Parkside Post Acute And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 147.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of policies titled Notification of Resident's Change in Condition, and Laboratory Testing, the facility failed to notify the physician and responsible party (RP) for a change in condition for one of 44 sampled residents (R) (R660). Specifically, facility staff failed to report critical urinalysis lab results for R660, who experienced actual harm on 12/16/2023, resulting in the resident being hospitalized for 11 days with urosepsis (sepsis caused by urinary tract infection) and acute renal failure. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Notification of Resident's Change in Condition revised 9/1/2019 indicated the policy statement as the facility will promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and responsible party of changes in the patient's medical/mental condition and/or status (changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). Practice Guidelines: Quality of Care - notification of changes - required notifications to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for one resident (R) (R660) with a severe urinary tract infection (UTI). Abnormal urinalysis (UA) and culture and sensitivity (C&S) results were reported to the facility on [DATE] and the facility failed to seek medication for treatment. Actual Harm occurred on 12/16/2023 when R660 was admitted to the hospital for 11 days with a urinary tract infection and acute renal failure. The sample size was 44. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R660 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (MS), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. She was discharged on 12/16/2023. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed R660 was occasionally incontinent of urine and no urinary tract infections 30 days prior to the assessment. Review of the EMR revealed a Progress Note dated 12/9/2023 documented resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods and Labeling and Dating, the facility failed to ensure frozen food wrappers were intact and that food items were not expired. This deficient practice had the potential to cause cross contamination of unwrapped meat and foodborne illness affecting 135 of 142 residents receiving meals prepared in the kitchen.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods revised February 2023 revealed under Procedures: .5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination.Review of the undated facility policy titled Labeling and Dating revealed under Importance of Labeling and Dating: Proper labeling and dating ensures that all foods are stored, rotated, and utilized in a First In First Out (FIFO) manner. This will minimize waste and ensure that items that are passed their due date are discarded. Under Guidelines for Labeling and Dating: Direct…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC), (Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC)): Clean Air Filters, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment by not ensuring that the PTAC unit filters were free of debris in 2 of 48 rooms (A9, A8 located in A Hall) and failed to ensure PTAC unit grills were free of debris in 1 of 48 rooms (A8 located in A Hall) . The deficient practice had the potential to affect resident comfort, air quality, and infection control.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC), (Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC)): Clean Air Filters”, documented under section titled, Steps, 1. Remove or open access cover. 2. Remove air filter and inspect for cleanliness. If filter is dirty, either wash or replace depending on type of filter. If clean, reinstall filter. 3. Re-install access cover. 4. Clean grill on cover. 5. Close and make sure it is secure. 6. At a minimum, air filters are to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of facility's policy titled, Water Temperature Policy, the facility failed to keep the residents free of accident hazards as evidenced by water temperatures above 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in 8 of 138 resident rooms (A2, A4, E31, E19, E16, E3, B10 and B12 located in A, B, and E Halls ) and in 1 of 3 showers (B Hall). The deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to residents residing in these rooms.Findings include: Review of the facility provided document titled Water Temperature Policy revealed under Policy Statement: Hot water temperature at all resident-use fixtures shall not exceed 110- degrees Fahrenheit per Georgia Administrative Code Rule 111-8-56.18. Physical Plant Standards. Review of the facility's TELS system (maintenance reporting system) and water temperature logs from 1/27/2025 to 8/4/2025 revealed temperatures consistently ranging from 107 degrees F to 108 degrees F in most areas, with the kitchen water temperature recorded at 120 degrees F. Review of resident skin assessments and shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices by not using sterile procedure during tracheostomy care for one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R120), not storing respiratory equipment in an approved container for two of 60 sampled R's (R2 and R5), not protecting shared medical supplies from contamination during wound care for one of 60 sampled R's (R10), by storing personal items on clean linen carts, and by staff not adhering to contact precautions by entering a room with a sign for contact precautions without proper PPE (personal protective equipment). The deficient practices had the potential to contribute to the transmission of infectious organisms among residents, staff, and visitors.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated June 2025 revealed under Policy Statement: Facility’s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy, the facility failed to obtain a level II PASARR screening for one of 60 sampled residents (R) (R41). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent R41 of achieving the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy revised 5/15/2025 revealed in the section titled Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis. As part of the preadmission process, this facility participates in the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening process (Level ll (follow your state recommended guidelines or specific state criteria for PASARR) for all new and readmissions per requirement to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 60 sampled residents (R). Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to colostomy care for R90 and administration of medications for R122. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise the residents' health and safety.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications dated June 2025 documented under Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Under section Procedure: .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 1. Review of R90's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, acute systolic (congestive) heart failure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled Urinary Catheter Care, Anchoring and Changing, the facility failed to provide proper catheter care and positioning for one of 16 residents (R) (R71). Specifically, staff failed to provide correct cleaning and failed to ensure the catheter drainage bag was properly positioned. The deficient practice had the potential to cause pain, trauma to the urethra, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and impaired drainage.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Urinary Catheter Care, Anchoring and Changing revised March 2024 revealed under section 10: .10. For the male resident, .cleanse the meatus outward., and section 16 revealed: .16. Secure foley catheter drainage bag below level of bladder and above the floor. Catheter drainage bags will be covered when residents are in a public area.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R71 was admitted to the facility with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy Policy, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen (O2) for one of 12 residents (R) (R165) and failed to ensure that O2 was administered as ordered for one of 12 Rs (R120) who use O2. This deficient practice had the potential to cause respiratory complications and inadequate oxygenation.Findings include: Review of the policy titled Oxygen Therapy Policy revised 4/1/2025 revealed under Standard of Practice: 1. Oxygen therapy is to be used with a written order by a physician. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R165 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to malignant neoplasm of the glottis, tracheostomy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There was no completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R165 at time of survey. The care plan for R165 did not include any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Storage of Medications and Biologicals and Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure the secure storage of medications by not locking medication carts when unattended for one of six medication carts. The deficient practice had the potential to allow residents, unauthorized staff, or visitors to access medications and biologicals, or to tamper with items stored on the cart.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications and Biologicals reviewed April 2025, revealed under Policy Statement: The facility shall ensure medications and biologicals are stored appropriately and securely at any given time. Review of the facility's policy titled Administration of Medications reviewed June 2025 revealed under Procedure: .16. The medication cart should be locked at all times. 1. Observation and interview on 8/6/2025 at 11:19 am revealed a medication cart was left open and unattended in Hallway AI with no nurse in sight. When a staff member was asked who the cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to document medication administration for 2 of 60 sampled residents (R) (R122 and R102. This deficient practice created an inaccurate record of care and services provided to the residents which had the potential to affect continuity of care.Findings include:1. Review of the facility policy titled Administration of Medications dated June 2025 documented under Procedure: .5. Each time you administer a medication, you need to be sure to have the right documentation. Under Procedure: .10. The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's electronic medication administration on the appropriate line entry after giving each medication and before administering the next ones, or document in wet ink the administration of medication.11. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,256 — penalty dated 2024-03-24
• $4,256 — penalty dated 2024-03-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $921K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA