Barnegat Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ182922Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 7/21/25, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by protecting Resident #4, as well as all residents from abuse, when on 1/25/25 at 8:40 PM, the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #3) observed CNA #1 and CNA #2 physically abuse Resident #4 and CNA #3 did not report the incident until the next day, 1/26/25 at approximately 12:37 PM. On 1/25/25 at 8:40 PM, during the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift (3-11), CNA #3 reported hearing screaming coming from Resident #4's room, and when she walked into the room, CNA #3 stated that she observed the resident sitting on their bed with CNA #1 trying to remove the resident's shirt and CNA #2 trying to put on a [NAME] coat (hospital gown). CNA #3 reported observing the resident yelling and being combative and spit at CNA #1, who appeared agitated from it and CNA #1 straddled the resident on the bed. CNA #3 reported that while resident laid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ # 164925 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #299) received adequate supervision to prevent an accident, specifically by a staff member operating a mechanical lift to transfer the resident from a bed to a wheelchair without another staff member as required resulting in the resident falling from the mechanical lift concluding in a fractured femur (thigh bone), head laceration, and a shoulder injury. The deficient practice was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #299's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 5/31/2023 revealed under section C that he/she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11/15 indicating that he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed under section G, that he/she required total assistance to transfer from bed to wheelchair with two people providing support to physically assist. A review of Resident #299's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation during food preparation in a safe and consistent manner designed to prevent food borne illness by cross contamination.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/27/2026 at 10:18 AM, during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, the surveyor observed [NAME] #1 on the preparation (prep) table wearing disposable latex gloves with a hair cover. The surveyor observed the cook pull a plastic tape from a blue box on the table, go to the large grey trash bin, lifted the lid of the bin with their gloved right hand, threw the plastic tape in the trash bin, and returned the lid of the bin. Without washing hands and changing gloves, the cook opened the blue box on the table, took out several raw frozen fish fillets from the box, and placed them on a tray. Wearing the same gloves, the cook then went inside the walk-in freezer and took out another blue box and placed it on the prep table. The cook turned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriate infection control practices specifically by failing to use personal protective equipment upon entering rooms that required it when performing patient care for 2 of 8 residents reviewed under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (Resident #10, #101). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/26/2026 at 9:31 AM while touring the first floor, while outside of Resident # 10's room, the surveyor observed an orange sign outside the room door that revealed a stop sign symbol and the words, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy. At that time, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure that a resident did not self administer medication without an assessment, interdisciplinary care team meeting determination, a physician's order, or care plan intervention for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for the Medication Administration task.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:During observation of medication administration on 03/27/2026 at 9:33 AM, Resident #28 told Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 that they had already administered their eye drops. Resident #28 stated, I have them in my drawer; I do it myself. When the LPN asked, You give yourself the eye drops? the resident confirmed. The surveyor then asked the LPN whether Resident #28 self medicated their eye drops, and the LPN stated, Yes.A review of Resident #28's admission Record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alcohol Abuse with Withdrawal Delirium, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.A review of the physician's orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the results of the most recent survey were readily accessible to residents and the public.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 03/26/2026 at 09:52 AM during the initial tour, the surveyor observed the State Survey Binder located in the lobby of the facility. At that time, the surveyor did not observe any Life Safety Code Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567) from previous surveys within the binder.On 03/31/2026 at 12:00 PM during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) replied I will check after the surveyor asked if there is a reason the Survey Binder does not include any Life Safety Code Statements of Deficiencies.On 04/01/2026 at 10:25 AM during an interview with the surveyor, the LNHA said that the Life Safey Code Statement of Deficiencies is now included in the Survey Binder.N.J.A.C. S 8:39-13.1(a)

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner for 2 of 2 units (First and Second Floor). This was evidenced by: On 03/26/2026 at 10:06 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the first-floor shower room. In the first shower stall, on the bottom left corner, Surveyor #1 observed black discoloration and several chipped tiles. During an interview on 03/30/2026 at 11:15 AM, the Assisitant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that housekeeping was responsible for the major cleaning of the shower room. Surveyor #1 and the ADON reviewed the shower room together. The ADON acknowledged that the shower tiles need attention. During the initial tour on 03/26/2026 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER]A. At that time, the surveyor observed that the wallpaper was ripped behind the bed. The surveyor then observed room [ROOM NUMBER]. At that time, the surveyor observed, below the window, that there was a gap…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility did not ensure a residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, a psychotropic medication ordered for an extended duration lacked documented clinical rationale in the resident's record. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for unnecessary medications.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 03/26/2026 at 12:43 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #41 walking the facility halls speaking incoherently to themselves. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under Diagnoses revealed that Resident #41 was diagnosed with but not limited to generalized anxiety disorder and unspecified dementia (a decline of cognitive function).A review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care) dated 03/11/2026, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 out of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate by relying solely on an initial assessment performed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) without further RN clinical verification for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 36) reviewed for assessment accuracy.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing assessments for falls were completed by a Registered Nurse (RN) and fall care plans were formulated and evaluated for effectiveness by an RN, in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for accidents.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate incontinence care was provided for a resident who was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and incontinence care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/26/2026 at 9:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed a malodorous smell on the first-floor unit hallway across the room of Resident #70. The surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA #1) 1 enter Resident #70's room.On 3/26/2026 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor observed the door to the resident's room open. From the hallway, the surveyor observed CNA #1 fixing Resident #70's hair. When CNA#1 exited the room, the surveyor asked the CNA how many residents were in their assignment. CNA #1 stated they have 16 residents in their assignment. The surveyor entered the room of Resident #70. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was identified as having a contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity or rigidity of joints) received services to prevent further decreased range of motion (ROM) after discharge from therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #25) reviewed for position and mobility.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/26/2026 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed. The surveyor observed the resident's right fingers flexed with short nails visible. The surveyor asked the resident if they could open their right hand. The resident's right fingers were observed with little movement but remained flexed. The surveyor observed the skin on the right palm dry under the nails with no redness. The surveyor asked the resident if the staff apply anything on their right hand. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,475 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,475 — penalty dated 2024-11-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ