Massena Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
89 Grove Street, Massena, NY 13662 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (315) 769-2494 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,387 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.3% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.9% | 5.8% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 1.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.8% | 19.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.3% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.3% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.7% | 13.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.6% | 78.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.9% | 20.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.5% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.00 | 1.36 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.2%CMS range 34.0–53.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.6–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 87.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.2–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 148.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide proper supervision to residents to prevent elopement and respond appropriately to wander alert alarms resulting in residents having access to unsafe areas and/or to exit the building undetected for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) reviewed. Specifically, on 08/24/2025 Resident #2 had known wandering behaviors, exited the building undetected by staff, and was found by a visitor in the parking lot, asking for a ride. Resident #3, had known exit-seeking behaviors and exited the building undetected by staff on 10/06/2025 and 10/23/2025 and was found across a four-lane highway in a shopping plaza, after an undetermined period of time. Resident #4 had known wandering behaviors, and on 02/21/2026 was found in an unsecured, non-resident administrative area where there was construction and electrical equipment and floors that were not finished. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Residents #2, #3, and #4, and placed other residents with cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-22 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews (iQIES Intake), the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional needs for two (2) of two (2) meals (the 05/04/2026 lunch and dinner meals) and for one (1) of four (4) kitchenettes reviewed. Specifically, the 05/04/2026 lunch and dinner meals were not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures, were not flavorful, and had missing food items; and the Unit A2 kitchenette was not stocked with sufficient snack items available to residents. Findings include:The facility policy Food Temperature, dated 09/2018, documented the policy was to ensure safe and quality food items. The facility would obtain and record temperatures of food items prior to serving the residents. The policy did not document the appropriate serving temperatures for hot and cold food items. The facility policy Food Preparation and Service, dated 08/2025, documented food is cooked in a manner to conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and texture. The danger zone for food temperatures is between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-22 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review (iQIES intake 2793248), the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility did not have a Food Service Director to manage the kitchen and food service; the full-time dietetic technician did not have the required credentials for the position of Food Service Director, and the registered dietitian worked remotely and was not available on site. Refer to citations (F800 - Food and Nutrition Services and F812 - Food Safety Requirements). Findings include: The 05/04/2026 Facility Assessment documented Former Food Service Director #40 was the current Food Service Director on Medical Leave; and the Per Diem Food Service Director was Per Diem Food Service Director #41. The Current Staff List provided by the facility documented Nutrition Assistant #39 was a Dietetic Technician. The undated Food Service Director Job Description documented the purpose of the position was to develop, plan, coordinate, and execute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews (iQIES Intakes 2607654 and 2985855), the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness in one (1) of one (1) main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had spoiled food; an unclean freezer; unclean surfaces; a steamer oven was in disrepair; and the box compactor room was piled with empty boxes.Findings include:The facility policy Kitchen Sanitization, dated 08/2025, documented food service should be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment should be kept clean and maintained in good repair. Between uses, cloths and towels used to wipe kitchen surfaces will be soaked in containers filled with approved sanitizing solution. Sanitizing solution would be changed at least once per shift or if solution becomes cloudy or visibly dirty. The Food Service Manager was responsible for scheduling staff for regular cleaning of kitchen and dining areas. Food service staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2638730), the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three (3) of four (4) resident units (A1, A2, and C2 units) reviewed. Specifically, A1, A2, and C2 units had strong urine odors and unclean walls and floors; and the A2 unit had several trash cans with fluid from a leaking ceiling.Findings include: The facility policy Quality of Life – Homelike Environment, revised 12/15/2025, documented the facility staff and management should maximize the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. The characteristics included a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment; clean bed and bath linens that were in good condition; and pleasant, neutral scents. Cleaning logs were not provided by the facility for C1 and B2 units as requested. The Daily Room Cleaning Log for 05/04/2026 was not provided as requested. No Daily Room Cleaning Log was provided for A2 unit. Terminal Cleaning Logs for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2607654), the facility failed to ensure a system of records and accounts of all controlled drugs was maintained for five (5) of five (5) residents (Residents #37, #38, #39, #40, and #41) reviewed. Specifically, Unit C1 had all the scheduled narcotic medications signed off at the beginning of the day, prior to the medication administration time.Findings include: The facility policy Controlled Substance Log, revised 11/2025, documented a record of all controlled substances would be maintained in the facility to ensure accountability and security of controlled substances. The facility's system would account for the receipt, usage, wastage, return to the pharmacy, disposition, and reconciliation of all controlled medications. The policy did not document the process for documenting medication administration of a control substance on the log. During an observation and interview on 05/04/2026 at 10:31 AM, the Unit C1 narcotic medication book was requested. Licensed Practical Nurse #30 provided the book and stated it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES intake 2610975), the facility failed to ensure they were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one (1) of four (4) resident rooms observed. Specifically, Resident #9's call bell did not function as designed.Findings include: The facility policy Resident Call System, revised 02/2025, documented the facility must be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities. The availability of the call system or alternative method for communication was mandatory by the facility. The following observations were made of Resident #9's call bell:-on 05/05/2026 at 8:43 AM, the resident was lying in bed and stated they were wet from urine. When they pushed the call bell button the light above their door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure sufficient support personnel to safely carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for the main kitchen and for 3 of 4 units (Units A1, B2, and C1) reviewed. Specifically, meal trays for Units A1, B2, and C1 were delivered an hour after the scheduled mealtimes, and concerns were identified with the effectiveness of meal preparation and other foot and nutrition services. Additionally, deficiencies related to food and nutrition services were identified in the areas of: Menus Meet Resident Needs/ Prepare in Advance/ Followed (F 803); Nutritive Value/ Appearance, Palatable/ Prefer Temperature (F804); and Food Procurement, Store/ Prepare Serve-Sanitary (F 812).Findings include:The facility policy, Food and Nutrition Services, revised 12/2024, documented meals and/or nutritional supplements would be provided within 45 minutes of either the resident request or scheduled mealtime, and in accordance with the resident's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025- 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for one (1) of (1) main kitchen reviewed. Specifically, the main kitchen had unclean floors, walls, and equipment, uncovered food, the sanitizer solution in the 3-bay sink was not tested, recipes were not followed for pureed items, a food scoop was left in a thickening agent bag, there was ice buildup in the walk in freezer, there were missing ceiling tiles, hand hygiene was not performed between dish washing and food services, there were no temperature logs for the tray line or the dishwasher, no kitchen cleaning logs, or sanitization logs. Findings include:The facility policy Kitchen Sanitization, revised 6/2025, documented the food service area was maintained clean and in a sanitary manner. All kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas were kept clean. All utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment were kept clean, maintained in good repair and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00372537) surveys conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the main lobby area, common areas, and four (4) of four (4) units (Units A1, A2, B2, and C1) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not maintain comfortable temperatures on nursing units A1, A2, B2, and C1, A2 and B2 dining rooms, and the A1 and C1 atriums; and Units A1, A2, B2, and C1, and the main lobby were unclean and in disrepair. Findings include:The facility policy Quality of Life- Homelike Environment, revised 12/15/2025, documented residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Characteristics that reflected a homelike setting included a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment; inviting colors and decor; comfortable and safe temperatures (71 degrees Fahrenheit- 81 degrees Fahrenheit); and comfortable noise levels. Temperatures:The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure prompt grievance resolution for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #138) or provide information on how to file a grievance or complaint for six (6) of seven (7) anonymous residents present at the group meeting. Specifically, Resident #138 had missing dentures and did not receive timely follow up on their grievance; and 6 residents present at the group meeting did not know how to file a grievance, grievance forms were not available to residents, and the facility lacked a process for residents to file an anonymous grievance. Findings include:The facility policy Grievances, revised December 2024, documented residents were afforded the right to voice grievances without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The Director of Social Work Services, designee, or resident social worker was identified as the grievance official and was responsible for acting as the resident advocate. A copy of the grievance policy was to be provided to residents upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00357525) surveys conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not provide on-going assessment and monitoring of bed rails (side rails) for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #4, #30, and #126) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 had bilateral bed rails and did not have an order or a comprehensive care plan that included the use of bed rails, regular assessments to ensure the bed rails remained appropriate or documented evidence that risks and benefits were reviewed with the resident or resident representative or consents were obtained prior to bed rail use; Residents #30 and #126 had bilateral bed rails and did not have regular assessments to ensure the bed rails remained appropriate or documented evidence that risks and benefits were reviewed with the resident or resident representative or consents were obtained prior to bed rail use; and the facility did not have documented evidence of inspections of bed frames, mattress, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one (3) of four (4) medication carts (Units A2, B2 and C1) and two (2) of two (2) medication rooms (Units A and C) reviewed. Specifically, the Unit A2 medication cart had opened and undated eye drops and multiple prefilled medication cups; the Unit C1 medication cart had opened and undated eye drops and an inhaler; the Unit B2 medication cart was left unattended and unlocked; and the medication refrigerator temperatures on Units A and C were not consistently monitored.Findings include:The facility policy Storage and Maintenance of Medications, revised 10/2017, documented medications were stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer's recommendation or those of the supplier under proper temperature. The refrigerator must maintain a proper temperature of 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit. Medications were checked regularly for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of two (2) meals reviewed (lunch meals on 8/12/2025 and 8/13/2025). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meals on 8/12/2025 and 8/13/2025. Findings include:The facility policy Food and Nutritional Services, effective 5/2019 documented each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking in the preferences of each resident. The undated facility policy Temperature Maintaining Equipment, documented the facility would hold and maintain the temperature of hot and cold food items during meal service inside the dietary department, dining rooms, and during transportation to resident units. During an interview on 8/11/2025 at 10:44 AM, Resident #98 stated the food was not good, the portions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (IQIES 525144 and 2582064) surveys conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence in a manner and an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for six (6) of six (6) staff (Licensed Practical Nurse #12, and Certified Nurse Aides #22, #51, #52, #53, and #54) observed. Specifically, during meal service on Unit A2 residents were observed being fed by Licensed Practical Nurse #12, and Certified Nurse Aides #22 and #51 while standing; and Licensed Practical Nurse #12, and Certified Nurse Aides #52, #53, and #54 addressed residents as honey and feeders. Findings include: The facility policy Maintaining Resident Respect and Dignity, revised 5/27/2025, documented the facility provided loving care to all residents in a timely manner that best bespeaks dignity, respect, compassion, sensitivity, and concern. The care embraced the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all residents. They respected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure all residents were fully informed of and participated in their treatment, including the right to be fully informed in a language that they can understand of their total health status, including but not limited to, their medical condition, and the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternatives or the option they prefer for one (1) of two (2) residents (Residents #53) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #53 was not informed of a medical order for a chest x-ray nor of the results of the x-ray. Findings include:The facility policy Resident Rights, revised 3/2025, documented residents had a right to be informed and make their own decisions. Residents had the right to be fully informed about their total health status, medical condition, and participate in decisions that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone and a place in the facility where calls can be made without being overheard for two (2) of four (4) residents (Residents #69 and #126) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #69 did not have access to a telephone and Resident #126 had to make phone calls at the nurse's station where others could overhear their conversations. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Right to Forms of Communication/Privacy, effective 4/7/2023, documented the facility protected and facilitated the resident's right to communicate with individuals and entities within and external to the facility. Resident's had easy access to telephones and a place in the facility where calls could be made without being overheard. 1) Resident #69 had diagnoses including fractured left arm and anxiety. The 8/2/2025 Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (3) of seven (7) residents (Residents #22, and #83) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #22 did not have an enabler bar on their bed as care planned; and Resident #83 was transferred with assistance of one and not two as care planned.Findings include: The facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning, revised 12/15/2025, documented the Comprehensive Care Plan included measurable objectives to meet the resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs identified from admission assessments, the comprehensive assessment, and application of the Resident Assessment Protocols. Other problems, strengths or needs identified by the Interdisciplinary Team were included in the Comprehensive Care Plan as appropriate. Types of problems which should be included were, risk for falls and activities of daily living. The facility policy Sit to Stand Mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025 the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #18 and #6) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #18 had an emergency department visit due to suicidal ideations, did not receive follow up from social services or psychology services upon return, did not receive psychotherapy services timely as requested and did not have a person-centered care plan and interventions in place to address their mental health; and Resident #6 did not have person-centered care plan interventions in place to address their mental health. Findings include: The facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning, revised 12/15/2024 documented comprehensive care plans would include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs identified by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/112/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure planned menus were followed for three (4) of thirteen (13) residents (Residents #8, #69, #98, and #148) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #69, #98, #148 did not receive Mighty Shakes (nutritional supplement) as planned; Resident #148 was missing multiple items listed on their meal ticket; and Resident #8 received bread at meals when care planned for no bread. Findings include: The facility policy Food and Nutritional Services, effective 5/2019, documented each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking in the preferences of each resident. 1) During a lunch meal observation on 8/11/2025 at 12:14 PM, Resident #98's lunch meal ticket documented the resident was to receive a Mighty Shake. The meal tray did not include a Mighty Shake. During a lunch meal observation and interview on 8/13/2025 at 12:51 PM, Resident #98's lunch meal ticket documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted on 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025 the facility did not provide specific services outside the facility when the facility did not employ a qualified professional to furnish the specific service for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was referred to Urology and was supposed to have dental and podiatry follow ups the facility did not follow up on in a timely manner. Findings include:The facility policy Consults-Outside Facility, revised 11/18/2024, documented the provider ordered all medical appointments and clinic visits. The Nurse Manager/designee initiated the consult form and filled out the name of the medical provider requesting the appointment, the medical clinic, the phone number, and the reason for the consult. The appointment was to be made in a timely manner, and they were to inform the provider if they were unable to do so. The resident/resident representative of the appointment were notified of the appointment, and the consult packet was made. Upon the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #8) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #8 was on contact precautions (used to prevent transmission of pathogens that are spread by direct person-to-person or indirect contact with the resident or environment) and Licensed Practical Nurse #20 changed a gastrostomy tube dressing (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) without wearing required personal protective equipment. Additionally, the facility Infection Prevention and Control policies and standards were not reviewed annually to ensure effectiveness and were in accordance with current standards of practice for preventing and controlling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00359676), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2's wound consultant recommended to start an antibiotic for a wound infection and the recommendation was not reviewed timely. Findings include: The facility policy, Consults-Outside Facility, effective 7/2023, documented upon return from an outside appointment, the Nurse Manager/designee followed up with the physician to discuss any new consult recommendations (this could be done by telephone or in-person if attending was in the facility at the same time resident returned from consultation). The attending physician might not agree with consultation recommendations which required documentation in the medical record by the Nurse Manager/designee. Resident #2 had diagnoses including diabetes, Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and peripheral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00331713), the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically: Resident #1 had a significant weight loss, noted worsening of wounds, decreased appetite/intakes, and a nurse practitioner's recommendation for a dietary consult, and the resident was not reassessed by clinical nutrition staff timely. Findings include: The 5/2019 Nutritional Assessment Policy documented an individualized care plan should address to the extent possible identified causes of impaired nutrition; the resident's personal preferences; goals and benchmarks for improvement, and time frames and parameters for monitoring and reassessment. The 7/2023 Consults - Outside Facility policy documented upon the residents' return from an outside appointment, the Nurse Manager/designee would follow-up with the physician to discuss any new consult recommendations. The attending physician might not agree with consultation recommendations which required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/11/2023 -12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility water cooling towers had not been tested monthly for Legionella in 2023, and the annual Legionella testing was not completed in 2022. Findings include: The Legionella Culture Sampling and Analysis, effective 5/2019, documented: Provisions requiring Legionella culture sampling and analysis at intervals not to exceed 90 days for the first year following adoption of the sampling and management plan. Thereafter, the plan should include provisions for annual Legionella culture sampling and analysis. The policy did not reference any sampling of the cooling towers. There was no documented evidence the facility water cooling towers had been tested monthly for Legionella in 2023. The monthly testing for the facility water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00319488, NY00326236, NY00319036) surveys conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure residents' rights to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 12 isolated areas (C1 unit handicap bathroom, C1 unit bathroom near the lobby, C1 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], C1 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], B2 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], A1 unit resident room [ROOM NUMBER], C1 unit long hall soiled utility room, A1 unit long hall soiled utility room, A1 unit resident room [ROOM NUMBER], second floor main dining area, occupational therapy/physical therapy room, A2 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER]). Specifically, call light devices were not functioning for multiple rooms (C1 unit handicap bathroom, C1 unit bathroom near the lobby, C1 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], C1 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], B2 unit central bath room [ROOM NUMBER], A1 unit resident room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00314558, NY00315659, NY00319036, NY00326236, and NY00327075) surveys conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing care to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 6 residents who expressed concerns regarding lack of sufficient staffing and not receiving care in a timely manner, and for four residents (Residents #22, #38, #89 and #107) reviewed. Specifically, during a confidential group meeting (resident council), 6 residents stated they had long wait times before their call lights were answered, Resident #22 was observed being provided care at an inappropriate assistance level, Resident #38's call light was answered after 72 minutes, Resident #89's call light was answered after 53 minutes and Resident #107's call light was answered after 74 minutes. Additionally,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure sufficient support personnel to safely carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for 2 of 4 resident units (Unit A1 and Unit C1), the downstairs dining room and the main kitchen. Specifically, Unit A1, Unit C1 and the downstairs dining room had resident meal trays delivered over one hour after the posted scheduled meal times, and concerns were identified with the effectiveness of meal preparation and other food and nutrition services. Additionally, deficiencies related to food and nutrition services were identified in the areas of: Menus Meet Resident Needs/Prepare in Advance/Followed; Nutritive Value/Appear, Palatable/Prefer Temperature; and, Food Procurement, Store/Prepare Serve-Sanitary. Findings include: The Resident Listing Report, dated 12/11/2023, documented the facility's resident census was 152. On 12/11/2023, the facility provided a dietary employee schedule which documented the projected schedule for the week…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00319036) surveys conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had undated and outdated food; staff were not wearing hair nets as required; floors, walls and other items were not clean; food scoops were left in sugar and flour bins; there were fruit flies within the kitchen; the three-bay sanitizer strips were expired; and the dish machine water temperatures were out of range. Findings include: The Use of Dish Machine policy, effective date 5/2023, documented that the operator would check temperatures using the machine gauge with each dishwashing machine cycle, and record the results in a facility approved log. The operator would monitor the gauge frequently during dishwashing machine cycles. Inadequate temperatures were to be reported to the supervisor and corrected immediately. The placard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00315659, NY00327075, and NY00319488) conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #22) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #22 developed three facility acquired pressure ulcers and: - The pressure relieving air mattress (specialty mattress used to relieve pressure) was not accurately set to the resident's weight. - There was no treatment ordered to the Stage 4 (full thickness skin and tissue loss with muscles, tendons or bones exposed) to left gluteal fold (the skin crease below the buttocks, separating the upper thigh from the buttocks) from 12/8/2023 - 12/14/2023. - Pressure relieving devices were not implemented as care planned. - The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/11/2023 -12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure 4 of 4 resident assistants (resident assistants #7, #8, #9, and #10) who completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program and working in the capacities of nurse aide trainees, were in compliance with the state approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program. Specifically, the facility received a letter from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services dated 10/11/2023, prohibiting the provision of a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program for a period of two years, effective 6/28/2023 through 6/27/2025. The facility hired resident assistants #7, #8, #9, and #10 after the 10/11/2023 prohibition letter to work as nurse aide trainees while waiting to take their nurse aide certification exam. Findings include: The undated facility job description for resident assistants documented they worked under the supervision of nurses to perform assigned functions of non-medical care to residents. Essential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during recertification and abbreviated (NY00319036) surveys conducted 12/11/2023 through 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure menus were followed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #95) reviewed. Specifically, during 5 meal observations, Resident #95 had missing menu items from their meal trays, and substitutions were not consistently provided as planned. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Food and Nutritional Services, documented that each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional and special dietary needs and took into consideration the preferences of each resident. Meal trays would be assembled, and all required items would be placed on the meal tray in an organized fashion. Food and nutrition services staff would inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal was provided to each resident. If an incorrect meal was provided to a resident, or a meal did not appear palatable, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00319036) surveys conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (12/11/2023 and 12/13/2023 lunch meals). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: During an observation on 12/11/2023 at 2:17 PM, the last lunch meal tray passed on Unit A1 was taken as a test tray in the presence of activities aide #19. The tray was tested, and a replacement was ordered for the resident. At 2:19 PM, the food temperatures were measured with the following results: the milk was 57 degrees Fahrenheit; and carrots were 118 degrees Fahrenheit. The milk and carrots were not held at palatable temperatures. During an observation on 12/13/2023 at 12:37 PM the lunch tray had been left in room [ROOM NUMBER]A Unit B2 before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00328448), the facility did not provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles for 3 of 3 employees reviewed (Employees #1, 2, and 3). Specifically, the facility did not complete the required health screenings Employees #1, 2, and 3 and the employees' health records were not completed accurately based on available information and standards of nursing practice. Additionally, Employees #1 and 2's health records included they received the influenza (flu)vaccinations when they had not received them. Findings include: The undated Employee Health Program policy documented the Employee Health Program consisted of: - pre-employment physical examinations and testing. - Providing immunization programs for recommended or required vaccines upon hire and annually when indicated. - Providing employee screening for communicable diseases and infections. The 5/2019 Influenza Vaccine policy documented for employees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey conducted from 11/15/21- 11/19/21, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for 1 of 4 resident units (Unit B2) and 3 of 29 residents (Resident #3, 2, and 24) reviewed. Specifically, on Unit B2 there were stained, non-waxed, and sticky floors; sticky, unclean walls, baseboards, wall handrails; unclean wheelchairs; and unclean, ripped lift equipment used by residents. Additionally, Unit A2 and B2 did not have enough bath linens for morning care and enough clothing protectors available for use during lunch. Findings include: Housekeeping The facility's Your Rights as Nursing Home Resident in New York State dated June 2010, documents as a nursing home resident they have the right to dignity, respect, and a comfortable living environment. The nursing home must provide the resident with safe, clean, and comfortable rooms and surroundings. The facility's Environmental Services Cleaning Guidebook dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 11/15/21 - 11/19/21, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards during the initial kitchen tour on 11/15/21 Specifically, there were multiple undated/unlabeled food items in coolers, employee personal food items in with resident food, soiled soda cans were stored with clean dishes, scoops were in bulk bin items, a plastic container of pizza sauce was not covered fully in the freezer, 1 box of frozen croissants were stored on the floor in the freezer, there were dented cans on a shelf in the dry storage room, and ice buildup in the walk-in freezer. Findings include: The 10/2018 facility policy Proper Food and Drink Storage and Labeling documented that all food and drink will be properly stored and labeled to ensure safe consumption. All food and drink are required to have labeling for easy identification. The facility will properly store and label food and drink items thereby maintaining sanitary and safe conditions in order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 11/5/21-11/19/21, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #59) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #59 was observed lying in bed in their room exposed from the waist down. The resident's door was open, the privacy curtain was not pulled, and the resident was visible from the hallway. Additionally, a housekeeper was in the resident's room cleaning. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Dignity effective 9/2018 documents the facility promotes care for residents in a manner and environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality. Staff were to respect the resident's private space and cover the resident 's skin while in bed. Resident #59 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and anxiety. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-19 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 11/15/2021-11/19/2021, the facility failed to ensure results of the most recent federal/state survey were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. Specifically, the Statement of Deficiency 3-ring binder in the main lobby did not include results from the last recertification survey on 7/11/19 or the 1/21/21 Focused Infection Control Survey. Findings include: The facility policy Your Rights as a Nursing Home Resident dated June 2010, documented the home shall make available for examination the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors including any statement of deficiencies, any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility and any enforcement actions taken by the Department of Health. They shall be made available in a place readily accessible to residents and designated representatives without staffing assistance. During an observation on 11/16/21 at 12:19 PM, the Statement of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00276030 and NY00283911) conducted 11/15/21- 11/19/21, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #14, 37, and 52) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #52 did not receive timely meal assistance at 3 observed meals, Resident #37 was observed wearing the same soiled clothing for 3 days, and Resident #14 did not receive incontinence care as care planned. Finding included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living dated 9/2017 documented residents with limited mobility receive appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is demonstrably unavoidable. Care and services for ADLs included hygiene, elimination, and dining. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00280353) surveys conducted from 11/15/21-11/19/21, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 2 meal trays tested (breakfast). Specifically, food was not served at palatable and safe temperatures for the 11/16/21 breakfast meal. Findings include: The facility's meal cart times documented the breakfast tray line started in the main kitchen at 7:25 AM and the meal carts arrived to the A2 Unit at 8:05 AM. During the breakfast meal observation on 11/16/21 the meal cart arrived to the A2 Unit Dining Room at 8:13 AM. At 08:53 AM, staff was observed bringing the last meal tray on the cart to an anonymous resident's room. Facility staff were asked to provide the resident with another breakfast tray and the original tray was used to measure food temperatures. The poached egg was 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the egg was firm and the consistency of a hard-boiled egg, 1 glass of ginger ale was 59.7 degrees F, 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 12/11/2023 - 12/15/2023, the facility did not ensure to post on a daily basis the current resident census and the total number, and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 5 of 5 days reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not post the resident census and nurse staffing information daily, as required. Findings include: The facility policy Staffing, dated 4/1/2022, documented staffing was evaluated at the beginning of the shift and adjusted as needed by the nurse manager/designee. Staffing analysts were available to support the designee on each unit during hours they were available and included: Providing timely, accurate data to the staffing office when needs changed and collaborating with the staffing office to correctly maintain call-off-data. Daily full time equivalents were to be posted in the glass display case by the night supervisor with updates made by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,387 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
- $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
- $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 20 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEIM, ESTHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 38% | since 01/15/2018 |
| WALDEN, CHAYA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 01/15/2018 |
| ZAGELBAUM, BATIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 27% | since 01/15/2018 |
| ZAGELBAUM, YECHIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 12/31/2020 |
| MARNC REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/16/2026 |
| BARTH, ALEXANDER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/15/2018 |
| OSTROVITSKY, ISRAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/18/2019 |
| GARRITY, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/12/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335592. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.