No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Highland Place Rehab and Nursing Center

1736 Irving Place, Shreveport, LA 71101 · For profit - Corporation · 227 certified beds · (318) 221-1983 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$294,723 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $294,723 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-04)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
745 Olive St · (318) 227-4088 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1822 Line Ave · (318) 221-5114 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
240 Topeka St · (318) 458-0830 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1701 Gilbert Dr · (318) 798-4643 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%17.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.2%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.1%2.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%17.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.7%94.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.0%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.7%22.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.6%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine15.8%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.7%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.6%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.962.561.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.092.741.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.7%CMS range 26.3–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.0–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified80.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization11.0%CMS range 7.8–17.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse and psychosocial harm from another resident for 3 (Resident #1, #6, #7) of 7 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) sampled residents. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 12/27/2024 at approximately 2:38 a.m., when Resident #1 was approached at his bedside by Resident #2 with Resident #2's penis exposed playing with himself. Residents #6 and #7 resided in the shared resident room at the time of the event. Resident #1 was verbal and his cognition was intact. Resident #1 reported Resident #2 grabbed him by his upper arms and shoulders and he had to wrestle with Resident #2 to get away. Resident #1 reported Resident #2 asked him if he was gay and had his penis exposed, in his hand playing with it. The facility staff did not separate Resident #2 from the other residents in the shared room. Resident #2 remained in the shared room throughout the night and part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #4, #5, #6, and #7) residents. The deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 12/27/2024 at approximately 2:38 a.m., when Resident #1 was approached at his bedside by Resident #2 with Resident #2's penis exposed playing with himself. Residents #6 and #7 resided in the shared resident room at the time of the event. Resident #1 was verbal and his cognition was intact. Resident #1 reported Resident #2 grabbed him by his upper arms and shoulders and he had to wrestle with Resident #2 to get away. Resident #1 reported Resident #2 asked him if he was gay and had his penis exposed, in his hand playing with it. The facility staff did not separate Resident #2 from the other residents in the shared room. Resident #2 remained in the shared room throughout the night and part of the following day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the provider failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and to prevent elopement for 1 (#140) out of 1 (#140) residents reviewed for wandering. This failed practice led to an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #140, which began on 05/06/2023 at 3:25 p.m. when he exited the facility, attempted to walk home and received a ride from a person unknown to him. S20 Agency LPN (licensed practical nurse) failed to notify the appropriate staff after he had not observed Resident #140 after administering four o'clock medications on the evening shift of 05/06/2023. S21 LPN failed to notify the appropriate staff when S20 Agency LPN reported Resident #140 had not been seen after four o'clock. S21 LPN failed to notify appropriate staff during the night shift on 05/06/2023 when Resident #140 was not observed. On 05/07/2023, Resident #140 was located at 9:02 a.m. at his home, which is located 6.1 miles from the facility, and had been missing from the facility for 18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to be administered to in a manner that used its resources efficiently to ensure staff supervised residents to prevent elopement for 1 (#140) of 1 (#140) residents reviewed for wandering. This failed practice led to an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #140, which began on 05/06/2023 at 3:25 p.m. when he exited the facility, attempted to walk home and received a ride from a person unknown to him. S20 Agency LPN (licensed practical nurse) failed to notify the appropriate staff after he had not observed Resident #140 after administering four o'clock medications on the evening shift of 05/06/2023. S21 LPN failed to notify the appropriate staff when S20 Agency LPN reported Resident #140 had not been seen after four o'clock. S21 LPN failed to notify appropriate staff during the night shift on 05/06/2023 when Resident #140 was not observed. On 05/07/2023, Resident #140 was located at 9:02 a.m. at his home, which is located 6.1 miles from the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to follow procedures to ensure a resident received pain medication to be administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 sampled residents. The facility failed to provide effective pain management due to the resident's scheduled morphine not being available. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #2 on 11/27/2025 at 8:10 p.m. when Resident #2 received a prn (as needed) dose of Oxycodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg (milligram) po (by mouth) for a pain level of 10 which had a follow-up status of ineffective. The facility had ran out of Resident #2's Morphine Sulfate (controlled substance) narcotic pain medication ordered for the administration of 30 mg 2 tablets for a total of 60 mg po q (every) eight hours. Resident #2's last documented dose of scheduled Morphine was on 11/26/2025 at 2:00 p.m. S3Unit Manager failed to follow up on the narcotic medication refill request for Resident #2's Morphine prior to and after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-02-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) sampled residents reviewed for pain. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, who reported pain after a post-surgery wound, received medication or interventions to alleviate pain. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #4 on 01/10/2025 at approximately 6:00 p.m. when Resident #4 requested pain medication for her post-surgical wound. Resident #4 requested Tylenol on the evening shift from S3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). S3 LPN told Resident #4 she could not give her anything for pain. Resident #4 called 911 as a result of not getting pain medication. Resident #4 was eventually admitted to the hospital ER (Emergency Room) for acute pain on 01/10/2024 where she received 2 doses of Dilaudid for acute pain. Findings: Pain Policy: Pain management Program dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 2 (#1and #3) residents of 3 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure:1. Resident #1's right lateral ankle pressure injury remained free of moisture and 2. EBP signage was in place for Resident #1 and Resident #3. Findings: Review of the facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy revealed in part: Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDRO to staff hands and clothing.All residents with any of the following conditions should use enhanced barrier precautions:2. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the provider failed to ensure a plan of care had been developed and implemented for 2 (#1 and #5) of 6 (#1, #2,#3,#4 #5 #6) residents whose care plans were reviewed by:1. Failing to develop a plan of care for the use of a PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) line for Resident #1 and Resident #5.2. Failing to administer Resident #1 intravenous antibiotic medication as ordered and failing to provide restorative care for Resident #5 as ordered.Findings: 1.Resident #1Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/17/2025 with a diagnosis of but not limited to sepsis unspecified organism, Bacterial infection, type 2 diabetes with other circulatory problems, polyneuropathy, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the feet.Review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/23/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident 1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a PICC line in his left arm. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed ensure a resident's Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a soft, plastic feeding tube that goes into the stomach used to provide nutrition when oral intake is inadequate) feeding was not administered while a resident was in a flat position for 1 (#4) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Feeding Systems (Artificial) policy dated 06/2025 revealed in part:Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of tube feedings.Procedure Guidelines2. Continuous Feeding:b. If not contraindicated, elevate the head of the bed thirty to forty-five degrees (30-45 degrees) for duration of feeding and for one (1) hour after administration. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/17/2025 with diagnoses including in part focal traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration and attention to gastrostomy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 (#165) of 5 (#5, #7, #14, #158, and #165) residents or resident's representatives reviewed for unnecessary medications were informed of risk and benefits, treatment alternatives or other options of psychotropic medications prior to administration. Findings: Review of facility's Psychotropic Medication Use and Chemical Restraints Policy dated 06/2025 revealed, in part:Purpose .This policy promotes safe, appropriate, and individualized use of psychotropic medications in nursing home residents.Policy StatementIt is the policy of this facility to prohibit the use of psychotropic medications as chemical restraints for staff convenience or disciplinary purposes. Psychotropic drugs will only be used: To treat a specific, documented condition diagnosed by a licensed practitioner, and As part of a comprehensive, person-centered care plan. Psychotropic Medication: Any drug that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to act promptly to concerns presented in the resident council meetings. The deficient practice affected 4 (#37, #139, #170, #178) of 7 (#37, #45, #139, #170, #173, #174, #178) residents interviewed for resident care and life in the facility. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the total census of 176 residents in the facility. Findings:Review of the facility's grievance policy with a revision date of 6/2025 revealed:INTENT: It is the policy of the facility to allow the resident and or legal representative to voice a grievance in such a manner to acknowledge and respect resident rights.PROCEDURE:1. The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 4 (#50, #88, #91, #110) of 11 (#35, #50, #56, #68, #88, #91, #110, #128, #158, #179 #189) residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to: 1. provide a clean room and a closet door for Resident #110.2. provide linens that were in good repair for all residents. (This had the ability to affect 176 residents residing in the facility.)3. provide the required furnishings in each resident room. The facility failed to provided a chair for Resident #88 and #91.4. provide a clean uncluttered room for Resident #50, Resident #50's clothes were stored on the floor. Findings: Resident #50 Review of Resident #50’s medical record revealed an admit date of 06/26/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: unspecified fracture of upper end of right humerus/subsequent encounter with routine healing, unsteadiness on feet, and cognitive communication deficit. Observation on 07/21/2025 at 8:05 a.m. revealed Resident #50's clothing in a box on the floor next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide the required documents to 1 (#110) of 1 (#110) resident and or resident representative who was transferred out of the facility for treatment. The facility failed to provide Resident #110 a copy of the facility's bed hold policy when transferred out of the facility. Findings: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed an initial admit date of 11/06/2025 and a re-admission date of 02/16/2025 with diagnoses of but not limited to hyperkalemia, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension and osteoarthritis.Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #110 was transferred to a hospital for treatment of hyperkalemia on 01/16/2025 and 02/13/2025.Review of Resident #110's medical record failed to reveal any documentation of the bed hold policy being provided to Resident #110 or Resident #110's representative when transferred to a hospital for treatment on 01/16/2025 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facitiy failed to ensure resident assessments were encoded, transmitted and completed for 1 (#81) of 3 (#81, #130, #183) residents reviewed for resident assessments.Findings: Review of Resident #81's medical records revealed an admit date of 02/05/2025 and discharge date of 03/14/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: heart failure unspecified and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of Resdient #81's MDS (Minimal Data Set) Assessments failed to reveal a discharge assessemnt. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 2:30 p.m. S3 MDS Nurse acknowledged Discharge MDS Assessment was not completed until today.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for 2 (#110, #188) out of 63 total sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Resident #110 Review of Resident #110’s medical record revealed an initial admit date of 11/06/2025 and a re-admission date of 02/16/2025 with diagnoses of but not limited to hyperkalemia, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #110's medical record failed to reveal a baseline care plan had been completed when Resident #110 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. During an interview on 07/22/2025 at 1:00 p.m. S3 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurse confirmed a baseline care plan was not completed when Resident #110 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and should have been. Resident #188 Review of Resident #188’s medical record revealed an admit date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services according to the written plan of care for 1 (#14) of 5 (#5, #7, #14, #158, and #165) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's lab were obtained as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of Resident #14's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 12/15/2023 and a re-entry admission date of 02/10/2025 with the following diagnoses, but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dementia without behavioral disturbances, psychophysiological insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #14's July 2025 Physician Orders revealed an order dated 06/02/2025: biannual labs: CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), hemoglobin A1C, TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone), lipid, B12, folate, Vitamin D, Magnesium, Thiamine and Iron panel with ferritin for June and December.Review of Resident #14's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) dated 04/30/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 indicating cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to complete their activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and hygiene for 4 (#50, #68, #74, #187) out of 4 (#50, #68, #74, #187) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #50 received baths, washed hair and toenails were trimmed,2. Ensure Resident #68 received baths, oral care and nail care,3. Ensure Resident #74 received proper peri-care for MASD (moisture-associated skin damage)4. Ensure Resident #187 received baths. Findings: Review of Facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/Maintain Abilities (undated) revealed: Procedure: 2. The facility will ensure a resident is given the appropriate amount of treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. 3. The facility will provide care and services for the following activities of daily living: a. hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (#74, #110) of 63 sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1.provide a splint for Resident #74 as ordered.2.complete all admission lab test ordered Resident #110.3.revise/update Resident #110's plan of care to reflect a diagnosis of hyperkalemia.4.complete Resident #110's admission lab in a timely manner. Findings: Resident #74 Review of Resident #74’s medical record revealed an initial admit date of 02/24/2017 with a re-admission date of 01/22/2023 with the following diagnoses, in part: Spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, chronic pain syndrome, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, left and right upper arms, and contracture, unspecified joint. An observation on 07/21/2025 at 12:32 p.m. revealed one hand splint on the bed side table of Resident #74. During an interview on 07/23/25 at 9:16 a.m. S31 COTA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident environment remains as free of accident hazards for 1 (#158) reviewed for accidents. The facility did not maintain resident #158's wheelchair in safe operating condition. Findings:Review of the Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and ResponseAdministrative Policies (7/2025) revealed in part:Purpose: To ensure a safe environment for all residents by minimizing accidents hazards, providing adequate supervision and assistive devices, and implementing a proactive and systematic approach to preventing, investigating, and mitigating accidents and incidents in accordance with federal regulations, facility policies, and resident-centered care principles.Policy StatementThe facility is committed to:Maintaining a resident environment that is as fee as possible from accident hazards while meeting individual resident needs.Observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:36 a.m. revealed resident #158's wheelchair was in need of repair. Resident #158's wheelchair locks did not lock, the right wheel was loose and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (#62) resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to consult a Registered Dietician for Resident #62 diagnosed with a pressure ulcer.Findings:Review of Facility's Pressure Ulcer Treatment Policy and Procedure dated 06/2025 revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers to facilitate healing and to prevent further deterioration. 3. Consult Dietary as needed/ordered. Review of Resident #62's medical records revealed an admit date of 05/02/2025 with the following diagnoses, including in part: other ulcerative colitis without complications, paraplegia complete, other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy and pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4. Review of Resident #62's medical records failed to reveal Resident #62 receiving supplements for wound healing.Review of Resident #62's weights revealed on 05/02/2025, the resident weighed 181 lbs. (pounds). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to provide residents necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 5 (#2, #35, #109, #128, #188) out of 6 (#2, #35, #109, #128, #186 and #188) residents reviewed for respiratory. The facility failed to store hand held nebulizer equipment in a covered bag and change and date oxygen tubing and humidification bottles weekly.Findings:Procedure Guidelines: Oxygen Administration -3. [NAME] bottle with date and initials upon opening.4. Change prefilled humidifier when water level becomes low.5. Change oxygen cannulas and tubing every 7 days and date. Resident #2Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 02/20/2024 with a re-entry date of 05/07/2024 with the following diagnoses chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #2's July 2025 Physician orders revealed dated 07/03/2025: oxygen at 2L (liters) via NC (nasal cannula), every 8 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitation services for 1 of 1 (#158) sample resident as required by the resident's plan of care. Resident #158 was not provided restorative services. Findings:During an interview on 7/21/2025 at 11:18 a.m. resident #158 reported she had therapy for three days and she had not had any therapy since then. Resident #158 reported she was told by therapy she would be seen by Restorative, and she had not been seen.Review of resident 158's Physical Therapy Restorative Referral dated 05/27/2025 revealed restorative service was to start dated 06/05/2025 for six weeks.During an interview on 07/22/2025 at 1:30 p.m. S17 Restorative CNA (certified nursing assistant) reported they did not provide restorative services for resident #158. S17 Restorative CNA reported there is only two Restorative CNAs for the entire facility. S17 Restorative CNA reported they obtain the referrals for restorative services from physical therapy then they give the referral to their supervisor. S17 Restorative CNA reported their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate direct care staffing information based on payroll to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as required. Findings:Record review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Report for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) revealed triggers for the following: One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. Review of staffing pattern forms for weekends of FY 2025 quarter 2 ([DATE]- March 31) revealed the facility provided more hours than required and failed to reveal any days in which the facility did not provide enough hours. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 4:35 p.m. S1Administrator reported corporate submitted the information for the PBJ and did not submit correct information. During an interview on 07/24/2025 at 8:55 a.m. S2Chief Nursing Officer reported she did not know why the information submitted by corporate to PBJ was not accurate.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 176 residents residing at the facility at time of entrance on 07/21/2025 as reported by the Administrator. The facility failed to:1. maintain an up to date monthly tracking and trending for infection prevention and control, 2. ensure resident care equipment, dirty linens and briefs were handled in a sanitary manner. Findings: Observations on 07/22/2025 at 11:50 a.m. during a tour of the laundry completed with S25 Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor revealed bed sheets, pillowcases are worn thin and discolored (yellowish and tan stains). Further observation of the facility’s blankets revealed to be in very poor condition thin, discolored, felt scratchy. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 10:30 a.m. S20 DON (Director of Nursing) present the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain and follow policies and procedures for immunization for 4 (#55, #84, #87, #186) of 5 ( #55, #77, #84, #87 and #186) sampled residents for influenza, pneumococcal disease and COVID-19. The facility failed to educate and offer residents and/or their representative immunizations of pneumonia, influenza and coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and failed to allow them to refuse and/or agree to either of the vaccines.Findings:Pneumonia Vaccine for Residents (Nursing Policy Manual 06/2025) revealed in part:Policy: Each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized.Pneumococcal Vaccine/Diseasea. Before offering the pneumococcal immunization, each resident or the resident's legal representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization.b. The resident or the resident's legal representative has the opportunity to refuse immunization.Influenza Vaccine for Residents (Nursing Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based of observations and interview the facility failed to have the most recent annual survey results of the facility posted in a place readily accessible to the residents, family members or anyone to review. Findings:During an observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:30 a.m., review of the survey results binder near the front door failed to reveal the annual survey from 2024.During an interview on 07/21/2025 at 12:05 p.m. S1 Administrator acknowledged that the previous years' annual survey results were not in the survey binder and should have been.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to accommodate 1 (#165) out of 1 resident reviewed for personal privacy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #165 had a privacy curtain in a shared room. Findings:Observation on 07/21/2025 at 10:00 a.m. of Resident #165's room revealed was in a shared with a roommate. Further observation revealed Resident #165 did not have privacy curtain. During an interview on 07/21/2025 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #165 and visitor reported Resident #165 did not have a privacy curtain.Review of Resident #165's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/07/2025 with the following diagnoses bipolar disorder, current episode depressed and altered mental status. Review of Resident #165's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Sets) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 11:30 a.m. S19 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) observed Resident #165's room and confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to develop an individualized person centered care plan for 1 (#14) of 2 (#5, #14) residents with measurable goals and appropriate interventions to address the care and treatment for a resident with dementia. Findings: Review of Resident #14's face sheet revealed an initial admission date of 12/15/2023 and a re-entry admission date of 02/10/2025 with diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident #14's July 2025 Physician Orders revealed an order dated 05/10/2024: Memantine HCl (hydrochloride) oral tablet 5 MG (milligram); Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to dementia and anxiety. Review of Resident #14's Care Plan failed to reveal a focus of dementia with measurable goals and appropriate interventions. During an interview on 07/23/2025 at 3:00 p.m. S3 MDS (Minimum Data Sets) Nurse confirmed Resident #14's care plan did not include a focus of dementia with measurable goals and appropriate interventions.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews the facility failed to maintain electrical equipment in safe operating condition for 1 (#35) of 11 (#35, #50, #56, #68, #88, #91, #110, #128, #158, #179, #189) residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #35's bed control was properly maintained and in safe working order. Findings:Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed, in part, a readmission date of 06/02/2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #35's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated Resident #35's cognition was intact. An observation on 07/21/2025 at 8:14 a.m. revealed Resident #35's bed remote had exposed wires. During an interview on 07/21/2025 3:28 p.m., S28Maintenance confirmed Resident #35's bed control had exposed wires. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's personal dietary choices were met for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The facility prepared a lunch meal with Resident #2's dislikes. Findings: During an interview on 04/22/2025 at 8:15 a.m., S2CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported Resident #2 only liked white meat chicken and did not like dark meat. Observation of Resident #2's plated lunch meal tray on 04/22/2025 at 12:45 p.m. with S3Dietary Aid, revealed two baked chicken legs as the meat portion. Further observation revealed Resident #2's meal card preference was listed as wants white meat. During an interview on 04/22/2025 at 12:45 p.m., S3Dietary Aid, acknowledged Resident #2's meal card had a preference listed for white meat and lunch meal was plated with dark meat. During an interview on 04/22/2025 at 12:50 p.m., S4Dietary Manager acknowledged Resident #2's lunch meal had been plated with dark meat. S4Dietary Manager further acknowledged Resident #2's preference for white meat had not been honored and should have been.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 (#4) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) sampled residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #4's high blood glucose levels were rechecked as ordered after being administered sliding scale insulin for glucose levels greater than 400. 2. Resident #4's blood glucose levels were checked to determine if sliding scale insulin needed to be administered as ordered. 3. Resident #4's MD (medical doctor) was notified when Resident #4's finger stick glucose was greater than 250. 4. Resident #4's Lantus insulin was administered as ordered. Findings: Review of Administration of Medications policy with review date of November 15, 2022 revealed, in part: Policy Statement Standards: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Procedure 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required timeframe. 5. Licensed Nurse/CMT (certified medical technician) giving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent the development of new pressure ulcers for 1 (#4) of 4 (#3, #4, #5, and #6) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to perform wound care as recommended by S2 Wound NP (nurse practitioner) for Resident #4. Findings: Review of Resident #4's record revealed an admit date of 02/14/2025 and a discharge date of 03/14/2025 with diagnoses that included, in part, gluteal cleft pressure injury, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, muscle weakness generalized, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage unspecified. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed the following: -02/18/2025 (end date of 03/12/2025) Gluteal cleft: Clean area with wound cleaner. Apply Venelex to wound bed. Cover with dry cover dressing every day and prn - every day shift for pressure injury and as needed for dressing dislodge/soiled. -03/12/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the facility's Grievance Policy was followed for 1 (#2) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) sample residents. The facility failed to resolve a grievance of resident #2's call light not being answered and failed to provide a completed review of the grievance in writing and/or verbal to resident #2 or his RP (responsible party). Findings: Review of the facility's Grievance/Complaint form revealed in part a resident, their representatives, interested family members or advocates may file a grievance or complaint with the facility without fear or threat of reprisal of any kind. Please fill out, date, and sign this report and submit it to any department manager. You will be provided with an oral and/or written report of the facility's findings as soon as possible. Review of resident #2's grievance/complaint form dated 01/31/2025 revealed grievance was filed by resident #2's RP. Resident #2's RP documented in part, the incident occurred on 01/25/2025 and again on 01/31/2025 during the 7-3 and 3-11 shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of sexual abuse was reported immediately to the facility's administrator and to the state agency within 2 hours after the allegations were made for 1 (#1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) sample residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy last reviewed date of 11/15/2022 revealed in part: 1. Prevention: The abuse coordinator in the facility is the administrator. Reports of allegations or suspected abuse, neglect .will be reported immediately to Facility Abuse Coordinator, Director of Nursing. 6. Report and Investigate: (e) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made .to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Agency .in accordance with state law).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 (#1) of 7 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) sample residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy (dated 9/5/16 and reviewed 11/15/22) revealed in part the following: Policy Statement: Standards The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of property. Facility has a zero-tolerance Abuse Standard regarding all proven allegations of verbal, sexual, physical, mental, neglect Action Prevention: The abuse coordinator in the facility is the administrator. 6. Report and Investigate: When suspicion of reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur, an investigation is immediately warranted. Once the resident is cared for and initial reporting has occurred, an investigation should be conducted. Components of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) sampled residents. The facility failed to have documentation of a physician's discharge order. Findings: Review of Resident #2's record revealed an admit date of 12/26/2024 and a discharge date of 12/27/2024. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the following diagnoses which included but not limited to: Pain in left wrist, chronic viral hepatitis C, cognitive communication deficit, cannabis use, unspecified. Review of Resident #2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 06 indicated severe impaired cognition. Review of Resident #2's physician orders failed to reveal a discharge order to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 01/20/2025 at 3:20 p.m. S6 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) reported she could not locate the discharge order for Resident #2. S6 ADON reported she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents had access to services outside the facility for 1 resident (#2) out of 3 residents (#2, #3, #4) reviewed for appointments outside the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's Transportation to Appointments Policy dated April 2022 revealed in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. .Facility will provide transportation to and from appointments for all residents, unless resident prefers to provide their own transportation. 2. Scheduled appointments for doctor's appointments, follow-ups, and referrals while residing in facility will be the responsibility of the Transportation Supervisor or designee. 3. Documentation of refusals, missed appointments, and rescheduling of appointments will be completed by the floor nurse on duty in the chart or medical record; after receiving confirmation from the Transportation Supervisor. 4. The Transportation Supervisor will also ensure all paperwork from appointments are handed to floor nurse and uploaded into medical records after scheduling follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the plan of care had been revised for 1 (#4) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included, in part, fracture of shaft of left tibia, fracture of shaft of left fibula, traumatic subarachnoid and subdural hemorrhage, multiple fractures of ribs, left side, fracture of base of skull, fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra, and fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra. Review of Resident #4's 07/20/2024 Quarterly MDS (minimum data set) revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Further review of the 07/20/2024 quarterly MDS revealed Resident #4 did not have any functional limitation in ROM (range of motion) for upper or lower extremity. Review of Resident #4's 07/20/2024 State Optional MDS revealed Resident #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for wounds received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, to prevent infection, and to prevent wounds for 1 (#5) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was performed and the Medical Doctor (MD)/Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notifed of a current skin condition. Findings: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/24/2021 with a re-entry date of 01/22/2023. Diagnoses, included in part, Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy, Type 2 Diabetes, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder and Paralytic Syndrome, unspecified. . Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/14/2024 revealed in part, Resident #5 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review of Resident #5's MDS revealed Resident #5 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and/or injuries and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 (#2, #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) Resident #2's physician orders had been followed, and 2.) Resident #4's care plan had been revised with each of Resident #4's falls Findings: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical records revealed an admit date of 04/15/2024 and discharge date of 07/06/2024 with the following diagnoses, including in part: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia/unspecified, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness/subsequent encounter. Review of Resident #2's physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/22/2024 for Keflex Oral Capsule 500 mg (milligram). Give 500 mg via (by way of) PEG (Percutaneous Esophageal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's responsible party was notified when there was a change in condition for 1 (#2) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's responsible party of an infection requiring antibiotic treatment. Findings: Review of Facility's Notification of Resident's Change in Condition (November 2019) revealed, in part: Policy Statement: This facility will promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and Responsible Party of changes in the patient's medical/mental condition and/or status (for example (e.g.), changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). Procedure: Quality of Life - notification of changes - 4. Regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, the Nursing Supervisor/Charge Nurse will inform the resident, family, or responsibility party of any changes in his/her medical care or nursing treatments. 5. The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will record document the name of the responsible party that was notified of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with an indwelling catheter received appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 1 (#4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of policy and procedure reviewed/revised on 04/01/2018 titled Urinary Tract Infections (Catheter-Associated), Guidelines for Preventing revealed: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs). Policy Interpretation and Implementation .Steps in the procedure The following CAUTI prevention strategies have been adopted and are to be followed by clinical staff: . 6. Maintain unobstructed urine flow .c. Keep drainage bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not place the drainage bag on the floor. Review of Resident #3's medical records revealed an admit date of 04/01/2024 with the following diagnoses, including in part: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute kidney failure unspecified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure received a written order from the physician for and an informed consent for bed rails prior to installation for 1 (#2) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Facility's Bed Rail Policy (December 5, 2017) revealed, in part: Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to identify and reduce safety risks and hazards commonly associated with bed rail use .The facility's priority is to ensure safe and appropriate bed rail use. It is the policy of this facility to prevent entrapment and other safety hazards associated with bed rail use . Procedure: 1. Resident Assessment - e. facility has indicated documentation that the side rail is the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time, f. the facility will document ongoing need for the use of a bed rail, .h. obtain informed consent, i. obtain physician order for medical symptom assessed for need for bed rail use, j. resident care plan will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure required annual abuse and dementia training was completed for 1 direct care staff [S2 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)] out of 6 [S2 CNA, S3 CNA, S4 CNA, S5 CNA, S6 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), S7 LPN] direct care staff personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy dated 09/15/2016 revealed in part: 4. Employee Training: All facility staff including contractors and volunteers will be educated on abuse, neglect, and exploitation . Annual education and training should be provided to all existing employees. Review of S2 CNA's personnel record revealed a hire date of 09/25/2018. Further review of S2 CNA's personnel record revealed abuse and dementia training was last completed on 06/01/2023. During an interview on 08/13/2024 at 4:36 p.m. S1 Staff Development reviewed S2 CNA's personnel record and acknowledged there was not documentation of required annual abuse and dementia training.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 2 (#39 and #67) of 5 (#21, #39, #51, #67, and #120) residents investigated for environment. The facility failed to ensure residents' call lights remained within reach. Findings: Review of Facility's Call Light, Answering procedure dated April 2022 revealed in part: Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. Key Procedural Points . 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . Resident #39 During an interview on 06/03/2024 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #39 reported she did not have a call light. Observation on 06/03/2024 at 9:45 a.m. failed to reveal Resident #39's call light within reach. Further observation revealed Resident #39's call light cord was connected to wall plug and the call light was on the ground between the wall and piece of furniture. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident #39's call light cord was connected to teh wall plug wall and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to consider the views of the resident council group and act promptly to concerns related to laundry presented in the resident council meetings. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total of 189 residents according to Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 06/03/2024. Findings: Review of the resident council meeting notes from January 2024 through May 2024 revealed the following grievances related to laundry/ missing clothes: 01/22/2024: Resident #62: missing her black blanket, activities gave her another one. Review of Resident #62's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 6 out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #69: states his laundry is slow coming back sometimes a week. Review of Resident #69's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Resident #13: states he is missing a gray shirt. Review of Resident #13's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed and implemented for 2 (#25, 98) of 2 residents reviewed for UTI (urinary tract infection). The facility failed to: 1. Develop a plan of care for 2 (#25, 98) residents diagnosed with urinary tract infection. 2. Administer medication as ordered for resident # 98. Findings: 1. Resident #25, Review of resident #25's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 02/07/2023 and a diagnosis of but not limited to chronic congestive heart failure, primary hypertension, type 2 diabetes and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of resident #25's MDS (minimum data set) revealed resident #25 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of resident #25's lab results dated 05/29/2024 revealed resident #25 had cloudy yellow urine with a blood urea nitrogen level of 22 and a creatinine level of .56, a presumed UTI pending urine culture. Review of resident #25's Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's plan of care was revised to meet the resident's needs for 1 resident (#159) out of 4 residents (#159, #7, #121, #161) investigated for weight loss. Findings: Review of Resident #159's record revealed an admit date of 02/02/2024 with a readmission date of 03/18/2024. Further review of Resident #159's record revealed Resident #159 was NPO (nothing by mouth) and was fed via enteral feedings through a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube. Review of Resident #159's weight log revealed on 02/02/2024, the resident weighed 112.6 lbs. (pounds). Further review of Resident #159's weight log revealed the following weights: -on 02/23/2024 Resident #159 weighed 107.0 lbs. -on 03/25/2024 Resident #159 weighed 106.1 lbs. -on 04/02/2024 Resident #159 weighed 101.3 lbs. -on 04/10/2024 Resident #159 weighed 99.4 lbs. -on 05/08/2024 Resident #159 weighed 97.6 lbs. which indicated a -13.32 % (percent) loss from 02/02/2024. Review of Resident #159's record failed to reveal Resident #159's care plan was revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to complete their activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and hygiene for 6 (#25, #57, #98, #120, #141, #174) of 10 residents (#16, #25, #33, #57,#65, #98, #120, #141, #174) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. The facility failed to ensure: 1. residents #25, #57, #98, and #141's fingernails were clean and trimmed. 2. resident #120's toenails were clean and trimmed. 3. resident #174 received scheduled bath/shower. Findings: Review of the facility's Nail Care (Finger and Toe) Policy dated 11/15/2024 revealed the following: The purpose is to clean the nail bed, prevent infection and comfort the resident. Practice Guidelines Key points 1. Nails can be partially cleaned during bathing. 2. Nursing Assistants do not trim the nails of diabetic residents 3. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming 4. Stop and report any evidence of ingrown toes nails,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#139) resident out of 1 reviewed for edema received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for applying ted hose, monitoring for edema with use of diuretics (Lasix), and revision to care plan of edema with use of diuretics (Lasix). Findings: During an interview on 06/03/2024 at 11:45 A.M. Resident #139 reported he had a medical history of blood clots and cellulitis, and reported he was not sure if his edema was from the cellulitis since he has completed treatment of antibiotics and legs are still swollen or from history of blood clots. Resident #139 went on to report he should be wearing ted hose. Observation on 06/03/2024 at 11:45 A.M. revealed Resident #139 had edema to bilateral lower extremities and failed to reveal Resident #139 had ted hose applied to lower extremities. Observation on 6/5/2024 at 2:20 P.M. revealed Resident #139 had edema to bilateral lower extremities and failed to reveal Resident #139 had ted hose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (#164) out of 3 residents (#164, #6, #94) investigated with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent infection. The facility failed to obtain and implement wound care treatment orders on Resident #164 upon readmissionn to the facility. Findings: Review of Resident #164's record revealed Resident #164 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #164's diagnoses included in part anoxic brain damage, cardiac arrest-cause unspecified, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis-unspecified organism, chronic osteomyelitis with draining sinus-left radius and ulna, osteomyelitis-unspecified, bacterial infection-unspecified, bacteremia, carrier of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, and severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #164's record revealed an incomplete skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #85 received at least quarterly Registered Dietician assessments according to policy. 2. Monthly weights were documented in EHR (electronic health record) to ensure Resident #135 maintained a desired weight. There were a total of 9 (#7, #21, #34, #52, #79, #85, #135, #159, #161) residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: 1. Review of facility's Role of the Dietician policy dated April 2022 revealed in part, 1. Review all new admissions on each visit. (minimum of Monthly) 2. Review all tube feedings at least quarterly unless there is weight loss/gain, or pressure ulcer. 9. Review residents on dialysis quarterly and as needed. Observation on 06/03/2024 at 9:00 a.m. revealed Resident #85 receiving Glucerna via feeding pump. Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed diagnoses that include in part hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #85's record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 (#85 and #161) of 3 (#21, #85, and #161) residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility failed to ensure the tube feeding container was appropriately labeled. Findings: Review of Facility's undated procedure with subject of Enteral Tube Feeding via Pump, revealed in part: Intent: It is the policy of the facility to provide enteral feeding as ordered by the physician via pump to ensure adequate nutrition for residents that are unable to maintain their nutrition orally. Procedure . 3. Label the enteral feeding bag/bottle, to include the tubing, with the following information: a. Resident's name and room # b. Type of formula (if using bags) c. Date and time formula is being hung d. Rate of administration Resident #85 Review of resident #85's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/13/2019 and a readmit date of 06/30/2021 with diagnoses that included in part hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 (#79, #120, #136, #139) out of 5 (#79, #120, #136, #139, #164) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure: 1. The oxygen concentrator and filter were clean and the nasal cannula was dated for Resident #79. 2. The respiratory supplies (oxygen mask and tubing for Resident ##139 and nebulizer mask and tubing for Resident #120, #136, and #139 were changed weekly, labeled with date and initials upon opening and stored in plastic bag between uses. Findings: Review of facility's Respiratory Therapy equipment policy dated April 2022 revealed in part: This procedure may involve potential/direct exposure to blood, body fluids, infectious disease, air containments, and hazardous chemicals. Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines to help prevent nosocomial infections associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs. The facility failed to provide the minimum required staffing hours for 3 of 27 weekend days during FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 1 2024. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31) revealed excessively low weekend staffing was triggered. Review of the facility's Staffing Pattern forms for weekends from FY Quarter 1 2024 revealed the facility: Provided 275.75 hours on 10/01/2023 and were required to provide 254.85 hours. Provided 375.38 hours on 10/21/2023 and were required to provide 378.35 hours. Provided 366.9 hours on 12/16/2023 and were required to provide 376 hours. During an interview on 06/06/2024 at 5:35 p.m. S13 Interim Administrator/Regional MDS (Minimum Data Set) confirmed the facility did not provide the minimum required hours on 10/01/2023, 10/21/2023, 12/16/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor for 2 (# 27, #106) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total 6 (#27, #67, #72, #78, #106, #175) residents reviewed. The facility failed to adequately monitor residents #27 and #106 for edema while on a diuretic, and resident #27 for bleeding and bruising while on an anticoagulant. Findings: Resident #27 Review of Resident #27's current Physician orders revealed in part: 6/4/2024 Monitor for abnormal bleeding or bruising every shift if + (positive) notify medical doctor or Nurse Practioner. 12/1/2023 Lasix Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligram) (Furosemide) Give one tablet by mouth one time a day related to Peripheral Vascular Disease, Check for Edema. 10/27/2023 Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 MG (Apixaban) Give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to Peripheral Vascular Disease Review of Resident #27's medical record failed to reveal monitoring for edema, bleeding and bruising. During an interview on 06/06/2024 at 4:45 p.m. S9 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed Resident #27's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee met at least quarterly. The failed practice had the potential to affect the 189 residents residing in the facility as documented by the facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form [CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)-671] dated 06/03/2024. Findings: Review of the QAA meeting information provided by the facility failed to reveal evidence of quarterly QAA meetings since the last annual survey on 06/08/2023. During an interview on 06/06/2024 at 5:30 p.m. S1 Administrator and S12 Regional Director of Clinical Operations acknowledged they could not provide documentation of quarterly QAA meetings since the last annual survey on 06/08/2023.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff practices were consistent with current infection control principles and practices to prevent cross contamination by failing to ensure staff used appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during resident care for 1 resident (#112) who was on contact isolation. 2. Ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained by failing to provide written evidence of implemented infection control policies and procedures for surveillance of tracking and trending of infections in the facility. This deificient practice had the potential to effect the total census was 189 according to the Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid Form dated 06/03/2024. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's contact isolation policy dated April 2022 revealed in part: In addition to standard precautions, contact precautions must be implemented for resident's known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure hallway hand rails were securely affixed to the walls. The facility failed to ensure hand rails were secure on 1 (Hall W) of 4 hallways in the building. This had to potential to affect 31 residents residing on Hall W. Findings: Review of the facility's Physical Environment Policy and Procedure dated 01/01/2023 revealed: It is the policy of the facility to provide care and services related to physical environment in accordance to State and Federal Regulation: The policy will include the Corridors have firmly secured handrails. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 12:50 p.m. revealed on Hall W near the exit door, the hand rail did not have an end cap on it leaving a sharp edge exposed with a crack in the hand rail. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 2:00 p.m. S4 CNA reported the hand rail on Hall W near the exit door had been broken for a couple of months. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 2:03 p.m. with S3 Maintenance Supervisor revealed on Hall W near the exit door, the hand rail did not have an end cap on it leaving a sharp…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (#178) of 2 (#178, #34) residents investigated for hospitalization. Findings: Review of Resident #178's record revealed a discharge date of 03/12/2024. Review of Resident #178's progress note dated 03/12/2024 revealed resident #178 was discharged to another long term care facility. Review of Resident #178's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178 was discharged to a short term general hospital. During an interview on 06/05/2024 at S10 RN (Registered Nurse)/MDS Director reviewed Resident #178's record and acknowledged Resident #178 was discharged to another long term care facility. S10 RN/MDS Director further acknowledged Resident #178's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #178 was discharged to the hospital and should have indicated Resident #178 was discharged to another long term care facility.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a medical doctor or representative was notified after a resident had a fall in the facility for 2 (#1, #2) of 2 (#1, #2) residents reviewed for falls. Findings: Resident #1 Record review of the facility's incident report dated 03/08/2024 failed to reveal a medical doctor or representative was notified of Resident #1's fall on 03/08/2024. During an interview on 03/26/2024 at 12:30 p.m., S1 Administrator verified she could not find any documentation the NP (Nurse Practitioner) or MD (Medical Doctor) were notified of Resident #1's fall on 03/08/2024 and should have been notified. Resident #2 Record review of the facility's incident report dated 03/09/2024 failed to reveal a medical doctor or representative was notified of Resident #2's fall on 03/09/2024. During an interview on 03/26/2024 at 11:55 p.m., S1 Administrator verified she could not find any documentation the NP or MD were notified of Resident #2's fall on 03/09/2024 and should have been notified. During a telephone interview on 03/26/24 at 12:10 p.m., S2 LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the Facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #9) of 13 (Residents #1, #2, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13) sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #9's Physician orders for March 2024 revealed the following order: Sacrum: Apply house barrier, every shift, every day, until resolved. Every shift for pressure injury. Created date was 02/07/2024. Review of Resident #9's comprehensive care plan revealed a plan with a focus of, Impaired skin integrity: Pressure injury noted to sacrum. Interventions: Notify Nurse Practitioner and/or Medical Doctor of decline noted to area being treated, skin checks to per company protocol, and treatment to area as ordered. Review of Resident #9's TAR (treatment administration record) for February 2024 revealed the following: 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. shift - Treatment not completed on February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were a sufficient number of personnel to provide care and respond to each Resident's basic needs. The facility failed to provide the minimum required staffing hours for 1 of 26 days reviewed during the month of February 2024. Findings: Review of the Facility's Staffing Pattern forms for February 4, 2024 to February 29, 2024 revealed the facility provided 384.57 hours on 02/24/2024 and were required to provide 397.15 hours. During an interview on 03/06/2024 at 4:05 p.m. S1 Assistant Administrator confirmed the facility did not provide the minimum required hours on 02/24/2024.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 (#1, #2) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents reviewed. Findings: Review of Resident #1's Medical Records revealed an admit date of 10/13/2023 from with the following diagnoses, in part: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, dysphagia following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, aphasia following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, encounter for attention to tracheostomy, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, essential hypertension, abnormalities of breathing, and acute upper respiratory infection Review of Resident #1's Physician Orders revealed: 10/13/2023: Trach: trach care every shift and as needed, suction every shift and as needed NPO (Nothing by mouth) diet Tube: peg tube .RN (Registered Nurse) to replace as needed for occlusion and dislodgement, check placement tube by aspiration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident received care and necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to follow up on Resident #1 identified skin issue and complete weekly skin checks for Resident #1. Findings: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Sets) revealed Resident #1 was admitted to facility on 10/13/2023 from a short-term general health hospital. Review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses on admit 10/13/2023 revealed a diagnoses but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, and aphasia following non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Review of S4 LPN's (Licensed Practical Nurse): Skin Evaluation dated 10/13/2023 at 7:57 p.m. revealed a skin issue: small open area to coccyx-purulent exudate, dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was developed and/or implemented for 6 (#32, #40, #73, #109, #125 and #130) of 6 residents reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure labs were obtained for resident #32 as ordered by the physician 2. The facility failed to ensure splint devices were used according to resident's plan of care for residents #40, #73, #109, #125 and #130. Findings: Resident #32 Review of the facility's Laboratory, Radiology and other Diagnostic Services Policy (reviewed in 11/2022) revealed in part: The facility will provide laboratory and diagnostic services to meet the needs of the residents in a timely manner. If facility does not provide laboratory services on-site; it shall have an agreement to obtain these services from a laboratory or radiology provider or supplier that is approved to provide these services under Medicare. It is the practice of this facility to provide laboratory or diagnostic services upon an order from a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to complete their (ADLs) activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain proper hygiene and grooming for 4 (#91, #5, #43, #79) of 7 (#32, #67, #5, #43, #91, #79, #111) residents reviewed for ADL. The facility failed to ensure Resident #91 received nails care and weekly skin assessments #5, #43, #79 received nail care #79 face was shaved Findings: Resident #91 Review of facility policy for Activity of Daily Living with a date of November 2022 revealed: Policy statement in part revealed Each resident shall receive, and this facility will provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident comprehensive assessment and care plan. Scope: Residents will be given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out the activities of daily living,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 4 (Residents #31, #22, #66, #132) of 4 sampled residents (Residents #31, #43, #79, #142) who received nutrition via a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube. There were 25 residents in the facility with orders for feeding via gastrostomy tube. The facility failed to: 1. Assure tolerance to feedings with gastric residual checks prior to restarting resident's daily feedings for residents #22, #66, and #132. 2. Ensure the water flush and feeding bags were labeled properly for residents #22, #66, and #132. 3. Ensure the tubing was covered to prevent contamination for resident #31. Findings: Review of facility's policy Gastrostomy, checking placement of Gastrostomy feeding tube policy dated 12/07/2017 revealed in part: To prevent aspiration and assure tolerance of feedings. -3. Place stethoscope over abdomen. Inject 30ml (milliliters) of air into the stomach; listen for a swish of air. -4. Slowly aspirate stomach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (#46) of 1 (#46) resident reviewed for dialysis by failing to communicate and collaborate with the dialysis facility as evidenced by completing dialysis pre/post evaluation form. Findings: Review of Electronic Scanning of Medical Records Policy (reviewed 03/04/2020) revealed: Policy statement revealed in part .Medical records will be maintained to reflect documentation of care and services for each resident. All documents must be uploaded into PCC (point click care) within 24 hours. Although the majority of the scanning is done by the Medical Records department, other departments listed below are responsible for scanning these documents into PCC. Nursing: dialysis return documentation Review of Resident #46's Medical Diagnoses revealed the following, but not limited to end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #46's June 2023 Physician Orders revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were transmitted within the required timeframe for 1 (#127) of 1 (#127) residents reviewed for assessments. Findings: Review of Resident #127's medical record revealed in part, Resident was admitted to facility on 01/06/2023 and left the facility AMA (Against Medical Advice) on 01/23/2023. Review of Resident #127's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments revealed the last transmitted MDS was an admission assessment dated [DATE]. Further review of Resident #127's MDS assessments failed to reveal a discharge MDS had been transmitted. During an interview on 06/06/2023 at 2:10 p.m. S12 MDS Nurse and S26 MDS Nurse reported a discharge MDS had not been transmitted for Resident #127 and should have been.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments were accurate for 1 (#141) out of 2 (#131, #141) residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility failed to enter an accurate discharge status for Resident #141. Findings: Review of resident #141's electronic medical record revealed an admission date of 3/9/2023 and a discharge date of 4/1/2023. Review of resident #141's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a (planned) discharge with a return not anticipated to an acute hospital. Review of resident #141's progress note dated 3/31/2023 at 12:11 p.m. revealed resident is being discharged on 4/1/2023 home with wife. Review of resident #141's Discharge Summary by S28 Nurse Practitioner dated 3/31/2023 revealed chief complaint: discharge to home on 4/1/2023. During an interview on 6/7/2023 at 9:25 a.m. S29 MDS nurse confirmed Resident #141 was discharged home on 4/1/2023. S29 MDS confirmed Resident #141's MDS was coded inaccurately.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of the bladder received appropriate treatment to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (#7) of 1 (#7) residents reviewed. The facility failed to position resident #7's catheter bag above the floor. Findings: Review of the facility's Urinary Catheter Care, Anchoring and Changing Policy revealed the following: Standard of Practice #16: Secure Foley catheter drainage bag below level of bladder and above the floor. Review of the facility's Catheter Insertion Policy revealed the following: Standard of Practice #23: .Keep drainage system off the floor. Review of resident #7's electronic medical record revealed an admit date of 12/10/2019 with diagnoses of but not limited to toxic encephalopathy, history of sepsis and urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes, quadriplegia, essential hypertension and convulsions. Observation on 06/07/2023 at 8:30 a.m. with S13 LPN (licensed practical nurse) revealed resident #7's catheter bag lying on the floor with cloudy yellow urine noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure the state Adverse Action Website checks were completed at time of hire and then monthly for 5 [S15 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), S16 CNA, S17 CNA, S18 CNA, S19 CNA] of 5 employees whose personnel files were reviewed. Findings: Review of S15 Contract CNA's personnel file revealed the first day of work in the facility was 05/27/2023. Further review of S15 Contract CNA's personnel file failed to reveal the State Adverse Action website check performed prior to first day worked in the facility. Review of S16 CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 02/23/2022. Further review of S16 CNA's personnel file revealed no State Adverse Actions checks were completed. Review of S17 CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/21/2022. Further review of S17 CNA's personnel file revealed no State Adverse Actions checks were completed. Review of S18 CNA's personnel file revealed a hire date of 04/15/2020. Further review of S18 CNA's personnel file revealed no Stage Adverse Actions checks were completed. Review of S19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received required in-service training for 1 [S15 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)] of 5 employees whose personnel files were reviewed. Findings: Review of S15 Contract CNA's personnel file revealed the first day of work in the facility was 05/27/2023. Further review of S15 Contract CNA's personnel file failed to reveal S15 had received required dementia training. During an interview on 06/07/2023 at 3:15 p.m. S2 DON confirmed S15 Contract CNA had not completed the required dementia training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$294,723 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $59,163 — penalty dated 2025-12-04
  • $235,560 — penalty dated 2025-02-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WELLINGTON HEALTHCARE SERVICES LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/31/2007
ANDWELL INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/10/2012
ANDREWS, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/10/2012
BAILEY, TERESAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2023
KELMAN, MOSHEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2023
ELKINS ROAD ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/31/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 8%Other / private 9%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$272per resident / day
operating cost
$8,254per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next