Medicalodges Iola

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 41.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with four residents sampled. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the physical abuse and neglect of R2. On 03/21/24, R2 reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was rough with her when assisting her to bed around 06:30 PM to 07:00 PM. R2 stated CNA M threw her into her bed by having a hold of her legs and swung her on the bed, while in the lift sling, during the transfer from the wheelchair to her bed. Afterwards, R2 experienced dizziness, nausea, and difficulty breathing due lying flat as the head of the bed was flat. R2 activated her call light and when nobody responded to the call light, R2 started yelling out. When CNA M responded to R2, she did so by yelling at R2 from the hallway saying R2 was not the only resident left to take care of. R2's bed remained flat and R2 lacked application of her supplemental oxygen for 3 to 3.5 hours, until CNA N arrived for the 10:00 PM shift. While rounding, R2 hollered out CNA N's name…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with four residents sampled. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report abuse and neglect of R2 immediately on 03/21/22 at 10:10 PM. On 03/21/24, R2 reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was rough with her when assisting her to bed around 06:30 PM to 07:00 PM. R2 stated CNA M threw her into her bed by having a hold of her legs and swung her on the bed, while in the lift sling, during the transfer from the wheelchair to her bed. Afterwards, R2 experienced dizziness, nausea, and difficulty breathing due to lying flat as the head of the bed was flat. R2 activated her call light and when nobody responded to the call light, R2 started yelling out. When CNA M responded to R2, she did so by yelling at R2 from the hallway saying R2 was not the only resident left to take care of. R2's bed remained flat and R2 lacked application of her supplemental oxygen for 3 to 3.5 hours, until CNA N arrived for the 10:00 PM shift. While rounding, R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with four residents sampled. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident (R) 2 from further abuse and neglect. On 03/21/22 at 10:10 PM when staff failed to notify the administrator immediately of an allegation of abuse and neglect. R2 reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was rough with her when assisting her to bed around 06:30 PM to 07:00 PM. R2 stated CNA M threw her into her bed by having a hold of her legs and swung her on the bed, while in the lift sling, during the transfer from the wheelchair to her bed. Afterwards, R2 experienced dizziness, nausea, and difficulty breathing due to lying flat as the head of the bed was flat. R2 activated her call light and when nobody responded to the call light, R2 started yelling out. When CNA M responded to R2, she did so by yelling at R2 from the hallway saying R2 was not the only resident left to take care of. R2's bed remained flat and R2 lacked application of her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents, with four residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for risk of elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment, as free of accident hazards as possible, to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired and independently mobile Resident (R)1. On 04/27/24 during the 05:45 PM to 06:00 AM shift, staff deactivated an exit door alarm on a hallway R1 did not reside on due to a storm causing the alarm to sound. On 04/28/24 at 03:57 PM, R1 attempted to exit a hallway door on the side of the facility the resident resided on, and staff redirected R1. On 04/28/24 at 03:59 PM, R1 sat in a chair in the activity area next to the nurse's station of the area of the facility he resided on. Shortly after, R1 exited the hallway door where the alarm had been deactivated. The facility staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with one resident reviewed, Resident (R)1, for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe environment as free of accidents as possible, when Social Service Staff X propelled R1 in her wheelchair backwards out of the facility's transport van, but failed to ensure the mechanical lift platform was in the proper up position. R1 flipped backwards in her wheelchair out of the van. The resident stated she could not breath as she was upside down having fell approximately two feet from the van door to the lift platform which was at ground level. R1 struck her shoulder and back on the lowered platform and her head on the ground. R1 required emergency medical transport for evaluation and treatment after the fall, where she was diagnosed with a concussion (damage to the brain caused by violent jarring or shaking, such as a blow). R1 had pain following the fall and suffered significant bruising to her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) who were employed at the facility for more than 12 months. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.Findings included:- Review of personnel records on 07/22/25 at 07:25 AM revealed that Certified Medication Aide (CMA) T, CMA U, CNA M, CNA N, and CNA L did not have performance evaluations completed for the last 12 months of full-time employment.During an interview on 07/22/25 at 07:25 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that no performance evaluations were completed for the five CNAs selected for review. Administrative Staff A further stated that she was aware that evaluations should have been completed, but they were not.The facility's Employee Handbook, dated 05/24/20, documented that full and part-time employees should receive formal, written evaluations. Supervisors, administrators/managers/directors are requested to conduct annual performance evaluations. It further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents with two kitchens. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary conditions for food storage and preparation to prevent the spread of food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. This placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness.Findings included:- Initial tour of the kitchen on 07/021/25 at 08:40 AM with Dietary Manager BB revealed the following areas of concern:The top of the automated dishwasher had dried food debris on it.The ice maker had food particles on the top and sides of it, and food was stored on top of it in storage bags.The kitchen area had multiple fans placed throughout the kitchen., The fans were dirty and dusty and blowing into the food preparation area and the dish cleaning area.There were numerous food items and trash on the floor.The trash cans in the food preparation area were visibly dirty on the outside.The counter where the coffee pot sat had spilled coffee on it.The floors were sticky and slick.Observed on 07/21/25 at 03:50 PM, seven plastic cutting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) was trained and certified in infection prevention and control. This failure placed all 43 residents at increased risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - During an interview on 07/23/25 at 12:11 PM, Administrative Staff A revealed the facility did not have a certified IP. Administrative Staff A stated the previous certified IP left 06/01/25, and the current IP is not certified. During an interview on 07/22/25 at 03:10 PM, Administrative Nurse C, the facility-identified IP, confirmed he was not certified in infection control. The facility's Infection Control Surveillance policy dated 11/2023 documented that the infection control preventionist is to monitor compliance with state and federal regulatory standards as they pertain to infection prevention and control.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory 12 hours of education were completed for Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) as required. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.Findings included:- Review of Certified Medication Aide (CMA) U's personnel and training records revealed CMA U had not completed any of the mandatory 12 hours of education in the last 12 months.On 07/23/05 at 08:46 AM, Administrative Staff A reported that she had performed her own investigation and discovered that CMA U had not completed the mandatory 12 hours of education. Administrative Staff A also reported that the facility did not have a policy related to education, and said the facility follows the regulations.On 07/23/25 at 09:00 AM, CMA U verified that she had not completed the mandatory 12 hours of education for the last 12-month period. The facility did not provide a policy.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent including purpose, risks versus benefits, and expected therapeutic benefits for the use of antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), anxiolytic (medication used to treat symptoms of anxiety) and other psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the brain and nervous system to treat mental illnesses)) for Resident (R)14, R6, R42, R17 and R2. This placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects of the medications and uninformed decisions. Findings included:- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included the following diagnoses: depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R14's EMR documented the following physician's orders:Sertraline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean home-like environment in all areas of the facility, including the dining area. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for tripping hazards and decreased comfort.Findings included:- During an observation on 07/21/25 at 09:26 AM, Resident (R) 2's fall mat and room floor had sticky food particles and debris on them. Licensed Nurse (LN) G acknowledged that the mat was filthy and the floor was very sticky and cleaned the mat at that time. During an observation on 07/22/25 at 10:05 AM, the floor area in the dining room had 44 tiles missing; no hazard sign or barrier was blocking the trip hazard.During an observation on 07/22/25 at 10:58 AM, the door on a resident room on the 400-hall displayed bubbling on the surface where the Veneer was separating. The door frames of the doors on the 400-hall had bubbled, chipped, and missing paint.During an observation on 07/22/25 at 11:02 AM, the door frames on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). The facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for residents. Additionally, staff failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. This placed the residents at risk for infections.Findings included:- Observation on 07/21/25 at 11:49 AM, Resident (R)'s fall mat next to his bed had cracks and frayed areas exposing the inner foam.Observation on 07/21/25 at 11:52 AM, R7 had a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) with the collection bag resting on the floor next to his bed. There was no PPE for EBP located in or around the room, and no signage alerting staff to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 43 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of three residents, Resident (R) 2, when R2 was transported from his room to the shower room via a shower chair only covered with a white sheet with his buttocks exposed. Additionally, staff entered the rooms of R2, R7, and R8 without knocking first and did not identify themselves or await acknowledgment from the resident. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for negative psychosocial effects related to impaired dignity.Findings included:- During an observation on 07/21/25 at 09:58 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O knocked on R8's door once and then entered the room without acknowledgement from R8 while he was being interviewed. R8 stated that staff frequently entered his room without knocking or waiting for permission.During an observation on 07/21/25 at 09:25 AM, R7's door was closed, and CNA O opened the door and entered R7's room without knocking or introducing herself.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set for Resident (R) 5 and R14. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs. Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R5’s 04/23/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of seven, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R5 had a Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) and was dependent on staff for assistance. The MDS documented R5 had one non-injury fall. R5’s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R)6 regarding non-pharmacologic pain interventions and for R42 regarding oxygen use. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs.Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia.R6's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. She received scheduled and as-needed (PRN) pain medications and reported she had occasional pain, which rarely affected her day-to-day activities and sleep. The MDS noted R6's worst pain in the past five days was rated at a five on a one to 10 pain scale (one being minimal pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable).The Pain Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/21/25, did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$42,224 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,377 — penalty dated 2024-05-06
• $25,847 — penalty dated 2023-12-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $217K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS