. These failures had the potential to result in poor control of Resident 89's diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and controlled medication diversion (the illegal distribution of prescription drugs not intended by the prescriber). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 89's admission Record, dated 8/17/23, indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with multiple diagnoses including diabetes with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar which can led to headache, fatigue, and in severe cases, loss of consciousness).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for two residents (Resident 57 and Resident 517) of 35 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 57 was administered sodium bicarbonate (medication used to treat heartburn or sour stomach) 325 mg (milligram: a unit of measure) instead of 650 mg as prescribed; and, 2. Resident 517 was administered a crushed potassium chloride (medication to prevent or treat low potassium levels) extended release (ER) tablet and was not administered zinc sulfate (medication to prevent or treat low zinc levels) 220 mg and Vitamin B+C Complex with Folate (medication to prevent or treat low vitamins) as prescribed. These failures resulted in four medication errors identified out of 28 opportunities during an observation of medication administration which then resulted in the facility having a medication error rate of 14.29%. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 8/14/23 at 8:23 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 prepared one tablet of sodium bicarbonate 325 mg to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly for a census of 109 residents, when: 1. Pharmaceutical products were not kept within the required temperature range in the medication refrigerator; 2. Products were opened without open dates labeled in medication cart; 3. Expired medications were available for use in medication cart; 4. Medications and syringes were found behind a drawer of the medication cart; 5. Loose pills were found in the medication carts; 6. The treatment cart had prescription products inside without a lock mechanism; 7. Prescription products were without pharmacy labels in the treatment cart; and, 8. A controlled medication cabinet was not permanently affixed. These failures had the potential for medication misuse, drug diversion and medication ineffectiveness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/23 at 9:23 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in the medication room, the DSD looked at the thermometer in the medication refrigerator and stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the nutritive value of meals was not compromised, when: 1. Pureed food was not prepared according to recipe; and 2. Vegetarian meal plan was not developed and/or followed. These failures had the potential to result in malnutrition for the 16 residents eating pureed meals, and the one resident who followed a vegetarian diet. Findings: 1. During an observation on 8/15/23 at approximately 10 a.m., [NAME] 1 (CK 1) began preparing the mechanically altered diets for the lunch meal. He explained that he was pureeing enough chicken for 16 servings. He placed eight cooked chicken breasts into the food processor bowl along with an unmeasured amount of drippings from the cooking pan. He proceeded to blend until smooth. Once done, he checked the consistency and noted it to be too thin. He took a gray handled scoop (1/2 cup per guide posted in kitchen) filled with thickener and added it to the mixture. Finding the mixture still too thin, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an acceptable amount of time in between dinner and breakfast was provided to 108 residents, when there was more than excess of 14 hours between the dinner meal and breakfast the following day. This failure had the potential to result in abnormal blood sugar levels and/or discomfort to residents who experienced excessive hunger. Findings: During review of the Resident Meal Policy on 8/14/23, the Resident Meal Policy indicated mealtimes for breakfast began at 7:05 a.m., lunch at 11:50 a.m., and dinner at 4:45 p.m. These times were also verified by the Meal Service document (RDs for Healthcare, Inc. 2018). During an interview on 8/16/23 at 11:02 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD indicated the bedtime snacks were only given to those residents who requested snacks and the residents who had a physician order for snacks. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/16/23 at 12:02 p.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), the undated document titled, Meal Times Schedule was reviewed. The DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 109 residents who received facility prepared foods, when: 1. A box of chocolate chips was not labeled or dated; 2. Open boxes of graham crackers crumbs and chocolate chips were found with inner bags not closed; 3. A container of tuna salad in the refrigerator was found to be out of safe temperature range; and 4. A refrigerator used for storing resident food was out of safe temperature range. These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/23 at 8:20 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the dry storage room, there was an undated and unlabeled box of chocolate chips. The DM indicated the box should be dated so the staff knew if the box of chocolate chips was still safe to eat. During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, FOOD RECEIVING AND STORAGE OF COLD FOODS, dated 2018, the P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of food was provided for a census of 109, when staff did not understand and did not follow the facility's policy and procedures for outside food brought in for residents. This failure had the potential to result in the residents' limited food options and enjoyment of outside meals. Findings: During an interview on 8/15/23 at 10:40 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 2), LN 2 indicated they were told approximately six months ago that they could no longer store food from outside sources. LN 2 indicated residents can get outside food, but any food that is not eaten right away would be discarded rather than stored. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 1:23 p.m. with LN 3, LN 3 indicated food can be kept for two days in the resident nourishment refrigerator as long as it's not leftovers. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 9:12 a.m. with LN 7, LN 7 indicated food was not kept if the food had been eaten from and food was thrown out after 24 hours in the refrigerator. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control program guidelines and practices were maintained for a census of 109, when: 1. Expired hand sanitizers were used by staff and residents; 2. Three urinals with no label and date were found in Resident 87's room; 3. Three wheelchair armrests had sharp pointy edges sticking through the padding for Resident 3, Resident 20, and Resident 64; and 4. Intravenous (IV, plastic tube within a vein for medication administration) tubing was not labeled for Resident 406. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection to a vulnerable population. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:09 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the storage closet contained nine boxes of expired hand sanitizer (Brand Name, Sanitizer Plus Gel), dated [DATE]. The IP verified the expiration date and stated it was expired and should not be used. The IP further stated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain resident care equipment in safe operating condition for 108 residents who received food from the kitchen, when an ice build-up was found in walk-in freezer. This failure had the potential to result in the freezer not maintaining the appropriate temperatures and decreasing food quality and safety leading to food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/23 at 8:45 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the freezer, an ice build-up was found on the walls, around the light, around the pipes, ceiling, freezer racks, and covering the floor. The freezer door gasket appeared misshapen as well as the metal in the upper corners of the door frame. The DM concurred that the gasket looked unusual. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/23 at 9 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD) in the freezer, the MD confirmed that the gasket was misshapen, and there was ice build-up in the freezer, condensation on the ceiling and wet, icy floors. The MD stated, It is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, functional and comfortable environment for a census of 109, when: 1. Flies were found in Resident 55's room; 2. Resident 78 had a nightstand with a broken drawer; 3. Resident 10's meal tray had a fly in his food while having lunch in the dining room; 4. A cockroach was found in the dining room; 5. Resident 3, Resident 20, and Resident 64 had torn wheelchair arm rests; and 6. Several cockroaches were found in light fixture and on the floor in Resident 517's room. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 8/14/23 at 9:24 a.m. Resident 55 was found lying in bed, awake and alert, appeared uncomfortable in bed, with a splint worn on the left hand and arm. Observed flying on Resident 55's face were two flies. Resident 55 tried to wave away the flies, but could hardly move her hands and attempted to shake her head to drive the flies away. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 78), when Resident 78 was found alone in the bathroom wearing a dirty shirt, had no communication binder at bedside, and the room was disorganized with a piece of furniture in disrepair. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 78's quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 78 was admitted to the facility in early 2020 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory impairment), restlessness and agitation, and depression. During a review of Resident 78's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 1/22/20 and revised 8/4/23, the NCP indicated, [Resident 76] primary language is Vietnamese .Resident will be provided with a communication binder by her bedside . During a review of Resident 78's NCP, dated 1/23/20 and revised 11/3/22, the NCP indicated, Cognitive Impairment .Severely impaired .Dementia .Staff to produce total assistance while ensuring comfort and dignity. During a review of Resident 78's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the rights of one resident (Resident 517) out of 35 sampled residents, when Resident 517 refused to take a laxative (a medication that helps have bowel movements) and the Licensed Nurse (LN) administered the laxative anyway. This failure contributed to the resident's diarrhea and had the potential to have led to dehydration. Findings: During a review of Resident 517's admission Record, dated 8/17/2023, the admission Record indicated Resident 517 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included generalized infection. During an observation on 8/14/23 at 8:50 a.m. of LN 2, LN 2 prepared medications for Resident 517 which included polyethylene glycol (a laxative) mixed with 120 ml (milliliter, a unit of measure) water in a cup. LN 2 entered Resident 517's room with the prepared medications and placed the cup with polyethylene glycol on the bedside table. There were no beverages on the bedside table or in reach of Resident 517, and LN 2 did not offer the resident any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's current condition for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 72), when the hearing status was coded incorrectly. This failure resulted in Resident 72's MDS data submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare-Medicaid Services) inaccurately and had the potential for Resident 72 to not receive appropriate treatment and care to attain her highest practicable quality of life. Findings: Resident 72 was admitted to the facility in late 2019 with multiple diagnoses which included anxiety and depression. During a review of Resident 72's Order Summary Reports (OSR), dated 4/20/23, the OSR indicated, Resident 72 has the capacity to make healthcare decisions .Refer to hearing and ear consult. During a review of Resident 72's MDS, dated [DATE], Section B of the MDS indicated, Adequate Hearing .No hearing aid or other hearing appliances used. During a review of Resident 72's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 76), when the care plan did not reflect the resident's current health status and needs. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 76 receiving outdated care and placing the resident at risk for not meeting her highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 76 was admitted to the facility in early 2020 with diagnoses which included depression, anxiety, and memory impairment. During a review of Resident 76's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 2/1/23, the NCP indicated, [Resident 76] needs motivation to join and participate in group activities .Resident is non English speaking .Resident on hospice. During a review of Resident 76's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 2/1/23, the OSR indicated, Family/caregivers in agreement with the change of plan of care. During a review of Resident 76's OSR dated 6/19/23, the OSR indicated, [Resident 76]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to professional standards for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 516 and Resident 519) receiving dialysis (removal of extra fluid and waste products when the kidneys are not able to) when: 1. Monitoring was not ordered for Resident 516's dialysis access site (entrance way into the bloodstream that lies beneath the surface of the skin and monitor for bleeding); and 2. Physician's orders for daily weights were not followed for Resident 519. These failures had the potential to result in undetected complications such as bleeding in Resident 516 and increased fluid retention in Resident 519. Findings: 1. Resident 516 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (ESRD, when kidneys can no longer support the body's needs), dependence on renal (kidney, organ that filters waste material out of the blood) dialysis. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/17/23 at 9:28 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), when asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on a previously reported medication irregularity (use of medication that is inconsistent with accepted pharmaceutical services standards of practice) identified during a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) in June and July of 2023 for one resident (Resident 52) of 35 sampled residents. This failure resulted in Resident 52 receiving an antipsychotic medication (a drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions or behavior) without an adequate indication (valid reason to take a medication). Findings: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2022 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (an illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and recurrent depressive disorder (an illness that can cause low mood and loss of interest). A review of Resident 52's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/17/23, indicated, .olanzapine [an antipsychotic medication to treat mental illness] Tablet 20 mg [milligram: a unit of measure] Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder M/B [manifested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident 52 and Resident 55) of 35 sampled residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication when: 1. Resident 52 was prescribed antipsychotic medication (medication to treat psychiatric illness) without documented behavioral symptoms that presented a danger to himself or others; and 2. Resident 55 was prescribed antipsychotic medication for an inadequate indication (valid reason to take a medication). These failures increased the potential for Resident 52 and Resident 55 to experience side effects from these medications such as frequent falls, sedation, and abnormal involuntary movements. Findings: 1. Resident 52 was admitted in the middle of 2022 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (an illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and recurrent depressive disorder (an illness that can cause low mood and loss of interest). A review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,842 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,842 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALABAZARON, REDENTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/14/2022 |
| CHINTHAKINDI, RAVI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/30/2023 |
| GLENN, CURTIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/05/2021 |
| LATA, ROSALIND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| MARTIN, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| POLLOCK, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2002 |
| THAPA, NISCHAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/06/2024 |
| WILSON, CLAIRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/12/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $991K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056177. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.