No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rehabilitation & Nursing Center At Everett (the)

289 Elm Street, Everett, MA 02149 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 183 certified beds · (617) 387-6560 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (617) 387-6560 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 31 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
602 Broadway · (781) 665-9500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
317 Ferry St · (617) 389-2188 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
178 Elm St · (617) 387-5520 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Elm St · (617) 394-2390 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.2%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%21.2%21.2%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.1%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.081.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.231.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 37.7–70.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 5.9–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.4–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
22.1%
Total nursing turnover
24.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 183 beds and averages 155.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement personalized care plans for two Residents (#78 and #128) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #78, the facility failed to prevent the Resident from having knives at meals.2. For Resident #128, the facility failed to have a fall mat in place. Findings include:1. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in September 2020 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and anxiety.Review of Resident #78's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #78 requires supervision for feeding tasks. Review of Resident #78's physician orders indicated the following orders: May use real utensils while in supervised area at lunch and plastic utensils at breakfast and dinner, every shift for Suicidal ideation with no plan, initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for one Resident (#61), out of 34 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain and implement physician's orders to discontinue Resident #61's CAM boot (medical walking shoe, is a type of orthopedic footwear used to immobilize the foot and ankle after an injury or surgery. It is designed to provide support, stability, and protection to the foot and lower leg during the healing process) and advance his/her weight bearing status after his/her surgical specialty (podiatrist) follow up on 5/19/25. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following:- Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance with meals for two Residents (#56 and #28) out of a total of 34 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), dated 9/20/24, indicated the following: -It is The Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Everett's policy that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident as outlined in regulatory grouping 483.24, and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, care and services will be provided to maintain their current ADL status. -Care and services for the following ADL's include: Dining-eating, including meals and snacks. -If a resident's ADL status is noted to have a decline, nursing will monitor the resident's status and send a referral to the appropriate department; appropriate department is determined by how the resident is presenting clinically (i.e. if eating difficulty is noted a referral would be made to Speech Therapy). 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during the 11:00 P.M. - 7:00 A.M. shift on two of five resident units. Specifically:1. The facility failed to ensure staff were awake and alert on the [NAME] Unit when staff were found asleep and three Residents (#3, #32 and #2) were observed wandering the unit.2. The facility failed to ensure that all assigned staff were consistently awake, alert, and were not simultaneously on their break during the night shift on the Main 1 unit.Findings include:Review of the Employee Handbook, dated 2018, failed to include expectations of staff sleeping while on duty. During the Resident Group Interview on 8/6/2025 at 10:35A.M., two of four participants reported staff sleep on the [NAME] and Main 1 Unit during the overnight shift. One Resident reported that staff hide in the TV room and another said that staff sleep at the nurses station. 1. During an early morning visit on 8/7/25 the following was observed on the [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adaptative equipment during meals for two Residents (#28 and #119) out of a total of 34 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including epileptic seizures, autistic disorder and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 is severely cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of five out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). The MDS also indicated Resident #28 required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Review of Resident #28's physicians orders indicated: Patient to be provided with weighted utensils and 2 handle overed (SIC) cup with meals, 4/30/25 On 8/5/2025 at 8:08 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #28 in his/her room eating breakfast. Resident #28's tray included weighted utensils and regular drinking glasses and mugs. Resident #28 used both hands to pick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for three Residents (#25, #78 and #15) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #25, the facility failed to accurately document treatment administrations. 2. For Resident #78, the facility failed to accurately document the completion of a physician's order.3. For Resident #15, the facility failed to accurately document the route of medication administration. Findings include:1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in October 2013 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and [NAME] insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #25 was moderately cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of 11 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS). The MDS also indicated Resident #25 had behaviors of refusing care. During an interview on 8/5/2025 at 9:57 A.M., the surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control undated, indicated the following: -The Infection Prevention and Control Program includes a comprehensive, total surveillance protocol which is based on the principles of epidemiology. -To provide a systematic method of collecting, consolidating and analyzing data concerning the distribution and determinants of a given disease or event followed by dissemination of that information to those who can improve the outcomes. A. Data Sources. Sources of data for infection surveillance include but are not limited to the following: Clinical record, Microbiology reports, Antibiotic Reports, Radiographic report, Activity logs / 24 hour report, Clinical rounds/staff reports. B. Data Collection and Tabulation: A line listing form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics which are used to guide decisions for evaluating antibiotic prescribing patterns in accordance with the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled: The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance. - Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. - The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use. - Any action taken to improve antibiotic use is expected to reduce adverse events,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain informed consents for psychotropic medications explaining the risks and benefits of treatment, prior to administering psychotropic medication for one Resident (#141) out of a sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Resident #141 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses that included foot drop, chronic non-pressure wounds, peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #141's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 3 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she had severe cognitive impairment. Further review on the MDS indicated he/she received antidepressant medications. Review of Resident #141's physician order, dated 7/19/24, indicated Mirtazapine (antidepressant) 7.5 mg (milligrams). Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to depression. Review of Resident #141's physician order, dated 7/23/24, indicated Fluoxetine (antidepressant) 10 mg. Give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Physician/Nurse Practitioner were notified of recommendations made by a Wound Physician for two Residents (#141 and #53) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #141, the facility failed to ensure the Physician or Nurse Practitioner were notified of recommendations made by the Wound Physician on 8/19/24 and 8/26/24. 2. For Resident #53, the facility failed to ensure the Physician or Nurse Practitioner were notified of recommendations made by Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner. Findings include: 1. Resident #141 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses that included foot drop, chronic non-pressure wounds, peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #141's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 3 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated the Resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect the status of two Residents (#71, #21) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #71, the MDS did not accurately assess Resident #71's functional ablities for self-care, specifically for eating and 2) For Resident #21, the facility failed to complete a discharge MDS Assessment when the Resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital. Findings include: 1) Resident #71 was admitted to the facility in February with diagnoses that include but are not limited to cerebral vascular accident, anemia, and malnutrition. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #71 scored a 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having a severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #71 had the following nutritional approaches: feeding tube,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for one Resident (#131) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff did not leave medications with Resident #131 while unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administration of Medications -General' dated November 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: -Medication may not be left unattended. Keep medications secured in a locked area or in visible control at all times. -Medications are never to be left at resident bedside if a situation occurs which necessitates that nurse must step away from resident prior to administration of all medications, medications must be removed from room and secured in locked medication cart until medications can be administered to resident. -Administers medications to residents via correct route. Offers residents a full glass of beverage. Observes residents to ensure medication consumption. During a medication pass on 8/27/24 at 9:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living for dependent residents for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 31 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated November 2023, indicated the following: - It is the facility's policy that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident consistent with the resident's needs and choices, care and services will be provided to maintain their current ADL status. - Care and services for the following ADL's include: Dining - eating, including meals and snacks - Referrals to therapy can be made based on the interdisciplinary team's review of resident's status during scheduled Comprehensive Care Plan Meetings. - Care Plans - All Resident care plans MUST match the Resident Profile care, CNA assignment, Pocket Sheet and DC POC and CNA Accountability sheets with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure standards of quality of care were implemented for one Resident (#2), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify a skin injury on the Resident's right forearm. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy subject: Managing Skin Integrity with an effective date of 1/3/2024, indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that all residents receive the highest practicable level of quality of care. Nursing, in collaboration with the health care team, will assess and manage skin integrity for all residents throughout their residence in the facility. Focus is on a 'gentle hands' approach when providing care to all residents. Any deterioration in or development of an alteration in skin integrity will be promptly addressed and individualized approaches in accordance with the resident's needs and goals will be implemented. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in July 2007…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to a) develop a care plan for the assessed risk for developing a pressure ulcer/injury and b) failed to implement the physician's order for prevalon boots (a heel protector) for one Resident (#79) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Subject: Pressure Ulcer Preventions and Management, with an effective date 1/3/2024 indicated the following: It is the policy of the facility to assess all resident for the risk of pressure injuries and to have an appropriate interdisciplinary preventive care plan implemented when indicated. Procedure: 3. When a resident is identified as at risk for development of a pressure injury, the licensed nurse/unit manager will initiate a care plan that recognizes the resident's needs and goals and addresses the same with individualized interventions that are consistent with recognized standards of practice. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically for Resident #48, the facility failed to ensure his/her oxygen concentrator air filter was in place. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titles Oxygen Therapy, dated 1/3/24, indicated Maintenance of Concentrator: - Filters will be washed in warm soapy water weekly. - Filters should be dried thoroughly before being reinstalled. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses that included sepsis, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #48's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of five percent or greater. One out of four nurses observed made two errors in 40 opportunities on one unit resulting in a medication error rate of 5%. These errors impacted one Resident (#53), out of four residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administering of Medications-General' dated, November 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: -It is the facility's policy that medications will be administered to residents in a timely and accurate manner by a licensed nurse or physician. -Nurse compares the medication names, strength, and dosage schedule on the medication administration record against the prescription label. Always check three times prior to administration. -Review physician's orders and compares against medication administration record. 1. During a medication pass on 8/27/24 at 9:44 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 prepare and administer including the following medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to properly secure the medication cart on one of four units 2. The facility failed to properly secure the medication room on one of four units Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Maintenance of Medications, dated 11/8/23, indicated Only authorized licensed personnel are to have access to the keys and the medications. Medication carts must be locked at all times when not in use, including during medication passes when the nurse steps away from the cart. 1. On 8/26/24 at 7:48 A.M. and 12:38 P.M., the surveyor observed the medication cart on the [NAME] 1 Unit unlocked and unsupervised. No staff were at the medication cart. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 7:30 A.M., Unit Manager #1 said the medication cart should be locked if a nurse is not present at it. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain dental services for one Resident (#87) out of a total sample of 31 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services/Dentures, dated November 2023, indicated the following: -Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the residents' assessment and plan of care. -Social services representatives with assist residents with appointments, transportation arrangements, and for reimbursement of dental services under the state plan, if eligible. -If dentures are damaged or lost, residents will be referred for dental services within 3 days. If the referral is not made within 3 days, documentation will be provided regarding what is being done to ensure that the resident is able to eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services, and the reason for the delay. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#76) was free from a significant medication error, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, Resident #76 was administered insulin (medication used to treat elevated blood sugars) when his/her physician's order indicated for the insulin to be held. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2021, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 9. The following information is checked/ verified for each resident prior to administering medications: b. vital signs Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in January 2020 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/11/23, indicated Resident #76 received insulin injections over the last 7 days. Review of the plan of care related to diabetes, dated as revised 11/9/21, indicated diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Review of the physician's order, dated 10/12/21, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of a refusal of a medication (an alteration in treatment plan) for one Resident (#60), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, on 8/28/23 Resident #60 refused his/her physician's ordered Haldol injection (antipsychotic medicine) and nursing failed to notify his/her physician of the Resident's refusal. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2021, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 17. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled, the individual administering the medication shall indicate this on the medication administration record space provided for that drug and dose and will inform the the provider [MD/NP]. Review of the facility policy titled, Change in Status Notification, dated as revised 2/2/23, indicated notification to the resident's attending physician will be made with a need to alter treatment significantly or to commence a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately assessed one Resident's (#13) speech clarity, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the MDS assessment for two consecutive quarters indicated Resident #13 had clear speech, which conflicts with his/her actual status. Findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in March 2009 and has diagnoses that include cerebrovascular disease, polyneuropathy, and other speech disturbances. On 8/29/23 at 11:08 A.M., Resident #13 was observed in the dining room. When greeted by the surveyor, Resident #13 did not respond verbally. The Activity Assistant, who was present, alerted the surveyor to laminated cards used to communicate with Resident #13. Resident #13 when asked how he/she was today pointed to the word happy. Resident #13 did not use spoken communication. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/14/23 indicated Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent or required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered communication care plan for one Resident (#116) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the Resident's primary language. Findings include: Resident #116 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #116's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #116's has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating that he/she could not complete the BIMS exam indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #116's preferred language is Vietnamese. During an interview on 8/29/23 at 10:27 A.M., Resident #116 was unable to communicate with the surveyor. Resident #116's roommate said he/she does not speak English, only Vietnamese. Review of Resident #116's progress notes indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services provided to one Resident (#475) met professional standards of quality, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the head of bed (HOB) to be at 90 degrees when Resident #475 was eating. Findings include: Resident #475 was admitted in August 2023 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia (a swallowing disorder), and left sided hemiparesis. On 8/29/23 at 9:08 A.M., Resident #475 was in bed eating breakfast with the head of bed at approximately 45-degree angle. On 8/30/23 at 9:00 A.M., Resident #475 was in bed eating breakfast with the head of bed at approximately 60-degree angle. Review of physician's order dated 8/16/23 indicated an order for aspiration precautions and HOB at 90 degrees while eating and 45 degrees at all other times. Review of speech therapy evaluation, dated 8/18/23, indicated a recommendation for swallow strategies to prevent aspiration (choking) including that Resident #475 should be in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary activities of daily living care for two dependent Residents (#114 and #37) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance with eating meals for Resident #114 and #37. Findings include: 1) Resident #114 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #114's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that he/she has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 out of a possible 15 indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #114 is totally dependent on all Activities of Daily Living, specifically totally dependent requiring one-person physical assist with eating. The surveyor made the following observations: *On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities for 1 Resident (#475) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Resident #475 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with the following diagnoses: left sided hemiplegia, generalized anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for Resident #475 indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 13 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she had intact cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident #475 is unable to walk and is totally dependent on staff for transfers and wheelchair mobility. On 8/29/23 at 9:08 A.M., Resident #475 said he/she unable to go to activities because there is nobody to transport him/her to activities. Resident #475 said he/she is interested in Bingo, Karaoke, and many events noted on the activity calendar that is posted on the bulletin board in his/her room. Review of Resident #475's care plan last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an orthotic device used for contracture management was implemented in accordance with the medical plan of care, for one Resident (#13) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, dated 2/1/23, entitled: subject: adaptive devices indicated the policy as: Residents at the Facility requiring adaptive devices will have the equipment available to them and used in accordance with the MD (medical doctor) order. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in March 2008 and has diagnoses that include cerebrovascular disease, polyneuropathy, and other speech disturbances. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/14/23 indicated Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent or required extensive assistance from staff for daily care activities. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #13 had functional limitation on range of motion on one side (of his/her body.) On 8/29/23 at 11:08 A.M., Resident #13 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it provided a physician's ordered medication for one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, on 8/29/23 Nurse #3 did not have Resident #60's physician's ordered metformin (antidiabetic agent that manages high blood sugar levels) and Nurse #3 failed to obtain the medication from the emergency medication supply. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2021, indicated medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 18. If a medication is unavailable, a temporary hold may be ordered by the MD/NP. A hold order for a medication must be accompanied by a restart date or time. Review of the facility policy titled, Emergency Pharmacy Service & Emergency Kits, dated as revised August 2020, indicated emergency pharmacy service is available 24 hours a day. Emergency needs for medication are met by using the facility's approved emergency medication supply. 6. The emergency supply along with a list of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow up with the dentist's recommendation for two Residents (#17 and #44) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Availability of Dental Services dated 1/1/2022 indicated the following: *The Unit Manager will be responsible for making necessary dental appointments *All requests for routine and emergency dental services should be directed to the Unit Manager to assure that appointments can be made in a timely manner. *Upon conducting a dental examination, a resident needing dental services will be promptly referred to a dentist. 1.) Resident #17 was admitted in March 2022 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infractions affecting left dominant side and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/9/23, indicated the Resident was assessed to be alert and oriented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one Resident (#13), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, staff documented that an orthotic right hand palm protector for contracture management was administered when the palm protector was not placed on the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, entitled: subject: adaptive devices, dated 2/1/23, indicated the policy as: Residents at the Facility requiring adaptive devices will have the equipment available to them and used in accordance with the MD (medical doctor) order. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in March 2009 and has diagnoses that include cerebrovascular disease, polyneuropathy, and other speech disturbances. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/14/23 indicated Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent or required extensive assistance from staff for daily care activities. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #13 had functional limitation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the call bell system for one Resident (#70), on one out of four resident care units was operable, resulting in the resident not having access to staff for potential unmet needs, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, entitled Resident Call System, dated 11/18/19, indicated the following: In accordance with 483.90 the facility must be adequately equipped to allow residents for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities. 8. When the call system is activated - alarm sounds and light is on, the following should be done: answer the bell/light promptly. 11. In the event that a call light is not functioning properly, the resident will be provided with a hand bell, staff will notify maintenance verbally and log into the maintenance logs that are on the units. During an interview on 8/29/23 at 8:45 A.M., Resident #70…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARB II HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 12/31/2020
EBZ II HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST29%since 12/31/2020
NEDLAW II HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST35%since 12/31/2020
YSZ 1082 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST21%since 12/31/2020
BARTH, ALEXANDERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
WALDEN, YEHUDAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2013
AWEH, NELSONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
MARSHALL, BENJAMINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2019
ZAGELBAUM, EPHRAIMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025
ERNC REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 5%Other / private 23%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,681per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$315per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225300. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next