Pinehurst Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 125.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews with staff and the Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #72). On 8/26/24 Resident #72 slid out of the bed to the floor while care was being provided by Nurse Aide (NA) #9. The incident resulted in a cut and swelling to the left eyelid. Resident #72 was sent to the emergency department (ED) and required 3 dissolvable sutures to close the wound over his left eye. On 1/12/25 Resident #72 was placed on his side during incontinence care by NA #3 and fell off the bed hitting his head on the side table when the NA reached for cream. Resident #72 was sent to the ED and required sutures to repair a laceration on his left upper eyelid. This deficient practice affected one of seven residents reviewed for falls (Resident #72). The findings included: Resident #72 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a stroke with left hemiplegia (paralysis on one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, date, and seal leftover food stored ready for use in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator, 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator. This practice had the potential to affect food served to residents.The findings included: a. Accompanied by Dietary Aide #1, an observation was made of the walk-in refrigerator on 4/27/26 at 6:30 AM. An undated piping bag, partially filled with whipped topping, was sitting on the shelf of the walk-in refrigerator. Dietary Aide #1 stated the whipped topping was likely used on desserts from the previous day. b. An observation was conducted of the walk-in freezer on 4/27/26 at 6:32 AM which contained one undated and open-to-air bag of twenty biscuits and one undated partially used bag of hash browns. Dietary Aide #1 was unable to state when the packages had been opened. c. An observation was conducted of the reach-in refrigerator on 4/27/26 at 6:34 AM. The reach-in refrigerator contained one bag of opened and undated turkey lunchmeat and seven undated zipper sealed bags of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and staff interviews, the facility failed to speak to a resident in a dignified manner causing the resident to feel shocked, angry, hurt and embarrassed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity (Resident #1).The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the nursing progress notes dated 2/3/26 at 1:52 PM revealed a note written by Nurse #9 that read: When the resident was asked about taking his morning medications Nurse #9 bumped his bed several times to wake him up and offer his morning medication along with getting his blood sugar reading. The Resident had covers pulled over his head and refused to respond. He was asked several times before breakfast. When the reporting nurse came in again at lunch time, looked behind the privacy curtain and resident was in the same spot. He did allow his blood sugar reading to be done by another staff member. Resident requested his medication that was pulled and when approached…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the areas of hospice participation (Resident #4), medications (Resident #2) and Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities (Resident #101). This deficient practice affected 3 of 22 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. A review of Resident #4's active physician orders included an order dated 3/27/26 for hospice services related to Alzheimer's disease. A Significant Change in Status MDS assessment 4/2/26 revealed Resident #4 was marked with an active diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and a prognosis of less than six months but not coded with receiving hospice care. During an interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 4/29/26 at 12:19 PM, she confirmed Resident #4 received hospice services and verified that hospice care was not marked on the MDS assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews with the Nurse Practitioner and staff, the facility failed to administer medications at the scheduled time for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #102 and #92). The findings included: 1. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension. A review of Resident #102's active physician orders for April 2026 included the following: An order dated 4/8/25 for Hydralazine 100 mg one tablet by mouth three times a day for hypertension. An order dated 4/10/25 for Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension. A review of the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Medication Administration Audit Report dated 4/28/26, for Resident #102 revealed the following: Hydralazine (used to treat hypertension or high blood pressure) was scheduled for 9:00 AM. Nurse #1 documented the medication was administered at 11:17 AM on 4/28/26. Metoprolol Tartrate (used to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment as evidenced by a housekeeping staff member mopping the entire width of the lower 300 hallway (Rooms 304 through 312) which would have required residents, staff, and visitors to walk on a wet floor. This deficient practice occurred on 1 out of 5 resident hallways.Findings included:A continuous observation was conducted on 4/29/26 from 2:47 PM to 2:51 PM of Housekeeper #1 mopping the entire length and width of the floor at the lower end of the 300 hallway. The total area mopped was approximately 4-foot x 10-foot, and the floor was completely wet across the hall. There was a wet floor sign located at the end of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER].An interview was conducted with Housekeeper #1 on 4/29/26 at 2:51 PM who stated she usually mopped across the entire floor then followed up with a dry mop to go back over the area. She explained she understood about safety and had placed a wet floor sign at the end of the hallway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident, staff, and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered at the prescribed rate for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #44, Resident #84, and Resident #123).The findings included: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified asthma and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The care plan revised on 2/2/26 had a focus area for Resident #44 requiring supplemental oxygen secondary to asthma with a flow rate of 3 liters per minute (lpm). An intervention read to give medications as ordered. A review of the active orders for Resident #44 included an order for supplemental oxygen at 3 lpm continuous by nasal cannula dated 2/16/26. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #44 as cognitively intact and she was coded for using supplemental oxygen. On 4/27/26 at 8:00 AM an observation was conducted of Resident #44's oxygen concentrator. It…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications per the parameters in the physician order for 2 of 7 residents whose medications were reviewed (Residents #44 and #123). The findings included: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart beat). Review of Resident #44's active physician orders included an order dated 2/19/26 for metoprolol tartrate (a medication that controls the heart rhythm) 25 milligrams (mg). Give half a tablet by mouth two times a day for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Hold for heart rate less than 60 or systolic (top number of blood pressure reading) blood pressure (SBP)) less than 120. The March 2026 and April 2026 Medication Administration Records (MARs) were reviewed and revealed Resident #44 had received metoprolol tartrate despite the SBP being below 120 on the following dates:3/4/26 the SBP was 102 at 9:00 AM and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to provide effective supervision for a cognitively impaired resident when Resident #1 left the facility through the locked main entrance door. The resident was outside without staff knowledge for approximately twenty minutes and the staff found her sitting in her wheelchair between the covered main entrance and the first parked car in the parking lot. Resident #1 was assessed with no injuries noted. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and brain cancer. Review of the significant changes Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/31/25, revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, and wandering behaviors were indicated to occur daily. The MDS also indicated Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the area of skin treatments (Resident #9). This was for 1 of 21 MDS records reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included a stage 3 pressure ulcer. Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated her cognition was intact and she had range of motion limitations to one side of her lower extremity. The area for skin conditions for Resident #9 was coded for 1 stage 3 pressure ulcer that was present upon admission/entry or reentry, and no pressure reducing device for chair was noted. Review of Resident #9's care plan, last revised on 11/11/24, included a focus area that read Resident #9 was at risk for pressure ulcer development related to impaired mobility and her comorbidities. The interventions included pressure reducing mattress on her bed and for staff to encourage her to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff assistance for nail care received assistance when needed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia. Resident #11's annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated her cognition was severely impaired. There were no refusals of care, and no behaviors coded. Resident #11 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bath, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. She had range of motion limitations on both sides of her upper and lower extremities. She was coded as receiving hospice services. Resident #11's active care plan, last revised on 11/17/24, included the focus area of an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit and required assistance with ADL.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,620 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,620 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC