Houghton Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00340465) the facility failed to protect residents from sexual abuse for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 with a history of sexually aggressive behaviors was found engaged in sexual activity with Resident #2. Resident #2 wandered into Resident #1's room without staff's knowledge. Resident #1 and Resident #2 both lacked the ability to consent due to their cognitive impairment and inability to express their feelings. Using the reasonable person concept, as referenced on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Psychosocial Outcome Severity guide, it was determined psychosocial harm occurred that is not immediate jeopardy. The finding is: The policy titled Abuse - Investigation, Protection and Reporting dated 10/24/2022 documented each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical/mental abuse, involuntary seclusion, exploitation in any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies on a 24-hour basis to provide care to all residents for one of one facility reviewed for sufficient staffing. Specifically, the facility did not meet their minimum staffing levels for Certified Nurse Aides to meet the needs of each resident as they utilized non-certified Resident Assistants to meet their established minimums. The findings are: REFER TO: F 561 - Self Determination F 728 - Facility Hiring and Use of Nurse The policy titled Staffing dated 4/1/22, documented in accordance with current federal law the facility will ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Development of the staffing plan shall include consideration of the following including: the scopes of practice of Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure there were services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight (8) consecutive hours, seven (7) days a week unless when waived. Specifically, the facility did not have eight (8) consecutive hours of Registered Nurse coverage on 3/30/25, 4/5/25, 4/12/25 and 4/13/25 as required and did not have a waiver. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Registered Nurse Coverage & Full-Time Director of Nursing revised April 2025 documented, the facility ensures compliance with federal regulations by ensuring a registered nurse is onsite for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive hours each day, seven (7) days per week. Scheduling of Registered Nurse coverage will be handled by the Staffing Coordinator or designee to ensure compliance. During an entrance conference interview on 4/28/25 at 12:27 PM, the Administrator stated the facility had no nursing staff waivers. The daily staffing sheets dated 3/28/25 through 4/27/25, documented they did not have a Registered Nurse for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-02 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during a Standard survey completed 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months was competent to provide nursing and nursing related services and that individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program or a competency evaluation program approved by the State for six (6) (Resident Assistant #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) of seven (7) resident assistants reviewed. Specifically, Resident Assistants #1, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7 worked greater than 4 months (120 days) as a nurse aide without receiving nurse aide certification. The finding is: Review of the New York State Nursing Home Nurse Aide Training Program and Certification dated January 2017, documented the Nurse Aide Training Program is responsible for scheduling the certification examination for its successful trainees within ten (10) business days of the last day of the Nurse Aide Training Program. The trainee must pass both the clinical skills test and the written (or oral) test in order to obtain New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/2025, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility must operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. The facility must have a governing body, or designated persons functioning as a governing body, that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility; and the governing body is responsible and accountable for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program. Specifically, the administration did not ensure nurse aide trainees were removed from providing hands on care within the required timeframe. The findings are: REFER TO: F725 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to choose activities, schedules, and health care consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care for two (2) (Resident #18 and #52) of two (2) residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, Resident #18 was not provided with the frequency of showers they preferred and Resident #52 was not offered or provided with a shower as scheduled. The findings are: The policy titled Activities of Daily Living-Bathing and Bathing Preferences reviewed 3/25 documented the facility would bathe/shower resident based upon his/her preferences, needs and choices. A licensed nurse/activities/designee will gather information about residents' personal preferences for bathing/showers upon initial assessment and periodically thereafter. Bathing/shower schedules will be developed according to resident's needs, schedule and routine and not for staff convenience. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not provide services consistent with professional standards of quality for one (1) (Resident #6) of one (1) resident reviewed for dialysis. Specifically, Resident #6 did not receive Torsemide 40 milligrams as ordered by the physician on non-dialysis days, and it was given on dialysis days. The finding is: The policy titled Orders dated 3/19 documented, it is the facility's policy that all orders are accurately transcribed and executed in a timely manner per physician/Nurse Practitioner orders. The healthcare provider will provide timely and appropriate medical orders, and the healthcare provider will verify the accuracy of verbal orders when they are given and will authenticate, co-sign, and date them in a timely manner no later than the next visit to the resident. Resident #6 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (receiving dialysis), lymphedema (a buildup of lymph fluid in the fatty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure that residents who had a suprapubic catheter (tube inserted into the bladder, through the abdomen, to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services to manage catheters for one (1) (Resident #20) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, staff did not utilize enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) during care, improperly emptied the drainage bag, did not offer Resident #20 a leg drainage bag and did not ensure the catheter drainage bag and tubing remained off the floor. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Catheter Care - Male/Female Urinary and Suprapubic reviewed 2/2025 documented staff were to ensure the drainage bag was not touching the floor and to place in a bag for dignity. If the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00375024) during a Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and a comfortable environment, to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (3) (Residents #28, #42, and #67) of five (5) residents reviewed for infection prevention and control and one (1) (Resident #31) of three (3) residents observed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Residents #28, #42, and #67 started experiencing cold signs and symptoms (wet cough, raspy voice, sore throat), were tested for influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus, and COVID-19 on 4/29/25, and were not placed on transmission based precautions pending their test results; staff did not ensure hand washing after changing their gloves, after cleansing wounds, prior to the application of treatment and between draining wound sites…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00324791) completed on 2/12/24, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to be free from sexual abuse for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was observed by staff engaged in non-consensual sexual contact with Resident #1. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse- Investigation, Protection, and Reporting dated 10/24/22 documented a policy of zero tolerance will be enforced if any violations of these rights occur. Residents shall not be subjected to abuse and mistreatment by anyone including but not limited to: facility employees, medical staff, other residents. The policy and procedure documented residents should be evaluated to determine whether the resident has the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (elevated fat levels in the blood). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 3/31/23, the facility did not ensure that residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four (100 Unit, 200 Unit, 300 Unit, 400 unit) of four resident units. Specifically, there was a lack of hot water in resident rooms and care areas. Sink faucets that did not function properly. Floor transitions between the hallway and resident living spaces in poor condition. Poor lighting in resident living spaces and safety floor mats soiled and in poor condition (Resident #29). The findings are: The facility P&P titled Daily Domestic Hot Water Testing dated 4/2018 documented to test the domestic hot water supply daily to provide safe, comfortable levels of hot water within all areas of the facility. The daily testing of the domestic water supply to ensure it is regulated within 90-120 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Turn on hot water faucet and let the water run approximately 10 seconds. Keep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$65,052 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $65,052 — penalty dated 2024-10-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 21 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY