Saint Mary Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 302 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 256 beds and averages 199.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-02-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #60) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately reconciled after the resident returned from the hospital resulting in the omission of a medication for 9 days which resulted in a significant change in the residents mental status and a subsequent 12 day hospitalization. The findings include: Resident #60's diagnoses included schizophrenia, cerebral palsy, congenital hydrocephalus and seizure disorder. A progress note, written by MD #3 (resident's primary care physician) dated 10/13/20 identified Resident #60 had a history of schizophrenia and seizure disorder and was currently on Clozapine 400mg daily. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 had moderately impaired cognition, required total 1-person assistance with bathing, extensive 2-person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and locomotion on unit, extensive 1 person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #5) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to honor a resident's Advanced Directive which specified Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Intubate (DNR/DNI) when the resident was found unresponsive and without a pulse. The findings included:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, cellulitis of left lower limb, and unspecified open wound of left lower limb.The Nursing admission assessment by RN #6 dated [DATE] at 4:51 PM identified Resident #5 arrived to the facility by stretcher, had reduced strength of the lower extremities, could ambulate with assistance, and utilized a four (4) wheel walker.The Current Consent for Life Sustaining Procedure dated [DATE] (located in the resident's paper chart and signed by both the resident and Medical Director) identified Resident #5 refused cardiopulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and staff interviews, for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for an injury of known origin, the facility failed to ensure the resident received necessary care and services when a physician-ordered x-ray was not obtained following complaints of left lower extremity pain, resulting in an eight (8) day delay in diagnosis of acute displaced fractures of the distal tibia and fibula. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included childhood polio, osteoporosis and Alzheimer's dementia. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was oriented to person, place, time and event. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/9/25 identified Resident #1 was at risk for bilateral leg pain with interventions that included pain medications as ordered, complete pain assessment/evaluations, and observe for non-verbal indicators of pain (facial grimacing, guarding, furrowed brow,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy, interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wounds, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of a physician order for wound care. The findings included:Resident #1 had diagnoses which included an unspecified wound, and local infection of the skin, subcutaneous tissue. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fifteen (15) indicative of intact cognition. Review of the RCP dated 8/20/2025 identified Resident #1 had an open wound/impaired skin integrity to the left lower extremity. Interventions directed to apply treatment: wound vac on Mondays/Wednesdays/Fridays. A physician's order dated 8/31/2025 directed to apply a wound vac at a low, continuous suction of 125 millimeters. Review of a nurse's note dated 9/1/2025 at 12:34 AM identified Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-12 · tag F0887 — widespread
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility documentation, facility policy/procedures, and interviews for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #83, Resident #97, Resident #120, Resident #160 and Resident #187), reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the COVID-19 vaccination were offered and/or assessed to residents. The findings include: 1. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in the month of June 2024 with diagnoses that included pneumonia, multiple rib fracture, and Alzheimer's disease. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #83 had severely impaired cognition. The assessment further identified that Resident #83 COVID-19 vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #83's immunization consents and/records, along with the new admission vaccine audit documentation for June 2024 with the Infection Preventionist (RN #2) on 11/7/24 at 9:45 AM failed to identify that the COVID-19 booster vaccine was offered to the resident. 2. Resident #97 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0572 — pattern
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident rights were reviewed on an ongoing basis. The findings include: A review of the resident council's monthly meeting minutes for the period of May 2024 through October 2024 failed to identify that resident rights were reviewed at the resident council meetings and/or that resident rights information was disseminated to the resident council as a group or to the residents in general. Interview on 11/04/24 at 2:07 PM with the resident council identified that the facility did not review resident rights during the resident council meetings and did not disseminate resident rights information to the residents on a routine basis. Interview on 11/7/24 at 9:29 AM with the Therapeutic Recreation Director identified the residents received a Resident's [NAME] of Rights when admitted to the facility. She further noted that she is the designated person that assists the residents with the resident council meetings and noted that the meetings did not have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of the facility assessment and interviews for six sampled residents (Residents #29, #55, #60, #142, #167, and #184) residing on the secured unit (West 1), the facility failed to assess, care plan, demonstrate the secured unit was the least restrictive setting, and obtain consents for residents who were selected to reside on the secured unit. The findings included: Observations during all days of the survey October 31st, November 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, 2024 identified the [NAME] 1 unit located on the first floor had entrance doors that were closed and secured. There was a key code pad adjacent to the doors that required a number code to be entered in order to gain access to the unit. All exterior doors and stairwell doors on the unit also required a key code to access the door. The staff was noted to input the code for visitors to exit the unit or enter the unit. Review of the Facility Assessment on 11/4/24 identified the facility's capability of managing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of facility policy for 3 of 4 medication rooms, the facility failed to ensure medication rooms had sanitary refrigerators, maintained at appropriate temperatures and expired medications were removed from the cabinets. Additionally, for 3 of 5 medication carts, the facility failed to ensure the carts were clean. The findings include: Observation of the [NAME] Crossing medication storage room with LPN #4 on 10/31/24 at 10:30 AM noted expired medication contained in the overstock cabinet consisting of 1 full bottle of 325 milligrams(mg) of Aspirin (100 tablets) with an expiration date of 9/24, and the freezer had a heavy accumulation of frost/ice. Interview with LPN #4 on 10/31/24 at 10:35 AM identified that she was unsure of who was responsible for cleaning out and restocking medication in the medication storage room. LPN #4 identified that the freezer needed to be defrosted and that the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift was responsible for picking up discontinued medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures, and interviews for two of five sampled residents (Resident #83 and Resident #160), reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine as requested by the resident upon admission. The findings include: 1. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in the month of June 2024 with diagnoses that included pneumonia, multiple rib fracture, and Alzheimer's disease. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #83 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the Vaccination Consent form for pneumovax identified Resident #83 gave the facility permission to administer the pneumovax vaccine on 6/26/2024. Review of Resident #83 clinical records failed to identify that he/she had received the vaccination at the facility or had change his/her decision. 2. Resident #160 was admitted to the facility in the month of June 2024 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of six sampled residents (Resident #60) residing on the secured unit, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was comprehensive in regards to behaviors of wandering, elopement risk and placement on a secured unit. The findings included: Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in October of 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, personal history of disease of the nervous system and sensory organs, and unsteadiness on feet and repeated falls. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 had severely impaired cognition, required partial/moderate assistance with chair to bed, toilet, and tub transfers, required supervision or touching assistance with walking 10 feet and wheeling 150 feet in the wheelchair. Additionally, the MDS indicated the resident did not exhibit wandering, rejection of care, or physical or verbal behaviors. The care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided nail care. The findings include: Resident #58's diagnoses include dementia, disorientation and difficulty swallowing. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired, was moderately visually impaired, required moderate assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent for toileting, showering, and transfers. The Social Worker note dated 9/5/24 at 12:55 PM identified Resident #58 was very hard of hearing and had poor eyesight. The care plan dated 9/24/24 identified Resident #58 was at risk for a self-care deficit, required assistance with activities of daily living related to a visual impairment with interventions that included providing assistance in completing ADL tasks, and assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT