Medicalodges Arkansas City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 36.3 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents, including 11 female residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. The sample included 13 residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), State Agency (SA) and/or Law Enforcement (LE) as appropriate when Resident (R) 1 repeatedly touched cognitively impaired female residents, R2 and R3, and displayed sexual behaviors such as masturbating in the presence of other residents. On 01/25/25 R1 grabbed R3's breast. The facility placed R1 on one-to-one with staff and sent the resident to an acute behavioral facility, but did not implement interventions to prevent further resident-to-resident abuse when R1 returned on 02/22/25 other than a medication for sexual aggression. The facility failed to notify LE. On 03/01/25 staff observed R1 rubbing the leg of an unidentified female resident. On 03/05/25 R1 grabbed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents and 11 female residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. The sample included 13 residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately implement protective measures to prevent further potential abuse, after an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse and further failed to conduct thorough investigations when Resident (R) 1 repeatedly touched cognitively impaired female residents, R2 and R3, and displayed sexual behaviors such as masturbating in the presence of other residents. On 01/25/25 R1 grabbed R3's breast. The facility placed R1 on one to one with staff and sent the resident to the acute behavioral facility but did not implement interventions to prevent further resident to resident abuse when R1 returned on 02/22/25 other than a medication for sexual aggression. On 03/01/25 staff observed R1 rubbing the leg of an unidentified female resident. The facility did not implement interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 13 residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from resident-to-resident abuse when on 01/25/25 Resident (R)1 grabbed R3's breast, and the facility failed to place any interventions to protect R3 and other residents from R1's unwanted sexual advances and touching. The facility placed R1 on a one-to-one with staff and sent the resident to a geriatric psychiatric (geri-psych) facility but did not implement interventions to prevent further resident-to-resident abuse when R1 returned on 02/22/25 other than medication for sexual aggression. On 03/01/25 staff observed R1 rubbing the leg of an unidentified female resident. The facility did not implement interventions in response to this incident. On 03/05/25 R1 grabbed R2's breast and staff directed R1 to his room but did not implement interventions to prevent further sexual contact. On 03/10/25 the facility placed R1 on visual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse when Resident (R) 1, who had a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors, exposed his genitals to R9, a cognitively impaired resident. This deficient practice resulted in the residents being at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being including fear and embarrassment, and risk for ongoing sexual abuse. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R1's 12/06/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with six residents selected for review, including three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used a gait belt while assisting Resident (R)1 in the shower room on 07/22/24. R1 was no longer to bear weight and required staff to assist him to the floor. R1's leg was underneath him, which resulted in a left ankle fracture (broken bone). Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R1 included diagnoses of muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the left nondominant side, cerebral infarction (stroke- damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), and nondisplaced oblique fracture (bone broken at an angle) of the shaft of the left fibula (one of the two bones of the lower leg). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed R 1 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents, one main kitchen and one kitchenette. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food-borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 06/24/25 at 03:39 PM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The stationary can opener had a sticky, thick substance covering the entire can opener. 2. Two machines utilized to puree food had dried food and liquids. 3. The inside and outside of the microwave oven had dried on foods and liquids. 4. Four cutting boards had deep grooves making them unsanitizable. 5. The front of the white cabinet doors and upper cabinet doors throughout the kitchen had dried on food and liquids. The handles to the cabinets contained a build-up of a sticky substance. 6. The inside of the cabinets which contained plastic pitchers, equipment parts, and other kitchen supplies rested directly on the bottom of the cabinets which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility staff failed to implement adequate and acceptable infection control practices related to laundry services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infections. Findings included: - During an observation on 06/24/25 at 02:56 PM, residents' clean clothes were carried by a hanger down the hall, uncovered, and placed in a resident's room by laundry staff. During an observation on 06/25/25 at 10:13 AM, staff carried resident clothes on a hanger down the hallway, uncovered. During an observation on 06/30/25 at 12:05 PM, observed in the soiled laundry storage there was a barrel with soiled laundry in and no cover, and there was soiled laundry sitting in the open on a covered transport bin. During an observation on 06/30/25 at 12:10 PM, the washing room, next to a washer, had a parked housekeeping cart, also observed were dirty mop buckets sitting on the drainage grate behind the washers. During an observation on 06/30/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in two of the three resident halls including the shower room on Hall A and Hall B as well as one supply storage room on Hall A which placed the residents at risk of unsanitary living conditions. Findings included: - During an environmental tour on 06/30/25 at 08:49 with Hskp/Maintenance U, the following concerns were noted: Hall A The shower room window had a build-up of dust, debris, and dead bugs. A four-tiered metal cart used to hold clean towels, wash clothes and toiletries had multiple areas of rust. The toilet seat was discolored and had several gouged areas on the seating surface. A storage room had two boxes resting directly on the floor. One unopened box contained urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) supplies. One opened box contained various wound supplies including assorted dressings, tape, and measuring devices. Hall B The shower room window had a build-up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for one of the five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed, CNA M, placing the affected residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: A review of five employee personnel files, employed by the facility for greater than one year, revealed the following: CNA M's personnel file revealed she was hired on 12/13/23. Her file lacked an annual performance review. On 06/26/25 at 09:45 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the facility had not completed an annual evaluation for CNA M. The facility policy for Performance Reviews, undated, included: Full and part-time employees shall receive a formal, written evaluation on an annual basis.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents; the sample included 14. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R)1, regarding antidepressants (medications used to treat symptoms of depression, a mood disorder that can cause persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and difficulties with daily functioning) medication. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and delusional disorders (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents; the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R)23, regarding Black Box Warnings (BBW), placing the resident at risk for inadequate care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included psychotic disorder with delusions (significant impairment in an individual's perception of reality, leading to the presence of false beliefs that are not based in reality) and high-risk behaviors (actions that significantly increase the likelihood of experiencing negative consequences). R23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident did not receive any high-risk medication during the assessment period. The Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/21/25, did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 3's Care Plan with the interventions to prevent further weight loss. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: unspecified psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) R3's 07/26/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R3's weight was 193 pounds, and she had no known weight loss. R3 consumed a regular textured diet with no eating or swallowing concerns. The 07/26/24 Nutritional Status Care Area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of cardiovascular accident (CVA-also known as a stroke, a medical emergency where blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted, leading to brain cell damage). R30's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. He required set-up assistance for mobility in his manual wheelchair. He had impairment on one side of his upper and lower extremities. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/24/25, documented the resident had left upper and lower extremity weakness and decreased safety awareness. Staff were to expect further activity of living (ADL) decline. R30's Quarterly MDS, dated 04/25/25, documented the resident had a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He had upper and lower extremity weakness on one side and was independent with mobility in his manual wheelchair. R30's Care Plan, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one resident reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to prevent UTI to the extent possible for Resident (R) 1 when failed to provide incontinence care monitor identify, and report signs and symptoms of ongoing UTI. This placed the resident at risk for ongoing UTI and related complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly, leading to a buildup of waste and fluid in the body), unspecified urinary incontinence (involuntary leakage of urine), and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines). R2 ' s Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents with three residents sampled for nutrition Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for Resident (R) 3 when the facility failed to implement interventions and recommendations including providing fortified foods to prevent further loss. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss. Findings: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: unspecified psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) R3's 07/26/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded R3's weight was 193 pounds,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$72,592 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $41,041 — penalty dated 2025-06-26
• $21,518 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-30 for 35 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $171K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS