Medicalodges Coffeyville On Midland

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 132 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 68.3 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 72 residents with four residents sampled and one resident reviewed for neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of cognitively impaired Resident (R)2, who displayed a recent increase in behaviors. On 08/26/24 at 10:12 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G completed a skin assessment on R2 and documented her skin as clean, dry, intact, and without new skin conditions. On 08/27/24 at 10:45 AM, staff observed blood on a tissue after wiping R2 and failed to notify the LN in charge of R2's care. On 08/27/24 at 11:15 AM, Social Service Staff X and Administrative Staff B took R2 out of town to a senior behavioral unit. Upon arrival to the emergency room, R2 expressed the need to use the bathroom and when assisted by facility staff, R2's brief had two dime size spots of blood in it, and she had blood at the front of her peri-area. On 08/27/24 at 02:45 PM, hospital staff began a skin assessment on R2 after she arrived at the behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. On 07/19/24, CNA M was in the hallway and heard CNA O and R2 yelling back and forth from R2's room. CNA M went to assist and saw R2 attempt to hit CNA O, and CNA O grabbed R2's arms and put them forcefully against R2's chest. CNA O stated to R2, You chose the right [explicit language] one, you will not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. On 07/19/24, CNA M was in the hallway and heard CNA O and R2 yelling back and forth from R2's room. CNA M went to assist and saw R2 attempt to hit CNA O, and CNA O grabbed R2's arms and put them forcefully against R2's chest. CNA O stated to R2, You chose the right [explicit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 99 residents with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff protected residents from abuse when staff did not immediately report incidents of verbal and physical abuse of cognitively impaired Resident (R) 2 on 07/13/24 and again on 07/19/24. On 07/13/24, Non-Certified Staff N observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O grab R2's arms near her wrists and pushed them to R2's chest. CNA O then stated to R2, You are [explicit language] with the wrong person. I will hit you back. CNA O then turned and walked away. Non-certified Staff N failed to report her observation immediately and CNA O continued to work her scheduled shift and additional shifts following 07/13/24. On 07/19/24, CNA M was in the hallway and heard CNA O and R2 yelling back and forth from R2's room. CNA M went to assist and saw R2 attempt to hit CNA O, and CNA O grabbed R2's arms and put them forcefully against…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-05-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 81 residents, with 20 in the sample, and two residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pertinent and timely interventions were implemented as ordered to prevent Resident (R)13's significant weight loss of 25.11 percent (%) in 141 days. The facility did not weigh R13 monthly and did not identify and assess R13 when meal intake consistently declined between 10/2023 and 02/2024. This failure resulted in a R13 losing 29.4 pounds (lbs.)/25.11% body weight, in 141 days. Additionally, the facility failed to monitor R13 for effectiveness of their treatment plan which resulted in an additional weight loss of 11.2 lbs in an additional 42 days which was a total of 40.6 lbs/29.64% over 182 days and placed the resident at risk for continued decline in nutritional status and at risk for the development of life-threatening symptoms, which could negatively affect the mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being of R13.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-07-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 89 residents with 20 selected for review including three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of and promote healing of a pressure ulcer diagnosed as a stage three (full thickness loss of skin usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R)41. In addition, the facility failed to perform a dressing change with sanitary conditions related to infection control. Furthermore, the facility failed to prevent the development of and promote healing of three pressure areas diagnosed as a stage two (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without sloughing or bruising and may also present as an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings included:- Review of employee files on 04/08/26 at 03:52 PM revealed a lack of performance evaluations or skills check-off for two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), CNA OO and CNA PP. CNA OO had a date of hire of 11/10/23, and CNA PP had a date of hire of 07/29/24. On 04/08/26 PM, Administrative Staff A and Administrative Nurse D confirmed the employee evaluation documents provided to the survey team did not contain performance evaluations for CNA OO and CNA PP. Administrative Staff A stated she expected performance evaluations to be performed annually. The facility did not provide a policy related to annual performance evaluations as requested on 04/09/26.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in the kitchen under sanitary conditions which placed the residents of the facility at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included:- The initial tour of South Kitchen on 04/06/2026 at 08:44 AM, with Dietary Staff DD identified the following concerns:A handwashing sink and backsplash area had grime build-up.One double-door freezer lacked an internal thermometer. The Resource Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log signage on the freezer door included the temperature recorded for 04/06/26 as 20 degrees Fahrenheit (F) by Dietary Staff DD. Grime build-up in the alcove of the kitchen along the baseboard.Dry storage with bread unsealed and unlabeled.Refrigerator with two unsealed and unlabeled ham spread sandwiches.Two unlabeled salad dressing bottles.Unlabeled container of pancake batter with congealed white batter on the outside of the container.Unlabeled and unsealed bread/buns bag with two buns missing.Sanitizing strips are unavailable in the south kitchen upon request.Two unlabeled bags of potato…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activity of daily living (ADL) cares to Resident (R)39 regarding an unshaven face, dried food on face and jagged, dirty fingernails; R6 regarding an unshaven face; R44 regarding an unshaven face and dirty clothing and R51 regarding jagged, dirty fingernails. Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R6's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He required substantial to maximal staff assistance for showering and personal hygiene. R6's Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/24/25, documented the resident required substantial assistance of staff for bathing and personal hygiene. R6's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident specific activity program for Resident (R)4, R6, R39, R44, and R51. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R4's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It was very important for her to listen to music she liked, participate in her favorite activities, participate in religious services, and go outside to get fresh air when the weather was good. R4's Activity Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/18/25, did not trigger. R4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R4's Care Plan, revised 03/26/26, lacked staff instruction on the residents' preferred activities. R4's Activity Assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for Resident (R)4, while she was in her room in bed. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R4's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). R4's ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/18/25, did not trigger. R4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for all ADLs. R4's Care Plan, revised 03/26/26, instructed staff she was dependent on staff for all ADLs. On 04/06/26 at 10:03 AM, the resident rested in her bed, covered with blankets, and the door to her room was open to the hallway. R39 wandered into R4's room and began to move around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 3, and R7 a written notification of transfer to the resident and/or his representative as soon as practicable and failed to send a copy of that notification to the ombudsman. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) R3's Discharge – Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had an unplanned discharge from the facility to a hospital on [DATE]. The EHR Progress Notes documented: On 01/11/26 at 05:42 PM, a Nurse's Note documented R3 was admitted to the hospital with a right hip fracture (broken bone) On 01/12/26 at 01:17 PM, a Social Service Progress Note documented the care plan meeting scheduled for the next day was cancelled due to the resident being in the hospital.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate catheter care within the standards of practice was provided for Resident (R) 59 when staff failed to secure the catheter tubing to R59's thigh to prevent pulling and/or dislodgement and also failed to empty the catheter bag before getting too full, to prevent catheter-related urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings included:- R59's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), chronic kidney disease-stage three (CKD), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), obstructive uropathy, neurogenic bladder and weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer non-pharmaceutical interventions for pain for one Resident (R)3, who had acute pain. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of a wedge compression fracture (a type of spinal fracture where the front of a vertebra collapses while the back remains intact) of the second lumbar vertebra. R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She received as-needed (PRN) pain medications and non-medication pain interventions during the assessment period. Pain was not assessed. She received opioid (narcotic pain medication) medication during the seven-day look-back period. The Pain Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/19/26, did not trigger. The re-admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing care. The facility also failed to store respiratory treatment devices in a sanitary manner. Findings included:- Observation on 04/06/26 10:36 AM, R20 oxygen tubing was wound around the portable oxygen tank. R20's nebulizer mouthpiece was attached to the medication bowl with a small amount of fluid in the medication bowl and attached to the nebulizer machine. On 04/08/26 at 10:35 AM, R1's nebulizer machine was attached to the face mask with the medication bowl attached with fluid in it. It laid on her chair beside her bed with the tubing wound up with a blacket, and her back brace laid on top of the nebulizer. An observation of catheter care was conducted on 04/08/2026 at 10:37 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) II and CNA Q assisting R59 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen, on 05/07/24 at 10:55 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: The hand-washing sink trashcan lacked a cover. The refrigerator contained 11 dressing cups which were unlabeled. Three gelatin parfaits which were unlabeled. A gallon container of peach slices, dated 05/01/24, was not properly covered. A bag of 12 baked potatoes, which were unlabeled. Three of the racks in the refrigerator contained dried-on food substances and rust. The outside dumpster contained garbage bags and was not closed. A five-gallon container of flour contained grime on top of the lid. A five-gallon container of dried milk contained grime on top of the lid. On 05/07/24 at 11:28 AM, Dietary Consultant E verified the above issues. The facility lacked a policy for the kitchen. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$217,665 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $54,084 — penalty dated 2026-04-09
• $84,124 — penalty dated 2024-09-09
• $24,065 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
• $24,065 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
• $31,327 — penalty dated 2024-05-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $485K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS