60 West

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a tour of the kitchen, observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that beards were covered when handling food on the steam table. The findings included: During observations of meal service on 6/18/25 at 11:45 AM with the Dietary District Manager, the following was identified: Cook #1 was at the steam table prepping food items for food service delivery. [NAME] #1 was placing hamburgers, chicken, and condiments in the compartments on the steam table without the benefit of wearing a beard restraint. [NAME] #1 had visible facial hair in the form of a goatee beard. Dietary Assistant (DA) #1 assisted [NAME] #1 with placing items on the steam table and was in direct contact with food items. DA #1's beard restraint was partially covering his beard with the right side of his face not completely covered with exposed facial hair. An interview with the Dietary District Manager on 6/18/25 at 11:50 AM indicated that [NAME] #1 should have been wearing a beard restraint as he was in direct contact with food. In addition, DA #1 beard restraint should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of every 15-minutes observations. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia, and schizoaffective disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #4 was severely cognitively impaired and had no behaviors. Review of the facility Reportable Event Form dated 7/22/2024 at 8:35 PM identified Resident #4 was involved in a resident-to-resident incident on 7/22/2024 at 7:15 PM. The residents were separated, and Resident #4 was placed on every 15-minute checks. A nursing note dated 7/22/2024 at 9:02 PM identified Resident #4 was involved in a resident-to-resident incident on 7/22/2024 at 7:15 PM. The residents were separated, and Resident #4 was placed on every 15-minute checks. Review of facility Every 15-minute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #39, 54 and 60) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from inappropriate touching by Resident #29, and for 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse by Resident #41. The findings include. 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorganized schizophrenia, intellectual disability and fluency disorder, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder, and was independent with transfers, dressing and toileting. The care plan dated 5/30/23 identified Resident #29 had a history of disorganized schizophrenia with psychotic symptoms including delusions of a sexual nature, disinhibited sexual speech, and disinhibited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #39, 54 and 60) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #29. The findings include. 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorganized schizophrenia, intellectual disability and fluency disorder, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder, and was independent with transfers, dressing and toileting. The care plan dated 5/30/23 identified Resident #29 had a history of disorganized schizophrenia with psychotic symptoms including delusions of a sexual nature, disinhibited sexual speech, and disinhibited sexual behaviors. Interventions included to report any observed behavior/speech to the charge nurse, and if any behavior/speech was observed to ask the resident to stop, redirect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #39, 54 and 60) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse, the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation, according to their policy, into the allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #29 to prevent further abuse from occurring while the investigation was in progress. The findings include. 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorganized schizophrenia, intellectual disability and fluency disorder, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder, and was independent with transfers, dressing and toileting. The care plan dated 5/30/23 identified Resident #29 had a history of disorganized schizophrenia with psychotic symptoms including delusions of a sexual nature, disinhibited sexual speech, and disinhibited sexual behaviors. Interventions included to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dry food was stored in a clean and sanitary manner, failed to ensure that hot and cold food temperatures for meals were obtained and documented appropriately, failed to ensure that out of range rinse temperatures logged for a high temperature dish washer had corrective actions documented and implemented per protocol, and failed to ensure that food items stored for the emergency 3-day supply were within use by dates. The findings include. 1. During an initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Services Director on 8/13/23 at 7:50 AM, observations of the dry storage area identified a significant amount of fruit fly activity throughout the area. Multiple fruit flies were observed flying throughout the storage area, resting on the walls and metal shelving, and resting on the exterior packages of multiple food products which included unopened boxed snacks, bagged dinner rolls, unopened cartons of dry potato pearls, and individually bagged turkey gravy mix packages. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program in the food storage, preparation, and service areas. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility kitchen with the Food Services Director on 8/13/23 at 7:50 AM, observations of the dry storage area identified a significant amount of fruit fly activity throughout the area. Multiple fruit flies were observed flying throughout the storage area, resting on the walls and metal shelving, and resting on the exterior packages of multiple food products which included unopened boxed snacks, dinner rolls, dry potato pearls, and turkey gravy mix. During this observation, a previously opened bag of yellow cake mix, which did not identify a date or time opened, was observed to be partially tied in the original package with a loose knot with visible open areas to the bag. The dry storage area was located directly adjacent to the cooking, food preparation, and steam table area of the kitchen with direct opening connecting the two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #39, 54 and 60) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician and resident representatives when the residents reported they had been touched inappropriately by Resident #29, and for 1 resident (Resident #71) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to ensure the physician and the resident representative were notified of multiple dental appointments and follow up dental recommendations, and for 1 resident (Resident #72) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the physician following a documented change in cognition. The findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorganized schizophrenia, intellectual disability and fluency disorder, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 2 residents (Resident #39 and 87) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to revise the care plans after Resident #87 inappropriately touched Resident #39. The findings include: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, and anxiety disorder. The care plan dated 2/11/23 identified Resident #87 has a history of disinhibited sexual behaviors and physical aggression. Interventions included to ask the resident to stop the disinhibited sexual behaviors if he/she exhibits such, redirect to a quiet space, attempt to explain to the resident why the behavior is not appropriate and notify the nurse. The 5-day MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #87 had severely impaired cognition, exhibited no behaviors, required supervision with transfers and was independent with bed mobility, walking in room, and walking in corridor. Physician's orders dated March 2023 directed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the nurse followed standards of practice during medication administration. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cirrhosis of the liver, constipation, and major depressive disorder. A physician's order dated 1/31/23 directed to administer Lactulose 30ml three times daily, for constipation. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #51 had intact cognition and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion on the unit. The care plan dated 7/6/23 identified a PASARR recommended that Resident #51 receive specific services, including interventions to provide medication education. Review of the August 2023 MAR identified the morning dose of Lactulose was administered on 8/13/23. Observation on 8/13/23 at 9:38 AM identified an unsupervised medication cup…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ICARE HEALTH NETWORK — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 97% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT