Auburn Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00364436) conducted 1/2/2025 -1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #276) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #276 did not have their hydrocollator pack (a device that heats cloth pads filled with a soft clay to provide moist heat therapy) monitored during therapy, causing a blister to their shoulder. This resulted in harm to Resident #276 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The updated facility policy, Applying a hydrocollator Pack, documented the hydrocollator was placed in the pocket of the terry cloth covering, then three (3) double-layer terry cloth towels were applied. The resident was checked for redness after five (5) minutes and if redness found, another layer of protective terry cloth towels was placed to prevent a burn. The hydrocollator was removed after 20 minutes. Hydrocollator temperatures were taken daily to ensure they were between 160 and 166 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00356805) conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 4 resident halls (North, West, East, and South). Specifically, there was a strong urine smell on North, West, East, and South halls; there was food and debris on the floor in the Northwest common area; Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was unclean with food debris and spots on the floor and floor mats; and Resident #16 wanted a chair in their room and did not have one. Findings include: The facility policy, Damp Mopping, dated 3/12/2020, documented all areas were maintained in a clean and pleasant manner. Mop heads were placed in a prepared detergent solution. After wringing out the mop, it would be used along the baseboard and then in a figure 8 stroke across the area. Detergent solution was changed after each room. The facility policy, Resident Rights,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY000325307, NY00035605, and NY000359258) surveys conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #4, #24, #27, and #178) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 was not provided oral care; Resident #24 was not shaved as planned; Resident #27 was not provided toenail care as planned; and Resident #178 was not showered, shaved, or groomed as planned. Findings include: The facility policy, Activity of Daily Living, Range of Motion and Mobility Policy, dated 10/2024, documented care and services for the activity of daily living included: - Hygiene- bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care - Mobility- transfer and ambulation including walking. - Elimination- toileting - Dining- eating, including meals and snacks. On admission a resident's activity of daily living status was assessed and as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and includes the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 1 treatment cart on the East Hall. Specifically, the East Hall medication cart was left unsecured; contained an expired insulin pen and an insulin pen without an opened or expired/discard date for Resident #27; and an insulin pen without any resident identifiers or opened/discharge date . Additionally, the East Hall treatment cart was left unsecured and contained medications and scissors. Findings include: The facility policy, Storage-Labeling-Maintenance of Medications, revised 11/8/2023, documented medications were stored safety, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations. The medication supply was accessible only to licensed nursing personal, pharmacy personnel, and staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals reviewed (1/3/2025 and 1/6/2025 lunch meals on the East Hall). Specifically, food was not flavorful and was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meals on 1/3/2025 and 1/6/2025. Additionally, two residents (Resident #24 and #53) interviewed stated the food did not taste good and was cold. Findings include: The facility policy, Food and Nutrition Services, dated 10/2023, documented each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met their daily nutritional needs. Food and nutrition services staff would inspect food trays to ensure the food appeared palatable and attractive and was served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Food palatability was evaluated by data collection from resident surveys, focus group sessions, meal observations, staff feedback,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen, and 1 of 2 (Northwest Unit) kitchenette nourishment areas. Specifically, the main kitchen had soiled and poorly maintained equipment, improper food and food product storage, and the lack of access to proper hand washing facilities; and the nourishment area on the Northwest Unit had unclean equipment. Findings include: The facility policy, Food Preparation Service, dated 9/2022, documented Food and Nutrition Services employees prepare and serve food in a manner that complied with safe food handling practices. The food preparation area was large enough to meet the needs of the facility. The department had a rotating cleaning list created by the Director to ensure the department was kept in proper sanitary compliance with all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Specifically, garbage was not properly contained outside on facility grounds. Findings include: The facility policy, Garbage and Refuse Disposal, dated 3/7/2022, documented garbage would be stored in a manner that was inaccessible to pests. Storage areas would be kept clean at all times and shall not constitute a nuisance. Outside dumpsters provided by the garbage service would be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. During an observation on 1/2/2025 at 9:51 AM, two dumpsters located outside the facility were open with plastic bags at the top blowing in the breeze. Wet cardboard boxes, broken equipment, and debris were piled outside of the Southwest exit by the activity room. Mattresses were piled between the dumpsters. Wooden pallets with debris were located behind a shed by the dumpsters, and more equipment and debris were collected outside of a garage at the end of the parking lot. Boxes, garbage,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00356805 and NY00362194) surveys conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence in a manner and an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #29 and Resident #282) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #29 was visible from the hallway in bed with their incontinence brief exposed; and Resident #282, who was continent of urine, urinated in bed when their call light was not answered timely. Findings include: The facility policy, Resident Rights, revised 3/22/2022, documented all residents had the right to a dignified existence, to be treated with dignity and respect, and had the right to privacy, and confidentiality. The facility policy, Maintaining Resident Dignity, revised 3/2024, documented residents were provided loving care in a timely manner that bespeaks dignity, respect, compassion, sensitivity, and concern. They respected the resident's choice of having their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #50 and #57) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #50 and #57 had medications at their bedsides and did not have orders for self- medication administration. Findings include: The facility policy, Administration of Medications, revised 9/2022, documented medications were administered to residents in a timely and accurate manner by a licensed nurse or physician. Medications were never to be left at a resident's bedside and if a situation occurred that necessitated the nurse had to step away from the resident prior to administration of all medications, medications were removed from the room and secured in the locked medication cart until they were administered to the resident. 1) Resident #57 had diagnoses including hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function), depression, and diabetes. The 10/4/2024 Minimum Data Set admission assessment documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey conducted 1/2/2025-1/8/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were provided the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out the activities of daily living including functional communication systems for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #13 was deaf and was not consistently provided a communication board as planned. Findings included: The facility policy, Resident Rights, effective 3/22/2022, documented employees should treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all resident of the facility. These rights include the resident right to a dignified existence and the right to communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility. Resident #13 had diagnoses including moderate intellectual disabilities and deaf non-speaking. The 10/31/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359258) surveys conducted 1/2/2025-1/7/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #15) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #15 had a new skin impairment that was not assessed and treated timely by a qualified individual. Findings include: The facility policy, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 3/2021, documented a registered nurse would conduct a comprehensive skin assessment when a significant change was identified. The nurse was responsible to document a comprehensive nursing note when a pressure ulcer was identified. All wounds should be noted on 24-hour report. Resident #15 had diagnoses including hypertension and diabetes. The 9/24/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment (health screening tool)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,901 — penalty dated 2025-01-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY