Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC
4735 South 54th Street, Lincoln, NE 68516 · For profit - Corporation · 173 certified beds · (402) 488-0977 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,998 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.9% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.5% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.2% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 32.8% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 20.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 11.4% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.65 | 1.92 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.1%CMS range 35.6–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.5–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 67.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.9–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 79 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.09 and 12-006.09(I) Based on record review, observation, and interviews; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent hot liquid burns for 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled residents, and failed to evaluate for potential injuries from a fall prior to moving the resident for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents . The facility staff identified a census of 107. The facility Administrator was notified on 10/17/24 at 4:30 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 08/05/24. The IJ was removed on 10/17/24 at 6:30 PM, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings are: A. A record review of admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: -Burn of unspecified body region, unspecified degree, -Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complication (a disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), -Muscle Weakness generalized (lack of muscle strength),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure reference number 175 NAC 4-006.12(D)(i) Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored and locked in a secure manner to provide resident safety. The facility census was 92. Findings are:An observation on 05/18/2026 at 8:02 AM revealed three medication carts in the three hundred hall were left unattended and unlocked with two of the carts having had computer screens left open with resident information displayed.An interview on 05/18/2026 at 8:05 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse-B (LPN-B) revealed that all three medication carts were left unattended and unlocked, and that two of the computer screens were open with resident information displayed. LPN-B confirmed that the medication carts should always be locked with resident information hidden.An observation on 5/18/26 at 9:56 AM revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart outside of Resident 2's room with a piece of paper that contained resident information on top.An interview on 5/18/26 at 9:57 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(3)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform or document skin assessments for Resident 1. This affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin protection. The facility census was 92.Findings are:A record review of Resident 1's admission Record printed 05/18/2026 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/09/2026.A record review of Resident 1's Discharge Summary with effective date 04/26/2026 revealed that the facility discharged the resident on 04/21/2026.A record review of a Progress Note from 04/21/2026 at 11:22 AM revealed Resident 1 went to a doctor's appointment and was transferred to the hospital from there.A record review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) dated 04/15/2026 revealed the resident was frequently incontinent (lacking control) of both bladder and bowel. Further review of the MDS revealed that the resident required substantial to maximal assistance (the helper does more than half of the effort for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice during wound care for Resident 2 and during wound care and resident care for Resident 4. This affected 2 of 4 residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 92.Findings are:A record review of the facility's Infection Control: Standard Precautions policy revised 01/2024 revealed that hand hygiene was to be performed: -before and after contact with the resident-before performing an aseptic task-after contact with items in a resident's room-after removing PPE -Gloves were to be changed as necessary or during the care of a resident to prevent cross-contamination (when moving from a dirty site to a clean one) from one body site to another.-Gloves were to be removed promptly after each use and before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces.-Gowns were to be worn to protect skin and to prevent soiling of clothing during procedures and resident care activities that were likely to generate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Guardian and or Power of Attorney of 2 (Resident 5 and Resident 8) of 5 sampled residents of leaving the facility against medical advice (AMA) and the facility failed to notify the physician of 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) of the resident's leaving the facility AMA with no services. The facility census was 98.Findings are:A record review of facility's Policy: Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) created 11-17 revealed:-A. The resident and family/legal representative should be informed of the risks involved, the benefits of staying at the facility, and the alternative to both. The physician should be notified and encouraged to speak with the resident. -B. Documentation of this notification should be entered in the nurses notes by the nursing department. The Social Services designees should document any discussion with the resident/family in the social services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Nebraska Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.19Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior. All residents who reside at this facility have the potential to be affected by these deficient practices.The facility census was 94. Findings are: Observations of Unit 1 on 04/14/2026 at 12:30 PM revealed: - strong urine odor in the carpeted hallway of Unit 1 -carpet of hallway of Unit 1 had over a dozen stains of various sizes and colors ranging from cream color to black throughout the unit. -wall of the doorway of the shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 15 was flaking with pieces broken away and framing visible beneath. Over a dozen pieces of material from the crumbling wall were on the floor. The remaining wall was rough and uncleanable in this area Observations of Unit 3 on 04/14/2026 at 12:45 PM revealed: -resident refrigerator/freezer contained spills of brown, white and yellow colored substances -mounting of sink in the ice machine room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 12-007.04 (D) The facility failed to ensure resident bathroom ventilation was functional in four resident rooms (room's 308, 502, 504, and 505) out of 14 resident rooms sampled. The facility census was 95 at the time of the survey. Findings are: An observation during the initial tour on 2.8.2026 at 8:00 AM revealed the bathroom ventilation was not functioning in resident rooms 100, 308, 315, 318, 319, 502, 504, and 505 when tested with a one-ply tissue. An observation during a facility tour on 2.10.2026 at 7:13 AM with the Administrator (Adm) revealed the bathroom ventilation was not functioning in resident rooms 308, 502, 504, and 505 when tested with a one-ply tissue During an interview on 2.10.2026 at 7:30 AM with the Adm, it was confirmed that the bathroom ventilation was not functioning in resident rooms 308, 502, 504, and 505 and it should have been. During a record review of the facility's undated Inspect exhaust fans for proper operation and clean if necessary document revealed: task completion was marked done on time on 12.29.2025, 9.29.2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) record to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the prescribed time frame for 1 (Resident 88) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 at the time of survey. Findings are:Record review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual revealed the facility is required to transmit the MDS within 14 days of completion.Record review of Resident 88's MDS revealed that the resident had an entry MDS on 9/5/2025 and discharge return not anticipated MDS on 9/13/2025 that was completed by the facility but not transmitted to CMS.Record review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed that the resident entered the facility on 9/5/2025 and then left the faciity on 9/13/2025.During an interview on 02/09/2026 at 9:54 AM MDS - C Registered Nurse stated that the Discharge MDS should have been separate from the Medicare 5 day MDS. It was not transmitted because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3)Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with nail care for one (Resident 10) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 95.Findings are:A review of the facility, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, dated 1/2024, revealed the following:-3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care), dated 1/29/26, revealed the following:-Resident 10 readmitted from the hospital on 1/23/26-Required supervision (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity) with personal hygiene.-Had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM- a condition that happens when someone's blood sugar is too high)A review of Resident 10's electronic health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control strategy that focuses on the prevention of the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms [MDRO]) were followed when wound care was provided and failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed between glove changes for 1 (Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility's census was 106. A record review of an admission Record printed on 10/06/2025 revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DMT2 a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults that is characterized by high blood sugar levels, resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to compensate with increased insulin production). This condition can lead to poor blood flow to the feet resulting in a diabetic ulcer (a slow-healing, open wound).A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02 (H) The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse on two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 102. Findings: A.A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census revealed an admission date of 5/16/2023. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (this comprehensive assessment evaluates each resident's functional capabilities) dated 6/03/2025 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of five which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A record review of Resident 1's Care Plan with an admission date of 5/16/2023 and a revision date of 3/26/2025 revealed a diagnosis of dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, adjustment disorder, anxiety, and depressed mood and a focus area to include mood problem relating to dementia. Interventions included redirecting/separating from another resident. A record review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated 6/16/2025 at 5:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(i) Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to store medications properly in medication rooms and medication carts for 2 (Resident 5 and Resident 14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 96. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 5's Clinical Census record dated 6/1/25 revealed admission to the facility was 7/18/24. Record review of Resident 5's Diagnosis record dated 6/1/25 revealed diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that leads to memory loss, thinking difficulties, and behavioral changes), and unspecified dementia (a general term for a group of brain disorders that cause a decline in memory, thinking, and reasoning skills). Record review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 4/16/25 revealed: -Section C -Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene prior to applying gloves and in between glove changes during peri-cares for 1 (Resident 5) of 2 sampled residents, and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to applying gloves and in between glove changes during peri-cares and catheter care, and wear a gown for 1 (Resident 14) of 2 sampled residents to prevent potenial cross contamination. The facility census was 96. Findings are: A. Record review of the facilities Infection Control-Handwashing Policy revised 1/2024 revealed: Policy Statement - This policy considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternately, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: -Before and after contact with residents -Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean during resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 4 Minimum Data Sets (MDS -a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) were coded correctly related to falls for 3 (Residents 1, 3, and 5) out of 5 sampled residents for falls. The facility census was 98. Record review of facility policy and procedures, titled Expanded Assessment Areas last updated 1/2024 revealed: -the facility shall prepare an interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment of the resident required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and evidence based discipline assessment tools. -the assessment and the MDS information will be used to develop a comprehensive, person-centered careplan. Record review of the RAI manual dated October of 2024 revealed the definition of fall with injury to include abrasions, fractures or any fall related injury that causes the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 (Resident 6) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 92. Findings are: A record review of the admission record reviewed on 3/3/25 revealed that Resident 6 had been admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of severe protein calorie malnutrition. A record review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 1/2/25, revealed Resident 6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 13/15 indicating the resident had no cognitive impairment. A record review of the Order Summary for Resident 6, reviewed on 3/3/25, revealed the indication for use of the Omeprazole was Gastro-Esophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-009.11(A) Based on observation and interview; the facility failed to ensure a bathroom floor was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 97. Findings are: In an observation on 1/21/25 at 3:27 PM of Resident 1's bathroom floor revealed the following: -4 cracked tiles in front of the toilet with one tile having a missing area -Large brown stained area out from base of toilet -Caulking around base of toilet with cracks and brown stains around the front of the toilet In an observation on 1/22/25 at 8:08 AM of Resident 1's bathroom floor revealed the same concerns as listed above. In an interview on 1/22/25 at 8:08 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the above-mentioned areas were present and confirmed that Resident 1's bathroom floor was not maintained in a clean and sanitary manner.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05Q Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents could access their personal resident fund money on weekends, holidays, or during evening/overnight hours. This affected 65 of 65 residents with a personal fund account. The facility census was 112. An interview on 08/20/2024 at 8:22 AM with Resident 9 revealed Resident 9 had concerns that they were only able to access their money in their personal fund account during business hours when the business office is open, or sometimes when certain front receptionists are working but was unable to get any monies in the evening or on the weekends. An interview with the Business Office Manager (BOM) on 08/21/2024 at 8:17 AM confirmed that residents who have money in a personal fund account at the facility can only access their money Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM at the front desk or the Business Office. BOM confirmed that there are 65 residents who have a personal fund account at the facility. A record review of the policy titled Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to provide the required 12 hours of ongoing training for 5 (Medication Aide (MA)-B, MA-E, NA-G, NA-H, and MA-J) of 5 sampled direct care staff. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 112. Findings are: Record review of 5 direct care staff files who have been employed a year or more revealed all 5 direct care staff had not completed the required 12 hours of ongoing training. An interview on 8/21/24 at 2:10 PM the Human Resources Director revealed that the 12 hour ongoing training had not been being completed for any direct care staff, confirmed that the 12 hours of ongoing training had not been completed on the 5 sampled direct care staff and should have been.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11 Based on observation, record review and interview, that facility failed to follow menus when preparing resident meals. This had the potential to affect 110 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified a census of 112. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy titled Food Preparation Guidelines, dated 11/17, contained the following guidelines: The cook, or designee, should prepare menu items following he facility's written menus and standardized recipes. Food should be protected from contamination while being stored, prepared, and transported. An observation on 08/21/24 at 9:37 AM of meal preparation being completed by Cook-A revealed a recipe was out for meatloaf preparation. The observation on 08/21/24 at 9:37 AM of the meatloaf preparation being completed by Cook-A revealed (gender) had washed (gender) hands and donned gloves, then retrieved 6 of the 5lb (pound) packages of ground beef. Cook-A to cut open 2 tubes of ground beef packaging with the knife and dumped the ground beef into a large mixing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.03(N), Licensure Reference Number 12-006.18, Licensure Reference Number 12-006.18(B), Licensure Reference Number 12-006.18(D) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a functioning handwashing sink was available in the laundry, failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions during peri cares (the practice of washing the genital and anal areas of the body) and a transfer for Resident 56, failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during peri cares in a manner to prevent cross contamination for Resident 56, and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 3 (Resident 15, 72, 76) of 5 residents with oxygen. The facility census was 112. The findings are: A. An observation on 08/21/2024 at 9:12 AM revealed no working hand sink or eye wash station in the laundry. An interview with Environmental Manager on 08/21/2024 at 9:12 AM confirmed that the hand washing station in the laundry area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.10(D) Based on observations, record review and interviews, The facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications on 3 stations (stations 1, 2, and 4) out of 5 nursing stations in the building, and the facility failed to properly store medications for Resident 42. The facility identified at census of 112. Findings are: A. An observation on 08/21/2024 at 10:54 AM with Medication Aid-B (MA-B), this station [station 1] medication storage room contains a small sized refrigerator. The door of this refrigerator had a sheet of paper taped to the outside of it. Furhter observation revealed it was a blank form dated 11/16/23 to record refrigerator temperatures. An interview on 08/21/2024 at 10:54 A.M. with MA-B reveals this sheet of paper was to record the temperatures of the refrigerator. This form contains a written date recorded as 11/16/2023. The form has no recorded temperatures out of 31 possible entries on it. MA-B stated they were unsure of who was responsible for recording the daily temperatures of the refrigerator. MA-B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 A(i) Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to evaluate 1 (Resident 6) of 5 sampled residents' ability to self-medicate and ensure security of medications. The facility had a total census of 112 residents. Findings are: According to Resident 6's admission Record, Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified (a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problem) and Unspecified Intellectual disabilities (a term used when a person has certain limitations in cognitive functioning, conceptual, social and practical skills). Record review of a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment utilized to determine a resident's functional capabilities and care) dated May 28, 2024, revealed that Resident 6 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, an interview used to determine cognition) of 15, which indicated the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY State Statue Number 71-6022(1) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the reason for transfer for 3 (Residents 42, 61 and 84) of 3 residents sampled for Hospitalizations. The facility identified a census of 112. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy Bed Hold and Return to Facility, revised 1-2024 revealed the following: It is the policy of this facility that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the State's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer. Residents and their representative will be provided with bed hold and return information at admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave. Nursing and social work staff are educated about the resident's bed hold and return rights to ensure that required information is provided at the time the resident leaves the facility. A. A record review of Resident 42's medical record revealed Resident 42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold policy to residents or their representatives within 24 hours of them being transferred to the hospital for 3 (Residents 42's, 61 and 84) of 3 residents sampled for Hospitalizations. The facility identified a census of 112. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy Bed Hold and Return to Facility revised 1-2024 revealed the following: It is the policy of this facility that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the State's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer. Residents and their representative will be provided with bed hold and return information at admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave. Nursing and social work staff are educated about the resident's bed hold and return rights to ensure that required information is provided at the time the resident leaves the facility. A. A record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor head injuries identified for 1 (Resident 165) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 112. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy titled Accidents/Neuro Checks, dated 11/22; 1-2024 read as follows; The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a neurological assessment: Neurological assessments are indicated: following a fall or other accident/injury involving head trauma; or when indicated by resident's condition. A record review of the document titled admission Record dated 9/11/23 revealed Resident 165 had been accepted into the facility on 9/11/23 with a primary diagnosis of Dementia (a loss of cognitive functioning that affects a person's ability to think, remember, learn, and make decisions). A record review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's physical and mental functional capabilities) dated 3/16/24 revealed Resident 165 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the floors and station 1, 3, and 4 within the facility. The facility identified a census of 110. Findings are: Observations made on 7/23/24 at 4:40 PM, and on 7/24/24 at 7:20 AM, 10:40 AM, 11:53 AM, and 1:55 PM: -Station 1 - There was free standing pieces of insulation along the window seal on the wall. -Station 3 - The hallway floors had clumps of a black substance, debris, food, stains, and sticky areas of unknown substances. There were four colored candy pieces at the end of the station 3 hall, 2 dead bugs next to the mat that is found at the end of the hallway. The mat was covered with dirt, dust, and rubber bands. - There were cobwebs and dust under the curio cabinet on the station 3 hallway. - Station 4 - The hallway was dirty with brown and black type debris and there was a sticky areas of unknown substances. - In the activity area next to the stove pieces of torn up paper towel were found. The entry way to the activity room had dried food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18A(1) Based on observation, and interviews the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for rooms 113,211,212, and 312. The facility failed to maintain a clean floors for 400 and 300 hallway and clean carpets for 100 and 200 hallways and the facility failed to maintain clean tray tables for rooms 211-212-312. The facility census was 107. An observation on 4/8/24 at 9:30 AM revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brown sticky substance on the floor by tray table. Observation of the trash can in room [ROOM NUMBER] 's bathroom was overflowing with paper towels. Observation of the tray table in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed Resident 9 that had a pitcher of water sitting on the tray table that was dirty with dry substance on top of tray table and base of tray table had a dry brown and yellow colored substance covering the base of the tray table. An observation on 4/8/24 at 9:45 AM revealed that in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] the floors had a sticky substance throughout the room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 174 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain daily weights for 1 (Resident 8) of 3 sampled residents as ordered by the Physician, and the facility failed to obtain labs for 1 (Resident 5) of 3 sampled residents as ordered by the Physician. The facility census was 107. Findings are: A. Record review of Physician Orders revealed that Resident 8 has orders for daily weights dated 12/2/23 for congestive heart failure, Fax recordings weekly to Physician. Call if weight gain of 2-3 pounds for 2 consecutive days, weight gain of 5 pounds in one week. Weights had not been documented as completed on the following dates: -4/3/24 -4/4/24 -3/29/24 -3/27/24 -3/26//24 -3/25/24 -3/24/24 -3/23/24 -3/22/24 -3/13/24 -3/6/24. Record review of the Weight Monitoring Policy created 1/2024 revealed compliance Guidelines: 1) Suggested weight schedule C) If clinically indicated-more frequent than weekly An interview on 4/8/2024 at 11:30 AM with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that daily weights had not been completed for Resident 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed to prevent the spread of infection or prevent cross contamination during and after catheter (a soft, plastic or rubber tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) care with appropriate change of gloves for 1 (Resident 7) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. Findings are: Observation on 4/9/24 from 10:01 AM to 10:13 AM of catheter care for Resident 7 with Medication Aide (MA)-A and the Nurse Consultant (NC) revealed the following: MA-A donned (put on) gloves prior to entering Resident 7's room. MA-A completed no hand hygiene prior to donning gloves. MA-A entered Resident 7's room and removed a new trash bag from the trash can and placed on the tray table, raised the bed with the bed remote, lowered the blinds and obtained supplies for catheter care. MA-A completed catheter care with no concerns. After catheter care was completed, MA-A rolled Resident 7 onto [gender] right side and found that [gender]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Change to F550 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a resident's preference for bathing for 1 (Resident 10) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. Findings are: In an interview on 2/5/24 at 3:10 PM, with Resident 10 revealed, Resident 10 had not received any showers last week, and [gender] preferred to have a shower twice a week. Resident 10 also revealed there had been other weeks when [gender] had not received a shower or any other sort of bathing. Resident 10 further revealed, that when [gender] had not received a shower [gender] felt dirty and smelly. A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care), dated 11/22/23, revealed the following: -Resident was admitted on [DATE]. -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a provider's order to change a Foley catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) monthly for 1 ( Resident 1's) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 107. Findings are: A record review of Resident #1 revealed they were admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: neuromusular dysfunction of bladder, paraplegia, colostomy, hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, osteomyelitis of vertebra. A record review of Resident #1's Physician Orders revealed an order to Change Resident #1's 16 french/5 milliliter (mL) Foley catheter on the 25th of every month for neurogenic bladder related to Neuromusclar dysfunction of the bladder. A record review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed in the month of October 2023, November 2023 and December 2023, there was not documentation the Foley cather was changed on the 25th. Was it signed out on a specific date? A record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for colostomy (a hole (stoma) in the abdominal wall allows waste to leave the body) for 2 (Resident 1 and Resident 6) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 107. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 1's Physicians Diagnosis list dated 02/02/2023 revealed a diagnosis of having a colostomy. A record review of Resident 1's Physician Orders dated 02/02/2023 revealed, there was no orders for the colostomy bag (a colostomy bag attaches to the stoma to collect the waste) and wafer to be changed. A record review of Resident 1's Progress Notes for December 2023 and January 2024 revealed, there was no documentation of colostomy cares being done. A record review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 02/10/2023 (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.11E, 12-007.01A Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a manner to prevent cross contamination to prevent the potential for food borne illness. The facility practice had the potential to effect 101 out of 104 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility staff identified a census of 104. Findings are: A. An observation during the initial kitchen tour on 9/20/23 from 7:23 AM to 8:05 AM revealed the microwave to be dirty both on the outside and the inside with crumbs and an uncovered plate of hard cooked eggs. Dry hard macaroni pieces were noted inside of microwave as well. A large trash can with trash like matter was placed next to and touching a rack of clean plate toppers and hot plates. The windowsill behind the microwave with old crumbs and dust present. There were clean plates with crumbs on them sitting on windowsill as well. The outside of the refrigerator had grease like build up on it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.07C Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Plan failed to identify ongoing issues relevant to F550, F580, F610, F656, F677, F686, F759, F812, F880, and F882 and implement plans of action to identify and correct the deficient practice. The QAPI failed to ensure repeated deficiencies at F686 and F880 were corrected and the correction was maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility identified a census of 104 at the time of survey. Findings are: Record review of an undated facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan revealed the following information: -Objective: -1. Provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to care and services. -2. Reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services. -3. Provide structure and processes to correct identified quality and/or deficiencies. -4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-26 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employee an Infection Preventionist (IP, a facility staff member that looks for patterns, observes, and educates staff on infection control, and compiles infection data for the facility) at least part-time, that was not the Director of Nursing (DON). This had the potential to affect all 104 residents in the facility. Total census was 104. Findings are: A record review of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Certificate dated 3/11/2023 revealed the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) was the DON (Director of Nursing). In an interview on 9/25/23 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the DON was the full-time DON and the facility's only Infection Preventionist. The Administrator confirmed the facility did not have a different IP that was employed at least part-time.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21) Based on the record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained while at an appointment for 1 (Resident 208) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 104 at the time of survey. Findings are: Record review of Resident 208's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) initiated 10/20/20 revealed Resident 208 needed extensive assist with personal hygiene cares. Interview on 09/25/23 11:45 AM with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation of refusals of cares or baths for Resident 208 noted in progress notes from 1/5/23 through 1/25/23. Interview on 9/27/23 at 1:14 PM with staff member at the Dialysis Center revealed that Resident 208 was transferred to the dialysis center the morning of 1/16/23 and was noted to have blood in hair, face and was wearing a hospital gown. Interview on 9/26/2023 at 10:54 AM with the DON confirmed the expectation is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSED REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to notify the practitioner of a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 24) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 104. Findings are: Record review of Resident 24's admission Record sheet revealed that Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 24 was admitted with diagnoses of closed fracture right femur, psychosis, dementia without behaviors, nonverbal and severe developmental delays, and anxiety. Record review of Resident 24's current diet order revealed: regular diet puree with nectar thickened liquids. Record review of Resident 24's weight record sheet revealed the following: -4/24/2023, Resident 24's weight was 124.0 pounds (lbs). -5/11/2023, Resident 24's weight was 119.0 lbs. -5/19/2023, Resident 24's weight was 118.0 lbs. -5/21/2023, Resident 24's weight was 117.0 lbs. Record review of Resident 24's Nutritional admission Data Collection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NAC 12-006.02(8) The facility failed to report significant falls with injury within the required time frame for 2 (Resident 8 and 208) of 4 sampled residents and the facility failed to submit a written investigation for accidents in 5 working days for 2 (Residents 8, 208) of 4 sampled residents. The facility also failed to submit a written investigation for an abuse allegation in 5 working days for 1 (Resident 59) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 104. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 8's face sheet revealed the resident admitted to the facility 10/9/2019 with diagnoses of Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities, Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic symptoms and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment used to determine resident needs) dated 8/28/2023 revealed in Section C, the resident had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.09C Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident 45) of 22 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 104 residents. Findings are: A record review of Resident 45's Face Sheet dated 8/28/23 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included the following diagnoses: Chronic diastolic heart failure (CHF) (the heart is not strong enough to pump blood), Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition making it difficult to breathe), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease causing too much sugar in the blood), asthma (a disease making it difficult to breathe), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a respiratory disease that makes it difficult to breathe), peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow throughout the body) , hypertension (when blood pressure is elevated), anxiety (a state of fear due to thoughts) , depression (feelings of sadness), Chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide oral cares and failed to follow resident preference for bathing for one resident (Resident 54) out of 8 sampled residents who required assistance with hygiene and bathing. The facility census was 104 at the time of survey. Findings are: A. Observation on 9/20/2023 at 8:45 AM revealed Resident 54 was in their room. Further observations revealed Resident 54 had food debrie in their mouth and there was not a toothbrush in the residents room. An interview on 9/20/23 at 8:46 AM with Resident 54 revealed Resident 54's teeth had not been brushed and had white matter on them. During the interview Resident 54's breath had a foul odor. Observation on 09/21/23 at 8:00 AM revealed Resident 54's teeth had white film noted and breath with foul odor. There was not a toothbrush found in Resident 54's room or in bathroom. An interview on 9/21/23 at 8:02 AM was conducted with Resident 54. During the interview Resident 54 reported their teeth had not been brushed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of less than 5% or greater. Observation of 41 medications administered revealed 3 errors resulting in a medication error rate of 7.31%. The medication errors affected 2 residents (38 and 54) out of 6 residents sampled. The facility identified with a census of 104 at the time of survey Findings are: A. Observation on 9/25/23 at 7:30 AM of medication aide (MA)-C administering Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol (inhaler) and Breztri Aerosphere (inhaler) to Resident 38. Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol was administered to Resident 38 by MA-C who gave Resident 38 1 puff and immediately after gave a 2nd puff of the inhaler. The Breztri Aerosphere inhaler was given 4 minutes after the Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aersol inhaler. MA-C gave Resident 38 one puff of the Breztri Aerosphere (inhaler) and immediately after gave a 2nd puff of the inhaler. A record review of Residents 38's active orders revealed: -Albuterol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure Oxygen tubing for 1 (Resident 77) of 4 residents was maintained in a manner to prevent contamination and failed to complete hand hygiene during the provison of personal care for 1 (Resident 45) of 3 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 104. Findings are: A. On 9/21/2023 at 10:41 AM observation of Resident 77 oxygen (O2)tubing was undated and lying found on the floor next to concentrator. Record review of Resident 77's Medication Administration Record for September 2023 revealed orders for Continuous Oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM)via Nasal Cannula(NC)to keep oxygen saturations above 90% at Hour of sleep(HS)every evening and night shift. On 9/21/2023 at 2:15 PM an observation of O2 tubing on the floor between the bed and concentrator and is undated. On 9/25/2023 at 10:15 AM an interview with Resident 77 revealed that(gender) uses O2 only at night time when in bed. On 9/25/2023 at 10:15 AM observation of O2 tubing undated and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-02-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC-12-006.06 Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC-1-005.04Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Grievance Official (GO, a designated staff member responsible for receiving, investigating and resolving formal complaints regarding resident care) responded to and followed up on concerns of cold food recorded at 6 different Resident Council (RC, a group of residents who meet monthly to discuss the care provided by the facility) meetings. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The census at the time of the survey was 95. Findings are: Resident interviews conducted by the survey team on day one of the facility's annual survey revealed concerns about meals being served cold. Interviews with Resident 2, Resident 4, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, and Resident 33 revealed an overall frustration with cold food being served even after complaints and grievances had been filed with the facility. An interview with Resident 2 on 02/08/2026 at 1:02 PM revealed that food is served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-02-11 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(I)(i)Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 95.Findings are:A review of the Emerald Nursing and Rehab Brookside LLC, Facility Assessment, dated 2/6/26, revealed that the facility is licensed to provide care for 173 residents.A review of the Social Work Consultant Job Summary-Brookside, signed and dated 6/15/25 by the Social Worker Consultant (SW-C) and the administrator (Adm), revealed the following:-a bachelor's degree in a human services field including, but not limited to, sociology, gerontology, special education, rehabilitation counseling, and/or psychology is required-is responsible for providing guidance and counseling to facility social service team members.-advocates for the facility, residents, and family members to ensure needs are met in accordance with federal, state, and facility regulations.In an interview on 2/9/26 at 11:10 AM, the Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,998 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $26,000 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
- $3,529 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
- $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-13 for 5 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-19 for 44 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROOKSIDE OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/15/2024 |
| CHAFETZ, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/15/2024 |
| WALDEN, JACOB | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/15/2024 |
| EMERALD HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| EVOLVE THERAPY SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2025 |
| LIMESTONE FISCAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| SAUL N FRIEDMAN & COMPANY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| WELLSKY CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| ZIMMET HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| FISH, AMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| FLEISCHMANN, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2022 |
| GOPIN, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2022 |
| MOLT, MELINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2022 |
| PEARSON, PAIGE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/22/2024 |
| SATTAR, ARIF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2022 |
| WICHMAN, JERI JO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2022 |
| MERCH PAY INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285049. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.