No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Oaks Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

333 Newtown Road, Warminster, PA 18974 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (215) 672-9082 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 672-9082 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607, F0610) — most recent Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$35,175 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,175 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-24)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
225 Newtown Road, Main Building, 2nd Floor
Pharmacy
30000 Anns Choice Way · (215) 674-5050 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.4 mi
260 East Street Road
Park
75 Downey Dr · (215) 672-0610 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.6%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.5%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.9%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.2%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.161.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.181.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.9%CMS range 26.9–47.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.7–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.3–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
30.3%
Total nursing turnover
4.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 153.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to communicate to the resident's physician assistant the refusal of a prophylactic anticoagulant medication for one of eight residents reviewed. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R86 who missed nine doses of an anticoagulant medication and development of Deep Venous Thrombosis. (Resident R86) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Documentation of Medication Administration dated October 20, 2023, revealed that A nurse shall document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). Documentation must include, as minimum: name and strength of drug, dosage, method of administration, date and time of administration, reasons why a medication was withheld, not administered, or refused, and signature and title of person administering the medication. Review of facility policy titled Requesting, Refusing and /or Discontinuing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, interviews with staff and review of policies and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a benzodiazepine medication was administered as ordered by the physician which resulted in actual harm to Resident R3, who experienced a tonic clonic seizure and was diagnosed with a closed head injury and left frontal scalp hematoma for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R3) Findings include: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration dated April, 2007, revealed that it was the responsibility of the licensed professional to document all medications administered to each resident as prescribed by the physician. The policy also stated that a signature and title of the person administering the medication was required to be documented on the medication administration record of the clinical record for each resident. Review of Resident R3's physician note dated February 8, 2024, indicated that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and staff, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment in one of the three nursing units observed (4th floor Nursing Units).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment revised February 2021, revealed Residents are provided with a safe, clean and comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extend possible. It further states, these characteristics include clean, sanitary and orderly environment, clean bed, bath linens that are in good condition, pleasant, neutral scents. On March 2, 2025, at 10:41 a.m., observation was conducted with the Maintenance Director, Employee E12 who confirmed the following observations: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Bathroom baseboard coming off; ceiling tile was damage. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Call bell wire came off; not functioning per maintenance staff. -room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of residents' menus and dietary policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a suitable nourishing snack was provided in the evening for 10 of 10 residents reviewed. (Residents: R26, R65, R23, R66, R84, R81, R104, R26, R121 and R112)Findings include: A review of the facility policy and procedure titled snacks, between meal and bedtime dated September 2001 revealed that the facility staff were responsible for providing the residents with adequate nutrition. The policy indicated that a staff member was responsible for recording the date and time that the snack was given to the resident, the amount of snack eaten by the resident, any special requests for snacks and if the resident refused the snack the reason for the refusal. The policy indicated that the supervisor was to be notified of the snack refusal. A group meeting held with alert and oriented residents (R65, R23, R66, R84, R81, R104, R26, R121 and R112) at 11:00 a.m., on March 3, 2026, revealed that residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advanced directives were accurately reflected in residence records for two of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R6 and Resident R9).Findings:Review of facility policy titled Advance Directives, revised [DATE], states If the Resident Has an Advance Directive: 1. If the resident or the residents representative has executed one or more advance directive(s), or executes one upon admission, copies of these documents are obtained and maintained in the same section of the residents medical record and are readily retrievable by any facility staff. 2. The director of nursing services (DNS) or designee notifies the attending physician of advance directives (or changes in advance directives) so that appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care. Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, observations of care and services, reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to revise and implement the comprehensive person center care plan for one of five residents reviewed related to sexually inappropriate behavior. (Residents R139). Findings include: A review of the policy and procedure titled reporting and investigating abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property dated April 2021, revealed that the facility staff was responsible for reporting abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property to local and state agencies. The policy also indicated that the facility management staff was responsible for conducting a thorough investigation into abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property maintaining documentation of the investigation. The policy indicated that all suspected abuse was to be reported by facility staff to management staff immediately. Upon receiving any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident's clinical record, observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of the resident's environment related to razors and large accumulations of personal items which impaired mobility of residents around the room for three of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R83, Resident R12 and Resident R5)Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Hazardous Area, Devices and Equipment undated, revealed All hazardous areas, devices and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, (where a person has an excessive emotional and behavioral reaction, like sadness and hopelessness, to a specific stressor, such as job loss or divorce, causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of one resident reviewed receiving hemo-dialysis (Resident R5).Findings include:Review of Resident R5's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and with the diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), and Dependence on Renal Dialysis (Renal Dialysis is the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Review of Resident R5's physician order, dated May 8, 2025, revealed Resident R5 received dialysis treatment at an outpatient dialysis facility on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of Resident R5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's nursing staff competencies and skills required to provide resident care, the facility failed to ensure complete competency documentation for four of the five nursing staff reviewed. (Employees E5, E7, E8, and E10) Findings Included: According to the facility policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, (revised August,2022) under the section Competent Staff, a competency is defined as a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. A review of the facility policy Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing confirmed that competencies are intended to measure the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for staff to perform their roles effectively. A review of the facility's nursing staff competency records revealed that a Registered Nurse was hired on March 14, 2023. The competency records completed on June 6, 2023, were incomplete and did not show validation that the required tasks had been assessed, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility assessment and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure active involvement of direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives, and family members in the development and revision of the facility assessment. Additionally, the facility failed to identify within the facility assessment a resident population with inappropriate sexual behaviors. The facility census was 154.Findings Included: Review of the facility's Facility Assessment revealed the most recent revision date was January 2026. The document did not indicate that direct care staff, residents, resident representatives, or family members were involved in the development or revision of the assessment. There was no documentation demonstrating that input from these individuals was obtained during the process. Further review of the facility assessment revealed that the document did not identify or address a resident population with inappropriate sexual behaviors, despite the presence of a resident in the facility who demonstrated sexually inappropriate behaviors. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for one of five residents reviewed with an indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter (Residents R13) and failed to disinfect a medical equipment on two of the three residents observed during medication administration (Resident R2, and Resident R3).Findings include: Review of facility policy, undated, on Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces, indicated that environmental and medical equipment surfaces will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated December 2024, revealed: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBPs employ targeted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to permit one of three residents reviewed to return to the facility after hospitalization (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Bed Hold Policy, revised undated, revealed The Medical Assistance Program will make payment to your nursing facility to hold (reserve) your bed for you while you are away from the nursing facility for continuous 24 hour period because you are in the hospital or on therapeutic leave. A bed must be available for you when you return to the nursing facility. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure, morbid (severe) obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (failure of the body to produce insulin). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note, dated January 30, 2026, which revealed the resident stated he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations in the main kitchen and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: A tour of the Food Service Department conducted on March 17, 2025, at 9:22 a.m. with Employee E5, Food Service Director, revealed the following concerns: Observations of the walk-in freezer revealed two tortillas loosely wrapped in plastic wrap with no dates. Observations of the dry storage room revealed the juices used for the juice machine were stored in this room. Two juice bags (fruit punch and orange juice) were taken out of the box and placed directly on a visibly dirty/dusty metal wrack. One juice was not hooked up (cranberry juice) and the tubing was on the floor and backed up with stagnant juice in the tubing. Observations revealed the drainpipe behind the ice machine was placed directly into the floor drain with no air gap. To prevent sewer water backup, all ice machine drains require an air gap of a few inches between the ice machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that trash was properly disposed of in the receiving and dumpster area. Findings Include: A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on March 17, 2025, at 9:22 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E5. Observations revealed double doors adjacent to the main kitchen where food deliveries are accepted and lead out to where the dumpsters are stored. Observations in the receiving area outside revealed trash, food, and debris on the ground surrounding the dumpsters. On one dumpster, the lid was open, and trash was exposed. 28 PA Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to establish an effective pest control program in the main kitchen. Findings Include: Review of pest control report dated March 4, 2025, revealed pest control inspected and treated the kitchen areas, storage areas, and dishwasher room for occasional invaders. Per the pest control report, mice droppings were observed in the kitchen food storage room. Pest control recommended a door sweep in the kitchen doors and replacing doors to the small room outside, next to the dumpster, as te doors are rotten. A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on March 17, 2025, at 9:22 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E5. Observations revealed double doors adjacent to the main kitchen where food deliveries are accepted and lead out to where the dumpsters are stored. There was a visible gap located at the bottom of the door allowing easy access to the main kitchen for common household pests (mice, roaches, flies, ants). Observations on March 19, 2025, at 12:15 p.m. in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility policy, observations, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent Department of Health Survey results were readily accessible to residents and visitors in three of three nursing floors and lobby (Second Floor, Third Floor, and Fourth Floor). Findings include: The facility's policy titled Examination of Survey Results, dated April 27, 2017, states, Survey reports and plans of correction are readily accessible to residents, family members, resident representatives, and the public. It further specifies under Bulletin 2: A copy of the most recent survey report and any plans of correction are kept in a binder in the resident's day room. During a resident council meeting held on March 18, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., with 12 residents (R62, R13, R35, R129, R70, R49, R6, R4, R96, R92, R93), who were identified as alert and oriented, it was revealed that the residents were unaware of the recent Department of Health Survey results. On March 19, 2025, at 9:31 a.m., a facility tour was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and staff, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment in three of the three nursing units observed (2nd, 3rd, 4th floor Nursing Units). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment revised February 2021, revealed Residents are provided with a safe, clean and comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extend possible. It further states, these characteristics include clean, sanitary and orderly environment, clean bed, bath linens that are in good condition, pleasant, neutral scents. On March 17, 2025, at 11:47 a.m., an interview with Resident R146 who lives in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that his mattress is peeling, and he collects the peeling material in a cup. Additionally, observation showed that there are five ceiling tiles with large brown stains. On March 17, 2025, at 11:51 a.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations during dining and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and attractive to meet resident needs for 20 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R62, R13, R35, R129, R70, R49, R6, R4, R96, R92, R93, R30, R9, R120, R122, R81, R108, R83, R58, and R139). Findings Include: During a Resident Council meeting on March 18, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. with 11 alert and oriented residents (R62, R13, R35, R129, R70, R49, R6, R4, R96, R92, R93) residents reported that the chicken being served is dry. Review of the facility menu revealed chicken was on the menu for lunch on March 18, 2025. Observations on March 18, 2025, at approximately 12:30 p.m. on the 2nd floor nursing unit during the lunch time meal revealed the following: Observations and interview at 12:38 p.m. revealed Resident R30 refused to eat the chicken served for lunch because it was dry. Observations and interview at 12:50 p.m. revealed Resident R9 and R120 refused to eat the chicken because it was served cold. Observations and interview at 12:51 p.m. revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility protocol, observations, interview ,and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to implement proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident on enhanced barrier precautions during morning care and wound observation of 31 resident records reviewed (Resident R102). Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) revised December 2024 states it is used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms to residents. EBP employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activates EBP are indicated for residents with wounds and or indwelling medication devices. Resident R102 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, major depressive and anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) , and had a gastrostomy (a surgical tube place in the abdominal wall and into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident group interview, resident interview, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for one of thirty-one residents (Resident R30) and effectively communicate the resolutions of grievances for 11 of thirty-one residents (R4, R6, R13, R35, R49, R62, R70, R92, R93, R96, R129) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing, revised on April 2023, stated under Policy Statement The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. Further review, in section Policy Interpretation and Implementation, part 12, it states that The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the finding of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems Review of Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the placement of beds against the wall as a restraint and failed to assess the functional status of an individual resident to determine the use of the restraint for one of 31 residents reviewed. (Residents R5). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Use of Restraints, revised 2017, revealed the definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which staff applied it given that resident's physical condition (i.e, side rails are put back down, rather than climbed over), and this restricts his/her typical ability to change position or place, that device is considered a restraint. Clinical record review revealed Resident R5 was admitted to the facility May 24, 2022 with a diagnosis that included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side (muscle weakness on one side of the body), acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform Elder Abuse and Resident Rights training upon hire for one of five personnel files reviewed (Employee E4). Findings Include: Review of the personnel file for Cook, Employee E4 on March 20, 2025 at 12:02 pm revealed employee hire date on December 5, 2024. Further review indicated that there was no documented evidence for completion of Elder Abuse training upon hire. An interview was conducted with Business Office/ HR, Employee E5, on March 20, 2025 at 12:13 pm, confirmed Employee E4's Elder Abuse training incomplete. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.19(8) Personnel policies and procedures

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for one of 31 residents sampled who were transferred to the hospital. (Resident R102). Finding includes: Resident R102 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with spastic quadriplegic (partial or complete paralysis of all limbs), cerebral palsy (condition that affect movement and posture), major depressive and anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On July 7, 2024, Resident R102 had an unplanned transfer to the hospital and a surgical gastrostomy (a surgical tube place in the abdominal wall and into the stomach used to provide nutrients and medications when a person cannot eat or drink adequately) was performed. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed on December 18, 2024 Resident R102 had an unplanned transfer to the hospital due to stomach pain. On March 20, 2025, at 11:43 a.m., the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure revisions were made to the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) application to include mental health diagnoses for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident R71, R98) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Preadmission Screening and resident Review (PASRR) policy last revised October 2023 revealed New admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disability (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screen for all potential admission, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, IM, RD. Review of Resident R71's PASRR completed on July 27, 2023, indicated that Resident R71 only had a mental health condition of Mood Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of R71's clinical record revealed on August 31, 2023, obtained a medical diagnosis Psychosis (is a mental health condition characterized by a disconnection from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and interventions to address resident care needs for Resident R37's diagnosis of diabetes, Resident R115 respiratory care, Resident R97 mood, R75 and R136 psychotropic medication, for five of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R37, R115, R136, R97, and R75). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Center revised March 2022, revealed the a comprehensive, person-center care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident R37's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with Diabetes (failure of the body to produc insulin) with orders for insulin and Accu-Cheks three times a day at 8:00 a. m., 12:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, and review of resident records determined the facility failed to document to ensure one resident (Resident R102) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to properly assess and document a change of condition per physician orders for one of 31 records reviewed. (Resident R102) Findings include: Review of Resident R102's clinical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, major depressive and anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and had a gastrostomy (a surgical tube place in the abdominal wall and into the stomach used to provide nutrients and medications when a person cannot eat or drink adequately). Review of Resident R102 quarterly MDS (an assessment of residents' needs) dated December 29, 2024, indicated Resident R102 was completely dependent on staff for all activities of daily needs including bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident R18). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown revised April 2018 revealed the nurse should describe and document/report a full assessment of the pressure ulcer including location, stage, length, width, and depth. The staff and practitioner will examine the skin of newly admitted residents for evidence of existing pressure ulcers or other skin conditions. Review of Resident R18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 18, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of peripheral artery disease (narrowing of arteries which results in reduced blood flow to head, arms, stomach and legs), diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder that affect how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility policies and procedures, observations of care and services, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide respiratory care and supplemental oxygen as ordered by the physician for two of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R115 and R63). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration dated October 2023, stated The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. A review of a clinical record for Resident R115 revealed an admission on [DATE], with a diagnosis of diffuse traumatic brain injury. A review of the physician order dated February 17, 2025, oxygen as needed to maintain O2 level above 92% at 2 Liter per min via nasal cannula, PRN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview with resident and staff and review of clinical records and facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately assess residents for use of bedrails and failed to ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bed rails were maintained for two of 31 resident records reviewed (Resident R37 and R77). Findings include: Review of Resident R37 medical diagnosis revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], identified lacking coordination, reduced mobility, abnormal posture and a need for assistance with personal care. Resident R37 was assessed as a fall risk and care planned to encourage the resident to use handrails/ siderails or assistive devices properly and to maintain the call bell within the resident's reach for preventing falls and accidents, dated January 10, 2025. During an interview on March 18, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. Resident R37 stated he did not like his bedrails and moved the bedrails to show how loose they were attached to his bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure that one resident, who displayed mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, received treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of four residents reviewed for mood/behavior (Resident R97). Findings Include: Review of Resident R97's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 6, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had moderate cognitive impairment, and diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia and depression. Further review of Resident R97's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored a 17 under section D Mood which can be interpreted as moderately severe depression. Review of Resident R97's clinical record revealed a psychiatry assessment dated [DATE], by Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP), Employee E8, that revealed Resident R97 expressed feeling anxious and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of a prescribed medication to meet the needs of one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R16). Findings include: A review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed Resident R16 was admitted to the facility September 1, 2022 , with diagnoses that included but not limited to congestive heart failure (condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough you meet the body's needs), alcoholic polyneuropathy (damage to the nerves caused by excessive alcohol consumption), and generalized anxiety disorder. On March 18, 2025 at 12:10 p.m. interview with Resident R16 revealed Resident R16 was experiencing anxiety due to a recent event that occurred in his personal life. Resident R16 stated the physician ordered Ativan and he did not receive it for 3 days due to the medication not being available. Review of Resident R16's nursing progress note, dated February 11, 2025 at 1:25 p.m., revealed resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a substitute for a resident who requested a meal alternative and failed to serve foods that accommodate a residents allergies for two of 26 residents reviewed during dining (Resident R97 and R6). Findings Include: Review of Resident R97's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 6, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had moderate cognitive impairment, and had a diagnosis of malnutrition (deficiencies, excesses, or imbalances in a person's intake of energy and/or nutrients). Observations on March 17, 2025, revealed an always available menu dated February 18, 2025, posted on the wall on the 2nd floor nursing unit located next to the elevators. For the lunch and dinner meal, a hamburger was listed as an alternative option that could be requested by calling the kitchen. Observations on March 17, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff and residents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for five of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R37, R115, R153, 109, R88 ). Findings include: A review of the policy titled Answering Call light last revised March 2021 revealed The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Its further states under General Guideline bulletin 4. Be sure that the call light is plugged in and always functioning. 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. Review of Resident R37's medical diagnosis revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], identified lacking coordination, reduced mobility, abnormal posture and a need for assistance with personal care. Resident R37 was assessed as a fall risk and care planned to encourage the resident to use handrails/ siderails or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and staff, and review of temperature logs, it was determined that the facility failed ensure that essential mechanical equipment ws maintain in working function to provide comfortable bathing temperatures on two of three nursing floors. (Second and Fourth floor) Findings include: Review of the policy titled bathing, showering and use of tub dated February 2018 revealed that it was the responsibility of the nursing staff to promote cleanliness and provide a comfortable bathing experience for the residents. Review of the policy titled safe water temperatures dated December, 2009 revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to provide a water temperatures used by the residents at safe levels to prevent burns. The maintenance staff was responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility to ensure safe and comfortable bathing, showering and sink use for the residents. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, at 1:00 p.m., on October 17, 2024 revealed that the facility has been having water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for one out of the seven records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Center last revised December 2022 revealed A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. It further states Each resident's comprehensive person-center care plan is consistent with the resident's right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed admission date on August 8, 2023, with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (typically caused by a blood clot or plaque buildup in the arteries, depriving brain cells of oxygen and nutrients, resulting in cell death), hemiplegia and hemiparesis, lack of coordination, adjustment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the required skills to properly care for residents' needs for three of three personnel files reviewed related to skills competencies evaluations (Employees E5). Findings include: Review of Employee E5's personnel file revealed that the employee was agency employee worked on September 9, 2024, hired, as a nursing aid. A review of the internal investigation included a written statement for Employee E5, which revealed that Employee E5 failed to follow the care plan for Resident R1, leading to an escalation of the situation. On September 16, 2024, at approximately 1:41 p.m. an interview with Administrator, Employee E1 and Director of Nursing, Employee E2 confirmed that agency staff nursing aid, Employee E5, was not being evaluated on their competency to ensure nursing employees possess the required skills to properly care for resident's needs and are oriented to the facility practices and care plans. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(7)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and procedures, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility following a hospitalization for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Admissions Policies undated states, Policy Statement- Written policies and procedures governing admissions to the facility will be maintained on a current basis to ensure fair and impartial admission practices. The objectives of our admission policies are to: a. Provide uniform guidelines in the admission of residents to the facility; b. Admit residents who can be adequately care for by the facility; c. Reduce the fears and anxieties of the resident and family during the admission process; d. Review with the resident, and/or his/her representative (sponsor), the facility's policies and procedures relating to resident rights, resident care, financial obligations, visiting hours, etc; and e.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in the main dining room and two of three nursing units (Second floor and Third Floor). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Bath, Shower, Tub revised February 2018 revealed the purpose of the procedures are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and observe skin conditions. This policy included instructions including: to be sure the tub or shower is clean, the bath area is a comfortable temperature for the resident, if using a shower regulate the temp and the flow of the water warm water is 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation on May 21, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., accompanied with Nursing Home Administrator Employee E1 (NHA), Director of Nursing, Employee 2 and Maintenance Director, Employee E11 of Third floor's resident shower, displayed a deteriorated malfunctioning shower. The shower floor was observed with noticeable fragmented broken concrete, sharp, shattered pieces. The showers wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted to rule out abuse/neglect for a bruise of an unknown original for 1 out of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R39) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol with a revised date of March 2018, indicated that management and staff with physician support will address situation of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner to appropriate agencies, consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Continued review of the policy indicated that if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The policy also indicated that upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and interventions to meet the resident's needs for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R140). Findings Include: Review of Resident R140's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 14, 2024, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, and functional limitation in range of motion to upper and lower extremities. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident R140 had diagnoses of hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Continued review of Resident R140's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with personal care. Review of Resident R140's comprehensive care plan revised February 16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, staff interviews and the review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of practice in regard to a change in a resident's medical condition for 1 out of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, with a revision date of April 2024 indicated that the facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g. changes in level of care, billing payments, resident rights, etc.). Review of the policy also included the following situations in which nursing will notify the resident's attending physician or the physician on call of resident changes: an accident or incident involving the resident; discovery of injuries of an unknown source; refusal of treatment; specific instructions from the physician to notify him/her about changes in a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for the prevention of pressure ulcers for one of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated April 25, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (disorder of carbohydrate metabolism) and hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness). Review of Resident R1's comprehensive care plan revised on January 22, 2024, revealed the resident was at risk for developing wounds related to non-compliance with care. Intervention dated February 16, 2024, included to offload heels as ordered. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician order dated February 23, 2024, to apply heel boots (device that pads the heel to relieve pressure and help to prevent skin breakdown) while in bed every shift. Observations on May 22, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained for 2 out of 30 residents reviewed with a history of weight loss (Resident R39 and Resident R454). Findings include: Review of the Resident R39's May 2024 physician orders included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); contracted right elbow and right wrist; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when your heart can't pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply). Review of the nutritional note by the Registered Dietician dated November 15, 2023, at 3:51 p.m. indicated that Resident R39 experienced an 18.3% significant weight loss from October 2, 2023 (weight recorded as 167 pounds) through November 9, 2023 (weight recorded as 136.4). Resident also had a significant weight loss over the past three months of -19. 3 % with August 2, 2023 weight recorded as 169 pounds; September 13, 2023 weight recorded as 164…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, review of clinical records and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were delivered from pharmacy timely for two of 30 resident records reviewed (Resident R133 and Resident R39). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Pharmacy Services Overview revised April 2029 states, The facility shall accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services including the provision of routine and emergency medications and biologicals. Resident R133 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (pancreatis does not produce enzymes or hormones to ensure proper digestion to absorb nutrients) and Tinea Cruris (fungal infection). Review of Resident R133's physician orders revealed an order for Pancrelipase (Lip-Prot-Amyl) Capsule, delayed release particles 12000-38000 UNI (used to help improve food digestion) was instructed to give one capsule by mouth with meals for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that as needed psychotropic medication included an end date for stoping the medication for one of 30 resident records reviewed (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use revised July 2022 states, Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. The policy defines psychotropic medication as any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behaviors. The same policy further states that psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on a PRN (as needed) basis unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics (example the benzodiazepines lorazepam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure labs were completed per physician orders for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R118). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol revised November 2018 reveled the physician will identify, and order lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. Review of Resident R118's clinical record revealed a physician order dated January 23, 2024, ordered by Nurse Practitioner, Employee E19, for laboratory values to be drawn on January 24, 2024. Continued review of Resident R118's clinical record revealed an assessment dated [DATE], by Nurse Practitioner, Employee E19, which revealed the Nurse Practitioner was unsure if the labs ordered for January 24, 2024, had been drawn. Review of Resident R118's entire clinical record revealed no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure beverages were provided in accordance with resident needs for three of three residents with orders for thickened liquids observed (Resident R1, R140, and R34). Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated April 25, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician diet order dated January 25, 2024, that indicated Resident R1 was ordered nectar thick fluids (liquids that have been altered to a thicker consistency than water - nectar thick liquids are similar to that of fruit nectar). Review of Resident R1's care plan revised May 22, 2024, revealed the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related, but not limited to, mechanically altered diet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for 1 out of 30 residents (Resident R89). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation, with a revision date of July 2017, indicated that all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also indicated that the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Continued review of the policy indicated that information documented in the medical record should include, but not limited to: Objective observations; treatments or services performed; changes in the resident's condition, and events, incidents or accidents involving the resident. Review of the Resident R89's May 2024 physician orders included the diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff, hospital record reviews and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified of a refusal of a laxative mediation for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R4) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled refusal and/or discontinuing care or treatment dated February, 2021 revealed that it was the facility's responsibility to inform each resident of the care that will be furnished or made available to the resident based on his or her assessment and plan of care, the risks and benefits of the proposed care , treatment, treatment alternatives or treatment options and any changes in the resident's care plan. The policy indicated that if a resident refuses treatment, the staff would meet with the resident to determine why he or she is requesting, refusing or discontinuing care and treatment and address the resident's concerns, and offer alternative treatment and care options.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review reviews of policies and procedures and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address the behavioral health needs and services for one of two residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the policy titled behavioral health services dated February, 2029 revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to provide behavioral health services for each resident to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The policy indicated that residents having emotional or psychosocial distress would receive services to meet their needs. The policy also indicated that residents having diagnoses of mental, psychiatric or psychosocial adjustment disorders would receive services to meet their needs. The policy said that residents with substance abuse or post traumatic stress disorder would receive services to promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety. The policy titled comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $35,175 — penalty dated 2024-04-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRUCKSTEIN, DANIELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
BRUCKSTEIN, ROBERTIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
MAJESTIC OAKS REAL PROPERTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
STONEBRIDGE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
B&B REIMBURSEMENT CONSULTING INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE I INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
LESHKOWITZ & COMPANY LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
TWOMAGNETS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
DORN, CHERYLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2022
KHAN, ZAFARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
LITMAN, WARRENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
LYNN, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2023
MANDELBAUM, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/03/2019
STONEBRIDGE HEALTHCARE MEMBER I LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
STONEBRIDGE HEALTHCARE MEMBER II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019
STONEBRIDGE HEALTHCARE MEMBER III LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$895K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 9%Other / private 11%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $895K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,788per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$328per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next