Rockdale Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 97.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to update and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan related to unwitnessed falls for one resident (R) (R#306). The sample size was 35 residents. Findings include: Review of the Care Plan Policy reviewed October 25, 2022, revealed each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs, and strengths that will identify how the facility staff will provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Standard of Practice: Number 1: Each resident will be assessed by the interdisciplinary team on admission, quarterly, annually, and with a significant change in status. Number 12. The plan of care is to be reviewed and updated as necessary at the completion of every assessment by the interdisciplinary team and resident representatives party if so desired. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure proper assessment and followup for one resident (R) (R#306) post fall on 1/20/2023. Specifically, facility failed to complete a fall assessment after an unwitnessed fall, failed to complete neuro-checks on 1/20/2023, and failed to provide Radiology services in a timely manner. Actual harm was identified on 1/23/2023 when resident was transferred to the hospital with continued pain. Computerized tomography (CT) of the head indicated chronic right posterior parietal lobe subdural hematoma. The sample size was 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Fall Prevention Protocol Policy revised 10/18/2021 revealed Action number 4. After an incident of a fall: a. Complete the Post Fall Risk Assessment (electronic medical record-EMR); b. Notify Medical Doctor (MD) and Resident Representative. c. Start Neuro check if there is a suspected head injury or for an unwitnessed fall as per facility protocol. d.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-06-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interview, and review of the policy titled Pain Management - Acute and Chronic, the facility failed to manage pain for one resident (R) (R#306) after a fall. Actual harm occurred on 1/20/2023 when R#306 had an unwitnessed fall, hitting his head, with complaints of pain in bilateral hips and back. Resident was transferred to hospital on 1/23/2023 with continued pain. Computerized tomography (CT) of the head without contrast indicated chronic right posterior parietal lobe subdural hematoma. The sample size was 35 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pain Management - Acute and Chronic reviewed November 2022 revealed the facility will have an effective pain recognition and management that is on-going and committed to resident's comfort, identifying, and addressing barriers to managing pain and addressing any misconceptions that the residents, family, and staff may have about managing pain. Review of the clinical record revealed resident was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review,staff interviews and a review of the facility policy title Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response and Care Plan-Comprehensive, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate care plan interventions were developed and implemented to meet the needs of two of three residents care plan reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to develop post fall interventions for one Resident (R1) following three separate falls. In addition, the facility failed to implement and establish care plan interventions for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for R3.Review of the policy titled Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, dated 05/2026. Purpose: To ensure a safe environment for all residents by implementing a proactive and systematic approach to preventing accidents and incidents in accordance with federal regulations, facility policies, and resident-centered care principles. D. Corrective Actions and Prevention: Develop and implement interventions based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, including a review of the Certified Medication Aide job description, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were maintained with one of three sampled Resident (R) (R2) during a scheduled medication pass. Specifically, the Certified Medication Aide (CMA) DD failed to maintain direct visual observation during the medication administration process, resulting in the resident being discovered holding a white pill that was actively dissolving in their hand. Findings include: A review of the Certified Medication Aide job description revealed: observe and verify that medication is ingested as directed. Review of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 4/29/2026 with diagnoses of but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, family and staff interviews, record review and a review of the facility's policy titled Accommodation Of Needs the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) for one resident (R) (R3) out of three dependent on staff for care.Findings include:Review of the policy titled Accommodation Of Needs, dated 12/2025. Policy: Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being. Procedure: 1. The resident's individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, staff attitudes and behaviors are directed towards assisting the residents in accordance with the residents' wishes. B. Arranging toiletries and personal items so that they are in easy reach of the resident.Review of the document titled Grievance/Complaint Form dated 04/15/2026 revealed the family of R3 filed a grievance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy titled Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, the facility failed to ensure that an environment free from accident hazards was maintained, and failed to provide adequate supervision and sufficient individualized interventions to prevent accidents for one Resident (R) (R1) who was identified as a high risk for falls and a history of recurrent falls. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement effective post-fall safety interventions following three separate falls sustained by R1 resulting in a major injury including a lumbar two (L2) compression fracture and a left distal femur fracture.Findings include: Review of the policy titled Accident and Incident Prevention, Reporting, and Response, dated 05/2026. Purpose: To ensure a safe environment for all residents by minimizing accident hazards, providing adequate supervision and assistive devices, and implementing a proactive and systematic approach to preventing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives, the facility failed to ensure the Advance Directive status was consistently documented in the clinical record for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R71). This deficient practice had the potential to place R71 at risk of not receiving life-sustaining treatment in accordance with the resident's wishes. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives dated 7/2025 documented Policy: A resident's choice about Advance Directives will be respected. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3b; Do Not Resuscitate-Indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident, legal guardian, health-care proxy, or representative have directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other life-saving methods are to be used.Review of the admission Record for R71 revealed R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents were allowed to receive mail/packages without staff opening and obtaining copies of the documents without the resident's/resident's representative's permission for one of 14 Residents (R) (R3) interviewed about receiving mail unopened.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Mail, dated 11/2017, revealed, . residents are allowed to communicate privately with the persons of their choice and may send and receive their personal mail unopened unless otherwise advised by the attending physician or resident and documented in the residents' medical records . Review of R3's admission Packet, signed by the resident on 2/6/2024, revealed under the section titled Mail that the resident shall be afforded reasonable privacy in communications, including the timely sending and receiving of mail and electronic communications.Review of R3's Diag (Diagnosis) tab of the EMR revealed R3 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction and slurred speech.Review of R3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy titled, Discharging/Transferring the Resident, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party on the day the resident was discharged and transported out of the facility for one of three Residents (R) (R7) reviewed for discharge out of a total sample of 20.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharging/Transferring the Resident, dated 6/2025, revealed it was the facility's policy to notify the responsible party of the transfer or discharge.Review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/19/2025 and located in the Aspen MDS Viewer, revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, dementia, and aphasia.Review of R7's Progress Note, dated 6/10/2025 at 4:39 pm and located under the Progress Notes tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a progress note written by the previous Social Worker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation or Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from verbal/mental abuse for one of eight Residents (R) (R) (R11) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 20.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation or Misappropriation of Property, dated 8/22/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility that each resident be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, and mistreatment of any kind. Under the Definitions section of the policy, it defined mental abuse as the use of verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation.Review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/7/2025 and located in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation or Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal/mental abuse to the State Survey Agency within two hours after the allegation was made for one of eight Residents (R) (R11) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 20.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation or Misappropriation of Property, dated 8/22/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility that each resident be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, and mistreatment of any kind. The policy indicated abuse is to be reported to the Administrator and the State Survey Agency within two hours of the allegation being made.Review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/7/2025 and located in the ASPEN MDS Viewer, revealed R11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. It…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, or Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for two of eight Residents (R) (R1 and R14) reviewed for a total sample of 20. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, or Misappropriation of Property, dated 8/22/2022, revealed it was the policy of the facility to ensure all suspected cases of abuse be fully investigated by the Administrator, Abuse Coordinator, or designee. Under the investigation section of the policy, it stated to . Interview all associates, residents, and family members involved . 1. Review of R1's admission tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, mental disorder, depression, muscle weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WELLINGTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $623K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA