Bennington Health & Rehab
2 Blackberry Lane, Bennington, VT 05201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 91 certified beds · (802) 442-8525 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $242,044 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-10)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 40% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 19.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.6% | 6.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 13.0% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.8% | 5.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.9% | 16.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 5.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.2% | 26.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.5% | 19.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.4% | 22.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.7% | 17.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.30 | 2.88 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.2%CMS range 38.1–59.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 8.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.7–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 80.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality for one of 3 sampled residents [Resident #1]. Resident #1 was receiving the medication Lithium Carbonate and physician orders for blood work were not completed as ordered and the physician was not notified of this or changes in the resident's condition. Additionally, the facility failed to act upon signs and symptoms of lithium toxicity while continuing to administer the medication, which eventually ended in the resident's death, and altered the resident's record to reflect compliance and notifications after they had been transferred out to the facility. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to the lack of process for notification and consultation with the physician regarding lab work not completed as ordered and with significant changes in resident statuses putting all residents at risk for serious injury or death because of the noncompliance. Per record review,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to carry out critical medication level monitoring that was ordered and failed to consider whether the onset or worsening of symptoms, or a change of condition, may be related to the medication and failed to respond to the presence of adverse consequences related to the use of a high-risk medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents [Resident #1], which resulted in Resident #1's death. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to the lack of an effective process to ensure medications are only administered with adequate monitoring of laboratory values, per manufacturers specifications and accepted professional standards for high risk medications, and not administered in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued, putting all residents at risk for serious injury or death because of the noncompliance. Findings include: Per record review, prior to their admission to the long-term care facility, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely acquisition and availability of ordered medications to meet resident needs, resulting in omission or delay of physician ordered drugs for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) and, per facility audit, for 35 of 81 residents facility wide. As a result, Resident #1 did not receive venlafaxine XR for 4 days and pregabalin for 8 days and suffered an unwitnessed fall, headache, elevated blood pressure, and seizure like activity that required them to be evaluated and treated at the hospital. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 had a Physician's Order dated 10/22/2025 for Effexor XR [Anti-Depressant] Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 150 MG (Venlafaxine HCl) Give 300 mg by mouth one time a day for Depression.Review of Resident # 1's Progress Notes and December 2025 and January 2026 medication administration records (MARs) revealed that the Resident did not receive the prescribed Effexor for 4 days,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors caused by frequent omissions of medications related to availability and/or transcription practices for 3 of 5 residents in the sample (Residents #1. #2. and #3). Due to this deficient practice Resident #1 experienced an unwitnessed fall, headache, elevated blood pressure, and seizure like activity that required them to be evaluated and treated at the hospital. Findings include:1. Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include panic disorder, anxiety disorder, dissociative identity disorder, major depressive disorder, tremor, and hypertension. A Physician's Order dated 10/22/2025 states Effexor XR [Anti-Depressant] Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 150 MG (Venlafaxine HCl) Give 300 mg by mouth one time a day for Depression.Review of Resident # 1's Progress Notes and December 2025 and January 2026 medication administration records (MARs) revealed that the Resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 29 residents in the sample were free from significant medication errors related to the administration of a medication prescribed for seizure management (Resident #1), and an antithrombotic (treatment and prevention of blood clots) medication (Resident #9). 1. Per observation of the lunch meal on 10/30/2023 at 11:45 AM Resident #1 was sitting in a specialized wheelchair eating her/his meal. S/he was observed with her/his arms raised above her/his head with a scared facial expression and drool coming from her/his mouth. This surveyor asked her/him if they were alright, and s/he stated in a barely audible voice can you help me? The nurse who was assisting another resident with their meal was alerted, and after speaking to Resident #1 they took her/him to their room. When the nurse came back into the dining area s/he stated that the resident was sick. At 5:20 PM Resident #1 was still in her/his room. S/he stated that s/he still did not feel good. Per record review Resident #1 has received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to maintain safety and prevent elopement for 1 or 1 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings Include:A progress note dated 4/30/26 stated that Resident #1 left the faciity on an unauthorized leave of absence. A document completed by the facility titled: Elopement Drill Documentation form stated Resident #1 was identified missing at 9:42 PM. Resident #1 was located by [NAME] Police Department at their partners apartment and returned to facility at 10:12PM.Per record review, Resident #1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. (BIMS is a standardized cognitive screening tool used primarily in long-term care and skilled nursing facilities to assess a resident's memory, thinking, and orientation skills. A score of 14 indicates intact cognitive function). Resident #1's care plan indicates that they can ambulate independently with a walker or wheelchair and are at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's representative was informed of benefits, risks, and alternatives prior to initiating an anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility 5/27/2025 with physician's orders for Depakote (anticonvulsant), Vistaril (antihistamine), and Zoloft (anti-depressant) for mood disorder. There is no documented evidence that the Resident's representative was informed of the benefits, risks, or alternatives until a consent form was completed by the Unit Manager on 6/20/2025 indicating that she had obtained verbal consent from the responsible party.On 7/17/2026 a physician's order was written for Buspirone (anti-anxiety) 10 mg by mouth twice daily for anxiety. Further review revealed that there was no documented evidence that Resident #2's responsible party was informed of the benefits, risks, alternate treatment, or initiation of the physician ordered Buspirone. A progress note dated 7/25/2025 reads Note: Order to DC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 7/16/25. Findings include:1. Per the initial tour of the Kitchen on 12/8/25 at 10:49 AM, a rack containing dishware was revealed. The Dietary Manager stated the dishware was ready for use. There was half a tray of cups that had been flipped upside down and were observed to be wet on the sides, and the bottoms of each cup. The Dietary Manager confirmed the cups were ready for use but hadn't been dried correctly. The Dietary Manager stated the cups should've remained on a drying rack to allow air to circulate and complete the drying process.The tour of the dry storage area revealed an open brownie mix and a package of elbow pasta with no dating. The Dietary Manager confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of one residents (Resident #5). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis (a type of treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys cannot). The Resident has a central venous catheter (a soft plastic tube, tunneled under the skin and placed in a vein in the neck, chest, or groin, which enters a central vein that leads to the heart). Review of Resident #5's Care Plan reveals a Focus area for the Resident is at risk for worsening impaired renal function and is at risk for complications related to hemodialysis, which was initiated on 10/7/25. One of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician; and/or notify the physician when ordered labs were not completed for one resident [Resident #6] of 29 sampled residents.Findings include:Per review of Resident #6's medical record, a third eye health note [a telemedicine service which examines patients remotely via video and audio] dated 11/25/25 reveals the resident was seen for new-onset gross hematuria [where blood is visible in the urine]. [H/she] is noted to be on Eliquis [an anti-blood clotting medication] with no reports of hematuria in the past (although [h/she] was recently hospitalized for a Gastro-Intestinal Bleed two times in September and October).According to the Mayo Clinic, the healthy range for hemoglobin is: For men, 13.2 to 16.6, for women, 11.6 to 15.[Hemoglobin (abbreviated Hgb or Hb) is the protein molecule in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the body's tissues].The telemedicine note continues: Recent Hgb levels [for Resident #6]: 8.2 on 11/13/2510.9 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-16 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the contracting food service department employed sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: During observations of the facility kitchen on 7/15/2025 at 8:50 AM there were several concerns with kitchen cleanliness, food storage, safety, and sanitization noted. Review of the facility Grievance Log and actual grievances from April 2025 - July 2025 revealed 5 grievances dated 4/7, 4/21, 4/25, 6/10, and 6/12 related to food quality, temperature, raw meats, over and under cooked foods including chicken, pork, and hamburger. Per interview on 7/15/2025 at 10:35 AM with the Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) when asked if there was a process to ensure that staff were competent in food service activities, he stated that the Dietary Manager supervises the food service process. The RDM was asked to provide evidence of education for three cooks and three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents in the facility. Findings include:Per observation of the main kitchen on 7/15/25 at 8:50 AM, it was noted upon entry that there were fruit flies flying around the food prep and cooking area. The cook and the Dietary Manager (DM) were present. The DM stated that the fruit flies have been there for about a week. He also stated that they have been flushing the drains with bleach, and he has been cleaning and mopping the kitchen every morning. In the dish room there were more fruit flies flying around, an osculating fan was on and there was fly tape hanging from the ceiling that was being blown around by the fan with dead fruit flies stuck to it.On the bottom shelf of a 3-tier metal rack was a large bin of flour that was uncovered with the lid slid off to the side. on the 3rd shelf there were two uncovered bins filled with kitchen utensils. Further observations of the kitchen revealed that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #1) who was moved from one room to another room within the facility was provided a safe homelike environment. Findings include: Per review of Resident #1's census information s/he was transferred to a new room within the facility on 7/12/2025.During an observation tour of the facility on 7/15/2025 at 12:22 PM Resident #1's room was noted to have two beds, one on each side of the room. The bed near the window was made with facility bedding, while the bed by the door was noted to be un-made with a bare mattress on the bed. On top of the mattress was a standing wet floor sign, two wheelchair leg rests, a cushion, a bare pillow, several papers, and an unattached foot board. There were four wheelchairs next to the bed. Along the wall there was a dresser with books and other items on the top, a desk with a laundry basket filled with personal items, and two shopping bags filled with items. There was a chair that had a large clear plastic bag that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director assisted the facility with the development and implementation of resident care policies, specifically related to laboratory services. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after being hospitalized with alteration in mental status- acute mania and psychotic break, and the diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder [Schizoaffective disorder is a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of hallucinations and delusions, and symptoms such as depression and mania-an over-the-top level of activity or energy]. Resident #1's physician orders reveal an order for Lithium Carbonate Oral Capsule 300 milligrams- give 2 capsules by mouth at bedtime, with a start date of [DATE]. A Physician admission History & Physical dated [DATE] reads do have some concerns that [s/he] may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies necessary to care for Residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and the plan of care. Findings include: Per review of 5 licensed nurses' employee education files, 3 Licensed Practical Nurses did not have evidence that they had been assessed for medication administration competencies. The Facility Assessment (an assessment that determines what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies), dated 1/23/25, reads, The staff competencies and skill sets that are necessary to provide the level and types of care need for the Facility's specific resident population are as follows and lists the competencies and skills needed for licensed nursing staff which include medication administration. Per interview and record review, on 3/25/25 at approximately 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that all licensed nurses are evaluated prior to taking an assignment to see if they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess Residents for urinary and bowel incontinence on admission to ensure that a resident who is incontinent receives appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible for 3 of 4 Residents in the sample (Resident #31, #48, and #105). Findings include: Per record review Resident #105 was admitted in October 2024. A care plan focus and the Resident [NAME] indicate that he/she is incontinent, interventions identified include 1 assist with perineal care as needed, multi-void disposable briefs to contain incontinence. Another care plan focus reflects that Resident #105 is incontinent of urine and is unable to cognitively or physically participate in a retraining program due to Dementia. There is no documented evidence of a urinary or bowel continence assessment in the record. Per interview on 10/22/2024 at 2:45 PM a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) stated that on admission, staff were told that Resident #105 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a Resident Representative of a change in condition related to a worsening wound, abnormal laboratory results, and transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Per interview on 10/23/2024 at 9:35 AM Resident #104's Representative stated that s/he had not been notified by the facility that Resident #104's wound had worsened. The Representative also stated that s/he had not been notified by the facility that the Resident's blood work was abnormal, and that the Resident had been transferred to the hospital. Per record review Resident #104 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with a stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. May also present as an open/ruptured serum-filled blister) on his/her coccyx and venous stasis ulcers. A care plan focus for Advanced Directives states Inform resident/patient and/or healthcare decision maker of any change in status or care needs. A skin assessment was completed on 9/8/23 reveals a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor weights and verify potential significant weight loss and gains as needed for 5 of 6 residents sampled (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6). Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #2 has a Physicians order for monthly weights. Review of the Resident's Weight Summary revealed significant weight changes of 12.60% weight loss over one month and 10.82% over six months. On 1/3/24 the Resident's weight was documented as 245 lbs. one month later, on 2/3/24 the weight was documented as 256.0 lbs., an 11 lb. weight gain. There is no evidence that the resident was reweighed. On 5/15/24 the Resident's weight was documented as 250 lbs., on 6/3/24 the weight was documented as 218.5 lbs., a 31.5 lb. weight loss. There is no documentation that reweighs were obtained. 2. Per record review Resident #3 had documented significant weight loss of 6.72% over one month and 10.39% loss over six months. Review of the Resident's Weight Summary reveals that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan was followed for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1) as evidenced by a lack of documentation for monitoring of the presence of pain and evaluating the effectiveness of regularly scheduled pain medication. Findings include: Per record review Resident #1 has diagnoses that include chronic pain syndrome, opioid dependence, opioid use disorder /substance abuse disorder (OUD/SUD), and arthritis. Per review of physician's orders Resident #1 has been receiving opioid medications for pain control since admission. A Physician's order dated 6/25/24 states Buprenorphine HCl Sublingual [under the tongue] Tablet Sublingual 8 MG (Buprenorphine HCl) Give 1 tablet sublingually every 12 hours for pain. Another Physician's order dated 6/26/24 states Buprenorphine HCl Sublingual [under the tongue] Tablet Sublingual 2 MG (Buprenorphine HCl) Give 3 tablet sublingually two times a day for pain for 28 Days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff was provided the necessary training and possessed the necessary competencies to care for residents with diagnoses of OUD (opioid use disorder), SUD (substance abuse disorder), and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Per review of 3 Licensed Nursing Assistant's (LNA's) employee training files. 2 of the 3 LNAs had not received any training related to OUD or SUD. 1 of 3 LNAs files revealed no evidence of training related to PTSD and trauma informed care. Per review of 3 Staff Nurse employee files, 1 Registered Nurse (RN) file revealed no evidence of training related to SUD, OUD, PTSD, and trauma informed care. Per interview with the Registered Nurse assigned to Resident #1 on 7/3/24 at 8:35 AM S/he was recently hired on 7/3/24. The RN confirmed that S/he had not received resident specific training regarding SUD, OUD, PTSD, and trauma informed care since being hired. When asked if S/he knew of any residents on her/his assignment who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect was maintained for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1). Findings include: During an interview on 5/1/24 at approximately 12:35 PM Resident #1 stated, I have lost my rights as a person, and I feel like I am being targeted . The previous Director of Nursing (DON) hung letters about me at the nurse's station and had things in my care plan that were not true. The resident was visibly upset about the content of the letters, stating s/he felt humiliated that this note was hung for everyone to see. Resident #1 also said that months ago a Nurse who is now the Interim DON had called the police on her/him because s/he got angry when the Nurse would not let her/him go outside alone. Per review of the letter that Resident #1 said had been hung up at the nurses station, it specified three Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) by name who should not provide personal care, and one LNA who should not go in Resident #1's room for any reason unless a true emergency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1) received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent infection and a new wound from developing. As a result, Resident #1 developed a toe wound and osteomyelitis (infection of bone) which led to a partial amputation of the toe. Findings include: Per record review Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. An admission Nursing Progress Note dated 9/1/2023 reflects that Resident #1 had no wounds on admission. Review of Resident#1's care plan initiated on 9/18/2023 reveals that the resident is at risk for skin breakdown. The care plan also identifies a diagnosis of diabetes and reflects an intervention of diabetic foot check daily. Observe feet/toes/ankles/soles/heels noting alteration in skin integrity, color, temperature, and cleanliness. Toenails for shape, length, and color. Inspect shoes for proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy that ensures written grievance decisions meet documentation requirements of issuing a written decision that includes the date the decision was issued to all residents. Findings include: Facility policy titled OPS204 Grievance/Concern, last revised 7/19/23, states that the department manager will Notify the person filing the grievance of resolution in a timely manner. Provide written resolution for Civil Rights grievances, and upon request for all other grievances, by giving a copy of the Grievance/Concern Form to the patient/representative. The policy does not address the regulatory requirements that all residents, not just those that have Civil Rights grievances, be issued a written decision and that the written decision should include the date the written decision was issued. 4 of 4 grievance forms sampled did not indicate that a written decision, or the date that the decision was issued, was provided to the resident. Per interview on 11/1/23 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, or plan of care impacting all residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of facility direct care staff schedules and PPD (direct care staff to resident ratios) for September and October 2023 reveals that the facility failed to maintain required minimum staffing levels to allow for 2.0 hours of direct care per resident per day (PPD) on a weekly average by Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) for 7 of the 8 sampled weeks in September and October 2023 and failed to maintain required minimum staffing levels to allow for 3.0 hours of direct care per resident per day (PPD) on a weekly average, including nursing care, personal care, and restorative nursing care for 4 of 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide required notice of the bed-hold policy before transferring a resident to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #56 and #309). Findings include: 1. Resident #56 was transferred without receiving notice of the facility bed-hold policy. Resident #56 was admitted from home 16 days prior to being transferred and discharged to the local acute care hospital. On 10/3/23 Resident #56 was sent emergently to the local acute care hospital with behavioral symptoms. Per the medical record, a copy of the written discharge notice was sent with the resident and his/her spouse had been notified verbally of the transfer with intent to discharge. On 11/1/23 at 11:30 AM during an interview with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Market Clinical Advisor it was confirmed that a bed-hold notice had not been provided. 2. Per record review Resident #309 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on 7/18/23. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0626 — patternPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a hospitalization resulting in a facility-initiated discharge for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #56 and #309). Findings include: 1. On 10/3/23 Resident #56 was sent emergently and discharged to the local acute care hospital with behavioral symptoms. Resident #56 was admitted from home 16 days prior to being transferred and discharged to the local acute care hospital. Resident #56 was admitted with a primary diagnosis of severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance. During this brief stay, Resident #56 demonstrated impulsive behaviors including sexual aggression, a severe lack of safety awareness demonstrated by climbing on top of unsteady items of furniture, tireless wandering, and self-injurious head banging. Per the medical record on 10/3/23 the following entry was placed by the Director of Nursing (DON) Case Managers from Southern [NAME] Medical Center (SVMC) had contacted Genesis Central…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident for 3 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #210, #212, and #33). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for post operative care and antibiotic therapy related to surgical amputation to his/her left toes. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] reveals that Resident #210 has a history of a mental health disorder and confusion, has moderately impaired vision, has anxiety about their surroundings, and has expressed the desire to leave the facility. A progress note dated 10/15/23 reveals that Resident #210 has expressed sadness or symptoms of depression and experiences loss of interest daily or almost daily. A 10/19/23 Physician assessment reveals that Resident #210 is experiencing a moderate episode of recurrent major depressive order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident's care plans after each assessment and with the required team for 9 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #37, #42, #16, #31, #10, #14, #45, #9, and #1). Findings include: 1. Per record review during an interview on 11/1/23 at 3:43 PM with the Social Service Director the following was revealed regarding care plan meetings: • Resident #37 had the following assessment dates: 5/3/23 and 7/19/23. A 5/12/23 care plan meeting note following the 5/3/23 assessment does not indicate that the attending physician, a nurse aide, or a food and nutrition service staff member were in attendance or provided input in the development and revision of the care plan. There is no explanation that participation from Resident #37 was not practicable in their medical record. The Social Service Director reported that Resident #37 had a care plan meeting on 8/3/23 but could not produce documentation of the meeting, or any evidence of who was in attendance. • Resident #42 had the following assessment dates: 5/17/23 and 8/2/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide services meeting professional standards regarding the use and monitoring of an IV (intravenous line) (Resident #210), and medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a tube that is inserted into the stomach to provide nutritional support in patients with impaired swallowing secondary to various disorders) (Resident #53) for 2 of 29 residents in the sample. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for post operative care and IV antibiotic therapy related to surgical amputation to his/her left toes. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] reveals that Resident #210 has a left upper arm PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter; IV). A 10/26/23 progress note reveals that Resident #210's IV became completely dislodged from their left upper arm. A 10/27/23 skin assessment reveals that Resident #210 has a left lower arm IV line. Review of Resident #210 Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Per observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as needed for 2 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #210 and #212) and failed to provide transfer assistance within a reasonable amount of time for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #212). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for post operative care and antibiotic therapy related to surgical amputation to his/her left toes. Review of Resident #210's care plan reveals a focus [Resident #210] requires assistance for ADL [activities of daily living] care related to: Recent illness, fall, hospitalization, etc resulting in fatigue, activity intolerance, confusion, etc. Amputation of toes., created 10/13/23, with the intervention, provide resident/patient with limited assist of 1 for bathing, created on 10/13/23. Per observation and interview on 10/30/23 at 1:04 PM, Resident #210 explained that s/he has not been offered a shower since s/he has been here. S/He explained that s/he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for residents on the second-floor unit. Findings include: 1. Per observation on 10/30/23 between 10:55 AM and 11:10 AM, 4 residents were observed in the common area. A movie is playing on the television but none of the 4 residents are paying attention to the movie. One of the residents, Resident #31 is yelling out phrases about dying and her father. There are no staff present during this time. Per observation on 10/30/23 between approximately 3:30 PM and 4:30 PM, three residents were sitting around the second-floor nursing station not doing anything while staff assisted other residents with care. Per observation on 10/31/23 between 9:00 AM and 10:15 AM five residents were sitting around the second-floor nurses' station at 9:20 AM another resident was brought to the nurse's station. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that required physician visits occurred every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least 60 days thereafter for 10 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #9, #31, #16, #37, #46, #1, #10, #14, #45, and #42). Findings include: Per record review, the following residents did not have documentation of all regulatory physician visits from 1/1/2023 through 10/31/23: • Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 did not have the required regulatory physician visits for March 2023 or August 2023. • Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #31 did not have the required regulatory physician visit for August 2023. • Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #16 did not have the required regulatory physician visit for May 2023. • Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #37 did not have the required regulatory physician visits for April 2023 or August 2023. •…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure standard precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infection related to hand hygiene and equipment cleaning. On 10/31/2023 at approximately 8:55 AM on the third floor, the Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) was observed administering medications. She/he administered a nebulizer treatment to Resident #1, assisting the resident to put on an Oxygen mask, then was observed returning to the medication cart, preparing medications for the next resident without performing hand hygiene. She/he was observed donning gloves to administer an Insulin pen, removing the gloves, and returning to the medication cart to continue setting up medications without performing hand hygiene on two occasions during the medication pass. Per a review of the Hand Hygiene policy, it read, Perform hand hygiene before resident care, before an aseptic procedure, after any contact with blood or other body fluids, even if gloves are worn, after patient /resident care, after contact with patient/resident's environment. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to determine whether it is clinically appropriate for residents to self-administer medications for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #20). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, and a need for assistance with personal care. Per observation of Resident #20's room on 10/30/2023 at 11:00, an Albuterol Inhaler (Albuterol is a medication used to prevent the muscles that line the airways from tightening, resulting in wheezing and coughing], was on the bedside table. Per interview on 10/30/23 at approximately 11:00, Resident # 20 stated that she/he uses the inhaler a few times daily. She/he does not advise the nurses when it is used. Review of the facility policy for Medication Self Administration initiated on 6/1/1996 and reviewed by the facility on 3/1/2022, states the following: Patients who request to self-administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident # 53) with respect and dignity and recognize the resident's individuality. Findings include: Per interview on 10/30/2023 at approximately 11:30 AM with the family of resident #53, a concern was voiced that Resident #53 was called by her/his first name and not her/his middle name as she/he preferred. She/he had requested that their middle name be posted on the room door to alert the staff. Per interview on 10/31/2003 at approximately 10:00 AM an LNA (Licensed Nursing Assistant) stated she/he knew Resident #53 by her/his middle name as it had been told to her several times by family. She/he said the preference should be found in the special instructions area of the medical record. Per record review, Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A discharge summary from the transfer facility has a note under the resident's legal name that states Prefers to be called [Resident #53's middle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for 2 residents [Res.#259 and #53] of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Per observation on 10/31/23 at 8:45 AM during the medication pass on the 3rd floor resident unit, the computer screen on the medication cart was open to a resident name [Res.#259], photograph, medications, and diagnoses. The Staff nurse administering medications was away from cart and in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Per observation, 2 residents were in proximity of the medication cart with the open resident screen. Additionally, per observation a second medication cart was located against the wall abutting the elevator across from the nurse's station. Visible in the trash container affixed to the side of the medication cart was a medication blister pack with a label listing a resident's name [Res. #53] and medication name. Per observation, 2 residents were in proximity of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility without ensuring documentation in the resident's medical record of the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose. Additionally, the facility failed to document in the resident's medical record communication with and the provision of required information to the receiving provider by the resident's physician for 1of 2 residents sampled (Resident's # 56) Findings include: Resident #56 was transferred on 10/3/23 with the intent to be discharged and not readmitted . Resident #56 was admitted from home 16 days prior to being transferred and discharged to the local acute care hospital. Resident #56 was admitted for long-term care with a primary diagnosis of severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance. During this brief stay, Resident #56 demonstrated impulsive behaviors including sexual aggression, a severe lack of safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days of admission for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #210). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. As of 11/1/23, 19 days after their admission, a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) was not completed for Resident #210. Per interview on 11/1/23 at 9:25 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that Resident #210 did not have a complete MDS assessment within 14 days of admission as required.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #46). This failure had the potential for Resident #46 to not receive specialized services. Findings include: Record review reveals that Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation related to pain management, cancer, and hip fracture. On admission, Resident #46 had a principal diagnosis of schizophrenia. Review of the electronic medical record Documents tab revealed a State of [NAME] Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR): Level I For Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Related Condition form signed by a physician for an exemption for a short- stay of 30 days or less. There is no date recorded on this screening form but the document tab reveals it was entered into the record on 3/6/23. There is no evidence that an updated PASARR was completed in full by the facility once Resident #46 exceeded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan including the participation of professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #8). Findings include: The care plan for Resident #8 does not include evidence of participation of or input from physical or occupational therapists. Per record review Resident #8 was admitted for skilled rehabilitation services from a local acute care hospital following an accident in which they suffered a knee injury. admission orders for Resident #8 included both physical and occupational therapy evaluations and treatment as recommended. On 9/5/23 Resident #8 was evaluated by the therapy department and a plan of treatment was created to include physical and occupational therapy five times per week. A review of Resident #8's care plan revealed entries from the nursing department for risk for falls which included transfer assistance and an entry for mobility assistance including PT/OT screen as indicated (Physical and Occupational therapies). There is no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were monitored for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident #8 was not weighed per physician orders. Per record review Resident #8 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, morbid obesity, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a weakness of the heart muscle resulting in less efficient fluid management), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). A physician order with a start date of 9/2/23 instructs to obtain the weight of Resident #8 every evening shift for 3 days AND every day shift every Wednesday without an end date. Further record review reveals one weight recorded on 9/2/23 which is 228#, there is no weight recorded on 9/3 or 9/4. The next 4 Wednesdays' weight is recorded as #228 each time (9/6,13, 20 and 27th). In October there are no weights recorded on the dates due which are 10/4, 11, 18, and 25 or at all. On 10/31/23 at approximately 10 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed the weight of Resident #8 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to recognize when a resident experienced pain and ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #7). Findings included: On 10/30/2023 at approximately 1:40 PM, Resident # 7 was observed sitting by her/his bedside crying. She/he states she/he has so much pain. She/he reported that she/he gets pain patches in the morning on her/his back and hip, but the staff has been too busy to get them. She/he was told she/he would get them later in the day. Record review indicates Resident # 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for therapy and pain management. Her/his diagnoses include chronic pain and Diabetes. She/he requires assistance with care. Per a review of Resident #7's Medication Administration Record (MAR), there is an order for a Lidocaine External Patch 5% [Lidocaine is a medication that eases pain by numbing the nerves and making them less sensitive to pain]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan that addresses the assessed emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident and failed to provide services that address the assessed needs of the resident for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #210). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for post operative care and antibiotic therapy related to surgical amputation to his/her left toes. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] reveals that Resident #210 has a history of a mental health disorder and confusion, has anxiety about their surroundings, and has expressed the desire to leave the facility. A progress note dated 10/15/23 reveals that Resident #210 has expressed sadness or symptoms of depression and experiences loss of interest daily or almost daily. A 10/19/23 Physician assessment reveals that Resident #210 is experiencing a moderate episode of recurrent major depressive order and is prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and record review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. Findings include: Between 10/30 and 11/1/23 41 medications were observed being administered with 8 of those medications being given in contrast to facility policy, professional standards, and a prescriber's order resulting in an error rate of 19.5%. On 19/31/23 at 8:26 AM during medication pass observation the surveyor observed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administer 8 medications simultaneously to Resident #53 via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) is a tube that is inserted into the stomach to provide nutritional support in patients with impaired swallowing secondary to various disorders). The medications given were: Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg 1 tablet - used for Parkinson's disease. Amlodipine 10mg 1 tablet- used for elevated blood pressure. Multiple Vitamin 1 tablet- used for health maintenance. Vitamin D 1 tablet- used for health maintenance. Citalopram 20 mg 1 tablet- used to treat depression. Eliquis 5 mg 1 tablet- used to avoid blood clots. Prednisone 20 mg 3 tablets-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident # 8 was not provided with the therapeutic diet as ordered. Resident #8 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, morbid obesity, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). The diet order placed as active on 9/12/23 created by the facility's registered dietician and signed by the nurse practitioner was noted to be a consistent carbohydrate diet (a diet intended to keep blood sugar levels stable), regular texture NO high processed breakfast foods, low sodium heart healthy. On 10/30/23 at 12:10 PM during an interview with Resident #8 his/her lunch tray was served with the following components noted: kielbasa and sauerkraut, scalloped potatoes, mixed vegetables, a roll, and a brownie (there were no condiments included). The lunch ticket on the tray included Resident #8's name confirming this was the correct lunch tray for this resident, the ticket listed the diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services as ordered for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident #8 did not receive skilled physical therapy 12 out of 35 opportunities during a 7-week period. Resident #8 was admitted for skilled rehabilitation services from a local acute care hospital following an accident in which they suffered a knee injury. admission orders for Resident #8 included both physical and occupational therapy evaluations and treatment as recommended. On 9/11/23, Resident# 8 was evaluated by the physical therapy department and a plan of treatment was created to include physical therapy five times per week. A review of the Service Log Matrix on which documentation of the minutes per day of therapy are recorded revealed that in the 7 weeks since Resident #8 began to receive physical therapy s/he should have received treatment 35 times. However, the Service Log Matrix from September 5-October 30 reveals s/he received therapy 20 times with 15 sessions being missed. Of these 15 missed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plan interventions for one resident (#2). Review of resident #2's medical record indicates this resident was admitted on [DATE]. S/he has dysphagia due to a stroke. The resident was hospitalized per a Southern [NAME] Medical Center Emergency Department note (08/17/21) for pneumonia due to aspiration. This resident is on a diet consisting of puree foods and thickened liquids and per a nutrition note (07/11/23) all meals are to be taken out of bed per provider. A care plan (date initiated 07/21/23) intervention indicates Resident will remain out of bed 20 min after meals as tolerated but does not show that all meals are to be taken out of bed. Progress notes indicate the resident refuses to get out of bed for meals most of the time, however one note (08/07/23) indicates Resident unable to get out of bed due to staffing shortage. One LNA on South wing. Observation of the resident and interview with the second-floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of documentation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate safety supervision and assistance to prevent an accident for one resident (#1). Findings include: On 08/23/23 review of resident #1's medical record indicates the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Pneumonia, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Lower Leg Ulcers and other comorbidities. S/he requires light assistance with ADLs, is continent of urine/bowels and ambulates with a walker. The admission assessment reveals a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. A score of 13-15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact. A nurse note (08/05/23-15:26) reveals the resident was sitting near the elevator and stated, [his/her] father is picking [him/her] up in a black car, refused treatment and would not go back to their room. The resident was later observed sitting south side stairwell by 2nd floor by 2nd floor nurse. Staff assisted [him/her] to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$242,044 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $74,620 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
- $76,281 — penalty dated 2025-03-25
- $91,143 — penalty dated 2023-11-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ICARE HEALTH NETWORK — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BENNINGTON CARE CENTER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 09/12/2024 |
| ACTIVE INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| LIFECARE ADVISORS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2025 |
| PLAZA INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 43% | since 09/12/2024 |
| PROCARE ADVISORS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| VANTAGE CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| NOBLE INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| KRAUSZ, ELIEZER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| PLAUSSE, MICHAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| SEBBAG, SAMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| BENNINGTON HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| ICARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| BREAULT, ALLISON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| BRICKLEY, JESPER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| DAVIS-BARRON, TABITHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2025 |
| DIX, CINDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| FAUCHER, JAIME | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| APEX ADVISORS | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2025 |
| BENNINGTON REALTY INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| EXECUTIVE ADVISORS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/04/2025 |
| ORCHARD CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| STERLING CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
| SEBBAG, JOSEPH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/12/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 40% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475027. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.