Medicalodges Fort Scott
915 S Horton, Fort Scott, KS 66701 · For profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (620) 223-0210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.4% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.0% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.3% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.9% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 35.0–63.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.0–18.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 34.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for two of the five direct care staff reviewed.Findings included:- Review of five direct care staff's employment records Revealed the following: 1.Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) P, hired 11/01/22, lacked an up-to-date annual performance evaluation. The last evaluation was dated 10/03/24. 2.CNA Q, hired 08/06/03, lacked an up- to-date annual performance evaluation. The last evaluation was dated 10/08/24. On 02/18/2026 at 12:48 PM, Administrative Staff A verified above concerns and reported performance evaluations should be done annually. The facility did not provide a policy related to the completion of annual performance evaluations.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment Findings included:- On 02/16/2026 at 01:43 PM, R2 had multiple areas on his wall missing paint near the bed and there was a heavy odor of urine in his room and in the hallway outside his room. On 02/16/2026 at 02:11 PM, R32 sat in her room in her recliner. She reported she had to keep the door to her room closed because of noise from other residents' televisions. On 02/16/2026 at 02:41 PM, the [NAME] on the air conditioning unit in R19's room was broken and was not installed on the front of the unit. On 02/17/2026 at 07:45 AM, R2 was not in his room but his television volume was very loud. There was a strong urine odor noted outside the room in the hallway. On 02/17/2026 at 03:35 PM, R2 sat in his room in his wheelchair. His television volume was very loud and there was a strong urine odor noted. Administrative Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Thirty medications administrations were observed with two medications errors identified resulting in a medications error rate of 6.67 percent. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rates of five percent or less. - Resident (R)39's Physician Orders (POS) revealed orders for the following morning medication administration: Phenazopyridine HCL 200 milligrams (mg), by mouth, three times a day, after meals, ordered 02/13/26 Protonic oral tablet, 40 mg, delayed release tablet, give twice a day, 30 minutes to one-hour before meals. On 02/17/26 at 09:00 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R prepared the R39's medications. The phenazopyridine HCL 200 mg was omitted. She reported the phenazopyridine had not been available from the pharmacy for administration since it was ordered on admission [DATE]. On 2/17/26 at 09:08 AM, CMA R added the prescribed medication protonic oral tablet, 40 mg. She entered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy including duration for Resident (R) 2. Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and developmental disorder of scholastic skills (persistent difficulties that significantly impact academic achievement and daily functioning). R2's 10/30/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. R2's Progress Note, dated 10/15/025, at 02:53 PM documented the resident was admitted to the hospital. R2's Progress Note, dated 10/16/25 at 10:25 AM, documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) after identifying a decline in Resident (R) 1's status resulting in initiation of hospice services. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), seizures, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues). R1's Quarterly MDS, dated 07/05/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R1's MDS did not indicate he had less than six months to live or that he received hospice services. The Quarterly MDS, dated 10/04/24, documented a BIMS score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R1 had upper extremity and lower extremity impairment on one side and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 33 residents; the sample included 14 with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and related monitoring. Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to monitor and respond to Resident (R) 2's lack of bowel movements. Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and developmental disorder of scholastic skills (persistent difficulties that significantly impact academic achievement and daily functioning). R2's 10/30/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] which documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. R2's MDS documented he required total assistance with toileting hygiene and R2 was frequently incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were reviewed and addressed by the physician for Resident (R) 23 and R2. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R23 documented a diagnosis of hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 01/23/26, documented R23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R23's MDS documented he required setup or clean-up assistance with showers/bathing himself and was independent with all other activities of daily living. R23's Care Plan, initiated 04/03/23, documented the pharmacist reviewed medication monthly and as needed. The plan of care directed staff to monitor labs and diagnostic tests as ordered by R23's physician and documented the pharmacy, physician, and psychiatrist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 33 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 23's thyroid (organ at the front of the neck that secretes hormones) hormone levels were monitored to determine the effectiveness of his ordered thyroid hormone replacement medication. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R23 documented a diagnosis of hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 01/23/26, documented R23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R23's MDS documented he required setup or clean-up assistance with showers/bathing himself and was independent with all other activities of daily living. R23's Care Plan, initiated 04/03/23, documented the pharmacist reviewed medication monthly and as needed. The plan of care directed staff to monitor labs and diagnostic tests as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and adequate system for monitoring and reconciliation of narcotic medications in the facility emergency kits (e-kit), putting the residents at risk of misappropriation of medications. Findings included: - A tour of the medication room on 07/02/25 at 09:09 AM with Licensed Nurse (LN) G revealed the following concerns: 1. A narcotic (a psychoactive compound with numbing or paralyzing properties) e-kit which contained 10 tablets (tabs) of hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a narcotic pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg); five tabs of hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg; hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg and a 15 milliliter (ml) bottle of morphine sulfate (MS) 20 mg/ml. The lock-out tag number did not match the number documented on the Controlled Medication Shift Count. 2. An e-kit which contained five tabs of alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.25 mg; five tabs APAP-Codeine #3 (a pain medication); five tabs clonazepam (an antianxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide protective measures for Resident (R)1 following an allegation of abuse. This placed the resident at risk for abuse. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), intellectual disability (ID- a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update Resident (R) 1's Care Plan, putting the resident at risk for inadequate care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), major depressive disorder (MDD-major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), intellectual disability (ID- a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and hallucinations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26. The sample included three residents reviewed for neglect. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent and cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1, who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phage (delay in swallowing), and ileus (obstruction of the intestines [gastrointestinal tract that absorbs nutrients and water from food], caused by immobility of the bowel), remain free from neglect when Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S continued to administer R1's morning medications despite R1's request to slow down because she was having a difficult time swallowing. When CMA S left the room, CMA S told R1 there you're done now you can quit your crying. Findings included: - (R)1's ''Physician Order Sheet'' (POS), dated 08/01/24, documented diagnoses which included: dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phage (delay in swallowing), ileus (obstruction of the intestines [gastrointestinal tract that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 26. The sample included three residents reviewed for neglect. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent and cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1, who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phage (delay in swallowing), ileus (obstruction of the intestines [gastrointestinal tract that absorbs nutrients and water from food], caused by immobility of the bowel), remain from neglect when Housekeeping U and Outside Resource Staff EE failed to report to Administrative Staff A that Certified Medication Aide S continued to administer R1's morning medications despite R1's request to slow down because she was had a difficult time swallowing. When CMA S left the room, CMA S told R1 there you're done now you can quit your crying. Findings included: - (R)1's ''Physician Order Sheet'' (POS), dated 08/01/24, documented diagnoses which included: dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phage (delay in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels on the weekends to meet the needs of the residents. This placed the residents at risk for impaired mental and physical well-being. Findings included: - A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 4 and FY 2024 Quarter 1 revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. On 04/03/24 at 10:15 AM, Resident Council members reported activities rarely occurred on weekends compared to the weekdays. The council reported due to the low staffing in the facility there was no activity person on the weekend. The council reported they would like activities on the weekends, such as bingo or interactive groups on the weekend. On 04/03/24 at 10:37 AM Administrative Staff A stated the weekend staff was low at times related to call-ins and lack of staff. Administrative Staff A stated the weekend staff had improved. On 04/03/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed for performance evaluations and the associated in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA Q, hired on 11/24/98 had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA M, hired on 05/14/19 had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA BB, hired on 05/22/20 had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA R, hired on 06/28/22 had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. CNA S, hired on 11/17/97 had no yearly performance evaluations upon request. On 04/02/24 at 04:02 PM Administrative Staff A stated the facility was unable to find any performance evaluations or the required in-service records for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed for 12 hours of required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - A review of the facility's staffing list revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA Q, hired on 11/24/98 had no hours of in-service training recorded. CNA M, hired on 05/14/19 had no hours of in-service training recorded. CNA BB, hired on 05/22/20 had no hours of in-service training recorded. CNA R, hired on 06/28/22 had no hours of in-service training recorded. CNA S, hired on 11/17/97 had no hours of in-service training recorded. On 04/02/24 at 04:05 PM Administrative Staff A stated the facility was unable to find any performance evaluations or the required in-service records for the above-mentioned staff. On 04/03/24 at 03:30 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to post the State Survey Agency (SSA) contact information on how to report abuse in a manner accessible to the residents and their representatives. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ongoing abuse and other concerns. Findings Included: - On 04/01/24 at 07:20 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed. Upon inspection of the facility's television area, a small 8-inch by 10-inch (8x10) poster with small black writing was posted by the main entry door to the room four feet high on the wall. The poster displayed the SSA contact information and instructions related to reporting complaints related to abuse. A walkthrough of the center hall revealed an 8x10 poster with a small black font on the wall placed behind two Hoyer lifts (total body mechanical lift). The poster was placed six feet away from the view of the hall. On 04/02/24 at 10:15 AM, the Resident Council members reported they were not aware of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a system to allow residents and/or their representatives to file grievances anonymously. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and unresolved grievances and concerns. Findings Included: - On 04/02/24 at 08:00 AM an inspection of the facility revealed no designated grievance drop boxes or system available in the areas accessible to the residents and visitors of the facility. On 04/02/24 at 10:15 AM, the Resident Council members reported they were not aware if the facility provided a way to complete anonymous grievances. The council reported Administrative Staff A was responsible for complaints and grievances. The council reported they did not know of a grievance box or forms. On 04/03/24 at 11:45 AM Social Services X reported she was not aware of any way for the residents or their visitors to file grievances anonymously. On 04/03/24 at 03:50 PM Administrator A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan with resident-specific interventions for Resident (R)7, R10, R25, and R14. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of morbid obesity (severely overweight), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness, and respiratory failure. R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) completed 02/02/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he required substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample includes 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weekend activities. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendar for January, February, and March 2024 was completed. The review revealed no activities on Saturdays and Sundays. The calendar indicated church services were provided on Sunday afternoons. On 04/03/24 at 10:15 AM, Resident Council members reported activities rarely occurred on weekends compared to the weekdays. The council reported due to the low staffing in the facility there was no activity person on the weekend. The council reported they could read books, and there were extra coloring pages, or they could watch TV. The council reported they would like activities on the weekends, such as bingo or interactive groups on the weekend. On 04/03/24 at 12:55 PM, Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) Q stated staff used to have activities on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from hazardous materials for eight cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to assess and ensure Resident (R) 25's siderails were mounted safely. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents. Findings Included: - On 04/01/24 at 07:05 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of the facility's east hallway revealed an unlocked oxygen storage room. An inspection of the room revealed 25 pressurized supplemental oxygen cylinders stored on the racks. The room contained eight smaller pressurized cylinders underneath a shelf. Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) O stated the room should be left secured due to the oxygen canisters and secured the door. An inspection of the north hallway revealed an unsecured beauty shop. The room contained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control standards related to following enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact care), laundry services, and sanitary care practices. his deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: - The facility identified it was completing ongoing exposure testing for COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory virus) but had no COVID-19-positive residents in the facility. A review of Resident (R)2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated she had a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). Her EMR lacked indication she was on enhanced barrier precautions. A review of R4's EMR indicated he had a percutaneous endoscope gastrostomy tube (PEG-a tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on records review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide effective pest control so that the facility was free from pests. This placed the residents at increased risk for impaired comfort and disease. Finding Included: - An inspection of the facility's Pest Siting log indicated that cockroaches were last seen in the facility on 07/07/23 around the north hall soiled utility room. The pest control log indicated the facility contracted a company to spray monthly. The log indicated the last pest control treatment was in March 2024. On 04/01/24 at 07:01 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed. An inspection of an unlocked shower room labeled Handicapped Women's Bathroom (north hall) revealed a large number of cockroaches crawling along the shower, toilet, cabinets, sink ceiling, and bathtub in the room. On 04/03/24 at 02:30 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated she was aware the facility had large numbers of cockroaches. She stated staff reported the north hall bathroom was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. The facility identified six residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage Form 10123 (NOMNC- the form used to notify Medicare A participants of their rights to appeal and the last covered date of participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) with the required information for Resident (R) 88 and R 89. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired decision-making. Findings included: - A review of R88's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 12/09/23 and ended on 12/21/23. R88 did not remain in the facility for custodial care. The facility was unable to provide documentation a NOMNC was issued for R88. A review of R89's EMR documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 9/27/23 and ended on 11/03/24. R89 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer or discharge notice for Resident (R) 10's facility-initiated transfers. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk of uninformed choices and miscommunication regarding care needs. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and a contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented no upper or lower extremity impairment for R10 during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice when Resident (R) 10 was hospitalized . This deficient practice placed R10 at risk of uninformed choices. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and a contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented no upper or lower extremity impairment for R10 during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 02/16/24 documented a BIMS score of 10 which indicated moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 25 received the necessary ADL assistance he required for his hearing aids. This deficient practice placed R25 at risk for the inability to communicate with peers or staff, increased confusion, negative psychosocial outcomes, and decreased dignity. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and cognitive communication deficit. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R25 was dependent on staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for daily weights to monitor for fluid overload for Resident (R) 14. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or never problems), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] did not document a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). The MDS documented that R14 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 with five reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7's pressure-reducing interventions were implemented correctly when his low air-loss mattress pump was inappropriately set for his current weight. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complications related to skin breakdown and pressure ulcers. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of morbid obesity (severely overweight), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness, and respiratory failure. R7's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 10 was provided services and treatment to prevent worsening of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) in his left hand. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and a contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for catheters (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) and urinary tract infections (UTI infection in any part of the urinary system). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)2 received sanitary catheter care when staff failed to provide R2 education on performing sanitary catheter care and failed to assess R2's ability to self-perform her catheter care. These deficient practices placed the resident at risk for catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, acute respiratory failure (occurs when your lungs cannot release enough oxygen you're your blood, which prevents your organs from properly functioning) with hypoxia (hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain accurate weights as ordered by the medical provider to prevent avoidable weight loss for Resident (R)4. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk for complications related to weight loss. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness, and abnormal weight loss. R4's admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) completed 03/04/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he weighed 139 pounds (lbs.) upon admission. The MDS indicated he had an enteral feeding tube (provision of nutrients…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory care and services for Resident (R)33 and R2. This placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung tissues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure) and weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated severe cognition impairment. The MDS indicated R33 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated R33 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for siderails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 25 had documented consent for the use of the siderails, failed to show alternative methods were attempted, and failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party were advised of the risks and/or benefits of the use of the siderails. This placed the resident and/or representative at risk for uninformed decisions related to the risks and benefits associated with the use of siderails. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and cognitive communication deficit. The Significant Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 with one reviewed for significant medication errors. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate skills and knowledge to administer Resident (R)30's Midodrine (medication used to increase blood pressure). This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for impaired quality of care. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R30's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). R30's admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) completed 03/15/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to severe impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated she had respiratory services. R30's Communication Care Area Assessment (CAA) completed 03/21/24 indicated she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the need for physician documented rationale for the continued use of the antipsychotic medication for Resident (R) 3 who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion). The facility also failed to follow the recommendations of the CP related to R30's Midodrine administration given outside of the physician-provided parameters repeatedly. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical record (EMR) under the 'Diagnoses tab recorded diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate pulse monitoring for Resident (R)4's anti-hypertensive beta-blocker (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure). The facility additionally failed to obtain physician-ordered lab results for R3's medication regimen. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse medication effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness, and abnormal weight loss. R4's admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)3's olanzapine (antipsychotic medication). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, or behavior) medications and related complications. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical record (EMR) under the 'Diagnoses tab recorded diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 with one reviewed for significant medication errors. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident (R)30 when staff administered Midodrine (medication used to increase blood pressure) outside of the physician-provided parameters repeatedly. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R30's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), muscle weakness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). R30's admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) completed 03/15/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to severe impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS indicated she had respiratory services. R30's Communication Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a communication process was implemented, which included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, and a failed to describe the services and equipment provided to Resident (R) 25 by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services and impaired care for R25. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and cognitive communication deficit. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R25 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection), and influenza (highly contagious viral infection immunizations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide consent, declination, or documentation of ineligibility for Resident (R)2, R19, and R33's pneumococcal vaccinations. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to pneumococcal diseases. Findings Included: - On 04/02/24 at 10:03 AM a review was completed related to pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations for R2, R7, R19, and R33. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR indicated she refused the Prevnar 13 (07/2017) and Pneumovax 23 (09/2018) vaccinations. The EMR indicated she received an unidentified pneumococcal vaccination from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) on 12/05/22. The EMR lacked consent, declination, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for COVID-19 (highly contagious viral infection) immunizations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide consent, declination, or documentation of ineligibility for Resident (R)3's COVID-19 immunizations. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to COVID-19. Findings Included: - On 04/02/24 at 10:03AM a review was completed related to COVID-19 immunization for R2, R3, R7, R19, and R33. R3's EMR indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR lacked documentation indicating she received or was offered COVID-19 immunizations. The EMR indicated she had no COVID-19 vaccinations. The EMR lacked consent, declination, or documentation of ineligibility for her COVID-19 vaccinations. The EMR lacked documentation related to the education provided and the risks associated with the vaccinations ordered. On 04/02/24 at 03:05 PM Administrator A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control and prevention program to prevent the spread of infection. Findings included: - Interview, on 08/30/22 at 08:00 AM, with Administrative staff A, revealed the facility had one Covid positive resident and the facility was in outbreak testing. Observation, on 08/30/22 at 08:00 AM, revealed the screening desk area at the front entrance adjacent to the common living area, contained approximately 12 completed rapid tests across one end of the desk. Observation of the hallway outside of a resident room with active Covid, revealed three isolation gowns thrown over the hand rails, and a large plastic bags that contained clean cloth isolation gowns directly on the floor beside the biohazard trash can. Observation on 08/30/22 at 08:45 AM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M in preparation to enter the resident's (in isolation for active Covid,) room to deliver her breakfast. CNA M could not locate a N95 masks (a specific mask type for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the principles of antibiotic stewardship in a proactive manner to ensure residents received antibiotics in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. The facility failed to track and trend causative microorganisms to determine trends within the facility. Findings included: - Review of the Infection Control Surveillance Logs revealed the following areas of concern: Review of the January 2022 log revealed seven urinary tract infections all lacking causative organisms to determine appropriateness of antibiotic use. Review of the February 2022 log revealed nine urinary tract infections, five with cultures done, one of the five indicated causative organism. One of the urinary tract infections without causative organism had been treated with Meropenem (a broad-spectrum antibiotic) for 21 days. Review of the March 2022 log revealed three urinary tract infections, one with culture results,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 50 residents. The sampled of 16 residents included eight reviewed for Covid-19 vaccinations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of the eight sampled residents were offered the second vaccine booster which became available on May 20, 2022 in a timely manner as required and/or failed to monitor the residents' vaccine status for possible booster administration. Findings included: - Review of the Immunization Report revealed the following areas of concern for Covid-19 vaccination status: Unsampled Resident (R) 18, last Covid-19 booster received on 11/30/21. Unsampled R30, last Covid-19 booster received on 10/28/21. R 19, last Covid-19 booster received on 11/22/21. Unsampled R 26, last Covid-19 booster received on 10/27/21. R 10, last Covid-19 booster received on 11/22/21. R2, last Covid-19 booster received on 11/19/21. R 24, last Covid-19 booster received on 12/31/21. R6, last Covid-19 booster received on 11/08/21. Interview, on 09/06/22 at 10:45 AM, with Administrative Staff A, revealed the facility did not offer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly environment in the storage closets that contained supplies for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During an environmental tour on 09/01/22 at 09:46 AM, with Housekeeping/Maintenance staff U, the following concerns identified: 1.) A storage closet near the kitchen had a partial box of dinner napkins, a full box of 1,000 plastic lids, a 16-pack box of paper towels and a partially full box of plastic lids, stored directly on the floor. 2.) A storage room on the north hall had a full box of ostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening on the intestinal wall to excrete feces from the body) supplies, two partial boxes of humidifier bottles, a case of Nutren 1.5 (a liquid nutritional replacement), a partial box of wound Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) supplies, a full box of foley (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine in a collection bag) supplies, a case of six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for residents in the facility. Findings included: - During an environmental tour on 09/01/22 at 09:46 AM, with Housekeeping/Maintenance staff U, the following concerns identified: 1. Sunflower hall shower room had a toilet seat riser with rust on two of the four legs. The shower room also had a shower chair with a heavily worn mesh back. 2. One resident room had large holes in the cove base as well as multiple gaps and scraped areas on the cove base, ranging in size from 1 inch to 3 feet. 3. One resident room had paint missing on the bathroom and closet doors, in multiple areas. 4. One resident room had a large piece of wooden windowsill, approximately eight inches long, broken away. The wall behind the recliner was heavily damaged and missing paint, in an approximately two-foot area. There was broken floor tile underneath the air conditioning unit, in about a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Review of Resident (R)24's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med (Medical) Diag (diagnosis) tab, included a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and had no limitation in range of motion (ROM). The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/24/22, documented the resident was able to make her needs known. She required extensive assistance of staff for transfers. The quarterly MDS, dated 07/23/22, documented the resident had a BIMS score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two for transfers and had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents with 16 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R)21, and R 25, received appropriate personal hygiene, regarding facial shaving. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)25's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag (medical diagnoses) tab, included a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The admission MDS, dated 06/19/22, documented the resident had a BIMS score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for personal hygiene. The Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents with 16 residents selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the two selected Residents (R) 13, received appropriate monitoring and treatment and preventive measures for pressure ulcers. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/19/22, revealed diagnoses included open wound of lower back and pelvis, emphysema (long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath,) and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness.) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) status as In Progress. Review of the electronic medical record revealed the following admissions to the facility: admission to the facility 04/18/22 with discharge on [DATE]. admission to the facility 06/16/22 with discharge on [DATE] with transfer to assisted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents with 16 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure staff provided safe transfers for one Resident (R)24, of the four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)24's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med (Medical) Diag (diagnosis) tab, included a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and had no limitation in range of motion (ROM). The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 resident with 16 selected for review which included two residents reviewed for urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary catheter care for one of two residents (R) 12, reviewed for catheter care. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)12's Physician Order Sheet, revealed diagnoses included diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function, and the resident required limited assistance of one staff for transfers and personal hygiene and extensive assistance of one staff for toileting. The resident had no impairment of the upper or lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident had a urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents. The sample of 16 residents included two residents which received their total nutrition and hydration through a percutaneous enteral gastrostomy feeding tube, (PEG- a tube that directly enters the stomach through the abdominal wall). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)19 received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications and/or metabolic interactions related to the resident's tube feeding and mixture of his medications through his PEG tube. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)19's Physician Orders, dated 08/09/2022, revealed diagnoses which included, encephalopathy (inflammatory condition of the brain), gastrostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening into the stomach thru the abdominal wall), aspiration (an inflammatory condition of the lungs caused by inhaling foreign material or vomit), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents, which included one resident sampled for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care in maintaining respiratory equipment to prevent the spread of infection, consistent with standards of practice and person -centered care plan for one Resident (R)19, related to storage and tubing/mask change of oxygen equipment. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)19's Physician Orders, dated 08/09/2022, revealed diagnoses which included, encephalopathy (inflammatory condition of the brain), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), epilepsy (seizures), insomnia (inability to sleep), pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs) , and hypertension (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents with 16 selected for review which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitor bowel movements and administer laxatives for two of the five Residents (R) 3 and R21. Furthermore, the facility failed to obtain laboratory results to monitor the effectiveness of medications for one of the five residents, R22. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's undated Physician Order Sheet, revealed diagnoses included unspecified injury of the cervical spine, diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with neuropathy (nerve damage causing weakness and pain), constipation (difficulty passing stools), and arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, heat, redness and limitation of movement). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-03 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received their mail services on Saturdays. Findings Included: - On 04/02/24 at 10:15 AM, Resident Council members reported that the facility does not provide mail services for the residents on Saturdays. The council reported they receive mail Monday through Friday, but there is no one to pick up and pass mail on Saturdays. On 04/03/2 at 10:31 AM Activities Coordinator (AC) Z reported that she would get the mail if Administrative Staff A was not going to be at the facility on Monday through Friday. AC Z stated there was no one at the facility to pick up the resident's mail on Saturdays. On 04/03/24 at 10:40 AM Administrative Nurse D stated that she picked up mail Monday through Friday, but she was not at the facility on Saturdays. She stated she was trying to get a box at the facility to ensure residents would be able to get their mail on Saturdays. The facility did not provide a policy related to mail…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to post the previous state inspection information in a location accessible to the residents and visitors. Findings Include: - On 04/01/24 at 07:10 AM an initial walkthrough of the facility revealed a sign posted Survey Results in the main lobby with an arrow pointing down to the ground. An inspection of the ground and surrounding area revealed no previous survey results. On 04/02/24 at 10:15 AM the resident council reported they were unaware of where the survey book was located. The council reported a sign in the main lobby behind a recliner but not sure where the book was located. On 04/03/24 at 11:00 AM an inspection of the facility revealed no posted survey results accessible to the residents or their representatives. On 04/03/24 at 11:30 AM Administrator A stated the survey binder had been in Administrative Nurse D's office, but she was not sure why. She stated the book was moved back to the table in the main lobby. The facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 37 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to retain the daily posted nursing staffing data for the 18 months as required. Findings included: - Review of the daily posted nursing staffing data provided by the facility lacked any posted nursing staffing data for January 2023 (31 days) and February 2023 (28 days). On 04/02/24 at 11:45 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated that all the posted staffing data that was available to be reviewed. Administrative Nurse D stated she was responsible for maintaining the posted nursing data and keeping it in the business office. The facility's Benefits Improvement Protection Act Nursing Staff Posting policy last reviewed in December 2019 documented that when a new daily staff posting form is initiated, the previous form would be removed and given to the business office for filing in the 18-month overflow. The facility failed to retain the daily posted nursing staffing data for the 18 months as required.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 2.8 | +2.2 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDICALODGES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/19/1976 |
| BROWN, KAREN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/24/2005 |
| BUTLER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2003 |
| COX, GAREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/26/1998 |
| DOLL, GAYLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/10/2005 |
| HINES, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/19/2009 |
| LAGER, SHANNON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/22/2017 |
| MARSHALL, CAROL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/27/2006 |
| OTT, RON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/15/2006 |
| LANTZ, KATHLEEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/22/2007 |
| MCBRIDE, TRAVIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2012 |
| ROHLING MCCORD, CATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/09/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $199K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.