Liberty Commons Nsg and Rehab Ctr of Rowan County

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to: label and date leftover food stored for use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and discard food showing signs of spoilage or past its use-by date in the walk-in cooler; monitor dish machine temperatures; and maintain a clean kitchen ice machine. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included:a. During an initial observation of the facility's kitchen with the Assistant Dietary Manager on 9/22/2025 at 10:36 AM, the walk-in cooler was noted to have the following concerns: -An opened and unlabeled 5-pound (lb.) bag of fancy shredded cheese.-An opened and unlabeled 5-pound (lb.) bag of romaine lettuce with signs of spoilage (brownish/ blackish in color lettuce leaves with thickened clear fluid).-A bag of diced strawberries with an open date of 9/10/2025 and a discard date of 9/10/2025 available for use.-Three (3) of 7 bell peppers showing signs of spoilage (black/ grayish looking spots, mushy texture with clear liquid). b. During an initial observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide access to the call bell, telephone, and water cup to accommodate a visually impaired resident. This resulted in Resident #6 yelling for assistance or asking his roommate to turn on the call bell, missing phone calls, and prevented access to the water cup as he wanted. This was for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #6).The findings included:Resident #6 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, kidney disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia (trouble swallowing), Barrett's esophagus (inflammation of the esophagus), macular degeneration, legal blindness, and history of falling. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact. He was dependent with mobility, used a wheelchair, needed extensive assistance with toileting and transferring, and required supervision with set up with eating.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment when they failed to maintain a sink drain that leaked in 1 of 4 shared bathrooms used only by Resident #50.The findings included:An observation on 9/22/25 at 1:55 PM of the bathroom in Resident #50's room revealed an approximate twelve-inch diameter puddle of clear liquid substance that resembled water on the bathroom floor. The liquid substance was located under and in front of the bathroom sink. The sink was a wall mounted unit and had two water feed lines from the wall to the bottom of the sink. The lines did not have leak protection covers. The sink had a center drain extending down to the p-trap (a plumbing device that prevents sewer gases from entering the facility by maintaining a water seal. P-traps are commonly found under sinks, bathtubs and showers), then a pipe from the p-trap that terminated at the wall of the bathroom. The bathroom floor was a solid surface linoleum type floor mostly beige/tan in color with blue/green accents. An observation on 9/23/25 at 10:24 AM of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a pureed diet (a smooth, creamy consistency/ texture) to a resident on an ordered therapeutic diet. Resident #24 was observed eating a moist to minced (food that can be easily mashed with little pressure from metal dinner fork, not sticky, no larger than 4 millimeters) breakfast meal. This deficient practice affected 1 of 8 residents reviewed for food form (Resident #24). The findings included:Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), vascular dementia, and decreased appetite. Resident #24 had a physician's order dated 2/15/2024 for a regular diet, pureed texture, thick liquids consistency. Resident #24's Care Plan, last revised on 3/20/2025, indicated the following interventions: 1) observe for/document/report to MD as needed (PRN) for signs and symptoms of dysphagia, pocketing, choking, coughing, drooling, holding food in mouth, several attempts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide resident meals in bowls along with preferred foods as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident with visual impairment (Resident #6), which resulted in Resident #6 having difficulty feeding himself and missing preferred foods.The findings included:Resident #6 was readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, kidney disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia (trouble swallowing), Barrett's esophagus (inflammation of the esophagus), macular degeneration and legal blindness. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #6 was cognitively intact. He required supervision for set up with eating. The Care Plan revised on 10/5/2023 for Resident #6, showed for the focus area of impaired vision related to macular degeneration and legal blindness revised on 10/05/2023, the goal was no decline of visual function with a target of 11/14/2025. Interventions included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to maintain resident areas and equipment in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 of 3 shower (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] on the 200 hall, Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] on the 300 hall), clean wheelchairs for 4 of 7 Resident's wheelchairs (Resident #24, Resident #132, Resident # 64, and Resident #3), and repair a wall behind the bed (room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A) for 1 of 10 rooms reviewed for environmental concerns. The findings included: 1a. On 09/09/24 at 3:38 PM the entrance door of the 200 hall shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was propped open. Upon entering the shower room, a rancid odor permeated the entire shower room causing the surveyor to feel nauseous until the morning of 09/10/24. On the left side wall of the shower room where the sink was located a white ceramic toothbrush holder on the right side of the sink was loosely attached to the tile wall. The round floor drain cover located in the center of the shower room floor was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for significant change in condition. The findings included: Resident #11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urine retention and chronic kidney disease. A review of hospital discharge note dated 08/26/24 revealed in part Resident #11 had a urinary tract infection and a wound to her sacrum. Review of a readmission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed in part that Resident #11 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer of the sacrum. A review of a nurse progress note dated 8/27/24 at 10:24 AM revealed in part that Resident #11 had a urinary catheter. A weight loss note dated 08/28/24 at 12:20 PM revealed that Resident #11 had a weight loss of 10% or greater in the last 180 days. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] included in part that Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment, she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards when Unit Manager #1 failed to ensure Resident #50 swallowed her medications prior to leaving her room and was observed with a pill lying on her chest, and Resident #13 was observed to have a medicine cup with pills left unattended on her bedside table. The deficient practice occurred for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for professional standards (Resident #50 and Resident #13). The findings included: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility 4/23/24 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) and gastrostomy. A review of Resident #50's physician orders revealed an order dated 5/20/24 for Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every 8 hours. The physician orders further revealed Resident #50 was able to swallow medications whole and all her pills were ordered to be administered by mouth. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #50 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours per day for 10 of 10 dates reviewed (7/8/23, 7/15/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23, 8/20/23, 8/26/23, 8/27/23, 9/2/23, 9/3/23, and 9/9/23). The findings included: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data report for fiscal year 2023, the quarter from 7/1/23 to 9/30/23 was reviewed. The report indicated the facility had the following days within the quarter with no Registered Nurse (RN) hours: 7/8/23, 7/15/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23, 8/20/23, 8/26/23, 8/27/23, 9/2/23, 9/3/23, and 9/9/23. The nursing schedules for 7/8/23, 7/15/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23, 8/20/23, 8/26/23, 8/27/23, 9/2/23, 9/3/23, and 9//9/23 were reviewed. No RN was scheduled to work on the reviewed dates. The time sheets for 7/8/23, 7/15/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23, 8/20/23, 8/26/23, 8/27/23, 9/2/23, 9/3/23, and 9//9/23 were reviewed and no RN were documented to have had worked any shifts for the reviewed dates. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/13/23 at 12:40 PM she reported she had started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to resolve repeat grievances related to dietary issues that were reported during the Resident Council meetings for 8 of 11 months reviewed (January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, September 2023, October 2023, and November 2023). The findings included: Resident Council meeting minutes for 2023 were reviewed and revealed issues the Resident Council had identified: a. The Resident Council meeting minutes dated 1/12/2023 indicated that the food served for meals was cold, and no spoons were available. The Dietary Manager's written response to the resident council dated 1/13/2023 read: We temp [check the temperature] of all food before it leaves dietary [department for meal delivery]. We have spoons. b. The Resident Council meeting minutes dated 2/9/2023 indicated that the facility was always out of jelly, the eggs and grits were cold, and the menus were repeated without variety. The Dietary Manager's written response to the resident council dated 2/9/2023 read: We do have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC