Serenity Spring Senior Living At Northwood
2515 Newton St, Jasper, IN 47547 · For profit - Corporation · 107 certified beds · (812) 482-1722 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.5% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.4% | 25.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.7% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.7% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.9% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.4% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.44 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 23.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.6%CMS range 38.4–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.5–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 23.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 23.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 10.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 4.6–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 73.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Care plan interventions were not followed or updated after falls, and one random observation of a treatment cart containing prescription medication was observed left unlocked and unattended. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 44 having 9 falls in 11 months resulting in three fractures. (Resident 44, Resident 28, Treatment Cart) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 2/1/23 at 9:21 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 73 indicated Resident 44 falls a lot. Resident's bed was observed in low position against the wall, with padded mat rolled up and stacked against the head of the bed. Resident was out of her room. On 2/2/23, Resident 44's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, type 2 diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 3 of 6 unit halls and common resident spaces. The 100 unit hall temperature was 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the Garden Ridge unit hall was 64 degrees F, and the Cedar point unit hall was 69 degrees F. (100 unit, Garden Ridge unit, Cedar Pointe unit, Resident B, Resident D). Finding includes:During a record review on 4/6/26 at 11:30 A.M., minutes from a Resident Council meeting on 2/17/26 mentioned facility temperature levels as a topic of concern. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 2:50 P.M., Resident B indicted the Garden Ridge unit temperature was cool.During an observation on 4/6/26 at 3:00 P.M., the Garden Ridge unit hallway thermostat read 65 degrees F. During an observation on 4/7/26 at 9:25 A.M., the Gardent Ridge unit hallways thermostat read 64 degrees F. On 4/7/26 at 9:30 A.M., the 100 unit hallway thermostat read 70 degrees F. on 4/7/26 at 10:50 A.M., the Cedar Ponite unit hallway thermostat read 68 degrees F. On 4/7/26 at 11:20 A.M. Resident D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions to prevent falls were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. A resident with a history of falls did not have specific interventions to prevent further falls in place according to the plan of care. (Resident C) Finding includes:During record review on 4/6/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Resident C's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/27/26, indicated the resident was alert and oriented, had upper and lower extremity impairments to both sides, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, and had two or more falls since the previous assessment. Resident C's care plan included, but was not limited to, resident is at risk for falls (last revised 1/12/26). Interventions included but were not limited to park wheelchair outside of room to maximize space and safety (initiated 8/25/25) and fall mat to be place beside left side of bed when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were held for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 11, Resident 44) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 8:20 A.M., Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to anxiety, osteoporosis, depression, and early-onset cerebellar ataxia (a neurological disorder that primarily affects the cerebellum, a part of the brain responsible for coordinating movement and balance). The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/20/25, indicated Resident 6 was cognitively intact. Resident 6's clinical record was reviewed for care plan conferences in the last year and lacked documentation of a care plan conference between 5/10/24 and 2/7/25. 2. On 6/11/25 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, and dementia with behaviors. The most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/19/25, indicated Resident 7 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notification to family/resident representative with a change in resident condition for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. Family/resident representatives were not notified following falls. (Resident 39, Resident 43, Resident 52, Resident 56) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 2:33 P.M., Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/9/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment and two or more falls since the previous assessment. A Health Status note, dated 3/27/25 at 3:04 P.M., indicated Resident 39 stood up from a wheelchair on his own, lost his balance, and fell on the right shoulder. The note lacked documentation that the family or resident representative was notified of the fall. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note, dated 3/28/25 at 10:06 A.M., indicated they reviewed the fall and interventions, but lacked documentation that the family or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. Complete and thorough assessments were lacking after each fall, care plans were not updated with each fall, current interventions were not in place to at times of falls and a comprehensive review of all falls was not completed. (Resident 39, Resident 43, Resident 52, Resident 56) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 2:33 P.M., Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/9/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and two or more falls since the previous assessment. Resident 39 required supervision or touching assistance with eating and bed mobility, substantial to maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with transfers, and was totally dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. Current physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a required notice to a resident being discharged from Medicare services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. No record of a SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notification) notice was available that indicated the resident was notified of a discharge from Medicare services with days remaining prior to the resident's discharge from the facility. (Resident 75) Finding includes: On 6/9/25 at 10:00 A.M., Resident 75's discharge from Medicare services was reviewed. Resident 75 was discharged from Medicare services on 2/24/25 when benefit days were not exhausted. Resident 75 discharged from the facility on 2/24/25. A copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notice was not provided. On 6/9/25 at 11:30 A.M., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notice was provided to Resident 75, but the facility lacked documentation in the clinical record that the resident was notified. On 6/9/25 at 11:35 A.M., the SSD supplied a copy of a SNF Beneficiary Notice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. A resident was given an antipsychotic without a physician's order and a gradual dose reduction (GDR) wasn't done for a resident taking an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication. (Resident 39, Resident 6) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 2:33 P.M., Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/9/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment, and use of an antipsychotic medication. Physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Haldol (an antipsychotic medication) Injection Solution 5 MG (milligram)/ML (milliliter) Inject 5 mg intramuscularly every 6 hours as needed, ordered 11/25/24 and discontinued 12/2/24 at 3:18 P.M. Haloperidol Lactate (Haldol) Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML Give 0.25 ml by mouth two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents observed for incontinence care. Hand hygiene was not completed between glove changes, staff washed hands with less then 15 second lather, an incontinence pad was held between the bed and the staff's knees (with the inside of the incontinence pad against her scrub pants), staff left a visibly soiled incontinence pad on a resident after toileting him, and residents were not offered to wash their hands after toileting. (Resident 7, Resident 45, Resident 6) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 8:51 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 7 was observed to provide toileting assistance to Resident 56. Prior to assisting the resident on the toilet, QMA 7 washed her hands for 9 seconds, then put on gloves. The resident was assisted to sit on the toilet. The inside of the resident's brief was visibly wet and bulging with brown spots on the inside of it. When the resident was finished…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer or discharge was given to residents or resident representatives for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The transfer or discharge notice was not completed and clinical records lacked documentation of residents/representatives receiving a notice of transfer or discharge at the time of the hospitalizations. (Resident 38, Resident 52, Resident 46, Resident 43, Resident 15) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 38's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/23/24, indicated Resident 38's cognition was severely impaired and she was an extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Progress notes included, but were not limited to, the following: On 1/30/24 at 3:31 A.M., Nurse's Note: At 0300 [3:00 A.M.] this nurse and CNA [certified nurse aide] heard a thump and got up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold form and policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The bed hold form was not completed and clinical records lacked documentation of residents/representatives receiving a bed hold form and policy at the time of the hospitalizations. (Resident 38, Resident 52, Resident 46, Resident 43) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 38's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to dementia. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/23/24, indicated Resident 38's cognition was severely impaired and she was an extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Progress notes included, but were not limited to, the following: On 1/30/24, Nurse's Note: At 0300 [3:00 A.M.] this nurse and CNA [certified nurse aide] heard a thump and got up to check what sound was and found res. [resident] setting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessments for 14 of 26 resident records reviewed during the survey. MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments did not accurately reflect resident status. (Resident 52, Resident 38, Resident 12, Resident 35, Resident 36, Resident 41, Resident 19, Resident 17, Resident 19, Resident 43, Resident 48, Resident 5, Resident 53) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 10:49 A.M., Resident 36's room was observed. The bed was observed equipped with small grab bars. On 5/16/24 at 1:52 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease. The most recent Annual MDS Assessment, dated 3/14/24, indicated use of physical restraints in the form of bed rails. Resident 36's clinical record lacked a current physician order for bed rails. Resident 36's clinical record lacked a current care plan related to bed rails. A Physical Device and/or Restraint Evaluation and Review form, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with resident specific needs for 4 of 22 residents reviewed for care plan development and implementation. Resident on hospice did not have a care plan for hospice, resident did not have a care plan for eating meals at a bedside table in the main dining room, residents that were taking an antianxiety, diuretic, and antidepressant did not have care plans for use. (Resident 19, Resident 5, Resident 48, Resident 45) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 1:41 P.M., Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and atherosclerotic heart disease The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/10/24, indicated Resident 19 was cognitively intact, an extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and was on hospice. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Admit to [name of hospice company] with diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease (ASHD),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had care plan conferences and care plans were revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident moved out of the locked dementia unit and a resident's sleep medication was changed but the care plans were not revised. Residents did not have care plan conferences timely. (Resident 38, Resident 12, Resident 5, Resident 48) Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 11:27 A.M., Resident 38 was observed waiting for lunch in the main dining room. On 5/14/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 38's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behaviors. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/23/24 indicated Resident 38's cognition was severely impaired and she was an extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. A current Dementia Care Plan, revised 10/13/23, included, but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. A resident had a Physician's Order for an antipsychotic with an unacceptable diagnosis. (Resident 45, Resident 3, Resident 14, Resident 19, Resident 48) Findings include: 1. On 5/15/24 at 8:59 A.M., Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia and muscle weakness. The most recent Quarterly and State Option Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/26/24, indicated Resident 48's cognition was unable to be assessed, and she received an antipsychotic. Current Physician Order's included, but were not limited to, SEROquel [antipsychotic] Oral Tablet 25 MG [milligrams] .Give 25 mg by mouth one time a day related to DEMENTIA IN OTHER DISEASES CLASSIFIED ELSEWHERE, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medications for 3 of 4 medication carts observed and 1 of 3 medication storage rooms observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication carts, and refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out completely in the medication room. Findings include: 1. On 5/17/24 at 8:44 A.M., the medication cart on the PARF (Therapy to Home) Hall was reviewed. The medication cart was observed with the following loose pills in the drawers: 1 small oval white pill At that time, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 19 indicated nurses on nights were supposed to go through the medication cart to make sure it was clean. She indicated she did it when she was here also. Pharmacy came once a month to review the carts. On 5/17/24 at 9:50 A.M., 300 Hall medication cart was reviewed. The medication cart was observed with the following loose pills in the drawers: 1 oblong white pill with L484 on one side 1 small oval white pill with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure distribution and food service was provided in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 meals observed, and 1 of 1 meal services observed in the kitchen. (Main Kitchen, Locked Unit Dining Room) Findings include: During a lunch observation on 5/13/24 from 11:56 A.M. through 12:02 P.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 3 was observed taking cookies out of the packaging with bare hands, and placing on the food trays to serve to the residents. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 was observed to also touch cookies with bare hands before serving to residents. On 5/16/24 at 10:36 A.M., a meal service was being observed in the kitchen. While preparing the cups and utensils, Dietary Aide 21 was observed transferring coffee mugs with bare hands to the trays touching the insides of the mugs. Dietary Aide 21 was also observed touching the inside lids of the handled cups with bare hands before filling them with drinks. On 5/16/24 at 2:49 P.M., the Kitchen Manager indicated staff was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly document influenza and pneumococcal vaccines being offered to residents for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. Clinical records lacked the vaccine consent/refusal date, the reason why it was refused, and a date education was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. (Resident 19, Resident 4, Resident 36) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 1:41 P.M., Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and atherosclerotic heart disease. The most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 4/10/24, indicated resident was cognitively intact. Resident 19 was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 19's immunization history was reviewed for his influenza and pneumonia vaccination status. The following vaccination lacked documentation of a refusal date, the reason why it was refused, and a date education was provided to the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 2 of 5 halls observed, and 1 of 1 common area observed. (Locked Unit, room [ROOM NUMBER] ) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 11:02 A.M., the bathroom vent in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed caked with dust. On 5/20/24 at 8:07 A.M., the same was observed. 2. On 5/14/24 at 11:12 A.M., the bathroom vent in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed caked with dust, and an unlabeled tube of zinc oxide was observed on the back of the toilet. The back of the room door was observed with a metal strip coming away from the door. On 5/20/24 at 8:15 A.M., the same was observed. 3. On 5/14/24 at 11:06 A.M., the bathroom door of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with scuff marks, chipping away at the door, and the room floor was sticky. On 5/20/24 at 8:14 A.M., the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was the same. The floor was not sticky. 4. On 5/14/24 at 10:49 A.M., the grab bar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 2 random observations. A staff member was observed standing while assisting to feed a resident, and a staff member walked away from a resident with visible urine under her chair. (Resident 27, Resident 48) Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 12:02 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5 was observed standing next to Resident 27 while assisting to feed the resident. 2. During an observation on 5/13/24 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 48 was observed eating in the dining room with a large wet spot under her wheelchair. On 5/13/24 at 11:28 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14 sat Resident 48's meal tray in front of her and walked away. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 11:34 A.M., LPN 14 indicated the wet spot was urine. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 4:14 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated if a resident was observed with a wet spot under their wheelchair that she would expect staff to bring the resident back to their room and provide care, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide services based on resident preferences for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. The facility failed to provide ice water to one resident when requested. (Resident 45) Findings include: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 9:39 A.M., Resident 45 indicated she didn't get water unless she asked. During an observation on 5/15/24 at 1:37 P.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 38 assisted Resident 45 from the commode to her recliner. CNA 38 put the bedside table in front of Resident 45 explaining where her cup of lemonade and box of Kleenex were located. She told Resident 45 her water cup only had a small amount of water in it and asked if she would like the cup filled up. Resident 45 told her yes. During an observation on 5/15/24 at 3:16 P.M., Resident 45's water cup had not been filled up. On 5/14/24 at 1:54 P.M., Resident 45's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to macular degeneration, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, Sjogren's Syndrome. The most current Quarterly, State Optional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify a Resident's code status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. A Resident's current Physician Orders did not match the signed DO NOT RESUSCITATE DECLARATION AND ORDER form. A Resident had a care plan for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) and CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). (Resident 18) Finding includes: On [DATE] at 10:00 A.M., Resident 18's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but was not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis and diabetes mellitus. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 18 was cognitively intact. Current Physician's orders included, but was not limited to, ADVANCE DIRECTIVE: Resuscitate (CPR), start date [DATE]. A STATE OF INDIANA OUT OF HOSPITAL DO NOT RESUSCITATE DECLARATION ORDER, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 18 requested to be a DNR and the form was signed by the Physician on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident right to be free of a physical restraint for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for physical restraints. A bed rail was used as a physical restraint. (Resident 12) Findings include: During an observation on 5/13/24 at 1:54 P.M., Resident 12 was observed in bed with 2 black bed rails that were attached at the top of the mattress 1/3 of the length of the bed. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 2:41 P.M., Resident 12's family member indicated the bed rails were put into place to keep her in bed since she had multiple falls. During an observation on 5/16/24 9:31 A.M., Resident 12 was observed in bed with bed rails up. At that time, she indicated the bed rails are there to keep her from falling out of bed. On 5/15/24 at 2:28 P.M., Resident 12's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. The most recent Quarterly and State Optional Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/30/24 indicated Resident 12 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) physically removed the resident's fingers and hand from the stand aide lift. (Resident 4) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/13/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 4 indicated on 5/4/24 CNA 53 ordered her to do things in an abusive tone and the CNA pulled her fingers one by one off of the sit to stand lift. On 5/13/24 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and depression. The most recent Annual (Minimum Data Set Assessment), dated 12/28/23, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact and required assistance with transfers. Current Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to, Activity level: up with assist, dated 10/4/13. Current care plans included, but were not limited to, The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care performance deficit R/T [related to] .decreased mobility, stress incontinence, Cerebellar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) physically removed the resident's fingers and hand from the stand aide lift. (Resident 4) Finding includes: During an interview on 5/13/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 4 indicated on 5/4/24 CNA 53 ordered her to do things in an abusive tone and CNA 53 pulled her fingers one by one off of the sit to stand lift. On 5/13/24 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and depression. The most recent Annual (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/28/23, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact and required assistance with transfers. Current Physician's Orders included, but was not limited to, Activity level: up with assist, dated 10/4/13. Current care plans included, but were not limited to, The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care performance deficit R/T [related to] .decreased mobility, stress incontinence,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. Neurological checks were not completed after a fall, new interventions were not put into place after falls, and interventions on care plans were not followed for residents at risk for falls resulting in multiple falls. (Resident 38, Resident 52) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 9:00 A.M., non-skid strips were not observed on the floor in front of the toilet in Resident 38's bathroom. On 5/14/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 38's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 4/23/24 indicated Resident 38's cognition was severely impaired, she was an extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and had 1 fall since the last MDS Assessment which was a Quarterly Assessment completed on 1/25/24. A current Risk for Falls Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received services and assistance to prevent and treat urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for UTIs. A resident with recurrent UTIs was not treated appropriately, and incontinence care provided lacked appropriate infection control practices to prevent infection. (Resident 36) Finding includes: On 5/14/24 at 2:38 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease and dementia. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/14/24, indicated no cognitive impairment, no toileting program, and a UTI in the previous 30 days. Resident 36 was frequently incontinent of bladder, and required extensive assistance of one staff with toileting. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: UTI-Stat Oral Liquid 30ml (milliliters) one time a day for urinary health, dated 5/21/23. Allergies included, but were not limited to, ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic). A current urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 5/15/24 at 1:58 P.M., Resident 28's oxygen filter on the side of the oxygen machine was observed to be caked with dust. Resident 28 was sitting in his recliner wearing O2 per nasal cannula at 2 lpm with gauze on the tubing to protect his ears. On 5/16/24 at 9:11 A.M., Resident 28 was observed sitting in his recliner with O2 on at 2 lpm per nasal cannula. The filter on the side of the oxygen machine remains dusty. On 5/15/24 at 2:49 P.M., Resident 28's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most current Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment and State Optional MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 28 was cognitively intact, required, extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and toilet use, limited assistance of one for transfers, and used oxygen. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to the following: Change out O2 tubing every Sunday night (Label with initials and date). Clean filter on the back of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 2 of 4 residents during observation of incontinence care and 1 of 3 observations of obtaining a blood sugar with a glucometer. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during peri care and staff cleaned a glucometer for an unmeasurable amount of time. (Resident 7, Resident 11, Resident 43). Findings include: 1. On 5/16/24 at 10:35 A.M., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 59 obtained a blood glucose level on Resident 43. After obtaining the blood glucose level, QMA 59 wiped the glucometer for an unmeasureable amount of time (less than 2 seconds) and placed the glucometer in the medication cart drawer. At that time, he indicated he typically lets the machine dry a minute. 2. On 5/20/24 at 10:04 A.M., incontinence care was performed on Resident 11 by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 10 and CNA 12. CNA 12 removed the soiled brief and applied cream to Resident 11's bottom, removed gloves, and placed new gloves on. CNA 12 failed to perform hand hygiene from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an abuse allegation to facility administration and to the state agency for 1 of 2 abuse allegations reviewed. Staff filed an abuse allegation as a grievance rather than immediately notifying the DON (Director of Nursing) or facility administrator, and the allegation was not reported to the state agency within the required 2 hour time frame. (Resident D) Finding includes: During a review of facility reported incidents on 12/12/23 at 11:00 A.M., an incident dated 11/27/23 included that Resident D stated, I had a terrible weekend because my aide (CNA 12) was horribly rude to me. She made me use the restroom by myself. She reminded me that she had other resident to care for and I would have to wait. (CNA 12) finally came to change me after an hour. I told (CNA 12) she should respect her elders and she replied I dont respect anyone. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 11:38 A.M., Resident D indicated a staff member had recently made her walk to the restroom by herself, even though she needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. During record review on 2/1/23 at 2:48 P.M., Resident 12 was [AGE] years old when admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed 3/26/21. Resident 12's most recent significant change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 12 had schizophrenia and received antipsychotics on a routine basis. Resident 12's current physician orders included, but were not limited to, Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Resident 12's assessments, behavior monitoring, and documentation of diagnosis criteria for schizoaffective disorder was requested, but not received. 5. During record review on 2/3/23 at 1:59 P.M., Resident 2 was [AGE] years old when admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed 7/28/22. Resident 2's most recent significant change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 during 1 random observation of staff entering a COVID-19 positive resident room, 3 of 5 resident observed for care, and 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Gloves were not changed from dirty to clean tasks, hands were not washed appropriately, staff was not appropriately wearing a face mask, staff did not sanitize hands prior to providing incontinence care, and staff did not sanitize hands prior to handling medications. (Resident B, Resident G, Resident K, Resident M, Resident J) Findings include: 1. On 2/2/23 at 10:32 A.M., CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) 88 was observed to assist Resident B with incontinence care and a shower. CNA 88 assisted Resident B to the shower room already wearing a pair of gloves. CNA 88 pulled the resident's pants and brief down around her ankles, and assisted her to sit on the toilet. After toileting, CNA 88 wiped the resident with 3 (three) wipes, pulled up the resident's brief and pants, put a new pair of gloves on, then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to for an incontinent resident in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for UTI (urinary tract infections). A resident with a UTI was observed incontinent of urine, and was not cleaned appropriately. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 2/1/23 at 1:46 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. The most recent significant change MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 12/10/22, indicated Resident B had a significant cognitive impairment, displayed no behaviors, and required extensive assistance of 2 (two) staff for toileting. The MDS indicated Resident B was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was not on a toileting program. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following orders: Keflex (an antibiotic) 500 mg (milligrams) ordered twice a day for 7 (seven) days for UTI, started 1/25/23 Current care plans included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with the professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to follow physician oxygenation orders and have an oxygen use care plan. (Resident 29, Resident 303) Finding include: 1. On 2/2/23 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 29 was observed sitting in a recliner in their room with their eyes closed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula with the machine set at 3 LPM (liters per minute). On 2/3/23 at 8:41 A.M., Resident 29 was observed sitting in a recliner in their room with eyes closed, head tilted to the right wearing oxygen per nasal cannula with the machine set at 3 LPM and humidification bottle empty. On 2/3/23 at 1:46 P.M., Resident 29 was observed sitting in a recliner in their room with eyes closed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula with the machine set at 3 LPM and humidification bottle empty. On 2/1/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a communication process with hospice personnel was developed and implemented, including how the communication will be documented between the LTC (long term care) facility and the hospice provider, and to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. The clinical record of Resident 41 lacked documentation of ongoing communication between facility staff and hospice staff. (Resident 41) Findings include: On 2/2/23 at 11:21 A.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus type II, dementia without behaviors, and cerebral ischemia. The most current significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/29/22, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and an extensive assist of 2 (two) staff for bed mobility and transfers. Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, admitted to (hospice company) with diagnosis of cerebral ischemia on 11/29/22, dated 12/6/22. The current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff COVID-19 vaccination medical exemptions specified a clinically recognized contraindication for 1 of 1 staff medical exemptions reviewed. (Staff 10) Finding includes: On 2/7/23 at 10:00 A.M., Staff 10's COVID-19 medical exemption was reviewed. The medical exemption, signed 6/7/22, indicated Staff 10 should not receive the COVID-19 vaccine related to family history of Guillian Barre after vaccine. During an interview on 2/6/23 at 3:05 P.M., the Administrator indicated that unvaccinated staff testing and precautions depend on the county rates of transmission of covid. On 1/30/23 at 10:34 A.M., the county rate for COVID-19 community transmission rate was high per the CDC COVID data tracker website. During an interview on 2/7/23 at 11:15 A.M., Staff 10 indicated they have a medical exemption for the COVID-19 vaccine because they had an aunt that passed away from Guillian Barre. They further indicated they have not tested for covid for awhile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing sheets were posted daily during the survey for 2 of 9 days reviewed during the survey process. Post nurse staffing was not updated over the weekend. (May 18, May 19) Finding includes: On 5/20/24 at 6:06 A.M., the posted nurse staffing sheet in the main lobby was dated 5/17/24. Staffing sheets were not completed for May 18, May 19. During an interview on 5/20/24 at 8:58 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated night shift is in charge of placing the posted nurse staffing sheet in the lobby, and it should be posted each day including Saturday's and Sunday's. On 5/16/24 at 3:17 P.M., the Dementia Care Director provided the Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy, revised July 2016 that indicated, Our facility will post, on a daily basis for each shift
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-02-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 6 of 6 days during the survey. Findings include: On 1/30/23 at 1:17 P.M., a staffing sheet was observed to be posted in the front lobby of the facility. The staffing sheet indicated the date, total census, number of staff and total hours for the following disciplines: Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Qualified Medication Aide (QMA), and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Specific number of staff and exact hours worked were not included in the posting. On 2/7/23 at 9:20 A.M., staff posting sheets were provided for the following dates: 1/30/23 1/31/23 2/1/23 2/2/23 2/3/23 2/4/23 2/5/23 2/6/23 2/7/23 Each staff posting sheet indicated the date, total census, number of staff and total hours for the following disciplines: Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Qualified Medication Aide (QMA), and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA). Specific number of staff and exact hours worked were not included in the posting. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| REETZ, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2014 |
| GREENE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2014 |
| JASPER SNF OPCO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/03/2024 |
| MEADOWS, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/12/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $504K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155282. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.