Cambridge Post Acute Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 138.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments were completed to ensure communication with the dialysis facility for one of two residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for dialysis of 32 sample residents. This failure had the potential to lead to uncommunicated and unassessed changes or complications for R10 and other residents receiving dialysis.Findings include:Review of the undated facility's policy titled, DIALYSIS, revealed Post Dialysis Monitoring: 1. Licensed nurse to obtain . Blood Pressure . Pulse . Presence/Absence of Bruit/Thrill as indicated . Licensed nurse will monitor for Signs/Symptoms of fluid overload/deficit . Dizziness . Neck vein distention . Remove pressure dressing from the shunt/fistula site upon return from Dialysis as indicated . Review of R10's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during wound treatment for one of two residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for pressure ulcers and failed to follow infection prevention measures when an indwelling urinary catheter bag was placed on the floor for one of two residents (R10) reviewed for catheters of 32 sample residents. These failures had the potential to cause infections in the wound and the urinary tract for R10.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dressings Non-Sterile, dated June 2025, revealed The purpose of this procedure are to provide guidelines for sterile dressing changes to protect wounds from injury and to prevent the introduction of bacteria . 20. Cleanse the wound. Use separate gauze for each cleansing stroke. Clean from the most contaminated area to the least contaminated area.Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated June 2025, revealed The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, the facility failed treat one of 9 sampled residents (R) (R9) in a dignified manner. Findings included:During an observation on 2/4/2026 at 1:15 pm, R9 was observed at the nurses' station in her self propelling in her wheelchair. The resident was verbalizing that she had to use the bathroom. As R9 proceeded to self-propel her wheelchair towards the A Hall, Certificed Nursing Assistant (CNA) AA approached R9 from behind her wheelchair, stopping the wheelchair and requesting to help move R9 in another direction. At that time, R9 pointed down the hall and stated, No. I am going that way. CNA AA told R9, No, you don't need to go down there. R9's tone elevated, and she began to hit the arm of her wheelchair, stating, No, no, no, no. I want to go that way, pointing towards A Hall. Staff AA grabbed the handles of R9's wheelchair and backed her up against the wall across from the nurses' station and locked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care of Central Venous Catheters including provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC Lines), the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to one of 10 sampled residents (R) (RB). Specifically, PICC line dressing protocol was not followed, a chest x-ray was not ordered or performed and the PICC line was used without confirmation of placement, and dressing changes were not done according to facility policy and physician's orders.Findings include:Review of facility's policy titled, Care of Central Venous Catheters including Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC Lines) revealed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 8. Change central line catheter site dressing every week transparent dressing (or as ordered by physician). Change central line catheter site dressing Q48 (every 48 hours) hours with gauze dressing (or as ordered by physician)Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Delivery Expectations-Nurses, the facility failed to keep one of six residents (R) (RB) free from significant medication error.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Delivery Expectations-Nurses last revised June 2025 documented under Protocol: .8. Notify the physician if medication will be given late or obtain an alternative order or different start time, if appropriate.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed RB was admitted with diagnoses of but not limited to intraspinal abscess and granuloma, infection following a procedure, candidiasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, depression, and muscle weakness.Review of RB's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive deficits.Review of the care plans for RB revealed the care plan was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Infection Control and Dressings, Non-Sterile, the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions and consistent hand hygiene when providing wound care for two of 16 residents (R) (R4 and R15) receiving wound treatment. The deficient practice had the potential of transmission of communicable diseases and infections.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control dated June 2025 revealed in Section Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): .4.b. All residents with any of the following conditions should use enhanced barrier precautions.2) Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central line, urinary catheter.) regardless of MDRO (multi drug resistant organisms) colonization status who reside on a unit.c. During high-contact resident care activities:1) Dressing 2) Bathing/showering 3) Transferring 4) Providing hygiene 5) Changing linens 6)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Giving a Bed bath, the facility failed to ensure residents' basins, urinals, and bedpans were labeled and covered for 11 of 69 shared rooms (D2, D5, D18, D16, C9, C15, B16, B5, A15, A5, and A11). These failures had the potential to expose patients to infections due to cross-contamination. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Giving a Bed bath, dated April 2022 under the section titled Steps in the Procedure revealed, 23. Clean washbasins, be sure the resident's name is written on the wash basin, place in a clean plastic bag and store it in the resident's bathroom, closet or nightstand and return any other supplies to designated storage areas. Observation of rooms on halls A, B, C, and D with the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) on 2/9/2024 from 4:40 pm through 5:05 pm revealed the following: Room D2, bathroom, shared by two residents, revealed two basins in a clear plastic bag. Neither of the basins was labeled with a resident name. Room D5, a bathroom shared by two residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medication Program, the facility failed to ensure that three of 56 residents (R) (R45, R113, and R432) did not have unauthorized and unsecured medications at the bedside. This failure created the potential for medication errors and unauthorized access to medications by other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication Program, revealed under the Policy statement, It is the policy of the facility to allow the resident and or legal representative of that resident the right to self-administer medication when it has been deemed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) that it is clinically appropriate. Under the section titled Procedure revealed, (5) If a resident request to self-administer drugs, it is the responsibility of the IDT to determine it is safe for the resident to self-administer drugs, before the resident may…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two out of 56 residents (R) (R35 and R6). Specifically, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for R35 related to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aures (MRSA) and R6 related to oxygen therapy. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated January 2023 under the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 1. An interdisciplinary team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative, would develop and maintain a Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident. 2. The Comprehensive Care Plan has been designed to: (a) Incorporate identified problem areas; (b) Incorporate risk factors associated with the identified problems .4. Care plans are revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate. Reviews are made at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Safety, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R) (R6) was administered oxygen therapy in accordance with the physician order and to ensure that the oxygen concentrators' filters remained clean for three residents (R98, R64, and R105) out of 19 residents receiving respiratory treatments. This deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk for increased respiratory infections, medical complications and potentially life-threatening complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Safety, dated April 2022 under the section titled Oxygen Administration revealed, 1. Oxygen therapy is administered to the resident only upon the written order of a licensed physician. 1. Review of the clinical records revealed R6 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to asthma, dependence of supplemental oxygen, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified bronchus or lung. Review of R6's clinical records revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,162 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $11,538 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $698K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA