No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Ridge Senior Living At Windy Hill

100 Dogwood Drive, Philipsburg, PA 16866 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (814) 342-6090 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 342-6090 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
271 Railroad St · (814) 342-1108 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
208 Medical Center Dr · (814) 342-3750 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
400 N Centre St · (814) 342-2739 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rt. 322 Port Matilda Hwy · (704) 685-4952 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Route 322 East East · (814) 342-1021

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.0%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms78.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.2%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.9%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.4%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.3%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.281.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.131.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.5%CMS range 29.0–57.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.9–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.4–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.611.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 87.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-11)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, in the main kitchen of the facility and store a prepared juice in a safe and sanitary manner during medication pass on one of three nursing units observed (first floor Cherry Blossom Lane). Findings include: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 10, dietary staff, on June 8, 2026, at 9:43 AM revealed the following: A tray holding various clean items and cups had a brown colored sticky substance and stains on the tray. A stack of green cups was observed laying in the substance. Coffee filters were stored in a plastic, clear container. The bottom of the container had an accumulation of coffee-ground appearing debris in the bottom of it. The exterior of the container was sticky to the touch near the base. There was a large bag of lettuce in a walk-in cooler that was open to the ambient air. There was extensive staining (appeared to be food splashes) to the ceiling and adjacent light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that residents or resident representatives were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for six of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 9, 10, 26, 38, and 46). Findings: Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed an active physician's order dated March 13, 2026, indicating they were a full code (patient wishes to receive all possible life-saving interventions if their heart stops or they stop breathing). There was no evidence Resident 9 or the resident's responsible party were offered or assisted if needed in formulating an advance directive. Additional information regarding advanced directives for Resident 9 was requested during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on June 9, 2026, at 2:15 PM, and again on June 10, 2026, at 2:15 PM, but no further information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents who utilize a lift, PICC line, catheter care, medication administration, intravenous therapy, and dressing changes for three of three employees reviewed for competencies (Employees 13, 14, and 15).Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 88 residents receiving medications, 28 residents that utilize lifts (transfer equipment), four residents with indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), 10 residents with dressing changes, one resident with IV therapy (intravenous therapy, a medical procedure that delivers fluids, medications, nutrients directly into a vein), and one resident with a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter inserted into a vein in the arm that reaches a large central vein near the heart to deliver medications, fluids, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide received 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4, and 5).Findings include: Review of Employee 3's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on April 14, 2025. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 3 revealed that she completed only six hours and 30 minutes of in-service education in the last year. Review of Employee 4's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on March 12, 2025. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 4 revealed that she had not completed any in-service education in the last year. Review of Employee 5's (nurse aide) personnel record revealed that the facility hired her on March 12, 2025. Review of training records provided by the facility for Employee 5 revealed that she had not completed any in-service education in the last year. Interview with Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for one of 18 residents sampled (Resident 3). Findings include: Review of a current facility policy titled Dignity indicated demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. Observation of Resident 3 on June 8, 2026, at 12:05 PM revealed they were in their bed with a urinary catheter bag (a bag that connects to a tube inserted into the bladder, used to collect urine) hanging from the side of the bed, with yellow urine visible. There was nothing covering the bag. Observation of Resident 3 on June 9, 2026, at 11:35 AM revealed that they were sitting in their wheelchair in their room with their catheter bag on their feet. There was nothing covering the catheter bag. Observation of Resident 3 on June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Resident 1).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last reviewed without changes on January 28, 2026, revealed residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others. Nursing staff will monitor for and report side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications to the attending physician. Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed that the facility admitted him on March 18, 2025. Review of Resident 1's medication regime included the use of the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 6, and 10).Findings include: Observation of Resident 1 on June 8, 2026, at 1:51 PM revealed that he did not have any teeth. Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated November 17, 2025, that facility staff assessed Resident 1 as not edentulous (having no teeth), indicating the resident had natural teeth. Interview with the Director of Nursing on June 11, 2026, at 9:54 AM confirmed Resident 1's MDS was coded in error regarding his oral/ dental status. Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed a MDS dated [DATE], that facility staff assessed Resident 6 as receiving an insulin injection during the last seven days in the assessment period. Further clinical record review revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered hospice care plan for two of two hospice residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 6); and failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed for one of four residents reviewed with dementia (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of the facility documentation titled, Hospice and Nursing Facility Services Agreement, revealed a section of the document titled, Design and Maintenance of Nursing Facility Plan of Care (POC), that noted (in part) that the nursing facility shall develop a nursing facility POC for each new residential hospice patient. The document further noted that promptly upon consent of the residential hospice patient, or their legal representative, the nursing facility shall furnish hospice with a copy of the nursing facility POC. Clinical record review for Resident 2 on June 11, 2026, revealed an active physician order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with activities of daily living assistance for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include Observation of Resident 8 on June 8, 2026, at 10:29 AM revealed she had her own teeth, and there was a large amount of buildup on Resident 8's teeth. Interview with Resident 8 stated that sometimes staff help her brush her teeth or set her up so she can brush her own teeth. She stated that she hasn't been to the dentist in a long time. Observation of Resident 8 on June 9, 2026, at 10:25 AM revealed Resident 8 again had a large amount of buildup on her teeth. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident February 18, 2026. Review of Resident 8's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated February 20, 2026, revealed staff assessed Resident 8 as dependent on staff for oral hygiene. Review of Resident 8's plan of care revealed Resident 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered weights for one of two residents reviewed for nutritional concerns (Resident 4).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed a diagnosis list that included a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed a current physician order dated October 13, 2025, for staff to weigh resident weekly (weekly every Monday per the order). Resident 4's current care plan revealed the resident has a nutritional care plan related to the medical history and PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube; a feeding tube placed through the abdomen and into the stomach). An intervention included monitor weights at least monthly and/or as ordered/needed and to notify the medical provider of any significant changes in weight status initiated on January 3, 2025. Further review of Resident 4's care plan revealed a care plan for hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent future falls or accidents for one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident 9).Findings include: During an Interview with Resident 9 on June 8, 2026, at 12:05 PM, they were observed to have a soft cast on their left arm. The resident stated that a while ago they had fallen in the bathroom and fractured their arm. Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed that on March 15, 2026, the resident had a fall in the shower room when a nurse aide was assisting the resident in pulling up their pants. The x-ray report revealed that the resident had suffered fractures to their left humerus bone. Review of the accident report revealed that the immediate intervention at the time of the fall was to educate the nurse aide who was assisting the resident at that time to ensure that the resident was holding onto something when dressing their lower body. Further review of the residents' care plan (an outline of an individual's health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store resident medications on one of three nursing units reviewed (first floor North Cherry Blossom Lane) and properly dispose of resident medications on one of three nursing units reviewed (second floor Magnolia Lane). Findings include: Observation during the medication pass on the first floor North Cherry Blossom Lane Nursing Unit on June 11, 2026, at 9:06 AM revealed a medication cart being utilized by Employee 9, licensed practical nurse. Observation of the medication cart revealed the following: There were several unsecured and unidentified medication tablets found at the bottom of the drawers that included: at least three white colored round pills, one capsule, one blue oblong tablet, a white oblong tablet, and a red and clear capsule. These medications were observed at the bottom of the drawers that held the pre-packaged pill blister packets. There was also an accumulation of debris at the bottom of the drawers that held the loose medications. The above findings were reviewed in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services for two of 18 residents (Residents 44 and 9).Findings include: Observation of Resident 44's mouth on June 8, 2026, at 11:35 AM revealed several missing and broken teeth. Interview with Resident 44's friend at this time revealed that she used to have a partial (artificial teeth designed to replace one or more missing teeth while preserving remaining natural teeth) but indicated that Resident 44's partial no longer fits her. She stated that Resident 44 is served food cut up due to her partial not fitting and stated Resident 44 does not like her mechanically altered diet. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 44 on January 9, 2025. Review of Resident 44's plan of care-initiated January 20, 2025, revealed Resident 44 has the potential for oral and dental issues. There was no evidence in Resident 44's clinical record that the facility offered or assisted Resident 44 dental care since admission. Interview with the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection during medication administration pass for two of five residents observed (Residents 72 and 88), and ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection on one of three nursing units (300-Unit).Findings include: Review of the facility's current policy entitled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revealed facility staff are to use an alcohol-based hand rub. or alternatively soap. and water for the following situations, which include; before and after direct contact with residents, before preparing or handling medications, after contact with objects (like medical equipment), in the immediate vicinity of a resident, and after removing gloves. Observation on June 9, 2026, at 11:45 AM revealed the freezer in the 300-unit pantry refrigerator was being used to store ice cream. Two medical type ice packs with resident names on them were observed in the freezer with the ice cream. Concurrent interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of transfer and written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for three of five residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents 28, 59, and 65).Findings Include:Nursing documentation for Resident 65 dated May 15, 2025, at 11:58 PM revealed that the resident had a change in condition and 911 was called. A Medication Administration Note dated May 16, 2025, at 5:36 AM revealed that Resident 65 was admitted to the hospital for a urinary tract infection.A review of the census for Resident 65 revealed that the resident returned to the facility on May 21, 2025. Clinical record review revealed no documentation to indicate that Resident 65 and/or their representative received a written notice of transfer and a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer. Documentation was also requested by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion ([NAME]) for one of two residents reviewed for ROM concerns (Resident 19).Findings include:Interview with Resident 19 on July 9, 2025, at 10:30 AM revealed that he receives no follow through after therapy discharges him. He said the therapist will tell him that staff are going to do exercise to his legs, but it either does not happen or does not happen consistently.Clinical record review of a physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that resident was to receive a restorative active range of motion program (resident can move extremity on his own) and passive range of motion (staff move the extremity through range of motion) program to his lower extremities. Review of the facility's task documentation revealed that Resident 19 was receiving a restorative active assist range of motion program to his bilateral lower extremities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions promote acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of five residents reviewed for nutritional concerns (Residents 28).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Weight assessment and Intervention, last reviewed without changes February 26, 2025, revealed residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record chart and in the individual's medical record. Any weight change of five pounds or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. Undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team whether the criteria for significant weight change has been met. The physician and the multidisciplinary team identify conditions and medications that may be causing weight loss or increasing the risk of weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee personnel record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance evaluation of each nurse aide at least once every 12 months for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 7, 8, and 9).Findings include:The facility noted the following hire dates for three employees reviewed for performance evaluations (EPR, employee performance review): Employee 7's hire date of November 5, 1991, last EPR was November 14, 2023Employee 8's hire date of June 24, 1996, last EPR was May 26, 2024.Employee 9's hire date of October 31, 2017, last EPR was October 18, 2023.A request to review the annual performance evaluations revealed no documented evidence that the facility completed performance evaluations for Employee 7, 8, and 9 (nurse aides) at least once every 12 months. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 10, 2025, at 9:40 AM confirmed that performance evaluations were not completed annually on the three employees requested. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (2) Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by three of five residents reviewed (Residents 33, 52, and 61). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 33 revealed the facility admitted her on March 26, 2025, with diagnosis including Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 33's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 33 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 33's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner, maintain equipment in a sanitary condition, and prepare food items in accordance with professional standards in the facility's main kitchen.Findings include:Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 6, Director of Dining Services, on July 8, 2025, at 10:00 AM revealed the following:A walk-in freezer contained a cardboard box with several items packaged in slide lock plastic bags. One bag contained baked beans with no label or dates. The other bag contained peeled, whole bananas with no label or dates. A concurrent interview with Employee 6 revealed it was unclear on when the items were packaged or the use by date.The top shelf of a storage unit located under the circulating fans in the walk-in freezer contained several packages of sliced flavored bread. There was a significant accumulation of ice on three of the bread packages. The dry goods storage area contained metal shelving units on wheels. The floor under four of the observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer recommended pneumococcal immunizations for five of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 11, 18, 19, 23 and 29).Findings include:The policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine, last reviewed February 26, 2025, indicates that prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine within 30 days of admission. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or revaccinations will be made in accordance with the current CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations at the time of the vaccinations.Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted her on January 28, 2021. Documentation in Resident 11's clinical record revealed that she received a pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar 13) prior to her admission in 2016, and the PPSV23 in 2001. According to the CDC guidance entitled Pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 7, 8, and 9).Findings include:During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 8, 2025, at 2:00 PM the surveyor asked for training records to indicate that nurse aides had received at least 12 hours of in-service training in the last year for Employees 7, 8, and 9 (nurse aides).Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 10, 2025, at 10:05 AM confirmed there was no documented evidence that the above employees received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (7) Personnel policies and procedures28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(6)(d) Staff development

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's injury of unknown origin for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12).Findings include:The policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating, last reviewed without changes on February 26, 2025, revealed if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator, and other officials according to state law. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source, the administrator is responsible for determining what actions (if any) are needed for the protection of the residents. All allegations are thoroughly investigated.Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 12 on May 19, 2024. Nursing documentation dated April 15, 2025, at 1:38 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve the ability to perform activities of daily living for one of two residents reviewed for eating concerns (Resident 12).Findings include:Clinical record review for Resident 12 revealed an MDS (Minimum Data Set, assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that staff assessed Resident 12 as requiring the supervision with set up help only for eating. Resident 12's next MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed staff assessed Resident 12 as now requiring extensive assistance of one staff for eating.There was no documented evidence in Resident 12's clinical record to indicate that the facility identified or assessed Resident 12's decline in her ability to perform this activity of daily living.Interview with Employee 2 (registered nurse assessment coordinator) on July 10, 2025, at 11:45 AM confirmed these findings and stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered medication parameters for one of one resident reviewed for concerns (Resident 43) and failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding pacemaker care for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 384). Clinical record review for Resident 43 revealed a diagnosis list that included hypertension (high blood pressure), essential hypertension, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that comes and goes). Review of Resident 43's current care plan revealed the resident has an altered cardiovascular status related to the medical history. An intervention included to administer medications as ordered. A review of the current physician orders for Resident 43 dated May 6, 2025, indicated for staff to administer Metoprolol Succinate ER Extended Release (a medication that is used to treat high blood pressure and/or heart rate) 25 milligrams (mg) give one tablet orally at bedtime related to essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of one resident reviewed (Residents 23).Findings include:Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 23 on December 26, 2019, with a diagnose of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation added on October 12, 2023. Observation of Resident 23 on July 8, 2025, at 10:50 AM and 1:25 PM revealed he was in his wheelchair with a nasal cannula (NC, tubing to deliver oxygen to the nose) on and running at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM).Observation of Resident 23 on July 9, 2025, at 10:53 AM revealed Resident 22 was in his wheelchair with oxygen on and running at 2.5 LPM.Review of Resident 23's physician orders revealed a current order for staff to administer Resident 23 oxygen continuous every shift at 1.5 liters via nasal canula.The findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 9, 2025, at 12:00 PM.28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care, and to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of five residents reviewed for mood/behavior (Resident 59).Findings include:Clinical record review for Resident 59 revealed that the facility admitted him with a diagnosis of PTSD (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event), on April 30, 2024.Interview with Resident 59 on July 9, 2025, at 8:45 AM revealed that he has PTSD that is triggered by loud noises, and other people screaming in the middle of the night. He said the screaming startles him and he wakes up panicked wondering what had happened. Further review of Resident 59's care plan revealed no evidence that the facility identified triggers (everyday situations that cause a person to re-experience the traumatic event as if it was reoccurring) for him related to his diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a consultant pharmacist reviewed a resident's medication regimen monthly for one of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Resident 65).Findings include:Clinical record review for Resident 65 revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Clinical record review for Resident 65 revealed a diagnosis list that included Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and cognitive abilities), cognitive impairment, and anxiety. Review of facility documentation for Resident 65 revealed a monthly medication regimen review dated April 10, 2025, from the consultant pharmacist. Further clinical record review for Resident 65 revealed no documentation that a licensed pharmacist completed required monthly medication regimen reviews for the resident during May and June 2025. Documentation for the completed monthly medication reviews was requested by the surveyor during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident to obtain routine dental care for one of one resident reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 23).Findings include:Observation and interview with Resident 23 on July 8, 2025, at 10:55 AM revealed he had several missing and broken bottom teeth. Resident 23 stated that he does not remember the last time he was offered dental services.Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 23 on December 26, 2019, with payment sources that included the state Medicaid benefit. Review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed a physician's order for a dental consult and follow up as needed on January 1, 2025. Further review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed his last dental visit was August 21, 2024.Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 10, 2025, at 10:19 AM confirmed Resident 23 did not receive dental care according to state plan. The facility failed to provide evidence that Resident 23 received routine prophylactic dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality according to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure licensed nursing staff were knowledgeable in the necessary care and services for one of one resident reviewed with a peripherally inserted central catheter (Resident CR1; Employee 3) Findings include: A request for the facility policy regarding a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, thin, soft, flexible tube inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart for the administration of fluids or medication) was made by the surveyor to the Nursing Home administrator (NHA) on December 11, 2024, at 11:20 AM and the Director of Nursing at 12:53 PM. A review of the policy provided by the facility titled, Intravenous Device Care, noted care of intravenous devices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in a safe and sanitary manner and prevent the potential for food contamination in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on July 30, 2024, at 9:37 AM revealed the following: A speed rack located beside the ovens was observed with trays of potatoes, as well as another tray at the bottom of the rack holding a container with a variety of equipment such as spatulas, spoons, labels, and pens. The tray contained dried spills and food splatter. A drawer unit under a preparation table across from the ovens was dusty, contained dried food debris, and food splatter. Lower shelves of preparation and storage tables throughout the kitchen where food preparation equipment was stored were observed with dust, crumbs, and dried spills. Flooring throughout the kitchen under preparation tables, steam tables, oven, coolers, and along wall edges, was observed with dirt and debris buildup, dried food, wrappers, soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs regarding the accessibility of a call bell for two of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 25 and 53). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 25 revealed a diagnoses list that included: a need for assistance with personal care, weakness, and contracture of the muscles. A current care plan for Resident 25 revealed the resident is at risk for falling related to gait abnormality, a history of pain, incontinence, and other medical areas. An intervention listed on the care plan included to keep the call bell in reach. Observation of Resident 25 on July 31, 2024, at 9:48 AM revealed he was in bed. The call bell was observed not within reach with the call bell cord tucked between the resident's right side rail and mattress and the activator hanging down under the bed almost touching the floor. Observation of Resident 25 on August 1, 2024, at 11:10 AM revealed he was in bed. The call bell was observed out of his reach with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident or responsible party for two of seven residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 8 and 13). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident 8 was still hospitalized at the time of the full health survey. There was no documented evidence in Resident 8's clinical record to indicate that the facility provided her responsible party written information on the facility's bed hold policy. Observation on August 2, 2024, at 12:15 PM confirmed that Resident 8's bed hold forms were still sitting in an envelope at the facility's front desk. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 2, 2024, at 12:55 PM confirmed that if a resident's responsible party is unable to be contacted regarding a transfer, then the notice is sent out via the mail. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder for level II review for one of one resident reviewed for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) compliance (Resident 10). Findings include: The PA-PASRR-ID form (Pennsylvania Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review; PA-PASRR, federally required form to help ensure that all individuals are evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability to ensure applicants are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) dated February 2016 and revised in September 2018, lists examples of serious mental illness including psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The revised PA-PASRR-ID bulletin number 01-14-13, 03-14-10, 07-14-01, 55-14-01 dated March 1, 2014, revealed that nursing facilities are responsible for assuring the accuracy of information reported on the PA-PASRR-ID form. If the individual has a change in condition that affects target status a PA-PASRR-EV (Level II) will need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care and eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 10 revealed a current care plan entitled Behavioral Symptoms that identified her as having PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from experiencing a traumatic event). The care plan goal was that Resident 10 would remain stable with interventions and medications as ordered. Further review of her care plan revealed that the facility failed to identify triggers that may retraumatize her related to her diagnosis of PTSD. A physician's progress note provided to the surveyor on August 2, 2024, at 9:30 AM dated November 24, 2004, indicated that Resident 10 was admitted from a personal care home after an alleged rape by another resident. The note also indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received or was offered pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 7 and 168). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed that the facility admitted her on March 12, 2024. Review of her immunizations in her clinical record revealed that there was no documentation related to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (vaccines administered to prevent pneumonia). Clinical record review for Resident 168 revealed that the facility admitted her on July 17, 2024. Review of her immunizations in her clinical record revealed that there was no documentation related to the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. The Director of Nursing was made aware of concerns with Resident 7 and 168's pneumococcal vaccinations on August 2, 2024, at 1:01 PM. The facility failed to ensure the Residents 7 and 168 received the appropriate vaccinations as recommended. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative received written notice of transfer and written notice of the facility bed-hold policy as soon as practicable for two of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 7 and 23).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed the resident was transferred to the emergency room on April 18, 2026, at her request. There was no evidence Resident 7's responsible party received a written notice of transfer or written notice of the bed hold policy as soon as practicable for Resident 7's transfer. Further clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed the resident was also transferred to the emergency room on May 20, 2026, for evaluation and treatment of pain. There was no evidence Resident 7's responsible party received a written notice of transfer or written notice of the bed hold policy as soon as practicable for Resident 7's transfer. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on June 11, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in the facility's main dumpster area.Findings include:Observation of the facility's main dumpsters on July 8, 2025, at 10:45 AM, located outside of a rear egress door from the facility's main kitchen revealed the following: There was debris and garbage on the ground surrounding the dumpster that included the following: four feet tall weeds, one to two inches of stagnant water ponding in a metal containment area underneath the container that held the facility's generator fuel supply, seven wooden boards of a fence that surrounded the dumpster area that each contained three rusted nails (for a total of 21) protruding from the boards and posing a risk of injury, an accumulation of dead leaves, discarded cardboard, and various discarded items on the ground (hair nets, gloves, paper products, and pieces of wood). The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 8, 2025, at 2:10 PM. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-02 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer that included all the written components to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party for two of seven residents reviewed (Resident 8 and 13). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred her to the hospital on July 23, 2024. Resident 8 was still in the hospital at the time of the full health survey. There was no documented evidence that that the facility attempted to provide Resident 8's responsible party with a transfer notice that included all the required contents: State long term care appeal agency or contact and address information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman including email address. Observation on August 2, 2024, at 12:15 PM confirmed that Resident 8's transfer forms were still sitting in an envelope at the facility's front desk. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 2, 2024, at 12:55 PM confirmed that if a resident's responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRUCKSTEIN, DANIELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE I INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ANDERSON, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
MILLINDER, TRAVISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ANDREW TOBIAS 2021 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
DORNCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
PHILLIPSBURG SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
RUDNIK CAPITAL LLC DEFINED BENEFIT PLANOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
BRISMAN, YAACOVIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HALBERSTAM, BENJAMINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
LAVERY, DORIANNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
TOBIAS, LAURENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 3%Other / private 10%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,346per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395533. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next