Forest Hill Manor Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 329 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 26 beds and averages 24.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.32 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate monitoring to prevent an elopement (leaving the facility without authorization) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1's elopement assessment indicated she was at risk for elopement, and a care plan was not developed upon admission. On 6/27/25, Resident 1 eloped, was found the next day on 6/28/25 in the neighborhood, transferred to a hospital, was noted to have hypothermia (significant and potentially dangerous drop in body temperature with most common cause from exposure to cold weather) and sustained injuries of forehead laceration (cut) requiring suturing.This failure resulted in Resident 1 having multiple bodily scratches/abrasions, hypothermia, altered mental status, rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood), forehead laceration and urinary tract infection.Findings:Review of Resident 1's Nurse's Note, dated 6/27/25 at 11:23 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided that meet professional standards of quality when assessments of pressure sores were incomplete for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2). This failure had the potential to compromise Residents' health and safety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), peripheral vascular disease (PVD, slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), Protein Caloric Malnutrition (PCM, condition resulting in inadequate intake of protein and calories, and chronic kidney disease (CKD, a condition where kidneys cannot properly filter blood in the body). Review of Resident 1's initial body check on 3/14/26 indicated, she had stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound over the tail bone) measuring 0.3 centimeter (cm, unit of measurement)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There were opened, undated, and unlabeled food items in the reach-in refrigerator; 2. There were undated and unlabeled food items in the food preparation area; 3. Pans used for food preparation and food service were stacked and stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 24 of 24 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour on 4/21/25 at 9:20 a.m., accompanied by the registered dietician (RD), the following observations were made in the reach-in refrigerator: The following items were opened and undated: - 1 gallon of milk - 1 32-ounce carton of liquid eggs - 3 5-pound containers of sour cream - 1 gallon of Italian dressing and 1 gallon of coleslaw dressing - 1 gallon of maple syrup The following items were opened, undated, and unlabeled: - 3 pitchers containing yellow, orange and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled drugs (medications that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) to document medication administration as in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P) and the availability of medication for three out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 9, and Resident 15). These failures had the potential for medication errors and controlled drug abuse or diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally) and had the potential for untreated or worsening of patient's medical conditions. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 10's clinical record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anxiety (Intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). A review of Resident 10's physician's order indicated an order, dated 3/27/25, for diazepam (it can treat anxiety)5 mg (milligram, unit of measurement), 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage when the medication refrigerator temperature is below the acceptable range of 36 Fahrenheit (F) to 46 (F). These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced efficacy. Findings: On 4/21/25 at 9:46 a, m., an inspection of the medication refrigerator in Medication Room with the Director of Nursing (DON) observed the built up of thick ice inside the medication refrigerator and the temperature was 32 F. There were medications inside the refrigerator. The DON confirmed these findings, she stated the ice built up inside the medication refrigerator should not be that thick. During a follow inspection of medication refrigerator inside the Medication room on 4/21/25 at 1:57 p.m., with the DON, The DON checked the refrigerator temperature, and she stated the temperature was 28 F, she further stated the acceptable range for medication refrigerator temperature is 36 F to 46 F. She stated she will call the pharmacy. The DON confirmed the Medications inside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and privacy was upheld for one of two sampled residents (Resident 179) when Resident 179's Foley catheter drainage bag, (a device inserted into your bladder [organ that collects urine] to drain urine if you cannot urinate on your own made of a semi-flexible plastic tube, one end inserted into the bladder and the other end attached to a bag that collects urine) drain bag was left uncovered. This failure had the potential for adverse effects on the psychosocial well-being and health of Resident 179. Finding: During an observation on 4/21/25 at 10:46 a.m., in Resident 179's room. Resident 179 was observed lying on her bed. Her Foley catheter drainage bag was on the floor and the bag was left uncovered, yellow colored urine was visible from drainage bag. During a review of Resident 179's clinical record indicated Resident 179 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including retention of urine (when bladder doesn't empty completely or at all). During a review of Resident 179's physician's order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 13 sampled residents (Residents 19) were free from unnecessary medication when Resident 19 received Lasix (used to treat edema [fluid retention; excess fluid held in body tissues]) without monitoring. This deficient practice resulted in unmonitored medical condition. Finding: During a review of Resident 19's clinical record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including Diastolic congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen). A review of Resident 19's physician's orders indicated an order for Lasix 20 mg, 1 tablet by mouth every 48 hours for swelling on feet, dated 4/12/24. A review of Resident 19's medication administration record (MAR) indicated the nursing staff did not monitor for swelling on the feet. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/25 at 3:12 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON reviewed Resident 19's physician's orders and confirmed there was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were followed for two of seven residents (Resident 83 and 179) when: 1. Resident 83's intravenous (IV, within or into a vein) tubing was undated; 2. A Certified Nursing Assistant not wearing wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, its equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards in the workplace) during patient care and; 3. Resident 179's Foley catheter drainage bag (a device inserted into your bladder [organ that collects urine] to drain urine if you cannot urinate on your own made of a semi-flexible plastic tube, one end inserted into the bladder and the other end attached to a bag that collects urine) was on the floor and uncovered. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing an infection and the potential to result in transmission of infection in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 83's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-23 · tag F0700 — widespread
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their bed rails (bed rails, safety rails, side rails, grab/assist bars: adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attached to the bed) policy for 12 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 8,178, 179, 184, 181, 12, 132, 4, 20, 7, 13, and 6). The survey team expanded the sample and identified that a total of 25 resident had the bed rails. The facility failed to follow their bed rails policy when: 1.There was no documentation that alternatives for bed rails were attempted prior to installing bed rails for 25 of 25 residents; 2.There was no informed consent (the process of communication between health care provider and resident that often leads to agreement or permission for care, treatment or services or interventions) from residents or responsible parties (RP, individuals designated to make decisions on behalf of the residents) prior to installing bed rails for 16 of 25 residents (Residents 183, 181, 8, 187, 186, 182, 180, 3, 132, 128,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. The convection oven (a cooking device that heats food) located in the skilled nursing facility (SNF) pantry area was not kept in a sanitary condition; 2. No thermometer inside the freezer designated for the SNF residents; 3. The freezer temperature log was not completed, and multiple times, the temperature was 1-2 degrees above 0 Fahrenheit (F, a scale of temperature) degree; 4. The freezer designated for the SNF residents had multiple items unlabeled; 5. An opened bag of pasta was not labeled in the dry storage area; 6. The ice machine was not kept in a sanitary condition; 7. One faucet of the main kitchen was not well maintained; These failures had the potential to cause cross-contamination of food (cross-contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can potentially cause foodborne illness), the growth of microorganisms, and foodborne illness for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 10.53 percent (%, unit of measurement) medication error rate, when 4 medication errors occurred out of 38 opportunities during the medication administration, for three out of nine residents (Residents 12, 4 and 185). These failures resulted in the medications, not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders, manufacturer's specifications and medication administration's instructions, which resulted in residents, not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications or the proper administration of the medication and may cause preventable side effects for the residents. Findings: 1. During the medication pass observation of Resident 12 with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C), on 1/16/24 at 12:30 p.m., there was no available hydralazine hydrochloride (used to treat or control high blood pressure) tablet and LVN C was not able to administer the hydralazine hydrochloride oral tablet medication to Resident 12 because it was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-10-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BVHC, LLC — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA