Eddy Heritage House Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (#2665815), the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from neglect for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. (Resident #1). Specifically, on [DATE] at 2:00 PM, the facility identified that Resident #1 received four (4) incorrect doses of morphine sulfate (a strong opioid analgesic used to treat moderate to severe pain) totaling 80 milligrams over a 12-hour timeframe. This resulted in the resident becoming lethargic and unresponsive with unstable vital signs including blood pressure and oxygen saturation. The facility failed to provide interventions to reverse the effects of the medication despite the family inquiry to Narcan (also known as naloxone, a medication used to reverse or reduce the effects of opioids). The resident expired on [DATE] at 6:20 AM. This resulted in Substandard Quality of Care that was Immediate Jeopardy that resulted in the death of Resident #1, with the likelihood of serious…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (#2665815), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, the facility administered four (4) incorrect doses of morphine sulfate (a strong opioid analgesic used to treat moderate to severe pain), totaling 80 milligrams over a 12-hour period. This resulted in Substandard Quality of Care that was Immediate Jeopardy and resulted in the death of Resident #1, with the likelihood of serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to all 108 residents in the facility.This is evidenced by:Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect.The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration dated [DATE], documented that each resident would receive medications according to the provider orders and accepted professional standards. The nurse was responsible for having knowledge of the therapeutic effects, contraindications,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (Case #2665815), the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four (4) (Resident #'s 10, 11, 12, and 13) of four (4) residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, the resident's medications were administered late across various units and their medical providers were not notified. This is evidenced by: The Facility Policy titled Medication Administration effective date 12/21/2025, documented it was the policy of the facility that each patient/resident/elder would receive medications according to provider orders and accepted professional standards. Times entered into the electronic medication administration record are used to organize the nursing workflow and do not reflect times ordered by the medical staff. Red alerts highlighted in the electronic medication administration record do not reflect late medications. The nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (Case #2665815), the facility did not ensure equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis for (1) (Resident #1) of one (1) resident reviewed. Specifically, staff did not question, assess, or respond to a significant medication error because Resident #1 was receiving hospice services. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 stated they did not question medication that they dispensed to Resident #1 because the resident was on hospice. This compromised Resident #1's right to dignity, self-determination, and access to medically appropriate care. This is evidenced by: Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect. Cross reference to F-760: Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors. The Policy and Procedure titled Resident Rights, dated 5/28/2024 documented that the facility would ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (Complaint #2665818), the facility did not ensure that hospice or the resident representative/emergency contact was notified of a significant medication error for 1 (one) (Resident #1) of 5 (five) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 experienced a significant medication error on 10/09/2025, and there was no documented evidence that hospice was notified, and the resident's representative was not made aware until 10/28/2025. This is evidenced by: Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect. Cross reference to F-760: Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors. The document Service Agreement by and between [Hospice Vendor #1] and [Facility] dated 10/24/2027, documented promptly upon admission of a hospice patient, who has not been residing in a nursing home, to the Nursing Facility and consent of the Hospice Patient (or his/her Authorized Representative), Hospice would furnish nursing with a copy of the then-current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (Case #2665815), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 (two) hours after the allegation was made, if the event that caused the allegation resulted in serious bodily injury to the Administrator and to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State Law for one (1) (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was involved in a serious adverse event / medication error that resulted in their death on [DATE]. The event was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. This is evidenced by: Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect. Cross reference to F-760: Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors. The Facility Policy titled Medication Errors and Reporting effective [DATE], documented the facility maintained a nonpunitive reporting culture, which encouraged all staff to report medication events immediately. All…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (Case # 2665815) from 11/17/2025 to 11/26/2025, for 1 (one) (Resident #1) of 3 (three) residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the Physician provided supervision of medical care. Specifically, Physician #1 signed 5 incorrect orders for morphine concentrate oral liquid resulting in Resident #1 receiving 80 milligrams of morphine over a 12-hour period. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that Physician #1 provided any follow up instructions or care to Resident #1 after the medication administration was discovered. This is evidenced by: Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect. Cross reference to F-760: Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for five (5) days of respite care (a short-term, substitute care for a person who requires assistance by a caregiver. Respite care provides temporary relief for primary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (Case # 2668815), the facility did not ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 (one) of 5 (five) residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, the facility administered morphine sulfate (strong opioid used to treat moderate to severe pain) as a routine, standing medication despite no documented clinical evidence of pain or shortness or breath, exposing Resident #1 to unnecessary risk of adverse drug effects including over-sedation and respiratory depression. This is evidenced by: Cross reference to F-600: Free from Abuse and Neglect. Cross reference to F-760: Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors. The Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration, dated 12/21/2023 stated each resident will receive medications according to the provider orders and accepted professional standards and the nurse is responsible for having knowledge of the therapeutic effects,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (Case # 2665815), the facility was not administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of ar resident (Resident #1). Specifically, the facility lacked oversight in place to use its resources (staff, policies, and communication systems) effectively and efficiently to protect Resident #1. This is evidenced by: Reference is made to deficiencies related to ineffective administration: Please refer to F600 as it pertains to the facility's failure to ensure freedom from neglect. Please refer to F760 as it pertains to the facility's failure to ensure freedom from significant medication errors. Please refer to F550 as it pertains to the facility's failure to ensure resident dignity. Please refer to F609 as it pertains to the facility's failure to ensure adverse events were reported to the State Survey Agency. Please refer to F684 as it pertains to the facility's failure to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/20/2024 to 2/27/2024, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to respond to grievances and complaints from residents of the facility. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the facility's process for missing property and grievances was followed when the residents reported lost items or filed complaints. Additionally, the residents needed to be appropriately apprised of the progress toward any resolutions made for grievances or missing items. This is evidenced by: Policy and Procedure titled Complaints and Grievances, dated 1/2016, documented that the facility would promptly deal with complaints and recommendations made by residents and their designated representatives. The purpose of this policy was to promptly bring complaints or recommendations to the attention of one individual responsible for addressing and explaining to the resident when a complaint could not be fully resolved. During a record review, grievances provided by the facility from August 2023 through November…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 2/20/2024 to 2/27/2024, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals according to professional standards. Specifically, (a.) an administered controlled substance was not signed out on the control substance record when documented in the resident's medical record as administered; and (b.) nursing staff did not verify the correct resident prior to medication administration for 2 (Resident #'s 4 and 76) residents observed for medication administration. This is evidenced by: The facility's Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, effective 12/21/2023, under Procedure: documented the Registered Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse will 3. Note carefully the name, dose, amount of administration and expiration date. 5. Use pill crusher to crush tablets (per order). 6. Identify the resident/elder by two identifiers (ex, checking the ID bracelet, ID photo in electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 2/20/2024 to 2/27/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labelled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, (a.) opened medications had no open and/or expiration dates; (b.) controlled substances were not kept secured in a double locked cabinet; (c.) expired medications were present; and (d.) an unlocked medication cart was left unattended. This was evident for 4 out of 6 medication carts reviewed, and for 1 out of 3 medication storage rooms reviewed. This is evidenced by: The facility's Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, effective 12/21/2023, documented the nurse was to carefully check the name, dose, amount of administration and expiration date, and to remain with the unlocked medication cart/cabinet. It further documented that if nurse needed to leave the cart, the cart was to be locked. The Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedure Manual revised 8/7/2023 documented the facility was to store Schedule II - V…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $993K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY