No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Woodhaven Nursing Center

1150 Pine Run Drive, Lumberton, NC 28358 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (910) 671-5703 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jul 20243 immediate-jeopardy citations$128,210 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jul 2024
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $128,210 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-31)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
815 Oakridge Blvd · (910) 738-7166 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4701 Fayetteville Rd Ste A · (910) 272-0044 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Save More0.6 mi
4611 Fayetteville Rd · (910) 739-0624 · Call to confirm hours
Park
500 Hornets Rd · (910) 671-3869 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Fayetteville Rd, Lumberton, NC · (910) 738-8050

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.8%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.1%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.5%18.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.9%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.5%5.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.3%14.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%78.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.4%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.231.781.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.181.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.1%CMS range 45.9–68.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.6–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
58.6%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 103.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy when Confidential Staff #1 allowed Nurse #3 to continue providing care to residents after witnessing Nurse #3 slap Resident #3. Confidential Staff #1 did not report the abuse to the administration resulting in no protection of residents from further abuse, no investigation, and no notification to the state, adult protective services or law enforcement. A second incident of abuse occurred when Nurse Aide #2 and Nurse Aide #3 did not identify abuse when they witnessed Nurse #3 rip a dressing off Resident #3's forearm resulting in the resident experiencing pain and her skin tear reopening and bleeding. Nurse #3 then raised her hand to Resident #3 like she was going to slap her. This resulted in the abuse not being reported to the administration, no protection of the residents from further abuse, no investigation, and no notification to the state, adult protective services or law enforcement. This deficient practice was for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect Resident #3's right to be free from abuse. In March of 2024 Confidential Staff #1 witnessed Nurse #3 slap Resident #3 across the face during care after Resident #3 spit on Nurse #3 twice. In July of 2024 during a weekly skin check Nurse Aide #2 and Nurse Aide #3 witnessed Nurse #3 rip a dressing off Resident #3's forearm resulting in a skin tear reopening and bleeding. Resident #3 repeatedly yelled you're hurting me. Resident #3 then spit on Nurse #3 twice and in response, Nurse #3 raised her hand like she was going to slap Resident #3 when Nurse Aide #2 intervened and Nurse #3 lowered her hand and proceeded to change the dressing. Resident #3 did not have the cognitive capacity to express a psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person expects to be free from abuse in their home. There is a high likelihood that abuse from a caregiver would cause serious psychosocial harm to include feelings such as fear, intimidation, withdrawal, agitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with staff, Emergency Medical Services personnel, and the Medical Director, the facility failed to immediately initiate emergency medical services (EMS) on a pulseless, nonbreathing resident who was a full code. On [DATE] at approximately 12:03 AM Resident #1 was found to be unresponsive, pulseless, and not breathing. Nurse #1 began cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (a way to try to restart the heart and lungs if they stop) and yelled out Code Blue. After approximately 2 minutes of (CPR) no other staff had come to assist Nurse #1 so she went to the door, saw a nurse assistant and yelled Code Blue she then resumed CPR on Resident #1. Nurse #2 arrived with the crash cart, applied the automatic external defibrillator (AED) pads and 2-person CPR was started. Staff failed to meet EMS at the door that was locked and with non-working doorbell. Emergency Medical Services record revealed dispatch received a call on [DATE] at 12:24 AM for a resident in cardiac arrest and was at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and Orthopedic Surgeon interviews the facility failed to perform comprehensive skin assessments, to conduct skin monitoring to the area under an immobilizer and to coordinate care with the resident's orthopedic surgeon to ensure care needs were met when the resident missed her 10/4/23 surgical follow up orthopedic appointment and was not seen by the orthopedist until 11/17/23. At the 11/17/23 orthopedic surgeon visit Resident #1 was identified with a wound on her right knee that appeared necrotic (dead tissue), black in color, and the skin around it appeared darker like a bruise. This was for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included right hip prosthetic (previous hip replacement hardware) removal followed by surgical repair of the hip joint (an artificial joint with two bearings replaces damaged joint), chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family, staff, non-emergency transportation services Manager, Orthopedic Surgeon, and orthopedic surgeon's Office Manager interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had transportation arrangements for initial post-operative appointment with the Orthopedic Surgeon on 10/4/2023, resulting in the resident not being seen by the Orthopedic Surgeon until 11/17/2023. At the 11/17/23 orthopedic surgeon visit Resident #1 was identified with a wound on her right knee that appeared necrotic (dead tissue), black in color, and the skin around it appeared darker like a bruise.This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medically related social services (Resident #1). The Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include right hip replacement, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Resident #1 was discharged to the hospital on 9/18/2023 and she was diagnosed with a right femur fracture. Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by the administration of wrong route and medications to be taken with food (5 medication errors out of 31 opportunities), resulting in a medication error rate of 16.13% for 2 of 5 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #24 and Resident #47).The findings included:1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, hypertension, depression, and respiratory failure. a. A Physician order dated 5/6/25 revealed Resident #24 was to receive folic acid (dietary supplement) one (1) milligram (mg) via gastrointestinal tube (G-Tube) once a day. The order was transcribed on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) accurately. b. Resident #24's Physician order dated 5/5/25 was reviewed and revealed Resident #24 was to receive docusate sodium liquid (constipation medication) 50mg per 5 milliliters (ml) twice a day via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff, Resident Council and Resident Representative interviews, and test tray, the facility failed to provide palatable foods for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for food palatability (Residents #14, #41, #50, #63, #96, #107 and #109). The findings included:Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and Type 2 diabetes. The medical record indicted Resident #14 resided in the dementia unit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that Resident #14 was severely cognitively impaired. During an interview on 8/26/2025 at 10:58 AM, the Representative of Resident #14 stated she was often there at mealtimes and the Resident complained of the food being cold during those visits. She stated this occurred frequently and most often during breakfast. The representative did not say if she touched or sampled the food to confirm that it was cold. She stated that she had observed the staff taking Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure dishware was clean, in good condition and not stacked wet, failed to maintain food preparation areas clean and free from dried debris, failed to label and date leftover food stored for use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and 1 of 2 walk-in freezers, failed to monitor and record the internal temperatures of food for 2 of 2 tray line observations and failed to ensure hot food was served at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F). These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents.The findings included: a. During the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Supervisor, on 8/26/25 from 9:45 AM to 10:00 AM, the following concerns were observed:- Three out of 8 steam pans that were ready to be used contained yellow and white sticky residue when touched. - Two out of 104 plastic dome lids that were on the tray line ready for use were stacked wet.- Seven out of 24 plates on the tray line ready for meal service had dried, yellow and red residue. - Seven out of 21 sectioned plates on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to assess whether the self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate before leaving medications at the bedside. This was for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #3 and Resident #35).Findings included: a. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified. A review of Resident #3's medical record did not reveal a self-administration of medication assessment. A review of Resident #3's physician's orders from 5/30/25 to 8/22/25 did not reveal a physician's order for Resident #3 to self-administer any medication. A review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was severely cognitively impaired with no behaviors. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 received antidepressant and hypoglycemic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure a cup of medications stored in 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (medication cart for Hall 1600).The findings included: An observation of the medication cart for Hall 1600 occurred on 8/28/25 at 8:15 AM. The Medication Aide (MA) #1 opened the top drawer of her medication cart and an unlabeled cup of medications was observed in the front left corner of the medication cart drawer. On 8/28/25 at 8:36 AM an interview occurred with MA #1 who confirmed she had left the medications in the top drawer of her medication cart for Resident #121. MA #1 explained the medications were centrum (vitamin supplement), clonazepam (seizure medication), fluoxetine (antidepressant medication), MiraLAX (constipation medication), and modafinil (central nervous system stimulant medication). She explained she had poured the medications and then realized the resident was in the shower, so she placed the medications in the medication cart drawer to provide Resident #121 with the medications later. MA #1 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement their infection control policies when Nurse #2 did not don (put on) a gown while administering medications via a gastrointestinal tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen to the stomach) to Resident #37 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to the presence of a gastrointestinal tube (G-tube). This practice occurred for 1 of 3 staff members observed for infection control.The findings included: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions door sign dated 1/20/2022 stated that all healthcare personnel must wear gloves and gown for the following High Contact-Resident Care Activities: Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, and tracheostomy care. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Standards policy (last approved 11/2024), and the Initiating Transmission Based Precautions policy (last approved 06/2025) stated Transmission-Based Precautions will be utilized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident, staff, Physician, and Vascular Clinic Nurse interviews, the facility failed to provide Thromboembolic Deterrent (TED) compression stockings and elevation of the lower extremities when up in her wheelchair which were ordered by the Vascular Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 6/5/2024 for 3 months, for a resident with bilateral lower extremity edema (swelling and puffiness of the lower legs and feet as a result of weakness or damage to veins in the legs), (Resident #27), for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for compression stockings. Findings included: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus type 2 with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that causes weakness, numbness, and pain), and atrial fibrillation. A physician's progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP #2) dated 1/26/2024 at 12:00 P.M. read in part, History of present illness: Resident has complaints of bilateral feet turning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired opened multidose medications, date an opened multidose medication and dispose of loose unidentifiable pills in the drawer of the medication cart (1100 Long Hall) and failed to discard an opened multidose medication per manufacturer's instructions stored for use in the medication cart (Memory Care Unit) for 2 of 6 medication carts reviewed. And the facility failed to remove expired medications available for use in the automated medications dispensing machine in 1 of 4 medication rooms (the Rehab Unit) reviewed for medication storage. Findings included: 1) Observation of the 1100 Long Hall medication cart was conducted on 9/9/2024 at 10:47 AM in the presence of Nurse #9 revealed the following medications were stored on the medication cart: 1a. According to the product manufacturer's instructions, in-use Humalog prefilled insulin KwikPen should be stored at room temperature of less than 86 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and used within 28 days. Resident #25's Humalog prefilled insulin KwikPen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, pharmacist interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to act on a pharmacy recommendation to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS/discus) assessment for a resident who received an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications, Resident #57. Findings included: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, anxiety and major depression. Review of the physician orders on 09/10/24 for Resident #57 revealed an order for Risperdal M-Tab tablet Dispersible 0.5 MG (Milligrams) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to recurrent major depressive disorder and moderate schizophrenia unspecified. Place on tongue and let dissolve (Order start date 09/25/23). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #57 was reviewed. Resident #57 had intact cognition. He had no moods or behaviors. He had no hallucinations or delusions. He had no extremity mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and Wound Care Nurse Practitioner interviews the facility failed to perform daily wound care treatments on a stage IV sacral wound and a deep tissue injury to left heel (Resident #4) and a stage IV pressure wound of the right posterior medial heel (Resident #5) according to the physician's order for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. Findings included: 1a. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include, in part, open wound to left foot, dementia and pressure ulcer to left buttock. A physician's order written on 03/26/24 revealed clean sacrum with normal saline, apply alginate calcium with silver, cover with gauze and island border once daily and as needed. The Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. She had no behaviors or refusal of care. She had a colostomy and was always incontinent of urine. She had no impairments and used a wheelchair. She was coded has having a pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy regarding applying Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to include applying gloves and gown during high contact resident care activities. Two nursing staff were observed providing care to a resident with a stage IV pressure ulcer who was receiving wound care to the sacrum and were not wearing a gown during care. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) observed for Infection Control. Review of the facility's policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (undated) revealed It is the policy of this facility to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) based on guidance from the Center for Disease Control (CDC). EBP expands use of personal protective equipment (PPE) beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated. It refers to the use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multi drug resistant organisms to staff hands and clothing. The policy applied to all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and physician interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident had transportation for a neurology appointment that was scheduled on 10/03/2023. The appointment on 10/03/23 was canceled due to the transportation provider being unavailable and was not rescheduled until 03/19/24 for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #2). Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis of lumbar region with neurogenic claudication (compression on spinal nerves caused by impaired blood flow), weakness of lower extremity, and leg spasms. The Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact and demonstrated no behaviors. She had impairment to both sides to lower extremities and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. She required extensive assistance with one staff physical assistance with bed mobility and all other activities of daily living; and two staff physical assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility ' s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee put into place following a complaint investigation on 12/15/23. This was for 1 deficiency that was originally cited in the area of medically related social services and was subsequently recited on the current complaint investigation on 04/24/24. The continued failure during 2 surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility ' s inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program. Findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F745: Based on observations, record review, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had transportation for a neurology appointment that was scheduled on 10/03/2023. The appointment on 10/03/23 was canceled due to the transportation provider being unavailable and was not rescheduled until 03/19/24 for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #2). During a complaint investigation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident's representative with the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital 4 of 4 residents (Resident #15, Resident #48, Resident #69, and Resident #7) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings included: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15's 12/28/22 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed resident was cognitively intact. A nursing progress note on 1/7/23 indicated Resident #15 was discharged to the hospital. Interview on 5/18/23 at 9:55 AM with Resident #15 revealed she did not recall being informed of or provided with the bed hold policy when she was sent to the hospital. Interview on 5/18/23 at 9:37 AM with Nurse #2 revealed she didn't send bed hold policy with the resident or provide it to the resident representative when a resident was transferred to the hospital. Interview on 5/17/23 at 1:25 PM with the Admissions Director revealed she didn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment on 1 of 1 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for significant change. Findings included: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, restlessness, chronic pain syndrome, and a history of falling. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had clear speech, sometimes understood, sometimes understands, had no signs or symptoms of delirium, had no behavior symptoms or mood indicators, required extensive assistance with transfers and eating, supervision with locomotion on and off the unit, had no impairments to upper or lower extremities, and had no falls. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had unclear speech, had signs and symptoms of delirium including inattention behavior and disorganized thinking both were continuously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite a cognitively intact resident (Resident #2) to an interdisciplinary care plan meeting for 1 of 18 residents reviewed. Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of debility, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had no signs of delirium or behaviors. Resident #2's care plan was last reviewed on 4/4/23 by MDS Nurse #1. Resident #2's care plan meeting minutes last reviewed on 4/4/23 did not include if Resident #2 was invited to attend. An interview conducted with Resident #2 on 5/15/23 at 4:01 PM revealed that Resident #2 had not been invited or attended any care plan meetings since Resident #2's admission. Resident #2 stated that she would like to go to her care plan meetings so she understood what she needed to do to go home. On 5/17/23 at 8:56 AM MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee put into place following a recertification and complaint investigation on 01/24/22. This was for one deficiency that was originally cited in the area of comprehensive assessments after significant change and was subsequently recited on the current recertification and complaint survey on 05/19/23. The continued failure during 2 survey of records shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program. Findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F637: Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed for significant change. During the annual recertification and complaint survey on 01/24/22, the facility failed to complete 2 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-29 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the daily posting of health care staff form had the correct resident census for 15 of 29 days. The findings included:A review of the facilities daily posting of health care staff from 7/30/2025 through 08/29/2025 revealed the following: a. Daily posting of health care staff dated 7/31/2025 revealed a census of 107. Review of the detailed census report dated 7/31/2025 revealed a census of 104. b. Daily posting of health care staff dated 8/1/2025 revealed a census of 107. Review of the detailed census report dated 8/1/2025 revealed a census of 105. c. Daily posting of health care staff dated 8/2/2025 revealed a census of 106. Review of the detailed census report dated 8/2/2025 revealed a census of 104. d. Daily posting of health care staff dated 8/3/2025 revealed a census of 105. Review of the detailed census report dated 8/3/2025 revealed a census of 102. e. Daily posting of health care staff dated 8/4/2025 revealed a census of 105. Review of the detailed census report dated 8/4/2025 revealed a census of 101.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · B2023-05-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #28) who received dialysis treatments. Findings included: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, in part, end stage renal disease (ESRD) with hemodialysis. Review of a physician order dated 09/22/22 revealed an order for dialysis treatments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for Resident #28. The MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact and was not coded as receiving dialysis. Review of Resident #28's care plan updated on 04/05/23 revealed a plan of care for ESRD hemodialysis on Monday/Wednesday/Friday with a goal that resident would not exhibit signs or symptoms of infection and or clotting at access site through next review. Interventions included monitoring and recording weight, monitor intake and output as ordered, monitor lab work and report abnormalities to provider. Monitor and report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$128,210 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $94,175 — penalty dated 2024-07-31
  • $9,718 — penalty dated 2024-04-24
  • $24,317 — penalty dated 2023-12-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-24 for 26 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWhiteville, NC 1 of 5Louisburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, NC 1 of 5Mary Gran Nursing CenterClinton, NC 1 of 5Oak Forest Health and RehabilitationWinston-Salem, NC 2 of 5Highland House Rehabilitation and HealthcareFayetteville, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center ofBenson, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSanford, NC 2 of 5Liberty Commons Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Pavilion Health Center at BrightmoreCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Pinehurst Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterPinehurst, NC 2 of 5Pisgah Manor Health Care CenterCandler, NC 2 of 5Roxboro Healthcare & Rehab CenterRoxboro, NC 2 of 5Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health CenterMatthews, NC 2 of 5The Foley Center at Chestnut RidgeBlowing Rock, NC 2 of 5The OaksWinston-Salem, NC 3 of 5Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAdvance, NC 3 of 5Elizabethtown Healthcare & Rehab CenterElizabethtown, NC 3 of 5Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan CountySalisbury, NC 3 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehab Center of SouthporSouthport, NC 3 of 5Shoreland Health Care and Retirement Center IncWhiteville, NC 3 of 5Silver BluffCanton, NC 3 of 5Southwood Nursing and RetirementClinton, NC 3 of 5Summerstone Health and Rehabilitation CenterKernersville, NC 3 of 5Warren Hills Nursing CenterWarrenton, NC 4 of 5Briar Creek Health CenterCharlotte, NC 4 of 5Capital Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 4 of 5Inn at Quail Haven VillagePinehurst, NC 4 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center ofBurlington, NC 4 of 5Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWeldon, NC 4 of 5Liberty Healthcare Services of Golden Years NursinFalcon, NC 4 of 5The Preserve At Fairfield GladeCrossville, TN 4 of 5Three Rivers Health and Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, NC 4 of 5Westfield Rehabilitation and Health CenterSanford, NC 4 of 5Woodlands Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterFayetteville, NC 5 of 5Parkview Health and Rehabilitation CenterChapel Hill, NC 5 of 5Yadkin Nursing and Care CenterYadkinville, NC

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • LIBERTY REAL PROPERTIES VII LLC — investment firm · 50.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIBERTY COMMONS OF ROBESON COUNTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2023
LIBERTY REAL PROPERTIES II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2023
LIBERTY REAL PROPERTIES VII LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2023
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
CALCUTT, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
WILSON, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/13/2025
KLING, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/13/2025
MCNEILL, JOHNIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
LIBERTY LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2024
LONG TERM CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
RONALD B. AND CYNTHIA J. MCNEILL 2013 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345054. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next