Eddy Village Green

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 15.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 192 beds and averages 186.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #'s NY00370986, NY00359919, NY00359950, and NY00360114), the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from abuse and neglect for four (4) (Resident #'s 1, 2, 3, and 4) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, which included physical, verbal and mental abuse. Specifically, (1.) Video footage documented Resident #1 was pushed to the floor on 2/02/2025 at 5:03 PM by Shahbaz (Certified Nurse Aide) #1, transferred off the floor by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 without an assessment by a Registered Nurse, and suffered a broken hip. (2.) Resident #2 was left unattended in the bathroom by Shahbaz #5 for one hour and twenty minutes on 11/04/2024. Resident #2 attempted to get themselves off the toilet and subsequently fell and suffered an injury to their right shoulder. (3.) On 11/05/2024, Resident #3 attempted to stand from the table after finishing their meal; Shahbaz #5 yelled at the resident to sit the F* down. (4.)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00370986, NY00359919, NY00359950, and NY00360114), the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for three (3) (Resident #'s 1, 2, and 3) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse investigation. Specifically, (1.) video surveillance footage revealed Shahbaz (Certified Nurse Aide) #1 pushed Resident #1 to the floor on 2/02/2025 at 5:03 PM. There was no documented evidence the facility initiated an investigation on 2/02/2025 (2.) Resident #2 was left unattended in the bathroom by Shahbaz #5 for one hour and twenty minutes on 11/04/2024. Resident #2 attempted to get themselves off of the toilet and subsequently fell and suffered an injury to their right shoulder. (3.) On 11/05/2024, Resident #3 attempted to stand from the table after finishing their meal; Shahbaz #5 yelled at the resident to sit the F* down. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and substandard quality of care to resident health and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview conducted during the recertification survey, it was determined that the facility did not post nurse staffing information in an area accessible to all residents and visitors, as required by the posting requirements. Specifically, the posting of daily nurse staffing levels for staff working in the facility on each shift was displayed on one (1) resident unit, and not accessible to residents and visitors on the other resident units of the facility. This is evidenced by: During an observation from 3/25/2025 through 4/03/2025, the doorway to the administration suite was labeled with a sign documenting that no one was allowed in the building except staff. During an observation on 4/03/2025, at 11:10 AM, the daily nurse staffing postings were located on the wall by the reception desk in the administration building, which was not readily visible or accessible to all residents and visitors. There was no nurse staffing levels posted at any of the 16 residential units where residents and visitors from other units would walk through. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) (House 21 and House 24) of 8 medication carts reviewed, and 8 (Houses 1, 2, 3, 4, 19, 21, 22, 24) of 8 medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, (a.) opened medications had no open and or expiration dates; (b.) one active medication had expired; (c.) medication rooms were left open and unattended; (d.) unlicensed staff had key/access code to medication rooms. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure Titled, Medication Administration effective [DATE] documented, each patient/resident/elder would receive medications according to provider orders and accepted professional standards. Under General Considerations, Responsibility and Procedure: The nurse is responsible for: #3: NOTE carefully the name, dose, amount of administration and expiration date. Be sure the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with dignity and respect, cared for in a manner, and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for three (3) (Resident #s 110, 136 and 145) of 36 residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, (a.) Resident #110 was administered medications in a common area with other residents and individuals present without resident's permission; (b.) Certified Nurse Aide stood over the dining room table instead of sitting with resident, while assisting Resident #136 with their meal; (c.) Resident #145 was served meals at dining room table with the use of plastic utensils. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Resident Rights, effective 5/28/2024, documented it is the policy to ensure residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure assessments were coordinated with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) program under Medicaid for eight (8) (Resident #s 16, 22, 65, 70, 115, 130, 145, and 166) of 36 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a) Resident # ' s 22, 65, 70, and 145 received new diagnoses of mental illness and no Level I screening was done to determine if a Level II screen needed to be done and (b) Resident # ' s 16, 22, 115, 130, and 166 were admitted with diagnoses of mental illness and Level I screen was not accurately completed to indicate the need for Level II. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR), effective 9/10/2022, documented all individuals seeking admission would undergo a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Level I screening prior to admission to determine if they have a mental illness or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure ongoing provision of programs to support each resident and their choices of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (3) (Resident #s 16, 22, and 25) of 36 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #22 was unable to make their needs known, and there were several dates with no documented activities. (b.) For Resident #s 16 and 25, there were no consistent activities planned to meet the resident's needs and/or preferences. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Activities, effective 10/15/2021, documented: (a) the Residential Services Activities Departments provided ongoing programs of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive resident assessment, the interest and the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident; (b) activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (Case #NY00347510) survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, and did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible. This was evident for one (1) (Residents #146) of the 36 residents reviewed, and for House #s 10, 16, and 21. Specifically, (a.) Resident #146, who had a prior incident of being found outside of the home unsupervised, was found to have an electronic monitoring device alarm on their walker that was not functioning as it should. There was no documented evidence that the electronic monitoring device was checked daily for placement and function to prevent further accidents. Additionally, (b.) alcoholic beverages within spaces and rooms of House #s 10, 16, and 21 were observed to be open and unattended. The facility did not identify the risk and the provision of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00368845), the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, (1) an analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from 3/25/2025 through 4/02/2025, the facility was below the minimum levels required; (2) staff reported a lack of sufficient staffing; and (3) residents reported during interviews that the facility was short-staffed at times, and this resulted in call bells not being answered timely and long wait times for care to be provided. This is evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on 3/25/2025, there were 170 residents residing in 16 housing units. The Facility Assessment, last reviewed on 7/31/2024, documented that the facility's bed capacity was 190. The section titled Staffing Plan documented the following: • The day shift required 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident's drug/medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for five (5) (Resident #s 53, 89, 145, 161, and 166) of nine (9) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, for Resident #s 53, 89, 145, 161, and 166, as needed psychotropic medication orders did not include end dates. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Psychotropic Medication Management, effective 3/06/2024, documented as needed orders for anti-psychotic and anti-anxiety medications were limited to 14 days and could not be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the as-needed order to be extended beyond 14 days,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for four (4) of 16 resident central kitchens. Specifically, (a.) bulk food items were not labeled for their contents; (b.) bulk food items and outside items were not date-labeled after opening or labeled with an expiration date; (c.) appliances were not cleaned and had dirt, grime, and unknown substances within them; and (d.) chicken was improperly being thawed. This is evidenced by: An undated policy titled Food Safety Labeling Procedure documented that all food or beverage items stored, opened, prepared, or leftover in our kitchens/storage areas and/or delivered to areas such as Nursing Stations or pantries would be clearly identified by the item name/product, the production or opened date, and the use-by date. A document titled Important Foodservice and Sanitation Guidelines described that any prepared food that was opened or stored must be labeled and dated for discard within…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents could safely self-administer medication when clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #84) of one (1) resident reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #84 was observed with a medicine cup of pills while eating breakfast in the dining area on 3/26/2025 and independently taking the pills. There was no documented evidence that Resident #84 was assessed to determine their ability to safely self-administer medications, or physician orders for self-administration of medications. This is evidenced by: Resident #84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) following cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted, leading to tissue death due to lack of oxygen and nutrients) affecting a dominant side, atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$97,383 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $97,383 — penalty dated 2025-02-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY