Health Center At Galloway, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 247 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to A.) administer physician prescribed insulin to diabetic residents as ordered for 8 of 24 residents (Residents #22, #24, #33, #73, #74, #81, #260, and #261) residing on 2 of 2 floors and B.) failed to follow a physician order for weekly weights on 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, (Resident # 35). Failure to administer the prescribed insulin and/or blood sugars (BS) put diabetic residents at risk for hyperglycemic reactions (high blood sugar that affects people with diabetes. Skipping doses or not taking enough insulin to lower blood sugar can lead to hyperglycemia, hospitalization, and possible death). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation which was identified on 10/30/2023, when the facility staff failed to administer physician prescribed insulin. The facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 10/30/2023 at 2:04 PM. A removal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ#2643473Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) Re-implement a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for a resident (Resident #72) who had a previously identified history of inappropriate sexual behaviors b.) implement a CCP for a resident (Resident #11) who was on psychotropic medications with behaviors, c.) develop a person-centered care plan for a resident who changed the setting on the oxygen concentrator (Resident #129) d.) develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #130) reviewed for unnecessary medications who was prescribed an anticoagulant (a medication used to prevent blood clots). This deficient practice occurred for 4 of 29 residents surveyed (Resident #11, #72, #129, and #130) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/12/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM, the surveyor attempted to conduct an interview with Resident #72 during the initial tour of the facility. It was determined from interview with staff and review of the electronic medical record that Resident #72 no longer was a resident of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint# NJ2699824 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that critical laboratory results obtained on 12/15/25 were immediately conveyed to the physician, which resulted in a three (3) day delay in notification on 12/18/25 and immediate transfer to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #123), reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) prevent the potential for cross contamination by not initiating and implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms) for a resident with a wound in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice. b.) follow appropriate infection control practices in a manner to prevent the potential spread of infection and/or cross-contamination during the provision of a wound care treatment and c.) transport linen in a manner that prevents the spread of infection for 1 (one) of 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure ulcers d.) maintain the feeding tube pump pole, overbed table, and wall in a sanitary manner, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for tube feeding e.) implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in accordance with the facility policy, physician orders, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman's Office of a resident transfer to an acute care hospital in a timely manner.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #123) reviewed for hospitalization and was evidenced by the following: On 2/17/26 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record of Resident #123.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a condition which makes it difficult to breathe), heart failure, unspecified, and Type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body does not produce enough insulin or use it effectively).A review of the resident's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 11/18/25, included the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) properly store a bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), machine [helps breathing by delivering air through a face mask), in a bag when not in use, b.) ensure that oxygen was being administered as per physician's orders, and c.) ensure that oxygen was humidified in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #116 and Resident # 129) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following:1.On 2/12/26 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #129 sitting upright in bed. Resident #129 had a nasal cannula (clear plastic tubing used to deliver supplemental oxygen to a patient through the nostrils) that delivered humidified oxygen via an oxygen concentrator set at eight (8) liters. The humidification bottle connected to the oxygen concentrator contained a small amount of liquid. On 2/13/26 at 8:46 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #129's electronic medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician supervision and oversite of medical care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure ulcer management and was evidenced by the following:The surveyor reviewed Resident #11's Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) which revealed the following information:A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, indicated that Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia: (a loss of mental functioning that affects thinking, memory, mood, and behavior) and diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body is unable to properly regulate blood sugar due to problems with insulin production or use).A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care, dated 12/14/2025, indicated that the resident scored 3 (three) out of 5 (five) on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) develop an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan (ICCP) with specific interventions to address dementia care, and b.) follow the facility policy for dementia care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for dementia care and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia and diabetes mellitus.A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care, dated 12/14/2025, indicated that the resident scored 3 (three) out of 15 (fifteen) on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated that Resident #11 did not exhibit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy consultant conducted a monthly review of each resident's medication regimen b.) to clarify a physician's order, c.) address a pharmacy consultant recommendation for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #113). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/12/26 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #113 lying in bed.On 2/13/26 at 1:40 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #113.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic condition where the body develops insulin resistance, causing high blood sugar levels because cells fail to respond to insulin properly) and rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic autoimmune disorder where the immune system attacks joint linings (synovium), causing painful, stiff, and swollen joints,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication with an error rate of less than 5%. The surveyor observed 3 nurses administer medications for 3 residents with 26 opportunities for error. There were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 7.6% as evidenced by the following: During the medication pass observation on 2/13/2026 from 8:27 AM until 8:35 AM, the surveyor observed the following: At 8:27 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #8 (LPN #8) prepare five medications for Resident #100 including Coreg tablet 25 mg (milligram) (carvedilol); give one tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN (hypertension) take with food, and Metformin HCL tablet 1000 mg; give one tablet by mouth two times a day for DM (diabetes mellitus) with a pharmacy cautionary label indicating to take this medication with food. At the time of the medication administration, the facility breakfast trays had not been delivered, and LPN #8 had not provided, offered, or instructed the resident to take the medication with food. At that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to secure a treatment cart during a wound treatment observation that was conducted on 2/17/2026. This deficient practice occurred with 1 of 1 nurse observed for the provision of a wound treatment and was evidenced by the following:On 2/17/2026 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor conducted a wound treatment observation on the third floor nursing unit with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). LPN#1 was observed gathering treatment supplies from the treatment cart. LPN #1 then proceeded to put the treatment supplies on top of the treatment cart. She then entered a resident's room, and left the treatment cart with the treatment supplies on top of the cart unlocked, unattended and out of her line of sight. LPN#1 returned to the cart to obtain additional supplies, then re-entered the resident's room, again leaving the cart unlocked, unsecured, and unattended.The treatment supplies left on top of the treatment cart consisted of one bottle of normal saline solution (NSS), one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$76,958 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $76,958 — penalty dated 2023-11-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ