Medicalodges Columbus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 28.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.43 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents, with three residents sampled and one resident reviewed for food served in a form that met the resident's individual needs. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 1 with the physician-ordered diet of mechanical soft food (a modified diet that consists of soft, easy-to-chew foods that require minimal chewing) on 02/08/26, when staff served R1 a whole chicken strip instead of ground meat per her orders. R1 consumed the chicken strip and began to choke. Staff performed the Heimlich maneuver (abdominal thrusts - a technique used to clear a blocked airway in conscious individuals) on R1 to dislodge the food. This deficient practice placed R1 in Immediate Jeopardy.Findings Included:- Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (difficulty initiating a swallow, transferring food from the mouth to the throat, and into the esophagus),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 30 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent Resident (R) 1 remained free from accidents when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M transferred R1 without a second staff member present to assist in a mechanical lift transfer. CNA M further failed to secure one of the leg straps to the mechanical lift, which caused R1 to fall from the lift, face forward onto the floor. These failures resulted in a laceration (a tear in skin) to the left ear that measured 2.0 centimeters (cm) by 0.1 cm, a hematoma (collection of blood trapped in the tissues of the skin or in an organ, resulting from trauma) to the left temple, and an acute left hip fracture (broken bone) involving the proximal (nearer to a point of reference or attachment) femoral (thigh bone) neck. This deficient practice placed the resident in immediate jeopardy. Findings include: - R1's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 07/01/24, revealed diagnoses included cerebral palsy (progressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for two of the five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed, CNA M and O, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of five employee personnel files, employed by the facility for greater than one year, revealed the following concerns: 1. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M, hired 11/04/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. 2. CNA O, hired 11/27/23, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. On 02/10/25 at 10:03 AM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed the facility lacked annual evaluations for the two CNAs. The facility Employee Handbook included: Supervisors are to conduct performance evaluations of all full-time and part-time employees on an annual basis. The facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least every 12 months for these two CNAs, employed great than one year, to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 29 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the staff improper hand hygiene with wound dressing changes and catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. The facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) (EBP). This deficient practice had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the facility. Findings included: On 02/06/25 at 08:12 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) U, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N, and Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered R11's room to transfer him and change the leg bag on the foley catheter to a full-sized bedside bag. The staff undressed him and changed out his catheter bag. They removed their gloves, but failed to preform proper hand hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 29 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a functional emergency call system, which allowed residents to call for staff assistance from each resident's room, bedside, bathroom area, and/or bathing facilities and alarmed at a centralized staff work area. Findings included: - On 02/05/25 at 09:02 AM, Resident (R) 11 sat in his recliner with his emergency call light laying on the floor behind the table beside him. The emergency call light sat out of his reach. The resident reported he used his phone to call for assistance when his emergency call light did not work. On 02/05/25 at 09:26 AM, R15's emergency call light sat on the over-bed table and out of the resident's reach. On 02/05/25 at 10:16 AM, R16 stated the facility emergency call system did not always work and the resident reported using the phone to call for staff assistance at times. On 02/06/25 at 07:52 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) U reported they did not have pagers on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the [NAME] Data Set for three residents: Resident (R) 15 and R20 related to falls; R18 related to antidepressant medication. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R15 had the following diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), coronary artery disease (CAD- abnormal condition that may affect the flow of oxygen to the heart), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), muscle weakness, and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The 11/04/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, implement, and reevaluate fall prevention interventions to prevent falls including failing to provide a call light within reach for Resident (R) 15, when staff preformed unsafe transfers and failed to follow the care plan for R20, and failed to follow the care plan by failing to provide the call light within reach R17 and R18. This placed the residents at risk for falls with injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R15 had the following diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), coronary artery disease (CAD- abnormal condition that may affect the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents sampled including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor four Residents (R)12, R 17, R 18, and R 30, for use of antipsychotic medications (drugs used to treat psychosis-related conditions and symptoms), regarding the facility's failure to complete informed consents for the use of psychotropic (medications used to treat mental illnesses by affecting the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) and antipsychotic medications. Furthermore, the facility failed to monitor the use of an antianxiety (a class of medications used to treat anxiety disorders and related symptoms like excessive worry, fear, and tension) medication. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)12's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses which included: depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (R)20, regarding the use of an electric recliner. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)20's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for chair-to-bed-to-chair transfers. The inaccurate MDS documented the resident had one injury (except major) fall since the prior assessment. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/19/24, did not trigger. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately revise Resident (R) 15's care plan after falls and failed to revise R 11's care plan for pressure ulcer care. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R15 had the following diagnoses cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), muscle weakness, diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), coronary artery disease (CAD- abnormal condition that may affect the flow of oxygen to the heart), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The 11/04/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to leave the shoes off one Resident (R)13, regarding the resident having abrasions (process of scraping or wearing something away) on the second toe of the right foot and the second and third toe of the left foot. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impairment. He required substantial to maximal staff assistance with putting on and taking off his footwear.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 29 residents with 15 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU). Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to care and services to promote the healing of an existing PU for one Resident (R)13, regarding a stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) PU behind the left ear and R 11, for failure of ensuring the resident had a pressure reducing cushion to his wheelchair. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He used a walker and a wheelchair for locomotion. He was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers (PU) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$36,322 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $22,925 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
• $13,397 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $170K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS