No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Transitional Care Unit At Nazareth Hospital

2601 Holme Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19152 · Non profit - Corporation · 28 certified beds · (215) 335-6367 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (215) 335-6367 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2630 Holme Ave Ste 104 · (215) 332-9095 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Acme0.2 mi
8200 E Roosevelt Blvd · (215) 338-8077 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.2%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.3%9.5%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.79U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.44hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.79 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.9%CMS range 66.3–76.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.4%CMS range 10.8–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.9–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

3.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.79
RN hoursweekends
19.0%
Total nursing turnover
7.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 14.7 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 3.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 3.77 to 2.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advanced directives/code status were in place for two of 11 clinical records reviewed (Resident R110 and Resident R111). Findings include: Review of facility policy on Advance Directive and Healthcare Agents and Representatives revealed that under section Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that [NAME] Hospital physicians and colleagues respect the health care decisions of its patients and comply with the requirement of Pennsylvania law governing Living Wills. Under section Policy: [NAME] Hospital will comply with the Living Will of a patient. Under section admission Procedure: Upon admission to [NAME] Hospital facility, the patient shall be informed of the right to execute an Advance Health Care Directives. The patient access representative will ask the patient if the patient has executed a living will/advance health care directive and if the patient has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify a physician's order related to daily weights for one out of 11 residents reviewed (Resident R61). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Weights, with a review date of August 2019 indicted that the purpose of the policy is to monitor weight gain or loss. The policy also indicated that nursing will notify the physician or any weight gain of 2 or more pounds in one day, and the dietician of any weight loss. Review of the guidelines that the facility follows for the managemement of heart failure, 22 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure indicated that the facility's disease management programs may compromise education, self-management, medication optimization, device management, weight monitoring, exercise and dietary advices . Review of Resident R61's nursing note dated March 13, 2025 at 11:54 a.m. indicated that the resident was admitted in to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident with a PICC line. (Resident R4) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Maintenance of Central Venous Catheters (CVC) revealed that under section Purpose: intravenous therapy for the administration of blood products, fluids, and parenteral nutrition, as well as for hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of medical practice. The following policy pertains to all central venous catheters (CVC) utilized at [NAME] Health Mid-Atlantic region, including PICC. Under section Maintenance of the Catheter Site, # C. The insertion site will be evaluated every shift for evidence of complications. Assessments include gentle palpation of the site through the intact dressing to discern tenderness and visual inspection of insertion site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the hand hygiene during medication administration, and wound treatment for two of two residents observed. (Resident R61 and Resident R108) Findings include: Revie of facility policy on medication administration revealed that the policy did not address hand washing and other infection control subjects. Review of facility policy on Hand Hygiene revealed that under section Purpose: To assure proper hand hygiene practices are utilized by employees during all activities including patient care, and to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens. Hand hygiene helps to physical remove infectious from hands. Hands can also be decontaminated using waterless alcohol hand sanitizer. Under section Policy: It is the policy of [NAME] Hospital to decrease the risk for transmission of nosocomial pathogens that may be carried on the hands of healthcare workers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records review, it was determined the facility did not develop a person centered baseline care plan for two of five resident clinical records reviewed. (Residents R3 and R116) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plan Policy last revised August 2012 revealed The transitional care unit at [NAME] Hospital will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives a timetables, to meet a residents medical, nursing and mental , and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], to receive rehabilitation services for ambulatory disfunction (a condition that make it difficult to walk). Continued review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R3 had the diagnoses of urinary tract infection, ambulatory disfunction (a condition that makes it difficult to walk), shortness of breath, kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and policy and procedure review, it was determined for one of two closed resident records, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, orderly, systematic and coordinated discharge to the community. (Resident R9) Findings include: Review of Resident R9's closed clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation. On May 8, 2023 the physician's progress note indicated that the resident was requesting to be discharge. On May 9, 2023 the nursing staff documented in the clinical record that Resident R9 left the facility at 8:05 p.m., with a family member to return home. The resident was documented as advised to continue Nexium 40 milligrams (mg) twice daily to treat acid reflux, Ibuprofen 800 mg three times a day and as needed for pain, Carisoprodol 350 mg daily as needed for muscle spasm, Calcitrol 25 mg daily (a vitamin supplement) and Lisinopril 20 mg daily to treat high blood pressure. The physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were follow related to medications for diabetes mellitus and hypotension for two of six residents reviewed. (Residents R61 and R70) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high blood glucose levels for prolonged periods of time, that was caused by an inadequate production of insulin). Clinical record review revealed that Resident R70 had physician' orders for insulin (Lispro Humalog); which was a fast acting insulin used to control high blood glucose. The physician directed the nursing staff to monitor Resident R70's blood glucose three times daily with meals. The physician orders also included directions for the nursing staff to treat hypoglycemia (low blood glucose).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed in oxygen therapy (Resident R3 and Resident R112). Findings include: Observations conducted on July 25, 2023, at 10:56 a.m. revealed that Resident R3 was receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula and the tubing was undated. Observations conducted on July 25, 2023, at 11:15 a.m. revealed that Resident R112 was receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula and the tubing was undated. Interview with Licensed nurse, Employee E11 on July 26, 2023 at 2:05 p.m. confirmed that the tubing has not been dated. Interview with Director of nursing on July 27, 2023 at 2:40 p.m. revealed that the tubing is changed every Sunday and should be dated. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services 29 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the security of a medication cart for one of one cart observed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated February 15, 2023 revealed never leave poured or prepared medications unsupervised. Observations conducted on July 24, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed that a medication cart stationed on the second floor was unlocked and unattended for a period of 7 minutes not in view of licensed nurse, Employee E24. At 9:08 a.m., Licensed nurse, Employee E24, approached the cart. When the surveyor asked why the cart was unlocked, Employee E24 stated, she was tending to a resident on isolation and could not bring the cart in the room. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, and the Director of Nursing, Employee E2 on July 25, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. confirmed that medication cart should be locked at all times when unattended. 29 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services 29 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide completed documentation and information as required within the appropriate time frames. Findings include: An entrance conference was held on July 24, 2023, at 9:15 a.m. the entrance conference worksheet was provided to the Director of Nursing informing the facility of needed documents and their expected time frames for delivery. The list of documents included but was not limited to, the wifi access and patient records access, to be delivered immediately. On July 24, 2023, at 12:10 p.m. another request was made for patient record access. Interview with Director of Nursing at the time stated that the requests for access was made but has been denied. Director of Nursing was waiting for IT (information technology) to respond to the requests. On July 25, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., surveyors were given computers to be able to access they system but still surveyors were unable to gain access to the facility program. At 10:33 a.m., surveyors were given access and assisted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TRINITY HEALTH OF THE MID-ATLANTIC REGIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2013
WAJDA, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022
BROMBERG, TALYANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2019
BRUCKER, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
BUCKLEY, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
CALOPE, MICHELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
DEIGNAN, MARTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
FONTANILLA, HIRALIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
GORDON, VINCENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
GRACE, MARIANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2022
JOHNSON, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
KAPUR, SHAILAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
KEEGAN, JULIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
MONIHAN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
WASHINGTON, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
WOODWARD, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
CUMMINGS, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
MAGRO, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/24/2021
MIKUS, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2021
KILPINEN, STUARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/10/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396002. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next