Riverside Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 152.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three residents (R) (R1) reviewed for falls with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 8/17/2025 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA transferred R1 unassisted from his bed to the wheelchair resulting in R1 sustaining a fall during transfer that resulted in a closed displaced spiral fracture of the right femur. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan- Comprehensive, dated September 2025 under Policy revealed: A comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs shall be developed for each resident. Under the section Policy Interpretation and Implementation number 2 (e) identify the professional services that are responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three residents (R) (R1) reviewed for falls with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 8/17/2025 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA transferred R1 unassisted from his bed to the wheelchair resulting in R1 sustaining a fall during transfer that resulted in a closed displaced spiral fracture of the right femur. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled, Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, dated July 2025 under Purpose: To ensure a safe environment for all residents by minimizing accidents hazards, providing adequate supervision and assistive devices, and implementing a proactive and systematic approach to preventing, investigating, and mitigating accidents and incidents in accordance with federal regulations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of policies titled, Preadmission Screening PASARR/PASSR, the facility failed to refer one of 10 residents (R)(R7) for level two pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) out of 10 residents identified with level two PASARR. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include:Review of the policy titled Preadmission Screening (PASSAR/PASSR) dated June 2025 revealed the policy of the facility was to follow the Federal and State regulations with regards to prescreening residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for individuals requiring more than 30 days in the Center, with the Procedure: 1. A level II PASSR must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder, or a suspicion or diagnosis of serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff, record review and review of the facility policies titled, Activities of Daily Living and Prevention of Pressure Injuries, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (R13), who required assistance with repositioning, was repositioned in accordance with the resident's turning schedule and interventions. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, decreased quality of life, and worsening pressure ulcers.Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living revised December, 2025 revealed the following: 1. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility will provide the necessary care and services to ensure that the resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. 2. The facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff, record review and review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to diet by failing to provide a meal tray to one of 150 residents on an oral diet (R13). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living revised December 2025 revealed the following: 3. The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living: d. Dining-eating, including meals and snacks.4. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed R13 iresident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, obstructive hydrocephalus, epilepsy, dysphagia following cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Respiratory Therapy Equipment, the facility failed to ensure proper maintenance and monitoring of oxygen equipment in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 28 sampled residents (R) (R109 and R1) reviewed for respiratory care related to maintaining a clean oxygen concentrator and filter. This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased oxygen delivery, increased risk of respiratory compromise, and exposure to contaminants, which could adversely affect the residents' health and safety.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy Equipment, which was undated, revealed procedure guidelines for oxygen administration directing staff to wash oxygen concentrator filters weekly, rinse the filters, and squeeze dry prior to reuse.1. Review of the EMR revealed R109 had diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene while passing lunch meal trays between each resident on one of three units. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of cross-contamination and the transmission of infectionsFindings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated February, 2026, revealed that handwashing /hand hygiene shall be regarded by this Center as a means of preventing the spread of infections. The subsection titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed under number 2. e. stated, Associates must perform appropriate handwashing procedures under the following conditions, between passing out meal trays at lunch.Observations made on 05/11/2026 at 12:33 AM in the Unit 2 dining hall revealed two employees, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) PP and QQ, not performing proper hand hygiene between passing out lunch meal trays.In an interview on 05/11/2026 at 12:33 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure all medication labels were legible and that expired medications were disposed of after expiration date on one of five medication carts and in two of three medication storage rooms on (100 Hall and 300 Hall). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, revision date of November 2020 revealed under policy statement, the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, and sanitary manner. 4. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Observation on 4/2/2025 at 9:36 am Certified Medication Aide (CMA) GG was observed during medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication, the facility failed to ensure one of 56 sampled residents (R) (R150) was assessed for self-administration of medications prior to leaving medications at her bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to place R150 at risk of medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication, dated April 2022, revealed the General Guidelines section included, 1. A resident may not be permitted to administer or retain any medication in his/her room unless so ordered, in writing, by the attending physician and approved by the Interdisciplinary Care Plan Team. A review of R150's electronic health record (EHR) for R150 revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 12 residents (R) (R120) with an indwelling urinary catheter and one of 26 R (R147) receiving oxygen (O2). This deficient practice had the potential to place R120 and R147 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, revised 11/15/2022, revealed the Policy Statement included, Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The Standards of Practice section included, . 9. A comprehensive plan of care will be developed by the interdisciplinary team, resident and/or resident representative as applicable. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's, Care Plan policy, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include a new sacral pressure injury with measurable goals and interventions for one of three residents (R) (R206) reviewed with pressure ulcers. The facility also failed to update the care plan for R47, whose oxygen treatment had been discontinued but was still listed on the care plan. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care plan policy updated 11/15/2022 revealed the policy statement: Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing. Further review of the Policy revealed under Standard of Practice number 1. Each resident will be assessed by the interdisciplinary team on admission, quarterly, annually, and with a significant change in status 5 .Upon a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, records reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure a physicians order for oxygen administration was obtained for one residents R (R147), the facility also failed to ensure two of 26 residents (R254 and R69) oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of undated facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised date of October 2010 revealed under Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1.Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R147 revealed resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to pneumonia, anxiety, and cough. Continued review of the residents' physicians' orders did not reveal an order for oxygen therapy administration. Review of the 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R147 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $874K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA