No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Silver Bluff

100 Silver Bluff Drive, Canton, NC 28716 · For profit - Corporation · 131 certified beds · (828) 648-2044 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20232 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
107 Haywood Park Dr · (828) 237-8001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid3.8 mi
10 New Clyde Hwy · (828) 648-4468 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6783 Cruso Rd · (828) 235-8008 · Call to confirm hours
Park
E Fork Pigeon Riv · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.9%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.8%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.3%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.1%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.8%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.1%14.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.4%78.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%22.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.451.781.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.891.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.6%CMS range 49.5–60.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.0–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 5.7–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
51.4%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 115.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident, staff, and family interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's (Resident #49) right to choose their preferred method of bathing and the resident's right to refuse a shower. On 4-22-23, Resident #49 had refused her shower three times and on the third refusal Nurse #1 was informed of Resident #49's refusal to take a shower. Nurse #1 informed Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 and NA #2 that the resident had to take a shower regardless of Resident #49's refusal. Nurse #1 and 5 NAs (NA #1, NA #2, NA #3, NA #4, and NA #5) proceeded to force Resident #49, who was combative and stating she did not want to get out of bed and have a shower, out of the bed, into a shower chair and into the shower. Resident #49 sustained a bruise to her left hand and had the likelihood of suffering serious physical and psychosocial harm. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as intimidation, fear, humiliation, embarrassment, and/or dehumanization (deprivation of human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, family and resident interviews, the facility failed to protect Resident #49's right to be free from physical and emotional abuse for one of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On 4-22-23 Resident #49 had refused a shower three times and on the third refusal, six staff members (Nurse #1, Nursing Assistant (NA) #1, NA #2, NA #3, NA #4, and NA #5) proceeded to force Resident #49, who was combative and pushing staff away, out of bed and into a shower chair and into the shower. Resident #49 sustained a bruise to her left hand and had the high likelihood of suffering other serious physical and psychosocial harm. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as intimidation, fear, humiliation, embarrassment, and/or dehumanization (deprivation of human qualities such as compassion). Immediate Jeopardy began on Saturday 4-22-23 when six staff members forced Resident #49 out of her bed to receive a shower with the resident sustaining a bruise to her hand and feeling that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of food stored past the use by date in 1 of 3 refrigerators (walk-in refrigerator). Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain clean air vents located directly above the kitchen's tray line free from gray debris and practice hand hygiene during tray line service for 1 of 4 kitchen staff (Kitchen Staff #1) observed in the kitchen. The deficient practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included:a. On 1/5/26 at 10:34 AM an observation was conducted in the walk-in refrigerator with the Dietary Manager. An opened 1-gallon container of soy sauce was observed on the top shelf of a storage rack. The container contained a written date 6/11 -12/11. On 1/5/26 at 10:43 AM the Dietary Manager stated the soy sauce useful date range was 6 months after it was opened on 6/11/25. The soy sauce should have been disposed after 6 months (12/11/25).b. On 1/7/26 at 11:31 AM during tray line service Kitchen Staff #1 was observed removing his hat and rubbing his hair with his bare hands. The Kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with the Wound Care Nurse Practitioner (NP), Medical Director (MD) and staff, the facility failed to follow up when a Wound Care NP recommended the staff contact the primary care provider about the condition of the wound and if antibiotics needed to be ordered for a resident who showed symptoms of a wound infection. This deficient practice affected 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #11).Findings included:Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain, type-2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (decreased control and strength on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS showed that she required substantial/ maximal assistance with upper body dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews with staff, resident, Nurse Practitioner and Pharmacist, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by a medication ordered not to be crushed was administered crushed and medication omissions (3 medication errors out of 34 opportunities), resulting in a medication error rate of 8.82% for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #116) observed during medication pass.The findings included:Resident #116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), benign prostatic hyperplasia (condition where the prostate gland enlarges) and age-related bilateral cataract.a. The Physician's Orders in Resident #116's electronic medical record indicated an active order dated 11/2/24 for Oxybutynin Chloride XL oral tablet extended release 24 hour 5 milligrams (mg) - give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for bladder spasms/urgency. Do not crush.On 1/7/26 at 9:04 AM, Medication Aide (MA) #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to date an opened insulin pen and discard an expired stock medication available for use in 1 of 5 medication carts (500 hall long-side medication cart). Additionally, the facility failed to store a heparin flush syringe in a locked cart instead of leaving it unsecured on a resident's bedside table (Resident #8).The findings included: 1. An observation of the 500 hall long-side medication cart with Nurse #1 on 1/8/26 at 10:24 AM revealed an opened and undated Novolog flex pen available for use in the top drawer of the medication cart. The insulin pen had a pharmacy label indicating it was filled by the pharmacy on 11/10/25. A review of the manufacturer's instructions for Novolog pen indicated that it lasted 28 days after its first use. The observation further revealed an open bottle of Acidophilus tablets with manufacturer's expiration date of 11/25. There were approximately 40 tablets left in the bottle. Acidophilus is probiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Payor source: MedicaidBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold aspirin (an antiplatelet medication that helps prevent blood clots) which resulted in Resident #55 not being able to have an ordered tooth extraction in November 2025 for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for providing dental services (Resident #55). Findings included:Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of severe protein-calorie deficiency and heart disease.A physician's order for one Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable 81 milligrams at bedtime was ordered on 4/9/25.Resident #55 was care planned on 4/10/25 for dental health problems related to broken teeth and poor repair. The care plan included Resident #55 had recent tooth pain related to abscess and recurring abscesses. The care plan intervention included reporting bleeding gums and complaints of mouth or tooth pain.Resident #55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded him as cognitively intact, received a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to secure an unopened vial of inhaler and an opened tube of ointment in the medication cart for 1 of 1 room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), failed to date an opened bottle of eye medication and 7 opened pens of insulin for 3 of 6 medication carts (200 halls, 300 halls, and 400 halls), and failed to lock 1 of 6 medication carts during observations for medication storage audits (300 halls). The findings included: a. During a medication storage audit conducted on 11/04/24 at 10:51 AM, 1 vial of unopened ipratropium-albuterol (DuoNeb) solution and an opened tube of zinc oxide ointment were found sitting on Resident #73's bedside table and ready to be used. An attempt to interview Resident #73 on 11/04/24 at 10:52 AM was unsuccessful. She was unable to answer questions. During an interview conducted on 11/04/24 at 10:54 AM, Unit Manager #1 acknowledged that the vial of DuoNeb solution and the tube of zinc oxide ointment should not be left unattended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical restraint when Nurse Aide (NA) #2 held Resident #61's wrists/hands in front of her chest during incontinence care when Resident #61 started swinging her arms and kicking her legs. In addition, NA #1 and NA Student #1 observed NA #2 smacking Resident #61 with an open hand on the wrist following the completion of incontinence care. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for physical restraint (Resident #61). The findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances. The annual Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she had physical behaviors directed toward others 1 to 3 days and verbal behaviors directed toward others daily. She was not documented for rejection of care. Resident #61 was documented as being incontinent of bowel/…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, test tray, and resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide palatable food that was appetizing in temperature for 3 of 3 residents reviewed with food concerns (Resident #42, Resident #59, and Resident #103). Findings included: a. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had severely impaired cognition and required set up assistance with eating. An interview on 11/04/24 at 10:15 AM with Resident #59's resident representative revealed the food was often cold at lunch and dinner. b. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #103 was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with eating. An interview on 11/04/24 at 11:08 AM with Resident #103 revealed he said the food was cold about half the time. c. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff, and family interviews the facility failed to follow their abuse policy in the areas of identification, immediately reporting an allegation of abuse to the Administrator, and reporting an allegation of abuse to the state agency within two hours. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for reporting. Findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and investigating policy and procedure revised on 9-2022 revealed in part; If resident abuse is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the Administrator. The Administrator immediately reports the suspicion to the agency within two hours of an allegation involving abuse. A telephone interview occurred with Resident #49's daughter on 6-6-23 at 11:35am. The daughter explained she had visited the resident around supper time on 4-23-23 and saw the bruise on her hand. She stated when she asked Resident #49 what had happened, the resident told her staff had held her hand down and pinched her hand on 4-22-23 because she did not want to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide protection for residents during the investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating last revised September 2022 revealed in part: Investigating Allegations: 6. Any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (the wearing down of protective tissue at the end of bones). A review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. She required the extensive assistance of 2 people for bathing and dressing. A nursing progress note dated 6/2/23 at 4:53 PM written by Nurse #3 revealed she was called to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to (1) perform hand hygiene and change gloves after removing a dirty dressing, after cleansing a wound, and before applying a clean dressing to a wound and (2) provide a clean field for wound care materials for 1 of 1 staff member observed for wound care (Nurse #4). Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled Wound Care revised in October 2010 read in part in steps #3 through #5 Put on exam glove. Loosen tape and remove dressing. Pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle. Wash and dry your hand thoroughly. Put on gloves. Step #12 read in part Be certain all clean items are on clean field. An interview on 6/07/23 at 2:28 PM with Nurse #4 revealed he was the Infection Control Preventionist and Wound Treatment Nurse. An observation on 6/07/23 at 2:28 PM with Nurse #4 for wound care on Resident #82's right shin skin tear. Nurse #4 was observed to place wound care supplies on the overbed table without sanitizing it or placing a protective barrier. Nurse #4 brought wound care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-06-12 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post complete and accurate daily nurse staffing information for 2 of the 5 days reviewed (6/06/23 and 6/07/23). Findings included: The daily nurse staffing information posted was observed on 6/06/23 at 9:30 AM. The posting revealed no total staff hours for nursing assistants or nurses for any shift. The daily nurse staffing information posted was observed on 6/07/23 at 10:45 AM. The posting revealed no total staff hours for nursing assistants or nurses for any shift. An observation and interview on 6/07/23 at 10:54 AM with the Director of Nursing revealed that she posted the daily nurse staffing information at the nurses' station. She stated she was aware of the requirement to post the total staffing hours by position and shift. She was unaware that the current information posted did not include the total hours. She stated it must have happened when the facility switched staffing software systems and she had not noticed it did not include the required information. An interview on 6/07/23 at 11:10 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWhiteville, NC 1 of 5Louisburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, NC 1 of 5Mary Gran Nursing CenterClinton, NC 1 of 5Oak Forest Health and RehabilitationWinston-Salem, NC 1 of 5Woodhaven Nursing CenterLumberton, NC 2 of 5Highland House Rehabilitation and HealthcareFayetteville, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center ofBenson, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSanford, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Pavilion Health Center at BrightmoreCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Pinehurst Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterPinehurst, NC 2 of 5Pisgah Manor Health Care CenterCandler, NC 2 of 5Roxboro Healthcare & Rehab CenterRoxboro, NC 2 of 5Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health CenterMatthews, NC 2 of 5The Foley Center at Chestnut RidgeBlowing Rock, NC 2 of 5The OaksWinston-Salem, NC 3 of 5Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAdvance, NC 3 of 5Elizabethtown Healthcare & Rehab CenterElizabethtown, NC 3 of 5Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan CountySalisbury, NC 3 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehab Center of SouthporSouthport, NC 3 of 5Shoreland Health Care and Retirement Center IncWhiteville, NC 3 of 5Southwood Nursing and RetirementClinton, NC 3 of 5Summerstone Health and Rehabilitation CenterKernersville, NC 3 of 5Warren Hills Nursing CenterWarrenton, NC 4 of 5Briar Creek Health CenterCharlotte, NC 4 of 5Capital Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 4 of 5Inn at Quail Haven VillagePinehurst, NC 4 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center ofBurlington, NC 4 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWeldon, NC 4 of 5Liberty Healthcare Services of Golden Years NursinFalcon, NC 4 of 5The Preserve At Fairfield GladeCrossville, TN 4 of 5Three Rivers Health and Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, NC 4 of 5Westfield Rehabilitation and Health CenterSanford, NC 4 of 5Woodlands Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterFayetteville, NC 5 of 5Parkview Health and Rehabilitation CenterChapel Hill, NC 5 of 5Yadkin Nursing and Care CenterYadkinville, NC

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LIBERTY LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/05/2024
LIBERTY REAL PROPERTIES II LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
JOHN A MCNEILL JR 2012 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/05/2024
JOHN A MCNEILL JR 2014 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/05/2024
RONALD B AND CYNTHIA J MCNEIL 2014 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/05/2024
RONALD B. AND CYNTHIA J. MCNEILL 2013 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/05/2024
MCNEILL, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
MCNEILL, ROBERTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
MCNEILL, RONALDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
MILLER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
CALCUTT, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
WILSON, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2026
LAFATA, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
SEXTON, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
OLIVER, ANNAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
PURVIS, JENNYIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES OF HAYWOOD COUNTY II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES OF HAYWOOD COUNTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024
LONG TERM CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 8%Other / private 25%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,012per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345341. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next