Medicalodges Dewey

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during eye-drop administration and catheter care for three (#33, 1 and 9) of six residents reviewed for infection control. The MDS Coordinator identified seven residents receiving eye-drops and five residents with catheters. Findings: A facility policy titled Eye Drops dated 01/23, read in part, .Procedures .Perform hand hygiene .With a gloved finger, gently pull down lower eyelid . A facility policy titled Hand Hygiene dated 05/17, read in part, .Hand hygiene to be completed by staff .Before and after direct resident contact .Between glove changes during care or procedures . 1. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included glaucoma and hypertension. A Physician order dated 12/14/23, documented Resident #33 was to receive brimonidine tartate-timolol ophthalmic solution 0.2-0.5 % one drop in each eye twice a day. On 11/04/24 at 7:45 a.m., CMA #2 was observed administering eye-drops to Resident #33. CMA #2 did not perform hand hygiene prior to administration. 2. Resident #1 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound was cultured prior to prescribing and administering an antibiotic medication to one (#11) of six sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The MDS Coordinator identified four residents who were prescribed antibiotic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Infection Control Surveillance, dated 03/207, read in part, The antibiotic initiated is to be based on the specific organism identified on lab results and per the physician orders. A review of Resident #11's medical records did not find any lab orders or results for a wound culture prior to the use of the antibiotic clindamycin. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included cellulitis and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of bilateral lower extremity. A physician's order, dated 10/23/24/, documented Resident #11 was to be administered Clindamycin HCL 300 mg by mouth every six hours for 14 days for a wound infection. A medication administration record, dated 10/01/24 through 10/31/24, documented Resident #11 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to routinely reconcile controlled drugs for three (#19, 26, and #142) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/08/23, documented 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A controlled medication reconciliation policy, undated, read in part, .Controlled medications will be stored in accordance with state and federal requirements. Controlled medications will be reconciled at each sift change or with a change in licensed nurse responsibility for controlled medications. A Controlled Medication Inventory sheet will be utilized to deter diversion . 1. Resident #19 had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pain, and anxiety. A physician's medication order, dated 04/01/23, documented morphine sulfate concentrate oral solution 100mg/5ml give 0.25 ml by mouth every four hours as needed for shortness of air or pain. A physician's medication order, dated 06/30/23, documented lorazepam oral concentrate 2mg/ml give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide resident and resident representatives a written notice of transfer prior to transfer to acute hospitals for two (#4 and #6) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The BOM reported 45 residents had transferred from the facility to a hospital between 01/01/23 and 08/11/23. Findings: 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease. A nurses note, dated 04/01/23, documented the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on that date. 2. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. A nurses note, dated 06/03/23, documented the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on that date. A nurses note, dated 06/15/23, documented the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on that date. On 08/10/23 08:45 a.m., the BOM was asked to provide documentation that residents #4, #6, and their representatives were given written notice of transfers prior to the residents' transfers to a hospital. They stated the written notices had not been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's prescribed medication was available for administration for one (#15) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents's form, documented 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #15 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. On 08/10/23 at 10:37 a.m., LPN #3 was observed during a medication pass for resident #15. LPN #3 was heard to tell the resident that their medication, gabapentin (a oral medication used for nerve pain) had not come in from the pharmacy and could not be given at that time. Resident #15 stated they were not happy about not having that particular medication. At 10:42 a.m. LPN #3 was asked why the medication was not available. They stated it had been ordered but had not arrived. They were asked when it had been ordered. They stated the computer system only documented it had been ordered but not when it had been ordered. They were asked when medications were suppose to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process and provide residents a discharge plan summary to one (# 40) of one resident who was reviewed for discharge. The BOM identified nine residents who had discharged between 01/01/23 and 08/10/23. Findings: Resident #40 had diagnoses which included dementia and atherosclerotic heart disease. An admissions record, undated, documented resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/17/23. On 08/11/23 at 11:41 a.m., the BOM was asked to supply a copy of the resident's discharge plan. At 11:52 a.m., the BOM stated there was not a discharge summary for resident #40. They were asked if discharge planning was conducted for the residents. They stated they believed it was done. At 11:55 a.m., the Administrator was asked if the facility had a discharge plan process and discharge plans were given to the residents when they discharged . They stated they put that information in the residents'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile pre and post discharge medications for one (#40) of one resident reviewed for discharges. The BOM identified nine resident who had discharged from the facility between 01/01/23 and 08/11/23. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included dementia and atherosclerotic heart disease. An admissions record, undated, documented resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/17/23. On 08/11/23 at 11:41 a.m., the BOM was asked to supply a copy of the resident's discharge plan. At 11:52 the BOM stated there was not a discharge summary for the resident. At 12:00 p.m., the DON was asked if discharge plans were developed for residents and a summary of the plan given when residents discharge from the facility. They stated they did not do that. They were asked if the resident's medications were reconciled, and a copy given to the resident when they discharge. They stated they had not been doing that.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility staff failed to follow accepted infection control precautions to prevent cross contamination during catheter care for one (#6) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/08/23, documented nine residents had indwelling catheters. Findings: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 05/2017, read in part, .to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections . The policy further documented staff was to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during resident care and procedures. A care plan, review dated 07/23/23, documented the resident had an indwelling cathe-ter related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and a goal to remain free of infection through the next review period. The plan further documented an interven-tion that catheter care would be performed every shift and as needed each day. On 08/08/23 at 12:16 p.m., the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure privacy while providing resident care for one (#26) of five sampled residents who were observed while staff provided care. The facility census and condition identified 28 residents who were bedfast or in a chair all or most of the time and dependent on staff for care. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included, urinary tract infection, sepsis, Alzheimer's disease, cachexia, anemia, dietary Vit B12 deficiency, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. An admission assessment, dated 03/19/21, documented cognition severely impaired, required extensive assistance for personal hygiene and bathing. Always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 04/14/21 at 10:30 a.m., resident #26 was observed being assisted out of bed by two staff members. The door to the room had not been closed and the curtain had not been pulled. The resident was observed unclothed from the hallway. On 04/22/21 at 2:02 p.m., CNA #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-22 · tag F0564 — pattern
  Inform each resident of his or her visitation rights and ensure that all visitors enjoy equal visitation privileges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's family was notified of visitation rights for one (#20) of three sampled residents whose records were reviewed for visitation. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A facility letter addressed to residents and family members, dated 07/21/20, documented, .Having had positive cases of COVID-19 in our facility unfortunately delays our ability to start the reopening process . A facility letter addressed to residents, families, and friends, dated 11/13/20, documented, .We were hoping to have more options for visiting in our locations however our surrounding communities and the entire Midwest have experienced a surge in cases of COVID . The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance titled, Nursing Home Visitation - COVID-19 (Revised), dated 03/10/21, documented, .Facilities shall not restrict visitation without a reasonable clinical or safety cause .A nursing home must facilitate in-person visitation consistent with applicable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MEDICALODGES, INC. — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $167K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK