Sodus Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, for one of one main kitchen and one (Cortland/[NAME]) of two satellite serveries, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically: there were dirty food and non-food contact surfaces, perishable food items were kept longer than 3-days per facility policies, and a sanitizer cleaning bucket with solution and a cleaning rag was dirty and not replaced between meals. The findings are: Record review of the undated facility policy Food and Supply Storage included: All perishable items will be disposed of 3 days after opening or on expiration date whichever is earlier. Observations during the initial tour of the main kitchen on 10/07/2024 from 7:45 AM to 8:35 AM included the following: 1. The following covered and labeled perishable food items were located in the walk-in cooler as follows: seafood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], for 54 of 102 residents, the facility did not ensure residents' right to privacy related to their medical records in that advanced directives wishes were not kept confidential. Specifically, there was a list of advanced directives information (such as wishes for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of an acute cardiac or respiratory event) that included the names of 44 residents with their wishes posted in plain sight in the facility library, which all residents and visitors have access to. In addition, there was a large picture frame hanging in the front lobby of the facility with 17 resident's pictures and names in view of the public; nine residents were listed in an elopement group (at risk for unsafe wandering outside the building) and eight residents an explorer group. This is evidenced by the following: During observations on [DATE] at 1:43 PM, [DATE] at 8:37 AM, [DATE] at 12:49 PM, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, for one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for food and nutrition, the facility did not ensure services were provided to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, Resident #35 was not consistently monitored for significant weight loss, and the facility could not provide documented evidence of consistent meal monitoring or interventions despite a significant weight loss. The finding is: The undated facility policy Weights documented each resident will be carefully monitored on a regular basis (monthly or weekly), or as otherwise specified by the provider, so that appropriate timely interventions may be initiated. Interventions will be initiated as needed to track unplanned significant weight variances of 5% weight loss/gain in 30 days, 7.5% weight loss/gain in 90 days, or 10% weight loss/gain in 180 days. The Dietitian/Designee will be responsible for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Sodus F760D Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00338097) from 10/07/2024 to 10/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that two (Residents #43 and #66) of six residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, Resident #43 received several medications prescribed to treat Parkinson's disease and seizures one to three hours after scheduled times and a second medication to treat Parkinson's was administered too closely to the next dose. Resident #66 did not receive their insulin administration as ordered. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Administration of Medications, dated September 2020, included that medications will be administered to residents in a timely and accurate manner. Administer medications within one hour before or after prescribed time. Immediately chart medications administered in the proper time and date via initials by signature in designated space on the administration record. If resident refuses to take scheduled medication(s),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review completed during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00337643), for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. Specifically, a staff member reported on 3/25/24 that they witnessed a potential abuse incident on 3/20/24 between another staff member and Resident #1. The facility's investigation to rule out any abuse, neglect or mistreatment concluded no abuse occurred but did not include any interviews with staff members who were working at the time of the alleged incident and witnessed the incident. Additionally, the facility did not report the alleged abuse until 13 days after it occurred. This was evidenced by the following: Resident #1 had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 1/10/24, documented the resident was severely impaired cognitively. Review of a facility's Investigation Summary dated 3/25/24 and completed by the Director of Nursing, revealed that an incident occurred on 3/20/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (#NY00320671) completed 10/12/23 to 10/13/23, it was determined that for one of one main kitchen the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food service operations were conducted in the area of an active wastewater backup and the incident was not reported to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). The findings are: During an interview on 10/12/23 at 8:47 AM, the [NAME] stated that there was a flood in the kitchen in July this year because the septic backed up. The [NAME] further stated that a vendor had to come in because the water from the septic came up to above their shoe line all along the cook line. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 8:56 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated that they had a problem in July this year when there was a flood in the kitchen when the drains backed up, and they had to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00304512) completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Empire) of three residential care units reviewed and one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards. Specifically, hot water temperatures exceeding 120 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F) were accessible to residents at point of use. Additionally, Resident #27 was observed with unlabeled and unsupervised medications at the resident's bedside. This is evidenced by the following: 1. Observations, interviews, and record reviews on 10/27/22 from 10:33 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. included the following: a. Water temperatures observed in the Empire Unit using a ThermoWorks Thermapen One digital thermometer: 129°F from the handwash sink in bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], 130°F from the handwash sink in the shower room next to room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for two (Resident #81 and #220) of two residents reviewed for tube feedings (TF), the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications. Specifically, there was no process for tracking and monitoring the daily total intakes of TF for either resident to ensure the resident's nutritional needs were being met. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Gastrostomy Tube Feeding, dated April 2022 directed that when an intermittent feeding was completed to document administration in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 1.Resident # 81 has diagnoses including a stroke with left side hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and malnutrition. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/22/22, revealed the resident was severely impaired cognitively and that a feeding tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #54) of five residents reviewed the facility did not ensure that the attending physician documented that the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) that was completed by the pharmacist was reviewed for irregularities/recommendations and action taken if any and/or a rationale if no action taken. Specifically, the pharmacist had consistently noted irregularities on the MRR reports related to a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication and recommendations for other medications and there was no evidence that the irregularities were addressed by the by the physician or the Director of Nursing (DON) per the regulations. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, 'Medication Regimen Reviews', effective November 2021, documented that any recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. The Physician accepts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 11/2/22, it was determined that for two (Empire and [NAME]) of three resident units, one of one service wing, and one of one basement, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, exhaust ventilation was not working, a water softener tank and circulating pump was leaking, soiled towels were present on a windowsill, and there was a leak in a water hose behind a washer. The findings are: 1. Observations in the presence of the Assistant Director of Maintenance (ADM) on 11/1/22 from 1:46 p.m. to 1:55 p.m. revealed that the mechanical exhaust ventilation was not drawing air through the ventilation ducts in the following locations on the [NAME] Unit: both shower rooms, the shared bathroom between resident rooms #12 and #14, in the shared bathroom between resident rooms #29 and #31, and in the soiled work room. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY