Health Center At Bloomingdale

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (two) of 21 residents (Resident #2 and #6) during the review of resident assessment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The MDS is a comprehensive tool, a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of completing the assessment. After the MDS is transmitted, a quality measure will be transmitted to enable a facility to monitor the residents' decline or progress. On 8/25/25 at 9:06 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Corporate Director of Clinical Reimbursement (CDCR) about the MDS Coordinator (MDSC). The CDCR stated that there are two MDSCs, one who works remotely and does not go to the facility, and the other one is working…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Repeat Deficiency Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for two (2) of 21 residents, (Residents #15 and #114) reviewed for MDS accuracy, and was evidenced by the following: 1.The surveyor observed Resident #15 on 8/22/2025 at 12:00 pm eating lunch in the unit dining room. An observation of the resident’s room on 8/25/25 at 9:35 am revealed signage on the door leading to the room indicating the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). A plastic bin was placed at the entrance to the room in the hallway containing personal protective equipment (PPE). A review of the resident’s care plan indicated the resident was on EBP because of a history of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in the urine. Additionally, the resident was care planned for a diagnosis of diabetes and the use of insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (CP) for a resident on long-term use of insulin medication. This deficient practice was identified in 1 (one) of the 21 residents (Resident#6) reviewed for CP.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/22/2025 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 sitting in bed awake, alert, and able to answer the surveyor's inquiry. Resident #6 confirmed to the surveyor that they have had diabetes and are taking insulin injections. On 8/25/2025 at 1:16 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record (eMR)/hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #6, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar levels). A review of the recent admission Minimum Data Set (A/MDS), (an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's primary physician accurately dated their physician progress notes (PPN) during their visit to ensure the resident's current medical regimen was up to date. This deficient practice was observed for 3 of 21 residents (Residents #3, #6, and #10). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 8/22/2025 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 sitting in a wheelchair in the activity room. On 8/27/2025 at 1:46 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record (eMR)/hybrid medical record (paper and electronic) of Resident #3, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to seizure disorder (abnormal electrical activity in the brain). A review of the recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (Q/MDS) (an assessment tool used to facilitate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat Deficiency Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications (meds) were administered without error of 5% or more. During the morning med administration observation on 8/26/25, the surveyor observed 1 (one) nurse administering meds to 1 resident (Resident #115). There were 25 opportunities, and 3 errors resulting in a total error rate of 12%.The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: On 8/26/25 at 8:24 AM, during the morning med administration pass (med pass), the surveyor observed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing to administer meds to Resident #115. At that time, the surveyor observed that the LPN prepared and administered crushed meds to Resident #115 that included the following: - two tablets (tabs) of ascorbic acid 500 mg. (milligrams) [2 tabs=1000 mg] -one tablet (tab) of vitamin B-12 1000 mcg. (microgram)-one tab Colace 100 mg. At that time, the LPN acknowledged that she gave two tabs of ascorbic acid for a total of 1000 mg [ERROR #1]. The LPN stated that the house…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT # NJ00172263 Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 3/25/24, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently complete the dialysis communication form and maintain a residents dialysis communication record. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice is evidenced by the following: 1. According to the facility admission RECORD Resident #1 was admitted with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: End Stage Renal Disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 9/15/23, Resident #1's cognitions were intact and required assistance during Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The care plan (CP), undated, revealed that Resident #1 had Seizure Disorder and Dysphagia. Interventions included but were not limited to the Resident attend dialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday The surveyor reviewed Resident #1's Dialysis Communication Binder (DCB) on 3/25/24 at 10:31 AM. The DCB reflected forms titled Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for six (6) of six (6) fall incidents of Resident #80 reviewed for fall investigations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/14/24 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80, awake, and laying on a low bed with two floormats in use. On 02/15/24 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) for the resident's fall investigations for the last six months. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #80 as follows: According to the admission Record (admission summary), Resident #80 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to essential hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), major depressive disorder, mood disorder due to known physiological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness as evidenced by the following: On 02/14/24 at 9:55, in the presence of the Food Service Manager (FSM) the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the freezer, the surveyor observed a pack of opened manufactured Cheese Omelet a bag of crunchy fish fillets, and a bag of tot potatoes. All were unlabeled and not dated with expiration or open dates. The FSM manager was unable to say when the package was received, opened, or the expiration date. 2. The Manual counter attached can opener and holder and blade unit was unclean with wipeable by the FSM with sticky brown substance and crumbs. The FSM acknowledged that it needed to be cleaned. On 02/15/24 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor interviewed the FSM. who stated, Having a dirty can opener can cause cross contamination of products being opened and can attract unwanted pests. It is cleaned daily but needs to be scrubbed prior to putting in the dishwasher. He further stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices for performing hand hygiene to decrease the possibility of spreading infection. This deficient practice was observed during dining observation with four (4) of four (4) facility staff in one (1) of three (3) dining areas, in accordance with the facility's practice, policies, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for infection control. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, Hand Hygiene Guidance, last reviewed on January 30, 2020, included that Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient Before performing an aseptic task or handling invasive medical devices Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient After touching a patient or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint# NJ169589 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure written grievance decisions met documentation requirements and b) maintain evidence of the result of all grievances for no less than three (3) years from the date the grievance decision was issued according to facility practice and policy. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #352) reviewed for complaints. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/16/24 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor requested for all the reportable and grievances for the last six months for Resident #352 from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA). The surveyor reviewed the facility provided grievance log for November 2023 that included Resident #352. A review of the Complaint #NJ169589 dated 12/08/23, reflected that the complainant had spoken with the Social Worker around 11/13/23, to discuss concerns but conditions had not improved. The surveyor reviewed the closed record for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ