Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received an accurate assessment reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment including the correct coding for anticoagulants for 7 (Residents #s #12, 25, 52, 53, 57, 62, and 72) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, for (a.) Resident #s 12, 25, 52, 53, 57, and 62 antiplatelet medications were coded as anticoagulants in the Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool). (b.) for Resident #72, there was not documented evidence that the resident was on anticoagulant, but it was documented in the Minimum Data Set that Resident #72 was on anticoagulant. This is evidenced by: The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (v1.08) Errata (v2) effective 4/1/2012 stated the coding instructions in Section N had been amended to include N0410 E. Anticoagulant. Specifically, the coding instructions stated that antiplatelet medications such as Aspirin were not to be coded as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure it developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframe to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident # 57) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. Specifically, Resident #57 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and prescribed an antibiotic. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was written that addressed the change in condition. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Interdisciplinary Care Conference and Care Planning dated 6/27/2023, documented it was the facility's policy to develop a comprehensive resident centered plan of care within 14 days of admission. The care plan was to be updated quarterly and with any significant change thereafter. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for 2 (Resident #'s 27, and 180) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #27, Comprehensive Care Plan for medications was not reviewed and revised for a resident who required Guaifenesin cough medication, daily Aspirin for blood thinning, and Cepacol lozenge as needed for sore throat. (b.) for Resident #180, Comprehensive Care Plan for nutrition was not reviewed and revised to account for discontinuation of the weekly weights that were to be done on Mondays. This is evidenced by: A review of the policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Conference and Care Planning dated 11/28/2016 and last revised 11/2019, documented the facility would develop a baseline interdisciplinary, resident centered plan of care within 48 hours of admission, and a comprehensive resident centered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews during a Recertification Survey, the facility did not provide needed care and services that were resident centered and in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #11) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not identify, document, investigate or monitored bruises to Resident #11's bilateral upper extremities. Resident #11 was prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication and was at risk for bruising. The is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Skin and Wound Care, effective 5/13/2024, documented it was the policy of the facility to assess/inspect the resident's skin, to monitor closely for changes and to document any new skin issues promptly and accurately. Resident #11 admitted to facility with diagnoses which included dementia, facial weakness following cerebral infarction (a pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain), and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (as assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (Resident # 19) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, on 6/10/2024 and 7/26/2024 Resident #19 was injured while nursing staff attempted to cut the resident's fingernails; there was no documented evidence completed incident and accident reports/investigations following the incidents and no interventions implemented to prevent recurrence after the first time the resident was injured. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Patient Safety Event Reporting effective 1/22/2021 documented the intent of the policy was to inform staff of the type of events and/or concerns about patient safety or quality of care to report, to achieve consistency in process and format for investigation, review, analysis and trending of patient events, and to identify opportunities to improve the quality of patient care and safety, systems/processes, and security practices. An Adverse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs required respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals and preferences were provided by a qualified professional for the assessment, treatment, and monitoring of residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function for 1 (Resident #58) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #58's oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date and time it was changed in accordance with professional standards and facility policy. This is evidenced by: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding on the brain), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (repeated shortness of breath), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (endocrine dysfunction causing issues controlling blood sugar levels). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 7/19/2024 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, opened insulin pens had no open and/or expiration dates written on them. This was evident for 1 medication cart on [NAME] Unit out of 2 medication carts reviewed in the facility for medication storage. This is evidenced by: The facility's Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, effective [DATE] documented, the expiration date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date should be recorded on the container. Facility staff should record the date opened on the medication container when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened. Facility staff may record the calculated expiration date based on date opened on the medication container. During an observation on [DATE] at 11:36 AM of a medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served under safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the potential contamination of food and the spread of food-borne illness in one of one kitchen. Specifically, expired foods were not disposed of in a timely manner, the kitchen was not clean and sanitary, and dented canned foods were not removed from common stock. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Food Supply and Storage, last revised January 2024, documented that food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation should be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption. The procedure included that most products had an expiration date. The words sell-by, best-by, enjoy-by or use-by should precede the date. Foods past the use-by, sell-by, best-by, or enjoy-by date should be discarded. The dry food storage procedure included that the facility should maintain a designated area for items that were damaged such as dented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of communicable diseases/illnesses. Specifically, the facility did not ensure staff completed hand hygiene when indicated during meal service. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Hand Hygiene/Artificial Fingernails, last revised 6/18/2024, documented the purpose of the policy was to prevent the direct or indirect spread of microorganisms via the hands of colleagues and healthcare workers who provided direct patient care. The procedure included that hand washing/hand antisepsis was indicated before and after touching a patient, before and after wearing gloves, before and after touching the patient's surroundings, before, during, and after preparing food, anytime hands were visibly soiled, after bodily fluid exposure risk from a patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 7 (Resident #'s 5, 6, 7, 17, 18, 30, and #49) of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (CCPs). Specifically, for Resident #5, the facility did not ensure the resident's CCP was implemented, resulting in a resident fall on 1/21/2022; for Resident #6, the facility did not ensure geri-sleeves were implemented and were added to the resident's CCP and [NAME] after documenting these as completed post-incident interventions on an incident report on 5/8/2022; for Resident #7, the facility did not ensure interventions were included in the CCP for Risk of infection of the mouth due to broken root tips, did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $915K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY