Ghent Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of 20 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was injured from their bed's installation hardware (bolt for a bed rail, which is an adjustable metal or rigid plastic bar that attach to the bed) that protruded beyond its frame. On 05/22/2026, Resident #1 sustained a cut to their right lower leg from the hardware on the bed while Registered Nurse #1 assisted the resident into bed. Resident #1 required hospitalization and 16 staples. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled, Resident Safety and Accident Prevention, reviewed 01/2026, documented that the facility is committed to providing a safe and supportive environment for all residents by implementing a structured, proactive accident prevention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey dated 08/28/23 through 09/01/23, the facility did not provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services for three (3) of 3 resident units and the core area. Specifically, on Unit #1, the floor was soiled with dirt in corners and next to walls in the corridors, dining rooms, nurse station, and resident room #s 101, 105, 109, 111, 118, 121, and 122; the windows were soiled with air borne debris and water stains in resident room #s 101, 105, 109, 111, and #122; the corridor wall outside the nurse aide room was soiled with drip marks, the walls were scraped in the room [ROOM NUMBER] restroom, the paint was chipped on the door frame to room [ROOM NUMBER], and wallpaper was peeling in the foyer old tub room; and the laminate on the nurse station enclosure walls was chipped. On Unit #2, the floor was soiled with dirt in corners and next to walls in the corridors, dining rooms, nurse station, and resident room #s 208, 212, 227; the windows…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 8/28/2023-9/1/2023, the facility did not provide food and drink that were prepared by methods that conserved flavor, and appearance, were palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature, for 4 of five test trays. Specifically, food and beverages served to the residents on the units were served at suboptimal temperatures, unappetizing in appearance and were not palatable. This was evidenced by: Food Council done separately from Resident Council documented the following concerns: - 5/17/2023 meeting documented the following: All residents attending stated food was not as warm as they would have liked, no cold cereal was provided as stated on meal slips, milk was sour, ice cream sandwiches were soft, toast too hard, too many egg dishes for breakfast, would like more meat, facility out of sugar substitutes that need to be available for therapeutic diets, out of Nepro (liquid supplement) needed for therapeutic diets, desert presentation is poor, an alternative to cart/heating ideas and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey dated 08/28/23 through 09/01/23, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for two (2) of 3 resident unit kitchenettes and the main kitchen. Specifically, in the main kitchen, the microwave oven, can openers and holders, sheet pan racks, plate warmer, shelving, stove drip pans, roll-in refrigerator, fire extinguishers, floor behind cooking equipment, and dishwashing area floor in corners and along the walls were soiled with food particles, food drips, and/or a black build-up; the pantry restroom fixtures were soiled with human residue or soap stains; the pantry restroom floor and walls were soiled with dirt particles along the walls and in corners. In both the Unit #1 kitchenette and Unit #2 kitchenette, the microwave ovens, refrigerators, cabinets, and floors next to walls and in corners were soiled with food particles, food drips, and/or dirt. This is evidenced as follows: During observations on 08/28/23 at 10:58…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey dated 08/28/23 through 09/01/23, the facility did not ensure foods brought to residents by family and other visitors was in accordance with adopted regulations in one (1) of 2 kitchenettes. Specifically, in the Unit #2 kitchenette refrigerator 3 packages of deli-sliced cold cuts were labeled with a resident's name and dated 7/17, 7/22, and 8/16; one package of deli-sliced cold cuts was labeled with a resident name with a date that was not discernable; restaurant meatballs that were not labeled with the resident name or date; and restaurant pizza that was not labeled with the resident name or date. This is evidenced was evidenced by: During observations on 08/28/23 at 10:58 AM, in the Unit #2 kitchenette refrigerator 3 packages of deli-sliced cold cuts labeled with resident name) and dated 7/17, 7/22, and 8/16; one package of deli-sliced cold cuts was labeled with a resident name with a date that was not discernable; restaurant meatballs that were not labeled with the resident name or date;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00309535), the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury for 2 (Resident #'s 55 and #69) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, for Resident #55, the facility did not ensure the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was notified about an unwitnessed fall resulting in a serious injury requiring transfer to the emergency room for further treatment and for Resident #69, the facility did not ensure to report a fall resulting in a left hip fracture to the NYSDOH within 2 hours of learning of the serious bodily injury. This was evidenced by: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Manual, dated 8/2020, documented an alleged violation of abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with profession standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals and preferences and that services are provided by a qualified professional for the assessment, treatment, and monitoring of residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function for 1 (Resident #33) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that Resident #33 was provided with Oxygen @ 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula (NC) every shift as ordered by the physician and did not ensure the prescribed oxygen flow rate was routinely monitored by a licensed nurse per standard of practice and as documented on the resident's comprehensive care plan for Altered Respiratory Status. This was evidenced by: Resident #33 Resident #33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of pleural effusion,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-06-09 · tag F0943 — pattern
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure training was provided to their staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, the facility did not provide new employee orientation to include Abuse, Neglect and Mistreatment to 5 (CNA #1, Laundry Employee #1, Maintenance Employee #1, LPN #4 and Dietary Employee #1) employees prior to their start of work in the facility. This was evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Resident Abuse Reporting dated 08/2020 documented, All employees are required to receive upon new hire orientation and at least annually therefore, training and competencies on the abuse prevention policies and procedures. It is the responsibility of the Staff Educator to ensure the coordination of the training requirements and keep records of all employees training. During an interview on 06/03/2021 at 11:30 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Resident #'s 27, 53, and #96) of 24 residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans (CCPs). Specifically, for Resident #27, the facility did not ensure a care plan was developed to address the resident's diagnosis of other seizures; for Resident #53, the facility did not ensure a care plan was developed to address the resident's diagnosis of hypothyroidism; and for Resident #96, the facility did not ensure a discharge care plan was developed to address the resident's discharge plan to return to the community. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Comprehensive Care Planning dated 10/2020, documented an individualized or person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey the facility must develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that include, but are not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the facility policy and procedure developed for the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) included time frames for the different steps in the process. This is evidenced by: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review dated 6/2020, did not include documentation of the time frames for the steps in the MRR process. During an interview on 6/09/2021 at 12:55 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated they were not aware the MRR policy did not document specific time frames for the steps of the process, and the MRR policy should include the necessary time frames for the steps of the process. During an interview on 6/09/2021 at 1:04 PM, the Regional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The safe and sanitary operation of a professional kitchen is to include particular methods of operation. Specifically, food temperature thermometers were not in calibration, plumbing fixtures were not in good repair, and equipment and the floor required cleaning. This is evidenced as follows. The kitchen and unit kitchenettes were inspected on 06/03/2021 at 10:09 AM. Two of 5 food temperature thermometers were found not in calibration when tested in a standard ice-bath method as follows: 20 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 29 F. The buffalo chopper, microwave oven, handwashing sink, and fire extinguisher in the kitchen and microwave ovens, cupboards, drawers, cabinets, refrigerator door gaskets, and floors in corners in the kitchenettes were soiled and required cleaning. The food preparation sink faucet was leaking, the drain under a preparation table was open to the kitchen environment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY