Medicalodges Paola

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 67.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.99 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of Resident (R)1, when staff did not utilize appropriate transfer equipment to safely meet the needs of R1, who displayed signs of weakness during cares. On 08/28/24 at 02:40 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M, CNA N, and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R assisted R1 to stand, with use of a gait belt that was not the appropriate size for R1. As two of the staff members attempted to pull R1's incontinence brief up, R1's legs became weak, and staff lowered R1 to the floor. During the lowering, the resident's left leg buckled underneath the resident and rotated outward, which caused a popping noise. The facility called Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to transfer R1 to the Emergency Department (ED). R1 admitted to the hospital with an obliquely oriented fracture (the bone fractured at an angle)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 65 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report the elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff) of Resident (R)2 to the State Agency, as required. On 08/27/24 at 08:48 PM R2 left the facility without staff knowledge or supervision and at approximately 10:41 PM, Law Enforcement called the facility to advise them they had received calls noting that R2 was walking on the highway, entered a gas station approximately 0.9 miles from the facility. Law Enforcement advised License Nurse (LN) H that someone needed to come to their location because Law Enforcement had the R2 surrounded with their patrol cars due to his threats to Law Enforcement and the store clerk, yelling, cursing and agitation. The LN H reported she immediately drove to the gas station in her personal vehicle, without contacting Administrative Staff A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 65 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident (R) 2 from possible harm when he exited the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge (elopement) on 08/27/24 at 08:48 PM. At approximately 10:41 PM, Law Enforcement called the facility to inform them they received calls noting R2 was walking on the highway, then entered a gas station (approximately 0.9 miles from the facility), threatened a store clerk, and wanted to buy cigarettes with postage stamps. Law Enforcement informed License Nurse (LN) H someone needed to come to their location because Law Enforcement had R2 surrounded with their patrol cars due to his threats of yelling, cursing and agitation to Law Enforcement Officers and the store clerk. LN H reported she immediately drove her personal vehicle to the gas station, without contacting Administrative Staff A or Administrative Nurse D, and returned to the facility with R2. LN H said as she drove R2 back to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 62 residents with 18 residents selected for review, which included two residents reviewed for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and secure environment to include adequate supervision for cognitively impaired Resident (R) 44, who the facility care planned for 15-minute checks due to a history of making elopement statements. On 10/22/23 at 05:07 AM R44 left the facility and walked approximately 0.6 miles to a local grocery store (which opened at 06:00 AM). The resident was observed in the grocery store eating at the salad bar. The facility did not realize R44 was missing for four hours and 23 minutes, when local police called the facility at 09:15 AM to report they located the resident and then returned the resident to the facility. This deficient practice placed the resident in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)44's Physician Order Sheet, dated 10/04/23, revealed diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 62 residents with three selected for review for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent an elopement when Resident (R)1 exited the facility grounds, unsupervised on 07/30/23 at 04:48 PM and remained outside of the facility grounds for approximately four hours. While out of the facility unsupervised, the resident walked 0.5 miles to a convenience store on a two-lane paved road. The temperature was 96 degrees Fahrenheit. While at the convenience store, the resident complained of chest pain and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) was called, and the resident was transported to the emergency room. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R did not locate the resident at dinner time around 05:00 PM and notified Licensed Nurse (LN) H, who told CMA R to look for the resident. LN H or LN G did not know CMA R could not locate the resident and did not activate the elopement protocol. The facility did not know of R1's whereabouts until the emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 63 residents and one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria placing them at risk of food-related illness.Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/27/25 at 10:51 AM, the following areas of concern were noted:1. The hand-washing sink had a build-up of dirt and grime.2. The trash can next to the hand-washing sink had dried on food and fluid.3. Three large plastic containers holding dried milk, flour, and sugar had a build-up of dust and a sticky substance on the lids.4. Four cutting boards had deep grooves, making them unsanitizable.5. Several drawers containing cutting boards, cooking utensils, and hot pads had food debris in the bottom.6. A corner cabinet used to hold sandwich bags, plastic wrap, and plastic containers had food debris throughout.7. The fronts of several cabinet doors had a build-up of dried-on food and liquid substance.8.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory 12-hours of education were completed for one Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) as required. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of care.Findings included:- Review of CNA N's personnel and training records revealed CNA N was hired on 01/20/20. CNA N's files lacked evidence that he had completed any of the mandatory 12 hours of education for the last 12 months.On 07/28/25 at 02:26 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S stated that required education was performed online through Relias. On 07/29/25 at 10:19 AM, Administrative Nurse D reported that staff were expected to complete mandatory online training, which included the required 12 hours of mandatory training, periodically each month.On 07/29/2025 at 10:39 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that the required and mandatory 12 hours of education had to be done; there was no excuse for it not to be completed in a 12-month period. Administrative Staff A further stated that there was a monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 63 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in four of 23 resident rooms on the south hall placing the residents at risk of an uncomfortable and unhomelike environment. Findings included:- During an initial environmental tour of the south hall on 07/26/25 at 08:00 AM, the following issues were noted: 1. Resident (R)38's room had a build-up of a black substance around the base of the toilet. The wall beneath the sink had a large area that had been cut out and not repaired. 2. R13's room had areas of cove base several feet long that had separated from the wall. A build-up of a black substance had built up in the gap between the cove base and the wall. 3. R19's room had an area of cove base that had separated from the wall. A build-up of a black substance had built up in the gap between the cove base and the wall. The base of the window lacked paint in several areas. The bathroom door had multiple areas of missing paint. 4. R24's room had multiple areas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to act upon blood pressure monitoring for Resident (R) 50 and administer a hypertensive (high blood pressure) medication per the physician orders. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to high blood pressure and ineffective medication regimen.Findings included:- R50's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure).R50's 06/27/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R50 had an active diagnosis of hypertension.R50's Care Plan dated 07/27/25 documented he had hypertension. The plan instructed staff to direct R50 to report complaints of headaches, dizziness, vision changes, chest pain, or palpitations. The plan noted R50 received Lisinopril (an antihypertensive medication) and Metoprolol (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 63 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility staff failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) for Resident (R)8 and for R21 who had wounds and received wound care. This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk for infections. Findings included:- Observed on 07/27/25 at 09:50 AM, there was no EBP personal protective equipment (PPE) or signage set-up in or around R8's room.Observed on 07/27/25 at 11:57 AM, R21 had no EBP personal protective equipment (PPE) or signage set up in or around his room.Observed on 07/28/25 at 09:00 AM, there was no EBP PPE or signage set up in or around R8's room.Observed on 07/29/25 at 08:35 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G opened the door after she finished R21's treatment. LN G stated the incision was closed, but there were two open areas they were debriding (medical removal of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 62 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for the spread of food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 11/02/23 at 08:05 AM, the following areas of concern were noted. 1. The front of the cabinet doors of the hand-washing sink were visibly soiled. 2. The trash can by the hand-washing sink had dried-on food debris. 3. Two red rolling carts had a build-up of dirt and grime in the grooved handles. 4. One rolling cart, which held the clean silverware, had four rusty legs and wheels. 5. The two oven doors had a build-up of a sticky substance on the handles of the doors. 6. The oven doors had dried food debris covering most of the surface. 7. The stationary can opener had a dried-on, sticky food substance on the cutting blade tip. 8. Two cutting boards were heavily gouged, making the surface uncleanable. 9. The door of the walk-in refrigerator had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 62 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for the residents of the facility in the identified resident areas. Findings included: - Observation on 11/06/23 at 01:15 PM, with Maintenance staff U, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. Six resident rooms on the north hall contained an accumulation of dirt and grime in the corners of the room. 2. One resident bathroom on the north hall contained staining over the surface of the floor, accumulation of dirt and grime along the perimeter of the floor. 3. The north hall men's shower room contained floor corners with an accumulation of grime. 4. The north hall clean utility room floor contained accumulated grime and debris around the perimeter of the floor, and across the surface of the floor. 5. The resident phone room floor perimeter contained grime and black discolorations. 6. The floor near the north hall exit door contained grime and two dead bugs. (First observed 11/01/23) 7. The corners of the floor at the double…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The resident reported a census of 62 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff in the facility kitchen areas. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 11/02/23 at 08:05 AM, the following areas of concern were noted. The floor throughout the kitchen and storage room had a build-up of dirt and grime around the parameters of the rooms and a heavy build-up of dirt and grime around the feet of all tables and equipment of the kitchen. On 11/06/23 at 02:01 PM, Dietary staff CC confirmed the floors of the kitchen areas needed to be kept clean at all times. The facility policy for Cleaning Rotation, dated 2011, included: The kitchen floors will be cleaned daily. The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff in the kitchen areas.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 62 residents with 18 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R)25, by not having a dignity bag for his indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine) collection bag. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)25's electronic medical record (EMR), dated 11/01/23, documented a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (a condition where normal bladder function was disrupted due to nerve damage). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. He had an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine). The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 62 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (R)25, with the failure to include staff instructions on the use of a dignity bag in the care plan for the resident's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)25's electronic medical record (EMR), dated 11/01/23, documented a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (a condition where normal bladder function was disrupted due to nerve damage). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. He had an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine). The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 05/15/23, documented the resident had an indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$78,225 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $55,991 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
• $14,041 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-09-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $189K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS