Mission Care At Holyoke
35 Holy Family Road, Holyoke, MA 01040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (413) 532-3246 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,343 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.9% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.7% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.2% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.4% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.5% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.41 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.7–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 119.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose care plan interventions included dependent with staff member assistance while eating, and that all food items were required to be pureed in consistency due to dypshagia (difficulty swallowing), the Facility failed to ensure nursing consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her care plan related to eating. On 03/12/25 around 7:45 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 delivered Resident #1 a peanut butter and jelly sandwich as an evening snack to him/her in his/her room, CNA #1 did not remain with Resident #1 to assist him/her while he/she ate the sandwich, and left Resident #1 unsupervised with the sandwich, which was not the correct conisistency per his/her care plan. Fifteen minutes later, Resident #1 was found by staff unresponsive and without a pulse, CPR was initiated, 911 was activated, however Resident #1 was pronounced dead at the facility. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), with diet orders for pureed foods only and was dependent on staff to provide assistance when eating, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance while eating to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident of choking. On 03/12/25 at around 7:45 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 delivered Resident #1 an evening snack which consisted of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, to him/her in his/her room. CNA #1 did not remain with Resident #1 to assist him/her while he/she was eating, and left Resident #1 unsupervised with the sandwich. Fifteen minutes later, Resident #1 was found by staff unresponsive and without a pulse, CPR was initiated, 911 was activated, however Resident #1 was pronounced dead at the facility. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Reportable Events-Reporting Allegations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-25 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) whose diagnoses included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and anxiety, with behaviors that included repeatedly entering and exiting his/her room and pacing on the unit when anxious, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was free from involuntary seclusion by means of confinement, when on 10/14/25 during the evening shift, Nurse #1 prevented Resident #1 from exiting his/her room by physically holding the door shut. Resident #1's anxiety escalated while he/she was confined to his/her room and he/she was heard crying, banging on the door and yelling to be let out.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Abuse (Screening, Training, Prevention, Reporting, Investigation)-MA, dated as effective 11/03/20, indicated it is the policy of the Facility that abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property is prohibited. Further review of the Policy indicated it included the following definition of involuntary seclusion:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff prevented significant medications errors for two Residents (#29 and #111), out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Nurse #9 administered 80 units of Humulin-N insulin (an intermediate acting Insulin that lowers blood sugar, its effect typically starts in 90 minutes and lasts 24 hours) to Resident #29 without a Physician's order and the Resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital for evaluation, and 2) Nursing staff omitted the administration of Insulin as ordered by the Physician for Resident #111. Findings include: Review of the policy titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration, dated 8/2020, indicated at a minimum, the 5 Rights: right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time-should be applied to all medication administration. Residents are identified before medication is administered using one method of identification. a. Checking the photograph attached to the medical record. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had been allegedly witnessed by a staff member on 5/10/26 to have been subjected to verbal abuse by another staff member, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the requirement to immediately report an allegation of abuse to Facility Administration when the Director of Nursing was not notified until 06/01/26 about the incident, which had occurred several weeks earlier.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Abuse (Screening, Training, Prevention, Reporting, Investigation), dated as effective 11/03/20, indicated it is the policy of the Facility that abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property is prohibited.The Policy indicated it included the following definition of verbal abuse as: any use of oral, written or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within their hearing distance, to describe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Provider when he/she was observed to have a new area of bruising around the corner of his/her right eye, of unknown origin.Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy titled, Physician Notification-Change of Condition, review date 10/15/25, indicated:-It is the policy of this facility to notify the physician when the residents' condition or status changes unexpectedly or substantially. -If a resident is evaluated by a charge nurse to have a change in condition, the charge nurse will notify the RN Supervisor on duty.-The RN Supervisor will do a follow-up assessment to ensure that the assessment is documented and reported to the Physician.-The Physician will (or alternate) will be contacted to report findings. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility May 2024, diagnoses included vascular dementia, depression, age-related osteoporosis (bone disease causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) the Facility failed to ensure that after being made aware that Resident #1 had an injury of unknown origin on 11/11/25 by the Hospital, that they reported the injury to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours as required, when it was not reported to DPH until 11/17/25, (6 days later).Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy titled, Resident Abuse (Screening, Training, Prevention, Reporting, Investigation), dated as reviewed 10/15/25, included but was not limited to the following:Allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property are to be reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health:a. Immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the allegation involves abuse or resulting in serious bodily injury or if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime as defined by the Elder Justice Act.b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4), the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of abuse to Facility administration, when: 1.) On 10/14/25, Nurse #2 and Nurse #3 became aware during the evening shift, of an allegation of involuntary seclusion by means of confinement, when Nurse #1 prevented Resident #1 from exiting his/her room at will, however, neither of them reported the allegation immediately, as required. 2.) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 reported an allegation of verbal abuse involving Nurse #1 and Resident #4 on 10/02/25 to the Charge Nurse, however, Facility administration was not notified until a few days later, on 10/04/25. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Abuse (Screening, Training, Prevention, Reporting, Investigation)-MA, dated as effective 11/03/20, indicated it is the policy of the Facility that abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment of residents or misappropriation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #4), who was moderately cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure that an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) as required, when on 10/04/25, the Director of Nurses (DON) was made aware of the allegation made by Certified Nurse Aide #4 against Nurse #1, however, the Facility had not reported the allegation to DPH as of 11/25/25 (52 days later).Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Abuse (Screening, Training, Prevention, Reporting, Investigation)-MA, dated as effective 11/03/20, indicated it is the policy of the Facility that abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property is prohibited. Further review of the Policy indicated allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property are to be reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health:a. Immediately but not later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to address and implement licensed Pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for two Residents (#106 and #117) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #106, the facility failed to implement the licensed Pharmacist's recommendation, which the Physician agreed with, to discontinue administration of a Multivitamin and initiate the use of Nephrocaps (vitamins for individuals with renal failure) when the Resident had a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and administration of the Multivitamin was not recommended for use for individuals with an active ESRD diagnosis, increasing the Resident's risk for renal toxicity. 2. For Resident #117, the facility failed to ensure that the licensed Pharmacist's recommendation to evaluate the use of Acetaminophen-Codeine (medication used to treat pain) was addressed in a timely manner by the Physician when the Resident was on dialysis and Acetaminophen-Codeine was recommended to be avoided for dialysis patients. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices in the facility main kitchen and cleaning in three (Floor One, Two and Three) out of the three kitchenettes on the resident care units. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure that dietary staff maintained and performed appropriate hand hygiene practices while preparing and serving meals for residents in the facility main kitchen. 2. ensure that cooking utensils, dishes, and countertops were properly cleaned and sanitized in the facility main kitchen. 3. ensure that the kitchenettes on Floors One, Two and Three were properly cleaned, and that utensils were stored in accordance with food service standards, putting the residents at risk for foodborne illness, cross-contamination, and food contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Manual Ware Washing and Testing Sanitizer Concentration, effective October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Foods can become contaminated by coming into contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence by recognizing the individuality of one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #1, the facility failed to promote the dignity of the Resident when staff walked by, looked into the Resident's room, and failed to intervene and cover the Resident's lower body when he/she was observed from the hallway to be uncovered in bed with his/her underwear briefs clearly visible. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including Dementia and Neurosyphilis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1: -was severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of a possible score of 15. -was dependent on staff for lower body dressing. On 6/6/25 from 8:14 A.M. through 8:45 A.M., the surveyor observed the following: -Resident #1 was visible from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment was maintained for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #48, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment relative to G-tube (gastrostomy tube: medical device inserted into the abdomen to deliver food, fluids, medications) feeding equipment and the surrounding space in the Resident's room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 5&7 Step Daily Room Cleaning, undated, and utilized by the housekeeping staff indicated the following: -Spot clean all vertical surfaces/Clean IV (Intravenous) poles. -Spot clean walls. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnoses including Protein Calorie Malnutrition, history of diseases of the digestive system, Gastric Ulcer, Dysphagia and Adult Failure to Thrive. Review of Resident #48's Care Plans indicated the following in part: -Resident #48 was NPO (nothing by mouth) and a new G-tube was placed on 5/7/21 for severe Dysphagia.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review [PASRR] Office) promptly of the need for Resident Review for one Resident (#107) out of a total sample of 24 residents,when the Resident experienced a significant change in his/her mental condition from his/her initial Level I PASRR. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the PASRR Office of the need for Resident Review when Resident #107: -had diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Personality Disorder. -newly expressed homicidal ideation (HI) and suicidal ideation (SI). -had psychotropic medication that was newly ordered and administered to the Resident to stabilize his/her mood. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled PASRR - MA (Massachusetts), dated 11/17/20, indicated the following: -The facility would follow Federal regulations and State required procedures for the screening of persons being admitted to, and residing in the facility for serious mental illness (SMI) . through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to safely provide feeding assistance for two Residents (#14 and #5), out of a total sample of 24 residents, when both Residents required assistance for eating, putting both residents at risk for aspiration. Specifically, 1. For Resident #14, the facility failed to ensure that safe swallow strategies recommended by the Speech Therapist (ST) were implemented and that liquids provided to the Resident were the ordered consistency. 2. For Resident #5, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was provided with nectar (mildly) thick beverages during the breakfast meal. Findings include: Review of the facility's Fluid Consistencies Chart, undated, indicated Honey consistency was described as a liquid that coats a fork and slowly sinks through the prongs (e.g. Yogurt, Honey). Review of the facility's Feeding (Dependent Feeding) Policy, revised 6/19/23, indicated the following: -Residents will be fed by staff that have appropriate training in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nutrition and hydration services as required for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #75, the facility failed to provide health shakes as ordered at the breakfast meal, putting the Resident at risk for compromised nutritional status. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nourishments and Supplements, effective May 1995 and revised in January 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Policy statement: High calorie food options .may be offered when a resident requires additional calories or nutrients. -Dining services will prepare nourishments as ordered. -Nursing staff will deliver nourishments/supplements to residents as ordered . Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in August 2021, with diagnoses including dysphagia, acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract, Dementia, and history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assist one Resident (#89), out of a total sample of 24 residents, in obtaining routine dental services. Specifically, the facility failed to schedule dental appointments when consent was given, to ensure that Resident #89 received routine dental services as requested. Findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the Request for Service Form, dated and signed 5/15/23, by the Resident Representative requested Dental Services. Review of a Physician's order dated 7/26/24, indicated: -May have Vision, Auditory, Dental, Podiatry, Wound Consult. Review of Resident #89's Dental Care Plan initiated 10/17/24, indicated: -the Resident has broken natural teeth and cavities noted on admission to the facility. -coordinate arrangements for dental care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #89: -was severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice while serving meals to residents on one Unit (3rd Floor) out of three Units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff distributing food during the lunch meal service on the 3rd Floor Unit performed appropriate hand hygiene to prevent contamination and the spread of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, last revised 6/19/24, indicated: -Hand hygiene will be performed in accordance with national standards from the Centers for Disease and Prevention and the World Health Organization (WHO). >Hand hygiene should be performed: -When coming on duty. -Before entering a resident's room and upon exiting a resident's room. -Before and after handling peripheral vascular catheters and other invasive devices. -After removing gloves or aprons. -After completing duty. >Alcohol-based hand rub may be used for all other hand hygiene opportunities (for example [e.g.] when soap and water is not indicated). -After caring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to uphold Resident Rights for one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 24 residents, relative to rights exercised by the Resident's Representative. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process including documentation of referrals made and response from referrals that focused on the Resident Representative's goals of discharging the Resident to a skilled nursing facility closer to involved family members, putting the Resident at risk of decreased family visits. Findings include: Review of the Resident's [NAME] of Rights, revised in October 2024, indicated the following: -you have the right to exercise your rights as a resident and as a citizen. The facility must protect and promote your rights and support, encourage and assist you in exercising them. -you have the right to make choices about aspects of your life that are significant to you. Review of the facility Policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was cognitively intact, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 12/09/24 during the day shift, Maintenance Assistant #1 hugged Resident #1 and kissed him/her on the mouth, without his/her consent, which made him/her feel uncomfortable. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights and Responsibilities, dated as revised July 2017, indicated the Facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident as set forth in the Resident [NAME] of Rights, which includes the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in March 2021, diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), anxiety disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/03/24, indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact with a score of 15 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff adhered to infection control standards for transmission-based precautions for two Residents #61 and #79, and on two Units (Unit One and Unit Three) out of three units observed to stop the spread of infection in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. On Unit One, for Residents #61 and #79, that staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for COVID-19 positive residents, to mitigate the spread of infection during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. 2. On Unit Three, that staff performed hand hygiene after caring for a COVID positive resident, between contact with multiple residents to prevent contamination and mitigate the spread of infection during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Isolation Policy and Procedures dated 10/22/21, indicated the following: *Droplet Precautions: -In addition to standard precautions, use droplet precautions for residents known or suspected to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#44) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -Implement a schedule for cleaning and storage of Resident #44's BiPAP mask (a mask used in conjunction with a BiPAP device [non-invasive ventilation machine that is capable of generating two adjustable pressure levels ), placing the Resident at risk for nosocomial (healthcare associated) infections. -Clean and maintain the Resident's oxygen concentrator (medical device that uses air in the atmosphere, filters it, and delivers air that is 90 - 95% oxygen concentrated) filter in accordance with professional standards and placing the Resident at risk for impaired oxygen delivery and equipment malfunction. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Concentrator Maintenance, undated, indicated the following: It is the facility policy that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#94) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -consistently communicate the facility Nurse's assessment of the Resident prior to him/her going to dialysis. -collaborate with applying EMLA (Lidocaine) cream to the dialysis access site prior to the Resident leaving the facility to prevent pain when the dialysis site is accessed in the dialysis facility. -implement recommendations made by the dialysis center to remove pressure dressings within 24 hours of dialysis treatments to prevent clotting of the dialysis access site. Findings include: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in February 2022, with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD: when the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs) and was dependent on dialysis treatments (a treatment that does the work of the kidneys by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#96) out of a total sample of 24 residents was free from a significant medication error. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -discontinue an order for an antipsychotic medication (medication used to treat certain types of mental health problems whose symptoms include psychotic experiences) dosage of 20 milligrams (mg) of Abilify, before administering the newly ordered dosage of 25 mg of Abilify resulting in the Resident receiving an excessive dosage (45 mg) of the medication, which was greater than the recommended maximum dosage of 30 mg daily. Findings include: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a chronic brain disorder with symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, trouble speaking, and lack of motivation). According to the Nursing Drug Handbook (2022), page 144, Aripiprazole (brand name Abilify, an antipsychotic medication) Indications and Dosage indicated but was not limited to: -for Schizophrenia:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately execute Advance Directives (written documents that tells your health care providers who should speak for you and what medical decisions should be made, if you become unable to speak for yourself) for two Residents (#30 and #79) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) decisions were made by: 1. Resident #30, who had not been deemed as lacking capacity for informed decision making by the facility's Physician instead of their Health Care Proxy (HCP-a legally designated person who can make medical decisions for a person deemed by a medical professional to be unable to make their own medical decisions). 2. Resident #79, who was not determined by the Physician/ Nurse Practitioner (NP) as being unable to make their own medical decisions, instead of the HCP. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled MOLST, last revised 2/19/21, indicated: -that if a resident (or if the resident lacks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility smoking policy one Resident (#22) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #22 the facility failed to ensure that staff completed re-admission smoking evaluations after the Resident was hospitalized on two occasions. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Smoking-MA, reviewed 2/14/23, indicated the following: -Smoking evaluations: Smoking evaluations should be done upon admission/re-admission and after significant change in resident status. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in June 2021, with diagnoses including Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and loss of judgment) with severe mood disturbance and a history of a traumatic brain injury (TBI - a form of acquired brain injury that occurs when a sudden trauma causes damage to the brain). Review of list titled Smoking Group provided to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff managed and monitored the psychotropic (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication regimen to promote and maintain the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being of four Residents (#36, #113, #272, and #41) out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to: 1) ensure residents (#36, #113, #272) were consistently monitored for medication side effects and that, 2) ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was time limited and reevaluated as required (Resident #41). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use of Psychoactive Medications and Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR), undated, indicated: -Psychoactive medications will be used in accordance with federal laws and the State Operations manual -The prescriber shall monitor and assess for efficacy, tolerability, and side effects and adjust dose as necessary Review of the facility policy titled use of PRN (as needed) Psychotropics, undated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff promoted care for residents in a manner and environment that maintained and enhanced each resident's dignity and respect, by neglecting to sit with residents while providing dining assistance on one unit (Unit Three) out of three units observed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Feeding (Dependent Feeding), revised 6/5/19, indicated the following: -Give resident your complete attention, sit so you are at the same level of the resident. During an observation on 12/27/22 at 9:55 A.M., during the breakfast meal on Unit Three, the surveyor observed Nurse #1 standing while assisting a resident with the breakfast meal. The surveyor noted there were multiple empty chairs throughout the dining area available for the Nurse to use. During an observation on 12/28/22 from 9:23 A.M. 9:30 A.M., during the breakfast meal on Unit Three, the surveyor observed Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) #1 standing while assisting a resident with the breakfast meal. The surveyor also observed that CNA #1 made no attempt to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable and needed accomodations for one Resident (#19), out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to place a call bell within reach, making it impossible for the Resident to summon help when needed and placing him/her at increased risk for falls. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in December 2021. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident's cognition was moderately impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, required extensive assistance with transfers in and out of bed, and had previously fallen two or more times. During an observation and interview on 12/27/22 at 10:34 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident, lying in his/her bed which was pushed up against the wall on the right side of his/her room. The surveyor also observed the Resident's call bell hanging off of the control panel in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#40) personal care choices were honored, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide showers for the Resident per his/her request. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in July 2021. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Further review of the MDS Assessment indicated the Resident was totally dependent with the assistance of two persons for dressing, toileting, bathing, personal hygiene and transfers in and out of bed. During an interview on 12/27/22 at 2:15 P.M., Resident #40 said he/she would love to have a shower and was supposed to receive showers twice weekly. The Resident further said the staff did not shower him/her or wash his/her hair because the facility did not have a shower chair large enough to accommodate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided Physician notification when insulin (a medication that controls the amount of sugar in the bloodstream) was not available to be administered as ordered for one Resident (#111), out of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM II). Review of the facility policy titled General Guidelines for Medication Administration, dated 8/2020, indicated the following: -If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is not available, the space provided on the front of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for that dosage administration is initialed and circled. -An explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record. -If three consecutive doses, or in accordance with facility policy, of a vital medication are not available, the physician is notified. -Nursing documents the notification and the physician response. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated December 2022, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided a clean home-like environment for two Residents (#21 and #36), out of a sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, the facility housekeeping staff failed to adequately clean wheelchairs so there was not a build up of food and other debris, that could potentially become a sanitary and safety concern. Findings Include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in March 2021. During an observation on 12/28/22 at 8:23 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #21 seated in his/her wheelchair. The surveyor observed the wheelchair to be filthy and appeared to not have been cleaned. The wheelchair had areas covered in a crusty white dried material, as well as a thick pink gummy substance. Upon further observation the surveyor observed areas on the wheelchair with a sticky substance that had accumulated hair and other debris. During an observation and interview on 12/28/22 at 10:47 A.M., the Housekeeping Director said housekeeping was the department that maintained wheelchair cleanliness. The Housekeeping Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff assessed, monitored and evaluated the use of a physical restraint for one Resident (#79), out of a sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Restraint-Physical, revised 3/11/21, indicated the following: - Physical Restraint, defined: any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. - All residents will be assessed by the interdisciplinary team on admission or when the implementation of a restraint is considered for medical necessity to utilize a restraint. - If a restraint is determined to be medically necessary, the competent resident and/or responsible party and/or legal representative will be informed of the risks and benefits, possible negative outcomes, alternatives to restraint use and a written consent for the use of the restraint will be obtained. - A written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff developed and implemented the plan of care for three Residents (#17, #21 and #52), out of a sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff: 1) failed to complete weekly skin checks for three Residents (#17, #21 and # 52), and 2) failed to provide an intervention intended to prevent a pressure injury for one Resident (#21), placing them at increased risk for acquired pressure injuries (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Findings include: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses of Dementia and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD- a circulation disorder in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/20/22, indicated the Resident had one, unhealed, Stage Three Pressure Ulcer (a wound that has gone through all layers of skin into the fat tissue, caused by pressure). Review of the policy, Pressure Ulcer Prevention, dated 3/18/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of existing pressure ulcers (wounds caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of four applicable residents (Resident #14), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that ordered wound care treatments and skin checks to identify new areas of concern were completed as ordered. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in September 2022. During an observation on 12/27/22 at 9:26 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #14 lying in bed on a pressure relief mattress set at 15 alternating with medium firmness. The surveyor also observed dressing supplies on the windowsill in the Resident's room. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #14 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of zero out of 15 on the Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility and its staff failed to ensure that the appropriate equipment and assistance to maintain and improve mobility were provided for two Residents (#1 and #41), out of 24 sampled residents with limited mobility. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure devices were applied as ordered to prevent and limit contractures (deformity and rigidity of joints resulting in decreased function). Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses including Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Review of an Occupational Therapy (OT) note dated 8/10/22, indicated Resident #1 had a left hand contracture and included the following treatment goal: -the Resident would safely wear a hand roll on the left hand (used as a splint) for up to 8 hours with minimal redness, swelling, discomfort or pain. Review of the nursing care plan titled Left-Hand Roll,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided appropriate care and services for three Residents (#14, #112, and #75), out of three applicable residents, with urinary catheters (tubes that drain urine from the bladder to a collection device outside the body) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to indicate: A) catheter care had been performed, B) evidence of drainage bag changes and urinary output recording, C) that dignity was provided relative to catheter drainage bags, and D) follow infection control practices to prevent contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. For Resident #14, the facility failed to ensure its staff documented catheter care and services as ordered by the Physician. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in September 2022, with a diagnosis of Obstructive Uropathy (a condition in which urine cannot drain through the urinary tract). On 12/27/22 at 4:10 P.M., the surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#1) with a tracheostomy tube (trach: a surgically created opening (stoma) from the neck to the trachea to create an airway for those unable to breathe through the nose or mouth), out of one applicable residents with tracheostomies, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to keep a spare tracheostomy tube (trach tube: a tube inserted into the tracheostomy to maintain an open airway) at the bedside in the event of an emergency, and document trach tie changes as ordered. Findings include: Review of an on-line article titled: Tracheostomy Care, published in Nursing Critical Care 2020, indicated: -emergency supplies should be immediately available at the bedside to protect the patient from complications of tracheostomy tube dislodgement -emergency supplies should include spare trach tubes .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#91), out of 4 residents receiving dialysis in a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to communicate effectively with the dialysis center by sending the Resident with incomplete, pertinent clinical information. Findings include: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-when kidneys no longer function well enough to meet a body's needs) and required dialysis (the process of removing excess water and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) on a Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday schedule. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1) acquired and dispensed medication as ordered for one Resident (#111), out of 24 sampled residents, and 2) replaced an Insulin Emergency Kit (E-Kit) on one out of one unit where the Insulin Emergency kits were stored. Findings include: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility April 2022 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM II). Review of the MDS Assessment, dated 11/13/22, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Physician's Orders dated December 2022, indicated the Resident had an order for Humulin-N insulin, inject 80 units subcutaneously (beneath the skin) twice daily, initiated 5/5/22. Review of the policy titled, Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medication, dated 8/2020, indicated the following: -Repeat medications (refills) are written on a medication reorder form or by peeling the reorder tab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff responded to medication regime reviews (MRRs-pharmacy recommendations) timely and documented within the clinical record for two Residents (#113 and #41), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #113 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including Bullous Pemphigoid (skin condition that can cause large blisters which can result in pain and itching), Vascular Dementia, antisocial personality disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of the Resident's medical record indicated MRRs were done by the Pharmacist on 7/20/22, 9/21/22, and 10/20/22 and recommendations had been made on each date. Further review of the Resident's medical record indicated no documentation the MRRs from 7/20/22, 9/21/22, or 10/20/22 had been reviewed, addressed, and signed by the attending Physician. During an interview on 12/28/22 at 1:24 P.M., Unit Manager (UM) #1 said the MRRs on the dates in question had not been reviewed, addressed, or signed by the attending Physician. She further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on two of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: A) an unattended medication cart was locked, B) expired patient specific medications were removed from the medication cart and medication storage room, and C) that medication refrigerator temperatures were monitored to ensure vaccines was kept under appropriate temperature controls. Findings include: Review of a facility pharmacy policy titled, Storage of Medications, effective September 2018, indicated the following: -Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly and is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel and staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. -Outdated medications are removed from inventory and disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. -The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccines are stored at least two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-03 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained Physician's orders for COVID-19 testing prior to testing being conducted on two Residents (#12 and #88), out of a total sample of three residents. Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Memo QSO-20-38-NH titled Interim Final Rule (IFC), CMS-3401-IFC, Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency related to Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Testing Requirements, revised 9/23/22, indicated the following: -Conducting Testing- In accordance with 42 CFR § 483.50(a)(2)(i), the facility must obtain an order from a Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner, or Clinical Nurse Specialist in accordance with state law, including scope of practice laws to provide or obtain laboratory services for a resident, which includes COVID-19 testing (see F773). This may be accomplished through the use of Physician approved policies (e.g., standing orders), or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff accurately documented the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device (a machine that uses positive pressure to keep breathing airways open during sleep). Specifically, the facility staff failed to document the Resident's refusal of wearing the device. Findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty/ discomfort breathing) and Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Review of the December 2022 Physician's Orders included the following: - CPAP settings: 5-12 centimeters of water (cmH2O- unit that measures the pressure). Apply at bedtime, off in the morning, initiated 11/11/21. -Check skin before applying and after removing CPAP after every shift. Review of the November and December 2022 Treatment Administration Records (TARs) indicated no documentation of CPAP use on the following dates:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,343 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
- $16,985 — penalty dated 2025-04-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ICARE HEALTH NETWORK — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| COMMONWEALTH CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| PRESTON CAPITAL INVESTORS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| VANTAGE CAPITAL INVESTORS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| COHEN, JONATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| SEBBAG, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2021 |
| THOMPSON, EDIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/02/2021 |
| WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/02/2021 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225480. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.