Silver Springs Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 148.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review for two of three residents (Resident #2, Resident #3) review for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from abuse. Residents #2 and #3 had a physical altercation, resulting in both residents with injuries to their faces, and were transferred to the hospital for treatment. The finding includes: 1. a. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indictive of an intact cognition and was independent with mobility and had no behaviors. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/15/2024 identified Resident #2 had the potential for verbal aggression and accusatory behaviors and ambulated independently. Interventions directed to monitor for accusatory behavior and offer tasks to minimize disruptive behavior.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical injury by another resident (Resident #133). The findings include: Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and a fracture of the pelvis. Resident #28 was responsible for self. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 was without cognitive impairment and required physical assist of one with ambulation on and off the unit with wheelchair support. The care plan dated 3/31/22 identified Resident #28 had a concern with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and fracture of pelvis and sacrum. Interventions included: Occupational Therapy (OT) Physical Therapy /(PT) as ordered, weight bearing as tolerated and toe touch weight bearing to right lower extremity and noted independence in the bedroom with the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two of six resident's reviewed for accidents, (Resident #499 and Resident # 500), the facility failed to ensure that a resident was seated in the correct wheelchair and that staff was educated on how to maneuver a wheelchair on an even surface and failed to ensure that intervention were in place to supervise a resident who exhibited restless behaviors to prevent falls with major injuries. The findings included: 1. Resident # 499's diagnoses included a late effect Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), acute on chronic renal failure and bilateral carotid stenosis. A re-admission assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was re-admitted with a diagnosis of a right middle cerebral artery infarct due to an embolism with left sided weakness, was alert and responsive, required total care with Activities of Daily Living ( ADL) and indicated the resident was a high risk for falls. The care plan dated [DATE] identified a risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a family member as the Responsible Party and the Responsible Party managed Resident #1's finances, the facility failed to ensure an applied income payment (payment for services not covered by insurance) to the facility from Resident #1 dated 3/9/26 was not deposited into a staff member's personal banking account. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, bipolar disorder and muscle weakness. The admission Record identified a family member was Resident #1's Responsible Party and Power of Attorney. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had poor memory recall. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/18/26 identified Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia, and may need cues, reminders, prompting, and redirection. The facility Reportable Event form dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for two (2) of six (6) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. The findings included:1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2014 and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4), was dependent for personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing, and utilized a wheelchair for transportation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/22/25 identified a history of engaging in non-consensual sexual advances by others. Interventions directed close observation levels applied as indicated per policy.2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July of 2008 and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder.The quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies for two (2) of six (6) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a resident-to-resident abuse incident. The findings included:1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in December of 2014 and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4), was dependent for personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing, and utilized a wheelchair for transportation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/22/25 identified a history of engaging in non-consensual sexual advances by others. Interventions directed close observation levels applied as indicated per policy.2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July of 2008 and had diagnoses that included vascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological monitoring was completed timely after an unwitnessed fall in accordance with facility policy. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity and heart failure. The significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/26/2025 identified limited physical mobility, non-ambulatory, and mobility by wheelchair. Interventions directed assist of one for wheelchair mobility. Review of facility reportable event dated 12/1/2025 at 6:45 PM identified Resident #1 was observed on the elevator floor after an unwitnessed fall from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from a physical altercation with a staff member that led to the resident falling. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included severe dementia with agitation, mild cognitive impairment and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) indicating severe impaired cognition, required supervision assistance when ambulating and was independent for bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 6/18/25 identified Resident #1 may have limited insight into his/her illness and abilities and may wander on the unit at times which puts him/her at risk for unsafe situations. Interventions directed to offer to help the resident and ask questions about what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to notified the Administrator and/or designee of a physical altercation between a staff member and the resident at the time of the incident and therefore the incident was not reported to the State Agency for five (5) days. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included severe dementia with agitation, mild cognitive impairment and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) indicating severe impaired cognition, required supervision assistance when ambulating and was independent for bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 6/18/25 identified Resident #1 may have limited insight into his/her illness and abilities and may wander on the unit at times which puts him/her at risk for unsafe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had sustained a fall, the facility failed to ensure vital signs were obtained and recorded accurately. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included severe dementia with agitation, mild cognitive impairment and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) indicating severe impaired cognition, required supervision assistance with ambulation and was independent for bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/18/25 identified that Resident #1 may have limited insight into his/her illness and abilities and may wander on the unit at times which puts him/her at risk for unsafe situations. Interventions included offering to help him/her and ask questions about what the resident is trying to do if he/she appears to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse/neglect was reported to the State Agency (SA). The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, depression, anxiety and overactive bladder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three), was dependent with ADL care and frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/12/2025 identified Resident #1 had a communication problem related to progressive multiple sclerosis, interventions directed to anticipate and meet needs. Further review identified potential impairment to skin integrity related to fragile skin and dependence for mobility, interventions included pressure relief wheelchair cushion and pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse/neglect. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, depression, anxiety and overactive bladder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three), was dependent with ADL care and frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/12/2025 identified Resident #1 had a communication problem related to progressive multiple sclerosis, interventions directed to anticipate and meet needs. Further review identified potential impairment to skin integrity related to fragile skin and dependence for mobility, interventions included pressure relief wheelchair cushion and pressure relieving/reducing mattress to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control guidelines by failing to ensure resident room sink faucet filters were changed once expired. The findings include: Observation during tour of the facility on [DATE] at 9:05 AM identified dated resident room sink faucet filters in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were dated [DATE] (7 days past expiration date), rooms 204, 206, 208, 211, 214, and 217 filters were dated [DATE] (6 days past expiration date). Review of [NAME]-Aquasafe Water Filter manufacturer's instructions last updated [DATE] indicated the water filter is designed to be used for a maximum of one calendar month (31 days) following initial connection. Interview on [DATE] at 12:13 PM with facility Maintenance Director identified that the facility was following a water management program for an infectious agent, and filters were being used, maintained and replaced at faucet sites. He identified that he and the maintenance assistant were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,150 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,150 — penalty dated 2024-10-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ICARE HEALTH NETWORK — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT