Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lancaster LLC
1001 South Street, Lincoln, NE 68502 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 293 certified beds · (402) 441-7101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $79,725 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-29)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 19.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.6% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.0% | 19.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.1% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.2% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.8% | 20.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.2% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.7% | 20.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.7% | 11.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.77 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.34 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 42.4–58.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 7.0–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.8–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 293 beds and averages 185.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 108 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent elopement (when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization) for 2 (Residents 1 and 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 198. The facility Administrator for Emerald Nursing and Rehab [NAME] was notified on 07/02/2024 at 5:30 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 06/29/2024. The IJ was removed on 07/02/2024, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Missing Resident/Elopement Procedure revealed all nursing staff were responsible for knowing the whereabouts of residents for which they were assigned. Each resident was required to advise the nurse in charge when the resident left the building. Residents were not permitted to leave the building alone unless a physician order was present. Residents identified as cognitively impaired and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18B Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure elopement (unsupervised wandering that leads to the resident leaving the facility without facility staff knowledge) door alarms were functioning, which affected 1 (Resident 3) of 14 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure all staff were aware of residents who were at risk for elopement which affected 1 (Resident 3) out of 5 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect 14 residents identified at risk for elopement. The facility census was 206. Findings are: A record review of Resident 3's admission Record dated 3/8/2023 revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Ataxia (have problems coordinating how your muscles work, leading to awkward, unwieldy or clumsy movements) following unspecified cardiovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), Cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to follow the medical practitioner's orders regarding wound care and failed to ensure wound treatment was completed for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 177. Findings are: Record review of facility's Skin and Wound Management Policy, last revised 1/2024, revealed the nursing staff and the medical practitioner: -Will assess and document regarding all current wound care treatments, -will identify type and characteristics of a pressure sore, -will identify and define complications of healing regarding pressure sores, -the practitioner will order wound treatments and identify medical interventions related to wound management. Record review of the undated facility admission record revealed that Resident 1's most recent admission to the facility was on 6/28/24 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents was assessed for the ability to safely use the resident's recliner/chair lift to prevent a fall with major injury. The facility census was 203. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents policy with a last revised date of 1/2024 revealed Accident/Incidents may include a fall or suspected fall. Should an accident/incident occur, the facility strived to prevent such occurrence from happening again. The facility's procedure should be to protect resident from further immediate harm or potential harm. A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census sheet dated 05/07/2024 revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 05/05/2022. A record review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record Medical Diagnosis list dated 05/07/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of History of Falling, Unspecified, Initial Encounter,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an uncluttered physical environment that is neat and well-kept for rooms 211, 215, 230, 234, 235, 412, 415, 428, and 436. The facility census was 191. Record review of facility Operations Management Policy on Physical Environment, dated 01/2024 revealed: -Policy: The facility will maintain all mechanical, electrical and patient care equipment in a safe operational condition. -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Routine rounding will include observations of the facility to determine whether the areas are large enough to comfortably accommodate the needs of the residents who usually occupy the space. Observations of resident rooms conducted on June 16, 2026, revealed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] had a bulletin board in front of and blocking the ventilation system. This room also had multiple plastic storage boxes on top of the vent. This blockage limited airflow and temperature control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E)Based on observations and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain ice machines on Stations 1 and 3 in a clean and sanitary manner in order to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 55 residents on Station 1 and 33 residents on Station 3. The facility census was 191.Findings are:An observation on 04/21/2026 at 11:19 AM of the ice machine on Station 1 revealed the white plastic piece over the ice had red stains and a black and brown substance on it.An interview on 04/21/2026 at 11:19 AM with Nurse Aide (NA) A confirmed that the ice machine was used to obtain ice for residents on Station 1. The NA further confirmed that the white plastic piece was not clean. The NA stated that they did not know how often the ice machines were cleaned, but that maintenance was responsible for it.An observation on 04/21/2026 at 11:44 AM of the ice machine on Station 3 revealed the white plastic piece over the ice had a grey film on it.An interview on 04/21/2026 at 11:44 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 (F) (i) (5)Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and family representative of one resident (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents of a change in condition. The facility census was 190.Findings are:A record review of the admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage(blood vessel on the brain's surface ruptures), Hypoglycemia (Blood sugar (glucose) drops below normal levels), Anxiety Disorder (excessive fear or worry that interferes with daily life, such as work, school, or relationships), Hypotension (occurs when blood flow to vital organs is reduced, often causing dizziness, fainting, or fatigue), Shortness of Breath (not getting enough air), Chronic Congestive Heart Failure (the heart cannot pump efficiently, causing fluid buildup in the lungs and body), Non-St Elevation- Myocardial Infarction (a serious, life-threatening heart attack caused by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D) (i) (3)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a professional standard of practice with assessing one (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents after Resident 1 had a change in condition. The facility census was 190. Findings are:A record review of the admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage(blood vessel on the brain's surface ruptures), Hypoglycemia (Blood sugar (glucose) drops below normal levels), Anxiety Disorder (excessive fear or worry that interferes with daily life, such as work, school, or relationships), Hypotension (occurs when blood flow to vital organs is reduced, often causing dizziness, fainting, or fatigue), Shortness of Breath (not getting enough air), Chronic Congestive Heart Failure (the heart cannot pump efficiently, causing fluid buildup in the lungs and body), Non-St Elevation- Myocardial Infarction (a serious, life-threatening heart attack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a urinary analysis results (UA-analyzing urine's physical, chemical, and microscopic properties to detect disorders like UTIs {urinary tract infections}, kidney disease, and diabetes) and the culture and sensitivity (detects infection-causing germs (bacteria or fungi) and identifies the most effective antibiotic to treat them) for one resident (Resident 3) of 3 sampled resident. The facility census was 190.Findings are: A record review of the admission record with the printed date of 4/14/26 revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system), Major Depressive Disorder (a common, serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and fatigue, lasting at least two weeks), Edema (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to drain the standing water and sanitize four (station one, station two, station three, and station four) out of four observed dining room steam tables, and to clean and sanitize the toaster in the station four dining area. This had the potential to affect 170 residents that utilized the dining area for meals. The facility census was 171. Findings are: A record review of the Facility Policy Resident Rights dated 11.2017 and a revision date of 10.2022 revealed that the residents have a right to a safe, clean, comfortable environment. A record review of the undated Facility Policy Cleaning Instructions: Steam Tables (commercial kitchen equipment that keeps pre-cooked food at safe temperatures by using steam from heated water) revealed: Remove the serving pans and wash according to the guidelines for pots and pans. Clean the inside and outside of each unit of the steam table. Use hot water and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent potential accidents for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 174. Findings are: A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census dated 02/14/2025 - 06/24/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 02/14/2025. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 05/21/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a resident's cognitive abilities) of 11, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired (somewhat confused). The resident had limited range of motion on one side of the lower extremities (shoulder to hand or hip to toe). The resident was independent for most activities of daily living and mobility. A record review Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04(F)(i) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04(G) Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of nursing staff were present on all shifts. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 176. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Facility Assessment Policy dated 01/2024 revealed the facility would do an assessment annually and determine what resources were needed to care for the residents. A record review of the facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy dated 01/2024 revealed the facility would provide sufficient staff to assure resident safety and needs of each resident. The facility's census, acuity (level of care), and diagnosis would be considered based in the facility assessment. The facility would provide services, by sufficient numbers of personnel types, on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents. A record review of the facility's undated Facility Assessment revealed the facility resources needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3) Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled bed linens was changed for 1 resident (Resident 2). The sample size was 5. The census was 183. Findings are: A record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 1/25/25 revealed that Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15/15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A record review of the Care Plan (CP-a written instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) dated 11/01/24 revealed the following for Resident 2: -Focus has bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility. -The resident will remain clean and dry. -Routine check and change at routine standard intervals and as required for incontinence. An observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-005.06(D) Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination between residents by not performing hand hygiene at the required intervals during the provision of care for 3 (Residents 1, 2, and 3) of 3 sampled residents and failed to apply and remove gloves using infection control practices while performing cares for 1 (Resident 2) out of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 183. Findings are: An observation on 3/4/25 at 5:15 AM revealed Nursing Assistant (NA)-A was walking down the hallway with gloves on their hands and entered into Resident 2's room. Upon entering Resident 2's room, observed NA-B on the side of bed holding Resident 2 on their left side and NA-A entered the room and on the right side of the resident and began to perform peri care with peri wipes and had not removed the gloves or performed hand hygiene prior to the start of cares. NA-A completed the cares and gathered the dirty linens and trash and proceeded down the hallway to the trash room with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Statute 71-6018.02 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours on 1/4/25 and 1/5/25. This had the potential to affect nursing care for all the residents that reside in the facility. The facility census was 174 at the time of survey. Finding are: Record review of nursing staffing schedules from 11/1/24 through 1/30/25 revealed no RN scheduled to work the weekend on 1/4/25 and 1/5/24. During an interview on 1/30/25 at 7:35 AM Nursing Assistant (NA) - M who was working as the staffing coordinator, confirmed that nursing staff titles were not listed on the staffing schedules and was unaware of which staff were RN's. Record review of the nursing schedule dated 1/4/25 revealed there was no RN in the building. Record review of the nursing schedule dated 1/5/25 revealed there was no RN in the building. Record review of daily posted nursing schedule for 1/4/25 revealed there were no RN hours marked. Record review of daily posted nursing schedule for 1/5/25 revealed there were no RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required 12 hours of ongoing training for 5 (Nursing Assistants (NA): NA-N, NA-O, NA-P, NA-R and Unit Director: UD-Q) of 5 sampled direct care staff. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility had a census of 174. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Training Requirements dated 1/2024 revealed: -the staff Development Coordinator will maintain a training schedule and documentation system for completed training of the required individuals, -documentation of the required training will be forwarded to the HR Department to be placed into the individual's personnel file, -an individuals failure to complete required training will result in termination. Record review of the facility policy titled Required Training, Certification and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides dated 1/2024 revealed: -documentation of in-services will be maintained in the employee's personal file, -the in-services are required to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11C Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene for 20 seconds and wear a hair restraint while in the kitchen to prevent the potential for food-borne illness. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean, food items were sealed, labeled, and dated, and outdated food were disposed of. The facility failed to ensure the scoop was not left in an ice cooler to prevent cross contamination. Facility reported that 173 residents receive food from kitchen. The facility census was 174. Findings are: A. Observation on 1/27/25 at 7:30 AM in the kitchen revealed the following: Foods found that were undated and/or opened or out of date: -In the dry storage area - chicken breaded powder not sealed and no date. - bag of macaroni open and not dated. In the walk-in freezer - 2 pieces of cake uncovered and not dated. - turkey patties opened and not dated. - grilled chicken breast fillets open and not dated. - Precooked pork breaded patties open and undated. In the walk-in refrigerator -5 bowls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to transport laundry in a way to prevent cross contamination, place dirty linens into a soiled linen container, ensure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, a single pressure machine used to treat sleep apnea) and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP, an inspiratory and expiratory pressure machine used to treat sleep apnea) cleaning for Resident 101, and change oxygen tubing for Residents 60 and 66 to prevent cross contamination. Findings are: A. On 1/29/25 at 9:19 AM observation of laundry aide (LA) that took clean gowns out of linen cart and held against [gender] uniform, then placed the gowns in another clean linen cart. LA dropped a clean towel on the floor, picked it up and placed the towel in the clean cart. Interview on 1/29/25 at 9:21 AM with LA confirmed that [gender] should not have linens against their body and if any linens fall to floor, they need placed in the dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(A) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the wall mounted oscillating (moved back and forth) fans' shrouds (cage around the blades) and blades in Rooms 204, 210, 213 and 233, the vent above the whirlpool in the Station 2 bathhouse, and the pivot stand (a device used to assist with resident transfers) in the Station 2 hallway were clean from lint and debris. The facility census was 174. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Cleaning and Disinfection - Environmental Infection Control policy dated 1/2024 revealed environmental surfaces would be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g. (for example), daily, three times per week), and when surfaces were visibly soiled. A record review of the facility's Survey Readiness Environmental Checklist log sheets did not reveal it included the bathhouses, pivot stand, or room fan cleaning. A record review of the facility's undated Environmental Service Associate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04J(i) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a qualified Activity Professional. The failure to have an Activity Professional had the potential to affect all residents that participate in activities in the facility. The facility had a census of 174. Findings are: During an interview on 1/30/25 at 9:19 AM the Activity Director (AD) confirmed that (gender) has not had any activity training. Record review of the AD's credentials revealed no Activity training. Record review of the undated Facility Assessment revealed the nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility wide assessment which includes the facility needs to care for their residents. Record review of the facility policy titled, Facility Responsibilities dated 1/2024 revealed that the facility must ensure that staff members are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibilities of the facility to properly care for the residents. Interview on 1/30/25 at 12:29 confirmed that the Manager of Operations (MOO) is the activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to residents or their representatives prior to a transfer for 4 (Residents 16, 85, 99, and 115) of 4 sampled residents for hospitalizations. or their representatives prior to a transfer to the hospital. The facility census was 174. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Transfer and Discharge from the Facility Policy dated 1-2024 revealed the following: The facility should provide notice in writing and in a manner and language that is understood. The notice should include at minimum the reason and effective date of the discharge/transfer, the location where the resident was transferred, a statement of the resident's appeal rights, the name, mailing address, email address and telephone number of the agency that receives discharge appeal requests, information about how to obtain an appeal form, title of the facility staff who will assist the resident to complete and submit the form, and the name, mailing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) reflected the current number of unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries (injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one (Resident 153) of 34 sampled residents. The facility census was 174. Findings are: A review of Resident 153's tissue analytics, dated 1/8/25, revealed the following: -Wound 4: Right hand; primary etiology: pressure ulcer-unstageable; eschar (thick dark brown or black dead tissue that adheres to a wound): fully covered A review of Resident 153's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the following: -Does this resident have one or more unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries? Marked Yes -Current number of unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries at each stage: All stages marked 0 including unstageable-slough (yellow/white dead…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(2) Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to meet the resident's needs for 3 (Residents 109, 133, and 168) of 3 sampled residents on the Alzheimer's Unit. The facility had a total census of 174. Findings are: Observation on 1/27/24 at 10:10 AM of station 5 with no activities written on the activity board and there were no activities going on noted on station 5. Record review of activity calendar for station 5 revealed that café cart and Catholic Mass activity should have been going on station 5 at this time and observation of no activity. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 9:38 AM Nursing Assistant (NA) - K revealed that there is not an activity person, a bath aide or a restorative aide scheduled to be on station 5 and the residents don't do scheduled activities. Observation on 01/27/25 at 2:25 PM of no activities being done on station 5. Record review of activity calendar for station 5 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3) Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure a complete, valid prescription was obtained for a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (cpap-a machine used to deliver positive airway pressure to a resident's airway to prevent it from closing during sleep) for 1 (Resident 60) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 174. Findings: A. An observation on 1/27/25 at 12:33 PM revealed a cpap machine on Resident 60's bedside stand. An interview on 1/27/25 at 12:33 PM with Resident 60 confirmed that [gender] wears the cpap every night. In a review of Resident 60's Order Summary Report, dated 1/28/25, revealed the following: -CPAP at current setting with oxygen. Connect O2 (oxygen) tubing to mask, apply at night and fill chamber with distilled water to the fill line. In an interview on 1/29/25 at 3:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that there was not a complete, valid prescription with the current settings for Resident 60's cpap.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-005.06(H) Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to employ an Infection Preventionist (IP). This had the potential to affect all the residents living at this facility. The census of the facility was 178. Findings are: Record review of Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy dated 5/20/2017 revealed: -The designated Infection Preventionist serves as a consultant to our staff on infectious diseases, resident room placement, implementing of isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, surveillance, and epidemiological investigations of exposures of infectious diseases. Record review of Antibiotic Stewardship and Infection Control Surveillance Record revealed no documentation for November 2024. Interview on 11/20/24 at 6:58 AM with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility has not had an IP since mid-October 2024. The facility has hired a new nurse and will have them trained for IP. DON confirmed that infection control duties had not been done since October 2024. Interview on 11/20/24 at 8:26 AM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC-12.006.09 Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to assess and monitor for potential signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident 2) of 3 sampled residents. The census of the facility was 178. Findings are: Record review of Resident 2's census record dated 11/19/24 revealed the resident admitted to the facility admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) dated 11/3/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score, the higher the cognitive function) was 15, which means the resident is cognitively intact. Record review of Resident 2's Physician orders dated 11/19/24 revealed: -Cephalexin Capsule 500 milligram (mg). Take one capsule by mouth every 6 hours for 5 days-indications for use: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) -Start date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 12.005.06(D)(E) Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene for 20 seconds and wear personal protective equipment (PPE) throughout wound care for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 178. Findings are: Record review of MDRO PPE-Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated 1/2023 revealed: Policy Statement-Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Record review of Infection Control Standard Precautions-Handwashing policy dated 1/2024 revealed: Policy Statement-The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Procedure: -Rub hands together vigorously for at least 20 seconds, covering all surfaces of the hands and fingers. Record review of Resident 9's November 2024's Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E) Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to honor preferences for religious practices for Resident 2 and bathing preferences for 5 residents (Residents 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7). This affected 6 of 7 residents sampled for choices. The facility census was 175. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility policy Quality of Life-Resident Self Determination and Participation revised December 2016 revealed that each resident was allowed to choose activities and schedules consistent with their interests and values, including religious affiliation and worship preferences. A record review of the facility policy Resident Rights created 11-17 revealed that the resident had a right to participate in activities, including religious, that did not interfere with the rights of other residents in the facility. A record review of Resident 2's admission Record printed 09/19/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(G) and (H) Based on record review, observation, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure a formal investigation was completed and the State Agency was notified for 2 (Residents 1 and 2) of 3 sampled resident's elopement. The facility census was 198. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Missing Resident/Elopement Procedure revealed all nursing staff were responsible for knowing the whereabouts of residents for which they were assigned. Each resident was required to advise the nurse in charge when the resident left the building. Residents were not permitted to leave the building alone unless a physician order was present. Residents identified as cognitively impaired and assessed as an elopement risk were to be provided with an elopement prevention device and all personnel were responsible for promptly going to the location and determining the cause of an activated audible door alarm. In the event a resident cannot be located the charge nurse of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of change of condition for 1 (Resident # 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 210. Findings are; A record review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident # 1 on 8/7/2023 with diagnoses of Urinary tract infections (an infection in your urinary system), Type 2 diabetes Melllitus (is a chronic condition that happens when you have persistently high blood sugar levels. Insulin resistance is the main cause), Bacterial Infection (microorganisms that invade tissue), Other Specified Disorders of Kidney and Ureter (urinary tract infections, kidney stones, bladder control problems, and prostate problems), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Unspecified Cognitive Communication Deficit (Reduced awareness and ability to initiate and effectively communicate needs), Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide an escort and or family member to a Cat Scan appointment for 1 (Resident #2) out of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 210. Findings are: A record review of admission Record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Aphasias following Cerebral Infarction (trouble talking or understanding what other people are saying when they're talking. They may also struggle to communicate in other ways like writing), Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (cognitive functions following cerebral infarction. Speech and language deficits following cerebral Infarction), Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status Epilepticus ( may have seizures again and again. May have status epilepticus if you have a seizure that lasts longer than 5 minutes, or if you have more than one seizure without returning to a normal level of consciousness between episodes),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place as care planned for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents. The facility censure was 209. Findings are: Review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 3/13/24, revealed that Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: senile degeneration of the brain (also known as late onset dementia), nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and thin tissues that cover and protect it) and restlessness and agitation. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care), dated 2/26/24, revealed the following: -Severely impaired for decision regarding tasks of daily life -Was dependent for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and transfer from chair to bed -Sit to standing and ambulation was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(4) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing preferences for 1 (Resident 4) of 7 sampled residents. The facility census was 216. Record review of Resident 4's undated admission Record revealed that Resident 4 admited to the facility on 7/20/22. Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) dated 12/20/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score, the higher the cognitive function) of 15, which indiciated the resident was cognitively intact. In an interview on 2/12/24 at 12:05 PM with Resident 4 revealed they wanted a bath twice weekly and they have not been recieving that preference. A record review of Resident 4's bathing tasks documented in Electronic Medical Records for December 2023 baths were documented on 12/5/23 and 12/29/23. The resident was in the hospital in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility kitchen staff failed to label, and date opened packages of food and failed to dispose of expired food and fluids from the walk-in refrigerators and walk in freezer to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 206 residents. The facility census was 207. Findings are: Observation on 1/17/2024 at 7:15 AM of the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen closest to the dry storage room revealed: - three opened containers of coleslaw dated 1/5/2024, 1/7/2024, and 1/8/2024, - container of prepared yellow jello dated 1/3/2024, - pan of cooked sweet potatoes dated 1/7/2024, - bowl of cooked hamburger dated 1/9/2024, - container of what appears to be tomato soup with no date, - pan of pork gravy dated 1/12/2024, - 2 jugs of Sparky's Wing and Dippin sauce that says opened 1/1/2024 but expiration date of 7/28/2023, - jug of opened picante sauce with expiration date of 9/1/2023, - a packaged of opened tomato slices covered in saran wrap dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F. A record review of the untitled and undated list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility had 19 residents that had tested positive for Covid-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) and that Station 5 had 3 residents in room isolation due to testing positive for Covid-19. An observation on 01/17/24 at 10:43 AM revealed NA-W to be standing at the nurses' desk with an isolation mask below (gender) nose. During the observation, the Unit Manager had instructed NA-W to wear (gender) mask correctly. An observation on 01/18/24 at 8:08 AM revealed MA-X to be standing at the medication cart with an isolation mask below (gender) nose. An interview on 01/18/24 at 8:08 AM with MA-X confirmed that staff are to wear their isolation masks above their nose. During the interview, MA-X voiced getting COVID-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) training and education just last week and voiced that ongoing Covid-19 training occurred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18A1 Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that station 2's clean utility refrigerator, microwave, and icemaker were clean, open items in the refrigerator were dated, exhaust vent fans were cleaned in resident restrooms 234, 214, 216, 211, 204, 231, 306 and 431, and that the wall fans were clean in resident rooms 214, 204, 231, 228, 228, 315, 306, 424, and 431. The total facility census was 207. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements policy dated 05/2017 revealed food that required refrigeration would be received by the facility designee for proper and immediate storage including labeling and dating. A record review of the facility's undated Cleaning Instructions: Refrigerators policy revealed the refrigerators would be washed thoroughly inside and out with a detergent followed by sanitizer at least once every other month or as needed. Spills and leaks would be wiped up as they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21) Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to treat 1 resident (Resident 18) of 2 sampled with dignity and respect by failing to provide privacy while performing peri-care. The facility census was 207. Findings are: Record review of Resident 18's Clinical Resident Profile dated 1/18/2024 revealed that [gender] admitted to facility on 7/20/2006 with diagnoses of: cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting left nondominant side, cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), contracture (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin) of right knee, pain, and bilateral hearing loss. A record review of the Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) (comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) dated 11/11/2023 revealed: -Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(8) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Adult Protective Services (APS) and the State of Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) were notified of a resident-to-resident abuse incident on 11/17/2023 between 2 (Residents 88 and 140) of 4 sampled residents. The total facility census was 207. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy dated 11/2017 revealed the that abuse meant the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment. Physical abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. The facility must report all allegations (claims) of abuse to APS within 2 hours for events that caused serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours for events that did not result in serious bodily injury and must send the report to DHHS within 5 working days. A record review of Resident 140's Clinical Census dated 01/18/2024 revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY B) A record review of Resident 143's undated Face Sheet revealed, that Resident 143 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Mood disorder, Major depressive disorder, Bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Resident 143 had a score of 14 on the BIMS indicating Resident 143 is cognitively intact. A record review of Resident 143's PASSAR II (is a comprehensive evaluation required as a result of a positive level I screening. A level II is necessary to confirm the indicated diagnosis noted in the level I screening and to determine whether placement or continued stay in a Nursing Facility is appropriate.) dated 2/28/23 revealed: The PASRR reported Resident 143 has a reported mental health diagnosis of anxiety, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. A record review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS), (a comprehensive assessment of each resident's Functinal capabilities) annual dated 10/26/23 revealed, in section 1500 reads: Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09 Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure blood pressures, pulses, and labwork were completed as ordered for 1 (Resident 140) of 1 sampled resident, failed to maintain wheelchair positioning for 1 (Residents 62) of 2 sampled residents, and failed to ensure Dycem (a material used to prevent sliding) was placed on wheelchair, scoop mattress provided, failed to unsure the recommeded lift was used during transfers, and did not provide built up silverware for 1(Resident 34) of 1 sampled residents. The total facility census was 207. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 140's Clinical Census dated 1/18/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 140's Medical Diagnosis dated 1/18/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of: Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rate), Other Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)(irregular rapid heart rate), Fluid Overload, Venous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were secured in a locked compartment for 1 (Resident 92) of 1 sampled resident for medication storage. The facility census was 207. Findings are: A review of Resident 92's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: cellulitis (skin infection) of the left leg, diabetes (a chronic health condition that affects how the body turns food into energy), and a recent left second toe amputation (removal of a body part). A review of the resident's admission and 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) dated 12/23/23 revealed Resident 92's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment used in long-term care to evaluate a person's cognitive [thinking] abilities) was 09, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. An observation of Resident 92's room on 01/17/2024 at 9:57 AM revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, record reviews and interviews; the facility staff failed to secure 4 of 10 medication storage carts when unattended. The facility staff identified a census of 213. Findings are: Observation on 8-24-2023 at 7:20 AM revealed medication storage carts were unlocked and unattended on station 3 A and 3 B. On 8-24-2023 at 7:40 AM an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) G. During the interview RN G confirmed the medication storage carts on station 3 A and 3 B were unlocked and unattended. RN G reported medication carts are to be locked. Observation on 8-27-2023 at 7:45 AM revealed the medication storage cart was unlocked and unattended on Station 4. On 8-27-2023 at 7:45 AM during the observation The Director of Nursing confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. Observation on 8-27-2023 at 8:42 AM revealed the medication storage cart on station 5 was unlocked and unattended. On 8-27-2023 at 8:42 AM an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F. During the interview LPN F…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.181(1) Based on observations, and interviews: the facility staff failed to ensure 2 (station 4 and 5) of a total of 5 stations were clean and in good repair. The facility staff identified a census of 213. Findings are: A. Observation on 8-27-2023 at 7:20 AM revealed a a brown liquid that had an odor of stool was dripping from a residents wheelchair as the resident wheeled in-between the nurses station and the dining room on station 4. A another facility resident informed Nursing Assistant (NA) C of the mess on the floor. NA C was able to obtain assistance for the resident in the wheelchair, however, the brown stool smelling liquid was not clean up. Further observations revealed 3 random staff walked through the brown liquid and 3 residents were wheeled through the brown liquid on the floor. B. Observations during a tour of station 4 and station 5 on 8-27-2023 at 2:02 PM and ending at 2:31 PM with the facility Administrator and Company Director (CD) revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to notify the resident's representative of falls for 2 ( Resident 1 and 4) and failed to notify the residents representative of being transported to the hospital for 1( Resident 7) of a total of 7 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 213. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6-30-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 1 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS of a 5. According to the MDS [NAME] a BIMS score of 0 to 7 indicate severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revised on 12-30-2022 revealed Resident 1 was at risk for falls. The goal identified for Resident 1 was to be free of major or injury. Interventions identified on Resident 1's CCP to meet this goal included keeping items within reach, using wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observations record review and interviews; the facility staff failed to implement assessed interventions for fall prevention for 3 (Resident 1, 3 and 4) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 213. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6-30-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 1 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS of a 5. According to the MDS [NAME] a BIMS score of 0 to 7 indicate severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revised on 12-30-2022 revealed Resident 1 was at risk for falls. The goal identified for Resident 1 was to be free of major or injury. Interventions identified on Resident 1's CCP to meet this goal included keeping items within reach, using wheelchair and bed alarms and ensuring the residents call light is within reach. Observation on 8-24-2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D4 Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed provided incontinence care for 1(Resident 1) of 3 residents sampled. The facility staff identified a census of 213. Findings are: Record review of Resident 1's Minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6-30-2023 revealed the facility staff assessed Resident 1 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS of a 5. According to the MDS [NAME] a BIMS score of 0 to 7 indicate severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) revised on 1-26-2023 revealed Resident 1 is incontinet of bladder. The goal identified for Resident 1 was to be continent at all time. The intervention listed on Resident 1's CCP was to change Resident 1 frequently and as needed. Observation on 8-27-2023 at 7:10 AM revealed Resident 1 was laying in bed with a sheet covering the abdominal area and in between the legs. Further observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 12-006.11E Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination related to food that was not dated upon opening and dietary staff that did not have hair/beard coverings in place during food handling. This had the potential to affect 184 of 186 residents that received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 186. Findings are: An observation on 02/21/23 at 08:31 AM of the kitchen revealed Cook-M to be completing meal prep with no beard cover in place and dread locks not in a hair cover. The walk through of the walk-in fridge on 02/21/23 at 08:31 AM revealed a container of shredded cheese with no open date, a container, opened and half used of whipped cream with no open date, and a gallon of milk, half used with no open date. The walkthrough of the walk-in freezer revealed a ready to serve container of pureed sausage with no date, pureed oats with no date, and pureed eggs with no date. An interview on 02/21/23 at 08:31 AM with the FSD (Food Service Director), confirmed that all food is to be dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 12-006.17A(1) Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all dietary staff wore facial coverings in a manner to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 (a mild to severe respiratory illness that is caused by a coronavirus) to 184 of 186 residents that consumed food from the kitchen, failed to ensure staff wore masks covering the nose and chin, failed to clean and store a nebulizer kit (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) for Resident 441, failed to ensure staff doffed (removed) PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) prior to exiting a COVID-19 positive isolation room, failed to disinfect eye protection when exiting an isolation room to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19, failed to ensure doors of COVID-19 isolation rooms were kept closed, and failed to deliver laundry in a covered cart in resident care areas. This had the potential to affect all 186 residents in the facility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored for Resident 46 and the facility failed to ensure medication carts on Stations 2 and 3 were secured when not in use. This had the potential to affect 43 residents on Station 2 and 19 residents on Station 3. The facility census was 186. Findings are: A. An observation made on 2/21/23 at 3:52 PM revealed that Resident 46 had a roll-on container of Icy Hot on the overbed table next to the recliner. An observation made on 2/22/23 at 8:00 AM revealed that Resident 46 had a roll-on container of Icy Hot on the overbed table next to the recliner. An observation made on 2/27/23 at 7:40 AM revealed that Resident 46 had a roll-on container of Icy Hot on the overbed table next to the recliner. A review of the Resident 46's active orders revealed an order for pain relieving cream 4 times a day that the resident may keep at bedside. A review of Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy created 11-17 revealed the following: 7. Bedside medication storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
175 NAC 12-006.16E Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide notice to Medicaid recipients when their Resident Trust Account (RTA) balances were within $200.00 of the maximum allowed in cash assets. This had the potential to affect 2 Residents (27 and 34) of 3 sampled for Personal Funds. The facility census was 186. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 27's Clinical Census revealed that the resident's payment source was Medicaid. An interview conducted with the Business Office Manager (BOM) on 2/28/23 at 9:19 AM revealed that Resident 27 did have a Resident Trust account. B. A review of Resident 34's Clinical Census revealed that the resident's payment source was Medicaid. An interview conducted with the Business Office Manager (BOM) on 2/28/23 at 9:19 AM revealed that Resident 34 did have a Resident Trust account. C. A review of The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Medicaid Eligibility website (https://dhhs.ne.gov/Pages/Medicaid-Eligibility.aspx) revealed that cash resources should not exceed $4000.00 for one person. An interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to Resident 24 and 34 or their Representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This affected 2 of 3 residents sampled for hospitalizations. The facility census was 186. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 24's Progress Notes from 10/22/22 to 2/23/23 revealed that the resident had gone to the emergency room (ER) on 10/26/22 for leg pain, on 12/16/22 for abdominal pain, and on 2/18/23 for a fall. An interview conducted with the Clinical Consultant (CC) on 2/23/23 at 2:20 PM confirmed that no written notices of transfer were provided to Resident 24 or the resident's representative for the ER visits on 10/22/22, 12/16/22, or 2/18/23. An interview conducted with the Director of Social Services (SW) L on 2/23/23 at 2: 56 PM confirmed that written notices of transfer were not provided to the resident or their representative for the ER visits on 10/22/22, 12/16/22, or 2/18/23. L further confirmed that the Ombudsman was not notified of those transfers. B. A review of Resident 34's Progress Notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notice of the Bed Hold Policy to Resident 24 or their Representative upon transfer to the hospital. This affected 1 of 3 residents sampled for hospitalizations. The facility census was 186. Findings are: A review of Resident 24's Progress Notes from 10/22/22 to 2/23/23 revealed that the resident had gone to the emergency room (ER) on 10/26/22 for leg pain, on 12/16/22 for abdominal pain, and on 2/18/23 for a fall. An interview conducted with the Clinical Consultant (CC) on 2/23/23 at 2:20 PM confirmed that no notices of the Bed Hold Policy were provided to Resident 24 or the resident's representative for the ER visits on 10/22/22, 12/16/22, or 2/18/23. An interview conducted with the Director of Social Services (SW) L on 2/23/23 at 2: 56 PM confirmed that notices of the Bed Hold Policy were not provided to the resident or their representative for the ER visits on 10/22/22, 12/16/22, or 2/18/23.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) accuracy related to the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) ability for Resident 97 and a diuretic medication (a medication used that causes the kidneys to make more urine) use for Resident 153. The sample size was 4. The facility identified a census of 186. Findings are: A. A record review of the MDS dated [DATE], Section G, for Resident 97, read as follows: A. Bed mobility - how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture with a response of 0 Independent for Self Performance and 0 Independent for physical assist. A record review of the MDS dated [DATE], Section G, for Resident 97, read as follows: B. Transfer - how resident moves between surfaces including to or from: bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position (excludes to/from bath/toilet) with a response reading : 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a new Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR)(a screening for mental illness) for Resident 146 following a new Bipolar Disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings) diagnosis. Total census was 186. Findings are: A record review of the Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review Policy dated 05-17 revealed the facility would refer all residents with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for a level II PASARR review to the State PASARR representative. A record review of the facility's Pharmacy Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 10/01/2022 revealed that Resident 146 was started on Depakote (a medication that can be used to treat Bipolar Disorder) was started on 09/29/2022. The Pharmacy requested an associated medical diagnosis. The provider's response was Bipolar Disorder. A record review of Resident 146's Medical Diagnosis dated 02/22/2023 revealed a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder was added during the resident's stay on 10/27/2022. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C7 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 12) of 1 sampled resident was treated for constipation in a timely manner. Total census was 186. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Admission/Ancillary Orders revealed the facility's Bowel Protocol per the facility's policy was to administer (give) a Dulcolax Suppository (a medication inserted into the rectum to dissolve and soften stools) as needed to residents with no bowel movement on day 4. In an interview on 02/21/2023 at 01:02 PM, Resident 12 confirmed that the resident had gone greater than 3 days with no bowel movement and had not received treatment from the staff. A record review of the facility's Medication Administration Report (MAR) dated 02/01/2023 -02/28/2023 revealed Resident 12 had an order for a Bisacodyl Suppository (brand name Dulcolax) on day 4 of no bowel movement. A record review of Resident 12's 30 Day Bowel Elimination Task dated 01/01/2023 - 02/28/2023 revealed the resident did not have a bowel movement from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D4 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a restorative nursing program was provided per therapy recommendation, to maintain and/or to prevent potential decline and/or complications of contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue often leading to deformity and/or rigidity of joints), mobility, or range of motion (ROM) for Resident 60 and Resident 146. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 186. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 60's medical diagnoses, dated 8/27/21, revealed a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area) affecting right dominant side. A record review of Resident 60's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's care plan), dated 2/6/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.07a Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 146 was assisted to bed after mealtime to prevent accidents, failed to ensure safe storage of Resident 153's cigarettes and lighter, and failed to ensure residents smoke in designated areas. This affected 2 of 2 sampled residents. Total census was 186. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents Policy dated 05-01-2017 revealed the facility strives to ensure residents will not experience undue discomfort due to an unusual occurrence such as an accident or incident. In an interview on 02/22/2023 at 09:24 AM, Resident 146 confirmed that the resident had fallen a couple of times since January 1, 2023. A record review of the facility's Incident Audit Report with an Incident date of 12/31/2022 at 04:15 PM revealed Resident 146 had an unwitnessed fall on 12/31/2022 at 04:15 PM. During the fall investigation, A Situation, Background, Assessment, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C7 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was staffed sufficiently to prevent potential accidents. This affected 1 (Resident 146) of 2 sampled residents. Total census was 186. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Accidents and Incidents Policy dated 05-01-2017 revealed the facility strives to ensure residents will not experience undue discomfort due to an unusual occurrence such as an accident or incident. In an interview on 02/22/2023 at 09:24 AM, Resident 146 confirmed that the resident had fallen a couple of times since January 1, 2023. A record review of the facility's Incident Audit Report with an Incident date of 12/31/2022 at 04:15 PM revealed Resident 146 had unwitnessed fall on 12/31/2022 at 04:15 PM. During the fall investigation, A Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Form and Progress Note had been completed and dated 12/31/2022 at 06:30 PM by Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$79,725 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $51,324 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
- $11,600 — penalty dated 2024-07-08
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-01-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-27 for 13 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-04 for 16 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-28 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EMERALD HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANCASTER OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/29/2022 |
| GRAFF, JENNIFER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/29/2022 |
| CHAFETZ, YISROEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/29/2022 |
| WALDEN, JACOB | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/29/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.