No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westminster Commons

560 St Charles Ave, NE, Atlanta, GA 30308 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (404) 874-2233 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse$23,472 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,472 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
650 North Avenue NE
Pharmacy
680 Ponce de Leon Ave NE · (404) 892-1164 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
650 Ponce de Leon Ave NE · (404) 853-1681 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Monroe Dr NE · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.3%11.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.9%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.6%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.5%19.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.2%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.6%25.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.3%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.242.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.241.901.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.7%CMS range 31.2–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.4–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified50.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting77.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.9–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
61.4%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and resident, resident family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure four of eight residents (Residents (R) 17, 43, 136, and 188) reviewed for abuse out of 46 sampled residents were free from abuse. This had the potential and/or physical harm to the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised April 2021 indicated, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . Protect residents from abuse, neglect .by anyone including but not necessarily limited to: a. facility staff; b. other residents .Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: a. abuse or mistreatment of residents; neglect of residents .identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect .protect residents from any further harm during investigations. Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and services to maintain vision and hearing abilities for one of two residents reviewed for communication (Resident (R) 22) out of 46 sampled residents. The failure to ensure communication deficits were properly assessed and managed placed the facility residents at risk of social isolation. Findings include: Review of R22's admission Record, found in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Review of R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/01/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed R22 was documented to have minimal difficulty in hearing, which indicated some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for four of 10 residents (Resident (R) 59, R287, R10, and R86) and failed to ensure a resident (R36) needing assistance with meals was assisted by staff sitting down, and failed to ensure a resident (R18) had their choice honored to receive medications by gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) out of 32 residents reviewed in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice the residents may negatively respond emotionally or may be triggered by past experiences to staff yelling/swearing. Residents may not feel respected or honored by staff hovering over residents while assisting with eating and not feeling valued when medication administration choices were not honored. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, revised 04/18, revealed Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that were considered include: . honoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure risk versus benefits were provided to the resident and/or the resident representative for one of six residents (Resident (R) 336) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 32 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or representative medication knowledge. Findings include: Review of R336's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R336 had diagnoses which included dementia. The resident was documented as passing away 01/18/25. Review of R336's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/25/24 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed and the resident was documented as having severely impaired cognition. Review of R336's Order Summary Report located under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' call light was within reach for one of one resident (Resident (R)136) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed the resident at risk of functionality not being maintained due to severe physical limitations, dignity, and well-being in accordance with his own needs and preferences, the resident could potentially not be able to call for assistance when needed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accommodation of Needs, revised March 2021, indicated, Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being. The policy further indicated, The resident's individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure their primary system for identifying a resident's code status accurately reflected the resident's end of life wishes for two of 46 sampled residents (Resident (R) 9 and R43) reviewed for code status. This failure placed the residents at risk for their wishes not to be honored, risk of there being a delay in treatment, and death. Findings include: 1. Review of R9's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a readmission date of [DATE]. Review of R9's EMR header information revealed the resident's code status was identified as Full Code and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Review of R9's Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form dated [DATE] and located in the resident's EMR under the Misc tab revealed Do Not Resuscitate [DNR] was selected. The POLST form was signed by the resident's representative and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of psychotropic medication side effects was conducted for one of six residents (Resident (R) 336) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 46 sample residents. This failure had the potential to result in an excess of medication provided to the residents resulting in oversedation. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Alternatives to Antipsychotics for Mood Disorders and Behaviors in LTC [Long Term Care], revealed Trazodone was indicated for depression. Trazodone has been used in mood disorders associated with poor/diminished sleep .Monitor for efficacy .Monitor for increased falls risk and cumulative anticholinergic side effects. Review of R336's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R336 had diagnoses which included dementia. The resident expired on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation for two of eight residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect (Resident (R) 136 and R188) out of 46 sampled residents. This failure placed all residents of the facility at risk for further abuse and/or neglect. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, last revised 03/01/18, revealed The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion .The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect .Reports of allegations or suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation .will be reported immediately .When abuse, neglect or exploitation is suspected the Licensed Nurse should: .Notify the Director of Nursing and Administrator .When suspicion or reports of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for incidents of potential abuse for three of nine residents (Resident (R) 136, R188, and R189) reviewed out of 28 sampled residents, for potential staff-to-resident abuse for R136 and R188, and visitor-to-resident abuse for R189. The failure to investigate potential allegations of abuse for facility residents placed all residents at risk of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, last revised 03/01/18, revealed The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion .When abuse, neglect or exploitation is suspected the Licensed Nurse should: .Notify the Director of Nursing and Administrator .Complete an incident report and initiate an immediate investigation to prevent further potential abuse .Once the resident is cared for and the initial reporting has occurred,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete discharge summary was provided to the resident and/ or resident representative (RP) for one of three residents (Resident (R) 338) reviewed for discharges of 46 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or representatives' knowledge of the residents' discharge plan. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, dated 10/2022, revealed Orientation for Transfer or Discharge (Planned) 1. A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least 24 (24) hours before the resident's discharge or transfer from the facility. Review of R338's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and the date of discharge was 12/19/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for two of 46 sampled residents (Resident (R) 9 and R18). Failure to code the MDS correctly regarding R18's feeding tube, and R9 for hospice care, could lead to inaccurate assessment and care planning of the resident. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/01/19 indicated, . It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment . 1. Review of R9's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 11/13/20 and a readmission date of 01/21/21, with medical diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive and unspecified dementia. Review of R9's Physician order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensively developed for two of 46 sampled residents (Resident (R) 18 and R52) reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated 01/23, revealed A Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs shall be developed for each resident. An Interdisciplinary Team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, develops and maintains a Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident. The Comprehensive Care Plan has been designed to: . identify the professional services that are responsible for each element of care; . Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems. 1. Review of R18's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 04/16/25 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely medication administration for one of seven residents (Resident (R) 286) reviewed for medication administration of 46 sample residents. The facility further failed to ensure physician orders were followed for the administration of medications using the gastrostomy (G-Tube) for one of six residents (Resident (R) 18). This had the potential for creating anxiety to the resident and possible medication administration errors or choking. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 04/19, revealed Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. 1.Review of R286's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had a discharge date of 01/18/25 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a urinary catheter bag were properly positioned in a manner to prevent potential urinary tract infections due to contamination for one of three residents (Resident (R)10) reviewed for urinary catheters out of a total sample of 46 residents. The failure to ensure catheter bags were properly positioned placed the resident at risk of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Use, revealed It is the policy of the facility to ensure the appropriate use of indwelling urinary catheters in accordance with State and Federal Regulations, and national guidelines .Indwelling urinary catheters and drainage bags should not be changed at routine or fixed intervals. Indwelling urinary catheters and drainage bags are changed when there is indication of infection, obstruction, or as clinically indicated. Review of R10's admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with side rails was assessed for entrapment, evaluated for need, informed of the risks/benefits, and failed to obtain a physician's order for side rail use for one of one residents (Resident (R) 20) reviewed for side rails out of a total sample of 46 residents in the sample. This had the potential for safety risks to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bedrails, with no revision date, revealed, The facility shall provide adequate management of Bedrails to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. If a bed or side rail is used, the facility will ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails, including but not limited to the following elements. a. Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. b. Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents reviewed for verbal and physical abuse had accurate documentation of the abuse incidents in the resident record for one of nine residents (Resident (R) 189) reviewed for abuse out of a total of 46 resident in the sample. The deficient practice had the potential for facility residents to not be identified for potential incidents of abuse, which could affect physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Records, dated 08/2022, revealed It is the policy of the facility to maintain Medical Records in accordance with State and Federal Regulations .The facility will maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, systematically organized. Review of R189's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 08/29/24. The resident discharged on 10/13/24. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Protocol Policy, the facility failed to adequately supervise, accurately evaluate and identify risk, analyze recurrent falls, and implement new interventions for one of three residents (R) (R2) reviewed for falls. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for R2 after having two documented fall incidents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention Protocol Policy revised 10/18/2021 revealed under step 1. All residents/patients are screened for fall risk on admission, significant change of condition, quarterly and annually. 4. After an incident of a fall: a. Complete the Post Falls Assessment. d. Complete pain assessment after the fall. g. Referrals, interventions, care plan updates completed in the clinical meeting. h. Review fall incident during the clinical meeting with a root cause analysis. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer or provide documentation of consent or refusal for three of five residents (Residents (R)3, R50, and R34) of 22 sample residents reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the residents to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. Findings include: Review of CDC website titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/who-when-to-vaccinate.html, last reviewed 9/22/2023, indicated . CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 65 years or older. The tables below provide detailed information . For adults 65 years or older who have not previously received any pneumococcal vaccine, CDC recommends you . Give one dose of PCV15 [pneumococcal conjugate vaccines] or PCV20 . If PCV15 is used, this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Facility Abuse Prevention, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse on 7/04/2023, 9/03/2023, and 10/19/2023 for four of four residents (Resident (R) 43, R58, R22, and R24) of 22 sample residents from R50 resulting in a minor scratch injury to R43's face on 9/06/2023 and a skin tear to R58's right hand on 10/19/2023. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Abuse Prevention, last reviewed on 11/15/2022, revealed Standard: The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. During a resident group meeting on 1/16/2024 at 3:00 PM, R54, R20, and R47 verbalized fear of R50's continued abusive behavior. 1. Review of R50's Face Sheet found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 10/09/21 with diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for one of eight residents (Resident (R) 54) of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 11/15/2022, revealed .Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made . Review of R54's undated admission Record under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R54 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (AR) of 12/22/2023 coded the resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R54 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, facility document review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of eight residents (Resident (R) 54) reviewed for abuse of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, dated 11/15/22, revealed .Components of an investigation may include a) interview with the involved resident, if possible, and document all responses. If resident is cognitively impaired, interview the resident several times to compare responses. b) interview all witnesses separately. include roommates, residents in adjoining rooms, staff members in the area and visitors in the area. Obtain witness statements, according to policy. All statements should be signed and dated by the person making the statement. c) Document the entire investigation chronologically. d) Notify the Local Ombudsman office to report the alleged abuse. e) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Notice Before Discharge, and Transfer, the facility failed to notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the hospital transfers. for one of one resident (Resident (R) 81) of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice Before Discharge, and Transfer dated November 2022, revealed Standard of Practice .4. This facility shall send a copy of the notice to the representative to the Office of the State Long Team Care (LTC) Ombudsman for a facility-initiated transfers or discharge. Review of the undated admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of calculus of gallbladder and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Progress Note located under the Prog [Progress] Note tab of the EMR, dated 12/02/2023, indicated Resident received in bed with labored breathing . writer was asked by DON [Director of Nursing] to transfer resident to the hospital, 911 was called, resident was transferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of two residents (Resident (R) 27 and R29) of 22 sample residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, approved November 2023, indicated Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. 1. Review of R27's undated admission Record found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) found under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Facility Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to review and revise care plan interventions for one of two residents (Resident (R) 60) reviewed for care plans of 22 sample residents. This failure had the potential to delay appropriate interventions for care needs and safety concerns. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Care Plan Policy, with a review date of November 2023, revealed that the plan of care was to be reviewed and updated as necessary at the completion of every assessment by the interdisciplinary team and resident representative party if so desired. Review of R60's Face Sheet found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission with diagnoses of diabetes, pancreatic disease, iron deficiency anemia, dysphagia, pain, wrist drop, and repeated falls. Review of R60's Care Plan, dated 10/13/2023 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to administer a physician ordered antibiotic medication for one of one resident (Resident (R) 79) of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications, dated 11/15/2022, revealed .Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders (physician orders) . Review of R79's undated admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included otitis media of the right ear, abscess of the external right ear, and mastoiditis of the right ear. Review of COMS-Clinical admission Evaluation V2 located under the Assessment tab in the EMR revealed the mental status of R79 was alert but experienced some forgetfulness. Review of the Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in the EMR, dated 12/20/2023, revealed Ampicillin-Sulbactam Sodium Injection Inject three grams intramuscularly every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, facility document review, and review of the facility policy titled, Dialysis, Care of the Resident Receiving Dialysis Treatments, the facility failed to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for one of one resident (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for dialysis out of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the Dialysis Contract, dated 6/21/2023 and provided by the facility, revealed .Both parties shall ensure that there is documented evidence of collaboration of care and communication between the Nursing Facility and ESRD [End Stage Renal Disease] Dialysis Center . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis, Care of the Resident Receiving Dialysis Treatments, dated 10/20/2022, revealed .Arrange for dialysis as ordered. Send Dialysis Information Transfer Form with resident . Post dialysis Assessment to be completed. Review of R3's undated admission Record under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview record review and, the facility failed to ensure the monthly review of drug regimens were completed by a licensed pharmacist for two of two residents (Resident (R) 29 and R50) reviewed for monthly regimen review of 22 sample residents. This failure has the potential to impact the residents' health and wellness. Findings include: 1.Review of R29's Face Sheet found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an initial admission date of 7/10/2021 with diagnoses of dementia, cerebral infarction, diabetes, hypertensive heart, end stage renal disease, hypoxemia, anemia, repeated falls, and insomnia. Review of R29's Consultant Pharmacist Note found under the Miscellaneous tab of the EMR revealed a documented pharmacy review dated 9/18/2023 recommending no changes. During an interview on 1/19/2023 at 3:30 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that there were no additional monthly medication reviews found for R29. The DON further stated that she had been trying to develop a system for reviewing recommendations and documenting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medication, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent for two of seven residents (Resident (R) 41 and (R)235) resulting from eight errors out of 29 opportunities for a medication error rate of 27.59 percent. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications dated 11/15/2022 revealed . Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders [physician orders] . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medication, dated 11/15/2022, revealed .Licensed Nurse/CMT [Certified Medication Tech] giving medication must follow the six rights to ensure safe medication administration. Each time you administer a medication, you need to be sure to have the: 1. Right individual; 2. Right medication; 3. Right dose; 4. Right time; 5. Right route; 6. Right documentation . 1. Review of R41's undated admission Record under the Profile tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to store physician ordered medications in a locked compartment for one of one resident (Resident (R)234), failed to discard medications that were not administrated for one of one resident (R10), and failed to discard expired medications located in the refrigerator on the Memory Care Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals, dated 11/29/22, revealed . Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. All Medication, Treatment carts must be secured/locked when not attended by licensed staff. 1. Review of the undated admission Record under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R234 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, dementia, myocardial infarction, and hypertension. During the Medication Administration Observation on 1/17/2024 at 9:14 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility's document review, the facility failed to implement the communication process, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 49) needs were met and addressed of 22 sample residents. Findings include: Review of the undated Agreement for Hospice Care for Skilled Nursing Facility and Nursing Facility Residents, provided by the facility, revealed Section 1.6 Coordination of Services indicated, .d. Provide for an and ensure the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all setting, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. e. Provide for an ongoing sharing of information with other non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions Review of R49's admission Record located under the Profile tab of electronic medical record (EMR) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Overview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program that demonstrated ongoing surveillance, recognition, investigation, and control of infection to prevent the onset and spread of infection. The facility census was 72 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Overview Issued November 28,2016 and last reviewed October 2021 revealed the following (not all inclusive) Goals The goals of the infection prevention program are to: A. Decrease the risk of infection to residents and personnel. B. Monitor for occurrence of infection and implement appropriate control measures C. Identify and correct problems relating to the infection prevention practices. D. Maintain compliance with state and federal regulations relating to infection prevention. Scope of The Infection Prevention and Control Program The infection prevention program is comp A. Surveillance of infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, the facility failed to ensure it developed and implemented an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to include antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: During a review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Issued November 2016 and last reviewed November 2019 revealed a policy statement: Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Standards of Practice: 1. The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. The policy explains the orientation, training and education, prescriber information to be provided, and other pertinent information related to monitoring antibiotics. During the entrance conference on 5/31/22, the team leader requested all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-03 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy titled, Facility Testing requirements for Staff and Residents. The facility failed to produce evidence of testing of residents and staff for the COVID-19 virus based on recommendations from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and the level of community transmission rates. The facility did not maintain testing logs or line listing forms for the residents or staff. The facility census was 72 residents. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Facility Testing Requirements for Staff and Residents revised CMS: QSO -20-38-NH Testing of Staff and Residents Regulations issued September 4, 2020, revised September 24,2021 revealed the following: Policy statement: To enhance efforts to keep Coronavirus COVID-19 from spreading throughout this facility, the facility shall provide on-site testing. Staff and residents will be tested in adherence to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services guidance. Outbreak Trigger testing: Test all staff and residents in response to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and reviews of the facility policy titled Documentation Policy the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff accurately documented daily wound care for two (2) of six (6) residents (R) (R#50 and R#58) reviewed for pressure related wounds. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Documentation Policy reviewed 10/2018, indicated: A designated staff member will chart on all residents to maintain a complete and accurate medical record. 1. R#50's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to fractured ribs, falls, dementia, osteoporosis, and hypertension. Review of R#50's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section G-Functional Status: resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, was total dependent for transfers, locomotion, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene; Section M-Skin: resident had one (1) pressure ulcer not present on admission and 2 unstageable deep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-22 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post completed up-to-date and current nurse staffing information to include the current date, and the total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff to include Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). This had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. By not having current and up-to-date information posted it is unclear how many staff were available to care for the number of residents in the facility each day. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy review titled, Instructions for Completing Nurse Staffing Information Form, dated August 2022 indicated Completing this Form- 1. Complete the Nurse Staffing Information form within 2 hours of the beginning of each shift. It further indicated, Posting the Information-1. Print the completed form in a clear and readable format every shift. 2. Post in a prominent place that is readily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,472 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $13,674 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $9,798 — penalty dated 2023-12-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WELLINGTON HEALTHCARE SERVICES LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/31/2007
ANDWELL INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/10/2012
ANDREWS, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/10/2012
BAILEY, TERESAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2023
KELMAN, MOSHEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
ELKINS ROAD ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/31/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$411K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 10%Other / private 90%

This home reported $411K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,752per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115674. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next