Holy Cross Rehabilitation And Wellness

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 69.9 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 98 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident who had fallen for 1 of 3 residents who were reviewed. (Resident G)Finding includes:During an interview on 5/15/2026 at 10:00 A.M., Resident G indicated she had fallen about a month prior when a staff member had moved her with the Hoyer lift by themselves. Resident G indicated she had not been injured during the fall. Resident G denied have been assessed by a staff member before she was lifted off the floor and back into her bed. She also denied having been assessed by staff after she was put back into her bed. Resident G's record review was complete on 5/15/2026 at 11:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, obesity and major depressive disorder. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/9/2026, indicated Resident G had moderate cognitive impairment and had been dependent on staff for transfers.A Rehabilitation Evaluation assessment, completed on 3/8/2026, indicated it was appropriate for Resident G to be transferred with a Hoyer lift.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident appropriately resulting in the resident falling for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident G)Finding includes:During an interview on 5/15/2026 at 9:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there had been an incident when Resident G had been in the process of being transferred with a lift by CNA 2 on 4/13/2026. The resident had been assisted to the floor during the transfer because the resident had been falling out of the mechanical lift transfer sling. CNA 2 had been sent home on 4/13/2026. An investigation into the incident had been started. During the facility's investigation it was determined that CNA 2 had moved Resident G with a mechanical lift, but had not had the assistance of another staff member. The DON indicated all mechanical lifts required the assistance of two staff members. CNA 2 was terminated on 4/15/2026 for not following the facility's policy related to transferring residents with a mechanical lift. During an interview on 5/15/2026 at 10:00 A.M., Resident G indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatment orders were obtained timely and wound treatments were completed and signed out as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents B and C)Findings Include:1.Resident B's record was reviewed on 3/12/26 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, and GERD.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had a surgical wound prior to admission.A Care Plan, dated 2/5/26, indicated the resident had alteration in skin integrity related to an incision of the scrotal and perineal area. Approaches were to provide treatments as ordered, monitor for pain, and observe for signs/symptoms of infection and notify physician of any abnormal findings.A Physician's Order, dated 2/5/26, indicated to apply vacuum assisted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were implemented regarding glove change and hand hygiene during a dressing change. In addition, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff understood the required protective equipment needed to care for a resident requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident C)Findings include:On 3/13/26 at 10:38 a.m., a wound treatment was observed on Resident C. Wound treatment began at 10:41 a.m. with RN 1 removing the previous foam dressing that was dated 3/12/26. RN1 removed his gloves and left the room to clarify treatment orders. At 10:45 a.m., RN 1 returned with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and she assessed the wound and agreed that the wound did not require packing and that it was healing great. She gave new verbal orders to RN 1 to clean with a gauze pad soaked with betadine, apply a 4x4 to the wound bed and wrap with kerlix.RN 1, donned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately address resident grievances regarding call light wait times for 18 of 18 residents reviewed for call-light wait times, (Residents B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, and U).Findings include:During an interview, on 9/17/25 at 9:10 A.M., the Director of Nursing indicated the facility call light system was in working order and had not been out of working order at any time that she was aware of. The Director of Nursing indicated that each resident had a staff member, called a Guardian Angel, who checked on their assigned residents addressing concerns including concerns regarding call ight wait times. The Director of Nursing indicated when residents had concerns, the Guardian Angel was to address the concern and/or file a grievance or complete a Call Light Response Survey form. The Director of Nursing provided a call light audit form that had been created following the previous annual survey on 4/28/25, and indicated call light wait time audits were ongoing but there was no audit documentation completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively act and resolve Resident Council's concerns related to long call light response times. This failure affected 2 of 7 residents attending the Resident/Surveyor group meeting. Findings Include: During a Resident/surveyor meeting on 4/22/25 at 12:59 P.M., seven of seven residents indicated the Resident Council had complained about long wait times for their call lights to be answered. Two of seven residents reported they were experiencing continued delays, and Resident B stated he had waited as long as an hour within the past couple of weeks. A review of Resident Council meeting minutes revealed repeated concerns over the past year about delayed call light responses on the following months: - 1/27/2025 - 10/16/2024 - 7/8/2024 During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 10:00 A.M., the Executive Director (ED) acknowledged he had been made aware of the Resident Council concerns regarding long call light response times. He indicated he had identified two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed and submitted in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents who were reviewed for discharge assessments. (Resident 29) Findings include: Resident 29's record review was completed on 04/23/2025 at 10:47 AM. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and arthritis. Resident 29 was discharged on 12/22/2024. Resident 29's Discharge MDS assessment was completed and submitted on 4/23/2025, 122 days after discharge. During an interview on 04/28/25 at 11:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the MDS assessment had not been completed or submitted timely. The DON also indicated the facility did not have a policy related to MDS assessment completion and followed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual as their guidance. According to the RAI User's Manual, Chapter 2, Page 2-17, a Discharge assessment must be completed (i.e., signed and dated as complete) within 14 days after the resident had been discharged from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for care planning ( Resident 22-bowel issues) and (Resident 27-skin issues). Findings include: 1. A record review was completed on 4/23/2025 at 9:01 A.M. for Resident 22. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and chronic kidney disease. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/29/2025, indicated Resident 22's cognition was moderately impaired and he was occasionally incontinent of bowels. Physician Orders included, but were not limited to: -3/20/2025 Linzess 145 micrograms (mcg) by mouth daily for constipation. -3/13/2025 polyethylene glycol 17 grams by mouth daily mixed with 4-8 ounces of water for constipation. -12/10/2024 docusate sodium 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice a day for constipation. The record lacked a care plan that addressed bowel issues, including constipation, and the use of bowel medications. During an interview on 4/25/2025 at 1:40 P.M., the ADON confirmed although Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the skin of a resident with a Gastronomy tube (G-tube) did not develop blisters caused by the friction from the G-tube for of 1 of 6 residents who were reviewed for skin problems. (Resident 27) Finding includes: During an observation of a medication administration on 04/23/2025 at 8:51 A.M., Resident 27 had a dime-sized blister directly located below the G-tube site on his abdomen. LPN 4 indicated the blister was new and attributed it to friction caused by the G-tube tubing being too long. LPN 4 pointed to a band-aid located toward the center of Resident 27's abdomen and indicated the resident had developed a similar blister several days earlier due to friction from the tubing rubbing on the resident's skin. LPN 4 indicated the resident did not have an order for the treatment of the second blister and she did not know if the facility had created a Care Plan to address further blister formation from the G-tube. Resident 27's record review was completed on 04/23/2025 at 10:51 AM. Diagnoses included, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate monitoring of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 25) Findings include: A record review for Resident 25 was completed on 4/23/2025 at 4:01 P.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were no limited to: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/15/2025, indicated Resident 25 was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated the resident had no potential indicators of psychosis, no behavioral symptoms, had not demonstrated any rejection of care and had no wandering behaviors. In addition, the MDS assessment indicated the resident was receiving an antipsychotic, an antidepressant, an anticoagulant and a diuretic medication. A Physician Order, dated 2/20/2025, indicated the resident was to receive Aripiprazole (anti-psychotic) 2 mg (milligrams) tablet oral six times weekly for bipolar disorder. A Pharmacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRINITY HEALTH — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $873K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN