Legacy Transitional Care & Rehabilitation
460 Auburn Avenue N.e., Atlanta, GA 30312 · For profit - Corporation · 186 certified beds · (404) 523-1613 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $113,074 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.2% | 15.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 11.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.1% | 15.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 15.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.6% | 19.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.3% | 2.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 55.2% | 78.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 25.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.81 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.5%CMS range 22.0–55.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.1–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.0–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 182.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of 30 sampled residents (R) (R16, R17, R19, R12, R1, R18, R30 and R22) were free from abuse. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/4/2024. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 3/2/2024. The facility remained out of compliance while the facility continues management level staff oversight as well as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Administrator's Job Description, Administration failed to provide protective oversight of the facility environment including adequate supervision for wandering residents and failed to protect residents on the secured memory unit from an abuse free environment. This failure had the likelihood of affecting all residents residing on the secured memory unit. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning to alert staff that residents required assistance on one of four floors (Fourth Floor) in the facility. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the comprehensive assessment addressed the wandering behaviors for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R1). R1's wandering led to physical altercations with multiple residents, including a physical altercation on 1/25/2024 when R1 wandered into R12's room and R12 pushed R1, causing R1 to sustain a fracture of the left elbow. On 2/28/2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/28/2024 at 3:05 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 9/30/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/4/2024. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program and Hand Hygiene and Hand-Washing Policy, the facility failed to use proper infection control measures during catheter care for one of seven sampled residents (R) (R6). This deficient practice had the potential to cause infection. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program date of issue: June 2025, Policy Statement revealed: Have a comprehensive program that addresses detection, prevention, and control of infections among residents and staff. This facility's infection prevention and control policies/practices are intended to facilitate in maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections.Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene and Hand-Washing Policy date of issue: June 19, 2025, Policy Statement revealed: Hand hygiene is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Facility Maintenance Policy, the facility failed to ensure that three of 14 shared bedrooms on the 400 hall (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) were maintained in good repair. Specifically, rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were not free from chipped and peeling paint, scuffed sheetrock, and damaged or broken electrical outlet. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Facility Maintenance Policy revealed the Maintenance Policy outlines the procedures and responsibilities for ensuring the proper operation and upkeep of the nursing home's facilities. It includes guidelines for plant operations and regular checks of the call light system to ensure the safety and comfort of all residents.Standard of Practice: Plant Operations revealed the plant operations is the maintenance and functionality of all mechanical, electrical, and plumbing within the facility. This includes heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), water supply, and emergency power…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of Facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Review Policy (PASARR), the facility failed to ensure PASARR Level II was submitted for one of five residents (R) (R8). This failure had the potential to prevent R8 from attaining or maintaining the highest practicable level of mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled, Preadmission screening & Annual Resident Review (PASARR) revised 5/15/2025 revealed under Policy statement: It is the policy of the facility to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis for PASARR. Under Policy Purpose: The Purpose of this policy is to define and set expectations regarding the appropriate preadmission assessment of all individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. This includes incorporating the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and evaluation in the residents' assessment, care plan and transition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Call light system/Light Policy, and Facility Maintenance Policy, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning adequately to allow residents to call for staff assistance in two out of seven restrooms (200 hall) and two of 14 rooms (301,305) on 300 hall.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Call System/Light Policy, revise date of May 15, 2025, revealed under Policy Statement: The purpose of the Resident Call System shall allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. Under Standard of Practice: Equipment: 1. Bedside call light in functioning order 2. Emergency call light in working order.Review of the facilities policy titled, Facility Maintenance Policy, dated July 2025, revealed under Standard of Practice: Plant Operations; Responsibilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer were labeled and dated and failed to discard the item by expiration date. In addition, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of the ice machine in the kitchen. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all resident receiving an oral diet. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour of the kitchen on 4/8/2025 at 9:08 am with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following was observed: The interior components of the ice machine, including the wall lining and the dispenser area, were observed to have visible black residue. The reach in freezer had a large box of beef stew with an expiration date of 12/24/2024, with no expiration date or open date written on the box or a label. During an interview on 4/10/2025 at 2:11 pm with DM, it was confirmed that the ice machine was in regular use for the residents and acknowledged the unsanitary ice machine. He stated mold in an ice machine poses several serious health and safety risks such as respiratory issues, foodborne…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Language Assistance Service, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (R) (R182) with Limited English skills, was provided with resources to access and understand communications regarding his healthcare regimen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service, dated 1/1/2025 documented under Purpose: To ensure meaningful access to healthcare services for resident with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). Under Policy: All Name of Corporation facility will provide qualified interpretation through Language Line to all resident, family members, or responsible parties who have limited English proficiency or required ASL (American Sign Language) or other communication support services. Under Procedure: 1. Identification of Language Needs: Upon admission and during care, staff will identify individuals who may need language…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface, the facility failed to maintain clean Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units for seven of 56 rooms on the third and fourth floors (Rooms 223, 227, 228, 302, 316, 317 and 323). The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the health and safety of the residents by increasing the risk of infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface dated October 2024 documented Environmental surface will be clean and disinfected according to current Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standards. 1. An observation on 4/8/2025 at 11:11 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the PTAC unit contained a gray, thick, fuzzy debris on the front dividers of the unit. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled, Residents Assessments, the facility failed to document a significant change assessment upon re-admittance and change to hospice status for one resident (R) (R 104) and failed to accurately document the discharge status for one of 64 sampled residents R192. This deficient practice had the potential to affect quality of care and resident outcomes. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments reviewed on 2/4/2025 revealed under Policy Statement: Resident Assessments will be completed upon admission, quarterly, annually and with a significant change on status. 1. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R104 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to adult failure to thrive, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx and malignant neoplasm of tongue. Furthermore, R104 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of R104's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy and Language Access Policy: Use of Language Line Service, the facility failed to follow comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 64 sampled residents (R) (R36). The deficient practice had the potential for R36's needs to go unmet. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy with a revised date 2/4/2025 documented under Policy Statement: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Under Standard of Practice: .7. The facility must provide the resident and the representative, if applicable, with a written summary of the baseline care plan by the completion of the comprehensive care plan. The summary must be in a language and conveyed in a manner the resident and/or representative can understand. This summary must include but is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feeding and Monitoring Policy, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to check residual and gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement for one of 10 residents (R) (R 243) of ten residents receiving tube feedings. The deficient practice had the potential to cause infection, poor quality of life and negative outcomes for R243. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Gastrostomy Tube Feeding and Monitoring Policy revised 4/16/2024 documented under Standards of Practice, Step number 1: Check physicians' orders for nutritional formula, rate of flow, flush amount, medication administration, checking for tube placement and for gastric residual.7. Check placement of feeding tube prior to feeding, medication, or flush administered by slowly injection approximately 30 ml of air through the tube and listening with stethoscope over the abdomen for a swish sound. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R243 revealed he was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R243 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to gastrostomy status, acute respiratory failure, seizures, encephalopathy. Review of the most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R423 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the Care Plan for R243 revealed a care plan dated 3/12/2025 that documented the resident to Monitor/document/report to MD PRN (as needed): aspiration- fever, SOB, tube dislodged, Infection at tube site, self-extubation, Tube dysfunction or malfunction, abnormal breath/lung sounds, abnormal lab values, abdominal pain, distension, tenderness, constipation or fecal impaction, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, dehydration. Provide local care to gastrostomy site (G-Tube) as ordered for signs and symptoms of infection. Review of the Physician orders for R243 dated 4/4/2025 documented Enteral feed order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Dating, Labeling, and Discarding Food, the facility failed to discard food items by the expiration or use-by date, failed to discard food items with a fuzzy green substance on it, and failed to ensure dietary staff wore beard coverings while in the kitchen. The deficient practice had the potential to place the 176 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dating, Labeling, and Discarding Food, revised January 2023, included Dating, labeling, food stored in the coolers, dry storage and freezers ensure the safety of the food that will be served to the residents. According to the 2022 Food Code, food that is RTE (Ready to Eat), Refrigerated and/or Time/Temp Control Food (food that contains ingredients that may cause food poisoning) MUST have an OPEN (or Prepared) Date and a USED BY (or DISCARD) date on each of these foods. The USED BY date that the FOOD CODE is referring to is not the use by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R684) was assessed to safely self-administer medications. The deficient practice had the potential to allow access to medications otherwise not prescribed by a physician to other residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Administration of Medications reviewed October 2024 revealed under Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Revealed under Procedure: All medications are administered accurately and safely, and free of errors. 1. Only licensed nurse or person permitted by the state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so.14. Patient may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notice Policy, the facility failed to appropriately provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R125). This failure had the potential for R125 not to be able to express her right to make an informed choice about Medicare services as well as being provided with appeal instructions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notice Policy revised May 2018 revealed under Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to issue Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) per CMS Guidelines to inform Medicare Beneficiaries of items or services that Medicare may not pay. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R125 revealed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) on two of four units. Specifically, room [ROOM NUMBER] contained a circulating fan with gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades, and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a dirty, damaged bathroom ceiling with black stains. The facility census was 181 residents. Findings include: 1. Observations during initial screening on 11/5/2024 at 11:05 am and on 11/6/2024 at 3:28 pm revealed a personal circulating fan blowing towards bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER], with thick, gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades. Interview and observations during walking rounds on 11/8/2024 at 12:30 pm and 2:30 pm with the Maintenance Director (MD) and Administrator confirmed a circulating fan with gray substances on its blades and a privacy curtain caught in the fan blades in room [ROOM NUMBER], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to attempt to obtain fingerprint checks for four of 10 files reviewed and reference checks for two of 10 employee files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the employee files on 11/7/2024 at 1:00 pm with the Assistant Nursing Home Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that there were no fingerprint results for staff who required completion of the GCHEXS (Georgia Criminal History Check System) (fingerprint background check). In addition, there were also no reference checks completed for staff who did not require GCHEXS fingerprint of the 10 staff reviewed. 1. The Administrator was hired on 9/18/2023, no evidence of reference checks performed. 2. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) GGG was hired on 1/16/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 3. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) HHH was hired on 8/9/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS fingerprint results and no references checked. 4. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) III was hired on 7/16/2024, no evidence of GCHEXS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR) (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), the facility failed to refer a Level Il PASRR to the appropriate state-designated authority for evaluation and determination of specialized services for one of 60 sampled residents (R) R171) reviewed with serious mental illness. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the appropriate level of care and services provided for R171. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR), revised November 2017 states that Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASRR Level I screen for those individuals identified per the Level II screen requiring specialized services. The facility will report any changes as identified via the screen to the state mental health authority or state intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure that ADLs were provided for two of 60 sampled residents (R) (R65 and R154) related to nail care. Specifically, nail care was not provided for R65 and R154. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated November 2022, the intent of policy indicated based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with resident's needs and choices this facility will provide necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's ability in activities of daily living will not diminish unless the circumstances of the individual's clinical and medical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. Also, the bath will be given for cleanliness, increased circulation, and comfort of the residents at least weekly, the skin will be observed during bath. 1. Review of the electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in sanitary conditions. The deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents and transfer harmful microorganisms to food, leading to foodborne illness. Findings include: During the initial observation on 11/5/2024 at 8:15 am, the dumpster area had discarded items such as gloves, plastic forks, cardboard, a chair, and combs on the ground surrounding the two dumpsters. In an interview on 11/5/2024 at 9:15 am, during the observational walk-through with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM confirmed the dumpster area had discarded items on the ground. The DM stated that everyone used the dumpsters, but the maintenance department was responsible for overseeing the site to make sure the area was maintained in a sanitary manner. In an interview on 11/8/2024 at 9:07 am, the Maintenance Director stated everyone shared the responsibility of ensuring the dumpster area was clean and maintained in sanitary conditions. He stated no one department or person was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure reusable medical equipment was cleaned between use for residents. The deficient practice had the potential lead to the spread of infection and illness. The facility census was 181 residents. Findings include: Observation on 11/6/2024 at 8:05 am during medication administration revealed Certified Medication Aid (CMA) DD obtained a blood pressure machine from the hallway, checked a resident's blood pressure with the machine, and returned the blood pressure machine to the hallway without cleaning the cuff or equipment. Observation on 11/6/2024 at 8:44 am during medication administration revealed CMA EE checked a resident's blood pressure with the unit blood pressure cuff and returned the blood pressure cuff to the medication cart drawer without cleaning the equipment. Continued observation revealed CMA EE used the same blood pressure cuff to check another resident's blood pressure without cleaning the equipment. In an interview on 11/6/2024 at 8:05 am, CMA DD revealed all reusable medical equipment should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Receiving and Storage and Service Line Refrigerated Leftover Storage, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, discard expired foods, and to ensure the inside of the ice machine was clean and free from residue. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure opened and frozen food items were properly labeled and dated and leftover food was properly covered and to ensure that kitchen equipment used for food preparation and storage was kept clean and sanitary. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 179 of 179 residents receiving an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Receiving and Storage under the section titled Policy, Receiving revealed Receiving is the point at which foodservice operation inspects and take legal ownership and physical possession of items ordered. Its purpose is to ensure that the food and supplies delivered match the established quantity and quality specifications. The section titled Storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment for 11 of 84 resident rooms and 10 of 48 bathrooms and for two of 66 sampled residents (R) (R128 and R428), R128 who had mobility issues from loose handrailing and R428 who had food splattered on their tube feeding pump. Specifically, resident bathrooms contained gaps behind the toilet, stopped up sinks, sinks loose from the wall, damaged faucet, ceiling damage, holes in the floor, and leaks around base of toilet and broken paper toilet paper dispenser with a sharp edge, Additionally, resident rooms and hallways contained stains on the ceiling, broken lighting behind the bed, dim lighting, wall scratches behind the bed, broken bedside table, damaged base boards, damaged packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit, drawer to dresser missing, loose handrails, door frame damage, privacy curtain off hooks, call light not working, several floor tiles missing, damaged ceiling, missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screening, specifically fingerprints for two of 10 staff reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy last reviewed May 2024 revealed Background, reference and credential's checks should be conducted on employees prior to or at the time of employment by the facility administration, in accordance with applicable person having knowledge that an employee's license or certification is in question should report such information to the administrator. Review of the facility employee files revealed the following: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) NN was hired on 2/1/2024 with no fingerprint process completed. 2. Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) OO was hired on 1/16/2024 with no fingerprint process completed. CNA NN and CMA OO had active, unencumbered CNA certifications. There were no concerns identified related to abuse or neglect within the facility. Interview on 5/15/2024 at 12:40 pm with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (R) (R172) that included goals and interventions to meet the immediate care needs present upon admission. The deficient practice had the potential for R172 not to have care needs met. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R172 revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to pressure ulcer to left heel, unspecified stage, pressure ulcer of sacral area. Review of R172's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals revealed resident required limited assistance with all care. Section M-Skin Conditions did not indicate that the resident had a surgical wound. Review of the baseline care plan dated 5/3/2024 revealed there was not a completed plan of care that included the goals and interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen (O2) Therapy, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two of fourteen Residents (R) (R1 and R281) receiving O2 therapy, related to ensuring O2 filters were cleaned and the O2 nasal cannula (NC) was stored in a plastic bag when not in use, and failing to obtain a physician's order for O2. The deficient practice had the potential to cause respiratory distress. Finding include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy stated under the section titled Policy Statement that Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress. Under the section titled Standard of Practice it stated the following but not limited to 1. Oxygen therapy is to be used with a written order by a physician. A physician's order for O2 therapy is to contain liter flow per minute (LPM) via mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). There were two medication errors with a total of 28 opportunities observed for two of four Residents (R) (R27 and R91) for a medication error rate of 7.14%. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Administration of Medications revision date 11/15/2022 revealed under the Standards section, Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R27 revealed diagnosis including, but not limited to spinal stenosis, alcohol abuse, esophagitis, and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan dated 4/11/2024 included R27 has nutritional problems and is at risk for malnutrition related to alcohol abuse. Review of the Physician Orders for R27 included thiamine 100 mg (milligrams), senna tablet 8.6 mg, multivitamin oral tablet (multiple vitamin), and folic acid 1 mg. Review of the EMR for R91 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals, the facility failed to properly store medication for two of 66 sampled Residents (R) (R27 and R32). This failure placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk of having unauthorized access to residents' medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals revision date 3/11/2024 revealed under Practice Guidelines, Facility should ensure that medications and biologicals are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, refrigerators/freezers of sufficient size to prevent crowding. Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible to residents and visitors. During observation of medication administration on 5/15/2024 at 9:20 am revealed a container of 'brand name' nasal saline on a bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of a facility document titled, Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care and the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, Cleaning, and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate hand hygiene during the passing of trays at mealtime, before and after each resident's meal consumption for one of 66 sampled Residents (R) (R425), and failed to sanitize point of care equipment after use for two of 66 sampled Residents (R27 and R114). The deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to infection. The census was 179 residents. Findings include: Review of a document titled Preventing Infections While Providing Personal Care, not dated, revealed Proper handwashing is essential to making sure that the skin is free of contamination by potentially infectious microorganisms. When soap and water are not available, an alcohol-based hand cleanser can be used, and you must rub hands thoroughly until they are dry. Your facility will have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of four floors (Third Floor and Fourth Floor). Findings included: A review of the facility's resident rights revealed that each resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including, but not limited to, receiving treatment and support for daily living safely. During an observation tour on the Fourth Floor on 2/20/2024 at 2:00 pm, double occupancy rooms and quad occupancy rooms were observed. The quad shared rooms were set up with four beds lined up in a row with curtain dividers in between them on one side of the room. Clothing closets were on the opposite side of the room near the door entrance for all four residents; these closets are not located near the resident's living space. These rooms appear to be set up institution-like. room [ROOM NUMBER]D was observed to have a broken and peeling bed stand. The divider privacy curtains were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for eight of 30 sampled residents (R) (R4, R21, R29, R23, R25, R26, R27, and R28) related to toileting and nail care. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Bath Shower Hygiene Care, revised November 2022, policy documented showers will be given for cleanliness, increased circulation, and comfort. The policy did not address nail care. 1. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R4 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and that R4 was assessed to require substantial to maximum assistance with personal hygiene. A review of R4's care plan, initiated on 10/8/2019, documented that R4 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to a decline in ADL Self Care. Staff documented that R4 required extensive to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning to alert staff that residents required assistance on one of four floors (Fourth Floor) in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Call System/Light, last revised 10/20/2022, documented that the call system shall allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member at a centralized staff work area. The bedside call light and the emergency call light shall be in functioning order. A review of the Maintenance Care Log records dated 2/13/2024, revealed that an unknown staff documented the following concerns: 1. Task Number 28680: room [ROOM NUMBER] . call light not working. 2. Task Number 28673: room [ROOM NUMBER] call light not working. During observation and interview on 2/22/2024 at 10:15 am, R4 was observed sitting sideways across his bed. A strong odor emanated from his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document behaviors for one resident (R1) who was involved in multiple resident-to-resident physical altercations due to wandering on the unit. The sample size was 30 residents. Findings included: A review of the Behavioral Management Program policy last revised 10/22/2022 revealed that it is the policy of the facility that each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services and medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being. The objective of the Mood and Behavior Policy and Procedure is to provide a plan of care that is individualized to the residents' needs based upon the comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team. The plan of care will include medically related social services to address mood and behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled residents received adequate assistance and support from social services with receiving urgent dental services. Findings included: Review of the facility's dental service policy dated 11/28/2017, and review date of 11/21/2021, revealed routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the residents of oral health service in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Further review revealed that social service personnel will be responsible for assisting the resident with making appointment transportation as needed. Review of R8 electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is a current resident. Some of his admitting diagnoses included congested heart failure, diabetes type 2, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and bruxism. Review of the physician order dated 11/29/2023 revealed a dental consult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of 30 sampled residents received dental services timely, after multiple requests and complaints of mouth pain. Findings included: Review of the facility's dental service policy dated 11/28/2017, and review date of 11/21/2021, revealed routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the residents of oral health service in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. It further reveals that those services will be provided to the residents through a contract agreement with the local dentist a referral to a personal dentist a referral to community dentist or referral to any other Health Organization that provides dental care. It further reveals that selected dentists must be available to provide follow-up care. It also reveals that dental assessments will be conducted at a minimum on a quarterly basis through the MSDS assessment process. Social service personnel will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment in twelve of 84 Residents rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) were found to have unclean conditions, broken tile, and unsafe surfaces. In addition, the third floor west and east shower room floors were unclean, and a mechanical door was left open and unlocked. The findings include: The facility did not provide a housekeeping policy for the survey team. Observation 10/10/2023 at 10:35 am revealed the third-floor mechanical room door was open, and no staff was present in the room. A sign on the door read, Door to Remain Locked at All Times. Interview on 10/10/2023 at 10:37 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LL revealed the mechanical room door should always be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medication, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented and administered for two of 35 sampled residents (R) (R 7 and R 100) according to professional standards. The findings include: Review of the facility's Administration of Medication policy, last review dated 11/15/2022, noted the standard of the policy was to administer medications in a safe and timely manner as prescribed: Procedure 1. Only licensed nurses or people permitted by the State to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications. 2. Only licensed nurses may administer IV push/Bolus medications following their individual state board of nursing standard of practice. 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame .8. During administration of medications. The medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication cart. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store medications in three of six medication carts (Fourth Floor Medication Cart #1, Fourth Floor Medication Cart #2, and Third Floor Medication Cart #2) and one of three medication rooms (Third Floor Medication Room). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications and Biologicals date of issue 9/1/18, last reviewed on 10/3/21, revealed the facility should ensure medications are stored appropriately and securely at any given time. A review of the package insert for the insulin Lantus, (revised May 2019) in section 16.2 titled Storage revealed once the 10 ml (milliliter) vial is opened, it may be stored refrigerated or at room temperature for 28 days. A review of the package insert for the insulin Levemir, (revised January 2019) in section 16.2 titled storage revealed Levemir vials can be stored unrefrigerated at room temperature, below 30 degrees Celsius (86 F) (Fahrenheit) as long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call system for 19 of 84 rooms (415A, 406A, 406B, 406C, 406D, 408A, 408B, 408C, 408D, 413A, 413B, 414A, 414B, 415A, 415B, 212A, 212B, 224A, and 224B) in the building. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Call Light Policy, .Resident Call System date of issue 11/28/17, and last revised 10/20/22, revealed the call light is to provide a system for the resident to call for assistance. Under the section titled Standard of Practice revealed: Step 2 was to ensure all residents have access to the call light and Step 7 revealed that any defective call lights should be reported to the charge nurse and maintenance department immediately. 1. During an observation on 8/8/23 at 1:09 p.m. the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed to not be functioning when an attempt was made to activate the system. During an interview with the resident in 415A, he stated that he had told multiple staff members that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$113,074 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $107,075 — penalty dated 2024-03-11
- $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELLINGTON HEALTHCARE SERVICES III, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2015 |
| ANDWELL INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2015 |
| REWELL INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2015 |
| WELLINGTON HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2015 |
| ANDREWS, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2015 |
| REES, HEATHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/28/2017 |
| PRESCOTT, DAVID | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/14/2018 |
| WIII GP, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $774K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115585. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.