No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Serenity Spring Senior Living at Scandia Village

10560 Applewood Rd, Sister Bay, WI 54234 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (920) 854-2317 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (920) 854-2317 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2521 S Bay Shore Dr · (920) 854-2347 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
326 Country Walk Ln · (920) 854-4121 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10576 Country Walk Dr · (920) 854-2391 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Bay Shore Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2336 Canterbury Ln · (920) 854-9600

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.6%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%2.1%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.5%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.3%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.3%16.9%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.8%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.3%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%82.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.5%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%15.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.951.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.312.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 36.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge36.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
70.4%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-03)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R12) of 4 sampled residents received the necessary pressure injury care and treatment to promote healing and prevent pressure injuries from worsening.R12 had a stage 2 sacral pressure upon admission that measured 6.2 centimeters (cm) (length) x 4.1 cm (width) x 0.2 (depth) cm. A wound clinic note included in R12's admission paperwork stated offloading was of the utmost importance and R12 should be repositioned side-to-side every two hours. If the sacral wound progressed, R12 should be started on an alternating air mattress as soon as possible. R12's sacral wound was documented as worsening on 1/21/26 and 1/28/26 and measured 9.1 cm x 7.9 cm x 0.1 cm with a reddened peri-wound and pain. As of 2/10/26, R12 did not have an alternating air mattress. In addition, R12 was admitted to the facility with a deep tissue injury (DTI) on the left heel that measured 1.8 cm x 1.3 cm. A wound clinic note stated to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff, resident, represenatative interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident enviornment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 residents (R) (R10 and R15) of 3 sampled residents. In addition, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R6 and R18) of 2 sampled residents had behavioral interventions and were adequately supervised. R10 had a fall with injury on 4/24/26. The facility did not update R10's care plan post-fall. R15 had a fall with injury on 6/2/26. The facility did not complete post-fall assessments, provide prompt or appropriate medical care, implement falls interventions, or notify the required parties. R6 and R18 were known to wander into other residents' rooms uninvited. R6 and R18's care plans did not contain interventions to address wandering or appropriate levels of supervision. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised January 2026, indicates: The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) is responsible for the development of resident care plans .Comprehensive, person-centered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R7 and R23) of 3 sampled residents were offered the opportunity to create or obtain Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) paperwork. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility did not obtain R7's POAHC document or offer R7 the chance to fill out a new document prior to 6/1/26. R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility did not obtain R23's POAHC document or offer R23 the chance to fill out a new document prior to 6/1/26. Findings include: The facility's Advanced Directive policy and procedure, dated January 2026, indicates: .1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so .8. If the resident indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives . 1. R7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when they did not ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported to the State Agency (SA) or local police for 1 resident (R) (R14) of 1 sampled resident. R14's wallet went missing after 4/15/26. The facility did not report the allegation of misappropriation to the SA or local police. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Policy, revised April 2021, indicates: Residents have the right to be free from .misappropriation of resident property .the facility will implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify .theft, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property .identify and investigate all possible incidents of .misappropriation of resident property .investigate and report any allegations within the timeframes required by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R14) of 1 sampled resident. R14's wallet went missing after 4/15/26. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation or report the findings to the State Agency (SA). Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Policy, revised April 2021, indicates: Residents have the right to be free from .misappropriation of resident property .the facility will implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify .theft, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property .identify and investigate all possible incidents of .misappropriation of resident property .investigate and report any allegations within the timeframes required by federal requirements. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, insomnia, and history of stroke. R14's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper discharge procedures and/or a written transfer or bed hold notice was provided to 3 residents (R) (R43, R8, and R41) of 3 sampled residents. R43 discharged from the facility on 4/10/25. R43's medical record did not contain a recapitulation of stay, confirmation of discharge against medical advice (AMA), indicate discharge orders were received from R43's primary care physician, or indicate education and further services were offered prior to discharge.R8 was transferred to the hospital on 2/23/26 and 4/29/26. R8's medical record did not contain written transfer or bed hold notices.R41 was transferred to the hospital on 4/5/26. R41's medical record did not contain a written transfer or bed hold notice. Findings include: The facility's policy Bed-Holds and Return policy, revised January 2026, indicates: .All residents/representatives are provided with written information regarding facility and state bed-hold policies, which address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for 1 resident (R) (R7) of 14 sampled residents. R7 had orders for oxygen use and Hospice care. R7's care plan did not contain goals or interventions to address R7's dependence on oxygen and potential for airway disturbance or need for Hospice care. Findings include: The facility's Individual Care Plans-Baseline policy, dated 1/2026, indicates: .The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident, including but not limited to, the following: .b. Physician orders . R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic heart failure, and pressure ulcers. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/18/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure physican orders were followed and appropriate wound care and treatment was provided for 1 resident (R) (R35) of 4 sampled residents.R35 was seen in the wound clinic on 5/8/26 for non-pressure right anterior and posterior leg wounds. New treatments were ordered. The facility did not update R35's orders until 5/14/26. R35 was seen in the wound clinic again on 5/22/26. The physician ordered a wound vac and transitioned R35 from non weight-bearing to weight-bearing status. The facility did not order the wound vac, update R35's weight-bearing status, or update R35's care plan and Kardex (an abbreviated care plan used by nursing staff). Findings include:On 6/2/26, 6/3/26, and 6/16/26, Surveyor requested the facility's policy for obtaining, transcribing, and/or following physician orders. A policy was not provided. R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, displaced unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R23 and R3) of 4 sampled residents received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from worsening.R23 was seen in the wound clinic on 5/28/26 for right dorsal foot, left fifth dorsal toe, and right hallux bunion wounds. New treatments were ordered. The facility was not aware of the updated orders which resulted in a missed dressing change for R23's right dorsal foot on 5/31/26. R3 had a stage 4 pressure injury on the left heel and an order for a dressing change every other day. R3's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated the dressing change was not completed on 5/20/26.Findings include:The facility's Wound Care policy, revised January 2026, indicates: The purpose of the policy is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing .Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: .2. The date and time wound care was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, including usual body weight range for 1 resident (R) (R39) of 1 sampled resident. R39 experienced a weight gain of greater than 5 pounds (lbs) in one week. The facility did not update the dietitian or R39's physician as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Weight Assessment and Intervention policy, dated 2026, indicates: Resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight .gain .Any weight change of 5 pounds (lbs) (or at the discretion of the dietitian) or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day .undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team .and will include the resident's target weight range, caloric, protein, and other nutrient needs, relationship between current medical condition/clinical situation, recent fluctuations in weight, and to what extent weight stabilization can be anticipated. R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of pharmacy services to meet the needs of 1 resident (R) (R6) of 5 sampled residents.A urinalysis and culture was ordered for R6 for a possible urinary tract infection. The facility did not promptly follow-up on the results or an antibiotic order which caused a delay in R6's treatment.Findings include: The facility's Guidelines for Notifying Physicians of Clinical Problems policy, revised January 2026, indicates: These guidelines are intended to help ensure .medical care problems are communicated to medical staff in a timely, efficient and effective manner and .all significant changes in resident status are assessed and documented in the medical record .The charge nurse or supervisor should contact the attending physician if a clinical situation appears to require immediate discussion and management . R6 had diagnoses including dementia, unspecified mood disorder, displaced fracture of the right femur due to a fall without routine healing, and insomnia. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 residents (R) (R21 and R15) of 7 sampled residents. R21 was on contact precautions which required staff to don a gown and gloves prior to room entry. Registered Nurse (RN)-L did not don a gown and gloves prior to entering R21's room to provide medication. RN-L did not complete hand hygiene in accordance with the facility's policy during wound care for R15. Findings include: The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, indicates: .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections .Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap .and water for the following situations: .Before and after direct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vaccines were offered for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R7) of 5 sampled residents.R2 was not offered the influenza vaccine in accordance with the facility's policy.R7 was not offered the PCV20 vaccine in accordance with the facility's policy.Findings include: The facility's Influenza Vaccine policy, revised January 2026, indicates: All residents .who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza .between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents. The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, revised Janauary 2026, indicates: All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections .upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, are offered the vaccine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with orders for a consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) diet received their prescribed diet. This practice had the potential to affect 12 residents (R) (R1, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14) of 12 sampled residents. R1's hospital discharge orders indicated R1 should have a low carb diet (60 grams of carbohydrates per meal). The order in R1's medical record indicated R1 should have 90 grams of carbohydrates per meal.R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14 had orders for a CCHO diet and did not receive what was on the CCHO diet lunch menu on 2/10/26.Findings include:The facility's undated Controlled Carbohydrates policy indicates: .Carbohydrates balanced consistently at each meal providing a range of 70-80 grams of carbohydrates. These diets can be used for the diabetic resident with glucose control concerns following regular and low-concentrated sweets are not omitted but planned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interview and record review, the facility did not notify a physician when blood sugars were outside the ordered parameters for 3 residents (R) (R4, R3, and R1) of 3 sampled residents. R4 had an order to notify the physician of blood sugars above 450 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). The physician was not notified when R4's blood sugars exceeded 450 mg/dL on 1/3/26, 1/11/26, 1/15/26, 1/16/26, 1/19/26, 1/20/26, and 1/31/26.R3 had an order to notify the physician of blood sugars above 350 mg/dL. The physician was not notified when R3's blood sugars exceeded 350 mg/dL on 1/5/26 and 2/6/26. R1 had an order to notify the physician of blood sugars above 400 mg/dL. The physician was not notified when R1's blood sugar exceeded 400 mg/dL on 1/31/26. Findings include:The facility's Diabetes Policy, revised November 2020, indicates the physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. Staff will incorporate such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The deep fryer was stored uncovered and had food debris along the sides and in the oil. In addition, there was no cleaning schedule for the deep fryer. Butter was observed in an uncovered container in the prep area. Equipment in the kitchen was not in clean condition. The hood vent above the deep fryer and oven contained a greasy black substance. The stove top had dried food debris. The microwave in the kitchen contained dried food on the inside. Fifteen boxes were observed on the floor in the freezer. Findings include: On 5/5/25 at 9:54 AM, Surveyor interviewed [NAME] (CK)-D who indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Deep Fryer/Uncovered Food Items: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 3-305.11 Food Storage: Food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food: .(2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented for 5 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F, CNA-H, Dietary Aide (DA)-J, CNA-G, and Registered Nurse (RN)-I) of 8 employees reviewed for background checks. CNA-F was hired and started work on 2/24/25. CNA-F's Background Information Disclosure (BID) form was completed on 3/1/25 and Department of Justice (DOJ) report was run on 3/28/25. CNA-F did not have an Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) report. CNA-H and DA-J's background checks did not contain IBIS reports. CNA-G did not have a background check completed within the last 4 years. RN-I's DOJ and IBIS reports were completed before RN-I signed a BID form. Findings include: The facility's undated Employee Screening policy indicates: Employee screening will be respected in terms of state law and facility policy. Background screening: It is a condition of employment that every employee successfully completes a background screening. Program eligibility checks: We are required by law to do pre-employment and then ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R25, R7, and R22) of 5 sampled residents or their legal representatives were thoroughly informed in advance of the risks and benefits of prescribed psychotropic medication. R25 was prescribed lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication), duloxetine (an antidepressant medication), trazodone (an antidepressant medication), and quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication). The facility did not ensure written consents were thoroughly reviewed and completed with R25's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). R7 was prescribed venlafaxine (an antidepressant medication) and bupropion (an antidepressant medication). The facility did not ensure written consents were thoroughly reviewed and completed with R7's POAHC. R22 was prescribed citalopram (an antidepressant medication). The facility did not ensure a written consent was thoroughly reviewed and completed with R22's POAHC. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were thoroughly investigated and resolved for 1 resident (R) (R28) of 13 sampled residents. The facility did not document, investigate, and follow-up with R28 after R28 reported seven missing articles of clothing. Findings include: The facility's resident grievance policy was not provided during the survey. From 5/5/25 to 5/7/25, Surveyor reviewed R28's medical record. R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/13/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R28 was not cognitively impaired. R28 made R28's own healthcare decisions. On 5/5/25 at 11:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed R28 who indicated R28 had informed several staff members, including housekeeping/laundry staff, about seven missing articles of clothing. R28 stated R28 was missing a yellow and tan t-shirt, a striped over-shirt, a matching top and bottom (missing since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not monitor the effectiveness of psychotropic medication for 1 resident (R) (R25) of 5 sampled residents. R25 had an order for lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) as needed (PRN) every 6 hours for anxiety disorder/irritability and anger with a start date of 2/25/25. The medication was not discontinued or reviewed after 14 days. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised July 2022, indicates: .Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: .c. Anti-anxiety medications .12. Psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given on an as needed (PRN) basis unless the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition .a. PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. 1. For psychotropic medications .If the prescriber or attending physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R11) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and name and address (mailing and email) with telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not ensure R11 received written information on the duration of the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R11 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) on 5/1/25. R11 was not provided with a written transfer or bed hold notice. Findings include: The facility's Bed-Holds and Returns policy, revised October 2022, indicates: .Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies .1. All residents .are provided written information regarding the .bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence. Residents, regardless of payer source,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen was updated to initiate a PASRR Level II Screen when a newly evident mental disorder and/or change in medication was identified for 1 resident (R) (R22) of 5 sampled residents. R22 received new diagnoses and orders for psychotropic medication, including an antipsychotic medication. The facility did not update R22's PASRR Level I Screen and submit for PASRR Level II reevaluation. Findings include: R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including fracture, anemia, hypertension, depression, and mood disorder. R22's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/19/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R22 had intact cognition. R22's PASRR Level I Screen was completed by the facility on 1/11/24. The Level I Screen indicated R22 did not have any diagnoses or medications prescribed that would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not revise a care plan in accordance with current care needs for 1 resident (R) (R34) of 4 sampled residents. R34 fell on 3/20/25 and fractured R34's left wrist. R34's care plan was not updated after the fall and did not include interventions to prevent future falls. Findings include: The facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, indicates: .Treatment/Management: 1. Based on the preceding assessment, the staff .will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and address the risks of clinically significant consequences of falling .2. If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various relevant interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falling, until falling reduces or stops or until a reason is identified for its continuation .Monitoring and Follow-up: 1. The staff .will follow-up on any fall with associated injury until the resident is stable and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R18) of 4 sampled residents received care and treatment based on the resident's needs and hospital discharge instructions. R18 had a fall with a head laceration on 1/5/25. R18 was transferred to the emergency room (ER) and received staples to repair the laceration. R18's hospital discharge instructions stated to apply Neosporin or bacitracin ointment to the wound. The order was not implemented until two days after R18 returned to the facility. Findings include: From 5/5/25 to 5/7/25, Surveyor reviewed R18's medical record. R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, chronic low back pain, peripheral neuropathy, and depression. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated R18 had severe cognitive impairment. R18 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) to assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. From 5/5/25 to 5/7/25, Surveyor reviewed R33's medical record. R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes, and malnutrition. R33's most recent MDS assessment, dated 2/10/25, had a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R33 had intact cognition. On 5/6/25 at 9:17 AM, Surveyor observed medication administration for R33 with LPN-O. While in R33's room, Surveyor observed a bottle of lubricating eye drops on R33's bedside table. Surveyor noted the eye drops were not labeled or dated. LPN-O removed the eye drops from R33's room. On 5/6/25 at 9:22 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN-O who indicated LPN-O was not sure where the eye drops came from and was not sure if R33 had a self-administration of medication assessment. On 5/6/25 at 2:24 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B regarding the eye drops at R33's bedside. DON-B indicated a box of Systane eye wipes and a tube of triple antibiotic ointment were also found in R33's beside drawer.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monthly medication reviews were completed for 2 residents (R) (R7 and R25) of 5 sampled residents. R7 did not have a monthly medication review (MMR) documented for November 2024, January 2025, or March 2025. R25 did not have a monthly medication review (MMR) documented for April 2025. Findings include: 1. From 5/5/25 to 5/7/25, Surveyor reviewed R7's medical record. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hypertension, depression, and history of a stroke. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/18/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 which indicated R7 had moderate cognitive impairment. R7 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). On 5/7/25 at 12:28 PM, Surveyor reviewed R7's MMRs from November 2024 through April 2025. R7's medical record did not contain an MMR for November 2024, January 2025, or March 2025. 2. From 5/5/25 to 5/7/25, Surveyor reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of potential neglect were thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R1) of 3 sampled residents. R2 passed away on [DATE] following a fall on [DATE]. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the incident of potential neglect. R1 fell on [DATE]. R1 went to the hospital on [DATE] due to increased pain and a change in condition and was diagnosed with a clavicle fracture. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the fall or the potential for abuse or neglect. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide a policy related to abuse and neglect investigations. 1. On [DATE], Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, familial dysautonomia (a rare inherited condition that affects the nervous system), congestive heart failure, sick sinus syndrome (a group of abnormal heart rhythms resulting from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure thorough neurological checks were completed per the facility's policy for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R1) of 3 sampled residents. Staff did not consistently complete vital signs during neuro checks following R2's fall on 8/24/24. Staff did not complete neuro checks per the facility's policy after R1 fell and hit R1's head on 8/17/24. Findings include: The facility's Neurological Assessment 2001 Med-Pass policy, revised October 2010, indicates: Neurological Assessment are indicated: Upon physician order; Following an unwitnessed fall; Following a fall or other accident/injury involving head trauma; or when indicated by the resident's condition. 2. When assessing neurological status, always include frequent vital signs. Particular attention should be paid to widening pulse pressure (difference between systolic and diastolic pressures). This may be indicative of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Steps in the Procedure: .6. Take temperature,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate assistive devices and interventions were in place to prevent falls for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1's care plan contained an intervention for a tab alarm. The intervention was not consistently implemented. Findings include: The facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy (from 2001 Med-Pass, Inc.), revised July 2017, indicates: Individualized, Resident-Centered Approach to Safety: .4. Implementing interventions to reduce accident risks and hazards shall include the following: .d. Ensuring that interventions are implemented. On 9/17/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including clavicle fracture and muscle weakness. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/5/24, stated R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1 did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 27 of 27 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not ensure time/temperature control foods were labeled with open or use-by dates. Staff did not wear hair or beard restraints consistently throughout the kitchen. Kitchen equipment and food services areas were not in a clean and sanitary condition. Findings include: On 4/22/24 at 9:23 AM, Dietary Director (DD)-K indicated the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. Open/Unlabeled/Undated/Expired Food: The FDA Food Code 2022 documents at 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking: (A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain infection control and water management programs designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. In addition, the facility did not ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for 4 residents (R) (R2, R18, R4, and R79) of 4 residents to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and did not ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene for 5 (R1, R9, R16, R129 and R19) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. These practices had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not maintain surveillance logs to assist with the recognition of trends and patterns of infection to help prevent the spread of communicable disease. In addition, the facility did not monitor residents for signs and symptoms of infection. The facility did not have a water management program that identified areas in the water system where Legionella could grow and spread and to reduce the risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) completed infection prevention and control training and was employed at least part-time in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. The facility's designated IP worked remotely and did not work in the facility at least part-time. In addition, the IP's certificate of completion for infection prevention and control training was not provided to Surveyor. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) memo QSO-22-19-NH, last revised 6/29/22, indicates: In 2016, CMS overhauled the Requirements for Participation for Long-Term Care (LTC) facilities (i.e., nursing homes) which was implemented in three phases: .Phase 3 (11/28/19) regulations require nursing homes to have an Infection Preventionist who has specialized training onsite at least part-time to effectively oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program. During the entrance conference on 4/22/24 at 10:09 AM, Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive plan of care was reviewed and revised in a timely manner for 6 residents (R) (R2, R16, R18, R20, R21, and R22) of 13 sampled residents. R2, R16, R18, R20, R21 and R22's care plans were not reviewed prior to or on the due dates listed on the care plans. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised March 2022, indicates: Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established in §483.21. §483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans indicates a comprehensive care plan must be .Developed seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment .(iii) Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments .Facility staff must develop the comprehensive care plan within seven days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status) and review and revise the care plan after each assessment. The Long-Term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, the facility did not ensure weights were obtained per physician orders for 4 residents (R) (R13, R20, R16 and R128) of 4 sampled residents. Staff did not obtain and document weekly weights for R13, R20, and R16 per physician orders. R128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R128's medical record did not contain weight information. Findings include: On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. R13 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) and diagnoses including dementia-severe with mood disturbance, edema, hypothyroidism, and anxiety. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/13/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated R13 had severely impaired cognition. R13's medical record contained a signed order from Medical Director (MD)-J, dated 2/1/24, for weekly weights on Tuesdays. R13's medical record did not contain weekly weights. Surveyor noted since October 2023, R13's weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident or their representative was informed and consented to the risks and benefits of care and the treatment for 2 residents (R) (R16 and R20) of 5 sampled residents. R16 was prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication), Lexapro (an antidepressant medication), Depakote (an anticonvulsant/mood stabilizing medication), Paxil (an antidepressant medication), Buspar (an anti-anxiety medication), and Namenda (a cognition-enhancing medication). R16's medical record did not contain current consents for the medications. R20 was prescribed Seroquel, Depakote, Paxil, Namenda, and Exelon (a cognition-enhancing medication). R20's medical record did not contain current consents for the medications. Findings include: On 4/24/24 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor requested the facility's Resident Rights policy from Regional Consultant (RC)-C who indicated the facility followed state and federal laws regarding resident rights. The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy indicates: Residents, families and/or their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R12 and R22) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received a transfer notice that included the date of the transfer, the reason for the transfer, the location of the transfer, and appeal rights. In addition, the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of the transfers. R12 was transferred to the hospital on 6/3/23. R12 was not provided with a written transfer notice and the Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer. R22 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R22 was not provided with a written transfer notice and the Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer. Findings include: The facility's Transfer Agreement policy, with an effective date of 8/1/17, indicates: Whenever the attending physician of a patient implements an order that a transfer of a patient from the facility to the hospital is medically necessary and appropriate, the facility shall transfer the patient .as promptly as possible .The facility shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R12 and R22) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization received written information of the duration of the facility's bed-hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, and the right to return to the facility. R12 was transferred to the hospital on 6/3/23 and was not provided a copy of the facility's bed-hold policy. R22 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was not provided a copy of the facility's bed-hold policy. Findings include: The facility's Bed-Holds and Returns policy, revised 3/2022, indicates: Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies .1. All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility's bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalizations or therapeutic leave). Residents are provided written information about these policies at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments for 2 residents (R) (R4 and R21) of 13 sampled residents. R4's MDS assessment, dated 2/21/24, did not contain a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score or indicate R4's cognition was assessed. R21's MDS assessment, dated 3/28/24, did not contain a BIMS score or indicate R21's cognition was assessed. Findings include: The facility's MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes policy, revised July 2017, indicates: Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. 1. The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS') Quality Improvement & Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. 2. Timeframes for completion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Screen was completed prior to admission for 1 resident (R) (R22) of 5 residents. The facility did not ensure R22's Level I PASRR Screen was completed prior to admission. Findings include: On 4/22/24, Surveyor reviewed R22's medical record. R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/28/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R22 had intact cognition. Surveyor noted R22's medical record did not contain a Level I PASRR Screen. On 4/24/24 at 2:31 PM, Surveyor interviewed Regional Consultant (RC)-C who could not locate R22's Level I PASRR Screen but agreed a Level I PASRR Screen should be completed for a resident with a diagnosis of anxiety. On 4/24/24 at 2:35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed or provided within 48 hours of admission for 1 resident (R) (R178) of 13 sampled residents. A baseline care plan was not completed or provided to R178 within 48 hours of admission. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised March 2022, indicates: Resident Care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by state statute (§) 483.21. According to §483.21 Comprehensive person-centered care planning: (a) Baseline care plans: (1) The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must: (i) Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission; (ii) Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop or implement an individualized comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 13 sampled residents. R21 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan that included ADL interventions related to toileting and incontinence care. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised March 2022, indicates: Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by state statute (§) 483.21. §483.21(b) Comprehensive Care Plans indicates a comprehensive care plan must be .Developed seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment .(iii) Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments .Facility staff must develop the comprehensive care plan within seven days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 resident (R) (R21) of 13 sampled residents. R21 required assistance with toileting and incontinence care which was not consistently provided. Findings include: On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R21's medical record. R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cerebral infarction (stroke), type two diabetes, anxiety, urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis. R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed. The MDS assessment also indicated R21 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and required partial/moderate assist for toileting hygiene. R21's previous MDS assessment, dated 12/28/23, indicated R21 was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel and required partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (R) (R13) of 1 sampled resident with edema. R13 had a diagnosis of edema. R13's plan of care did not contain interventions to treat, monitor, or provide edema relief. In addition, the facility did not update R13's physician on the effectiveness of a short-term medication order for edema. Findings include: The facility's undated Goals and Objectives, Care Plans policy indicates: Care plans shall incorporate goals and objectives that lead to the resident's highest obtainable level of independence .Care plan goals and objectives are defined as the desired outcome for a specific problem .When goals and objectives are not achieved, the resident's clinical record will be documented as to why the results were not achieved and what new goals and objectives have been established. Care plans will be modified accordingly .Care plan goals and objectives are derived from information contained in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 4/23/24, Surveyor reviewed R16's medical record. R16 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) and diagnoses including dementia with delusional disorder, cognitive communication disorder, dysthymic disorder, acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive system, and anxiety. R16's MDS assessment, dated 3/6/24, contained a BIMS score of 0 out of 15 which indicated R16 had severely impaired cognition. A progress note, dated 4/22/24, indicated: Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated R16 lost footing when walking and fell to buttocks on the floor. Bruising noted to R16's right mid back and right hip. R16 transferred with assist and reported no pain. The progress note indicated R16 did not have footwear on during the fall. Surveyor reviewed R16's care plan, with a revision date of 10/15/23, and noted R16 had falls due to confusion and advanced dementia, running down hallways, poor safety, and spatial awareness. The care plan contained an intervention to ensure R16 wore appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring of a high-risk medication was provided for 1 resident (R) (R22) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility did not monitor R22 for potential side effects or adverse reactions of anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. Findings include: On 4/22/24, Surveyor reviewed R22's medical record. R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and long-term anticoagulant use. R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/28/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R22 had intact cognition. R22 had a physician order for Eliquis (an anticoagulant mediation) 2.5 mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth two times daily for atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). Surveyor noted R22's plan of care did not contain interventions that alerted staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring for adverse effects of psychotropic medication was provided for 3 residents (R) (R16, R128, and R178) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R16 was prescribed antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anti-anxiety medication. R16's medical record did not indicate a gradual dose reduction was attempted within the last year or that a GDR was contraindicated. R128 was prescribed antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anti-anxiety medication. R128's plan of care did not contain monitoring for signs and symptoms of adverse effects or the effectiveness of the medication. In addition, R128's medical record did not contain an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment. R178 was prescribed antipsychotic and anti-anxiety medication. R178's plan of care did not contain monitoring for adverse effects or the effectiveness of the medication. In addition, R178's medical record did not contain an AIMS assessment. Findings include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not have a process to ensure mail was delivered on Saturdays. This practice had the potential to affect all 37 residents (R) residing in the facility. The facility did not have a process to deliver mail on weekends. Mail delivered to the facility on Saturdays was not provided to residents until the following Monday. Findings include: The facility's Mail and Electronic Communication policy indicates: .4. Mail and packages will be delivered to the resident within twenty-four hours of delivery on premises or to the facility's post office box (including Saturday deliveries). The facility's admission Agreement indicates: .Your mail will be delivered to your room within 24 hours of receipt at the center. On 6/2/26 at 1:03 PM, Surveyors conducted a Resident Council meeting. R7, R1 , R23 , R24, R36, and R38 were in attendance. R7 stated residents do not receive mail on Saturdays. When Surveyor asked the other residents if they receive mail on Saturdays, all residents indicated they receive mail Monday through Friday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-04-24 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the minimum required members of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met at least quarterly which had the potential to impact all 27 residents residing in the facility. Three of four required quarterly QAPI meetings held over the past year did not have the Medical Director (MD), Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Director of Nursing (DON) and/or Infection Preventionist (IP) in attendance as required. Findings include: On 4/24/24 at 8:27 AM, Surveyor reviewed the facility's QAPI sign-in sheets for meetings held during the previous year. The sign-in sheets indicated a QAPI meeting was held on 6/14/23 with the NHA, DON, IP and seven other staff in attendance. A meeting was held on 9/13/23 with the MD, NHA, DON, IP and five other staff in attendance. A meeting was held on 12/13/23 with the NHA and five other staff in attendance. A meeting was held on 3/13/24 with the DON/IP and five other staff in attendance. On 4/24/24 at 9:47 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who indicated the DON was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-07 for 131 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SCANDIA VILLAGE MEMBER LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
BRUCKSTEIN, DANIELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
EISENBERG, ANDREWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
SISTER BAY SNF REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
LITMAN, WARRENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2024
DORN, CHERYLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/25/2024
MANDELBAUM, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/25/2024
CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE I INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
FASTEN HALBERSTAM LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
WIPFLI ADVISORY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2025
JOHNSON, RORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
SCHMITZ, ARTHURIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/25/2024
GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-50.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 13%Medicare 1%Other / private 86%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$294per resident / day
operating cost
$8,925per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$196per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525494. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next